6 minutes ago, Evil Penevil said:

Why was the post disgusting? The picture of the Palestinian man wasn't that bad.

I don't know anyone who doesn't oppose genocide. We all agree genocide is horribly wrong.

Comparing people to animals, denial of genuine opposition to genocide and of course laced with the idiocy that compassion is some how fake if the compassionate are leftwing liberals.

You claim not to know anyone opposed to genocide while stating:

“Palestinians have become the equivalent of baby seals for the woke left. The clubbing of a few hundred baby seals upset people much more than more horrific deaths of tens of thousands of other young animals.”

An utterly disgusting denial of genuine opposition to genocide on the basis of others having political leanings different from your own.

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Comparing people to animals, denial of genuine opposition to genocide and of course laced with the idiocy that compassion is some how fake if the compassionate are leftwing liberals.

You claim not to know anyone opposed to genocide while stating:

“Palestinians have become the equivalent of baby seals for the woke left. The clubbing of a few hundred baby seals upset people much more than more horrific deaths of tens of thousands of other young animals.”

An utterly disgusting denial of genuine opposition to genocide on the basis of others having political leanings different from your own.

Don't worry about him; he is on my ignore list, but I still have to read his answers.

3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The BBC are reporting at least 100 killed with a depressingly familiar response from the attacking force:

Before I take a guess, whom are you referring to ?

Whose is the response familar to ?

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Comparing people to animals, denial of genuine opposition to genocide and of course laced with the idiocy that compassion is some how fake if the compassionate are leftwing liberals.

🤣🤣🤣 You sure read a lot into a few lines of text. Many similes in English compare people to animals. Would you get upset if a poster wrote Palestinians were "brave as lions," "strong as bulls," or "wise as owls?" What's the difference between those similes and "heart-wrenching as a baby seal?"

In any case, I was writing about the baby-seal EFFECT, not directly comparing Palestinians to seals. @Nick Carter icp asked about the disparity in the extent of the reaction to the deaths of Palestinians in airstrikes compared to deaths of Afghanistanis. One explanation is the baby-seal effect, in which one group is given much more sympathy than another.

I brought up the woke left because it has effusive sympathy for some groups, such as Palestinians or transgendered individuals, while not reacting nearly as much to groups with equally large or larger levels of suffering, such as Sudanese refugees or homeless U.S. military veterans.

13 minutes ago, still kicking said:

Don't worry about him; he is on my ignore list, but I still have to read his answers.

I take it as a badge of honor when certain individuals put me their ignore lists. It means I have rattled their hate-filled worlds.

5 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Before I take a guess, whom are you referring to ?

Whose is the response familar to ?

Since when did you hold back on making wild guesses?

4 hours ago, Evil Penevil said:

🤣🤣🤣 You sure read a lot into a few lines of text. Many similes in English compare people to animals. Would you get upset if a poster wrote Palestinians were "brave as lions," "strong as bulls," or "wise as owls?" What's the difference between those similes and "heart-wrenching as a baby seal?"

In any case, I was writing about the baby-seal EFFECT, not directly comparing Palestinians to seals. @Nick Carter icp asked about the disparity in the extent of the reaction to the deaths of Palestinians in airstrikes compared to deaths of Afghanistanis. One explanation is the baby-seal effect, in which one group is given much more sympathy than another.

I brought up the woke left because it has effusive sympathy for some groups, such as Palestinians or transgendered individuals, while not reacting nearly as much to groups with equally large or larger levels of suffering, such as Sudanese refugees or homeless U.S. military veterans.

I take it as a badge of honor when certain individuals put me their ignore lists. It means I have rattled their hate-filled worlds.

In a sense the clubbing to death defenseless seals is an apt simile for the slaughter of Palestinian civilians you have so effusively support and now seek to trivialize.

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Since when did you hold back on making wild guesses?

I guess it was Israel whom you were referrring to .

So, who was it ?

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

I guess it was Israel whom you were referrring to .

So, who was it ?

Are you asking permission to make my mind up for me? No such permission will be given.

Why not cast your mind back and see if you can think of any nation that makes similar statements in the aftermath of its military having slaughtered civilians:

“Pakistan denied striking the facility deliberately, saying it had "precisely targeted military installations and terrorist support infrastructure".”

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

In a sense the clubbing to death defenseless seals is an apt simile for the slaughter of Palestinian civilians you have so effusively support and now seek to trivialize.

Your comment is indeed an example of the baby seal effect!

The pro-Zionists on here (and elsewhere) must enjoy watching two of their 'enemies' fighting each other (I wonder who put Pakistan up to this, hmm? Israel's useful idiot proxy the CIA?)

6 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Are you asking permission to make my mind up for me? No such permission will be given.

Why not cast your mind back and see if you can think of any nation that makes similar statements in the aftermath of its military having slaughtered civilians:

“Pakistan denied striking the facility deliberately, saying it had "precisely targeted military installations and terrorist support infrastructure".”

Can you just say whom you are referring to ?

If you dont want to say the word Isreal, you can use the words that Iran uses , call them the Zionist entity or something

1 hour ago, ronnie50 said:

The pro-Zionists on here (and elsewhere) must enjoy watching two of their 'enemies' fighting each other (I wonder who put Pakistan up to this, hmm? Israel's useful idiot proxy the CIA?)

You have quite an imagination. 🤣 Nether Pakistan nor Afghanistan have been involved in Israel's struggles to defend the Jewish homeland, so there's no reason for Israelis to cheer the fighting between those two countries.

There's not one shred of evidence any third country is behind Pakistan's attacks on Afghanistan. Occam's Razor applies to international politics and the least complicated answer is most often the best one. That's why conspiracy theories can be debunked so easily.

Pakistan is attacking Afghanistan because radical groups which seek the overthrow of the Pakistani government or independence for some parts of Pakistan are using Afghanistan as a base to attack Pakistan. No one needs to "put Pakistan up to this" as it has valid reasons of its own.