Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Criminally Investigating E. Jean Carroll, News

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post
23 hours ago, BLMFem said:

Let's do a summary, shall we?thumbsup

Joe Biden autopen - dropped

Letitia James - tossed out

Jerome Powell - dropped

Mark Kelly - Grand Jury failed to indict

James Comey case #1 - tossed out

Lisa Cook - still part of the Fed

Adam Schiff - no charges

See where I'm going with this?😂

Meantime apparently the DOJ does not have time to release the million or so remaining Epstein files in direct violation of the very specific law was passed by house and senate and signed by Potus long ago.

Also no time for FBI to investigate the many people tangled up in the pedo ring.

But plenty of time to investigate a minor allegation against a woman who a jury and court found was sexually assualted by the emperor....and plenty more wasted time and money on a long list of bogus BS similar to list above.

  • Replies 110
  • Views 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • BLMFem
    BLMFem

    Let's do a summary, shall we? Joe Biden autopen - dropped Letitia James - tossed out Jerome Powell - dropped Mark Kelly - Grand Jury failed to indict James Comey case #1 - tossed out Lisa Cook - sti

  • candide
    candide

    What you don't mention is that it's about a minor issue (the funding of her lawyers), and not the core accusation against Trump. 😂 But I guess the objective of the investigation was to confuse people

  • spidermike007
    spidermike007

    Just another case of a truly ridiculous man weaponizing the justice department to carry out his own personal vengeance, how incredibly juvenile, how petty, and how shameful for America. The fact that

Posted Images

  • Popular Post
41 minutes ago, Effective altruism said:

You copied and pasted this one-handed.

I have a mouse, don't you?

1 hour ago, LosLobo said:


Translation:
'Accuse others of what you are guilty of'.
Joseph Goebbels (1897-1945)

Well of course something like you would quote him LOL

  • Author

More on the scandal.

Looks like Cnn who broke the story went down the wrong rabbit hole again. Its not so much E Jean but the financier Hoffman's activity.

The DOJ is investigating Hoffman’s nonprofit for potential money laundering, conspiracy, and obstruction related to its funding of E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits against Trump.

Prosecutors are reviewing Carroll’s 2022 deposition testimony denying outside funding, but the Chicago U.S. Attorney’s Office has stated they have not opened a criminal investigation targeting Carroll herself.

Prosecutors are reviewing Carroll’s 2022 deposition testimony denying outside funding, but the Chicago U.S. Attorney’s Office has stated they have not opened a criminal investigation targeting Carroll herself.

Give it time... They're going to discover all kinds of malfeasance when they subpoena the records.

  • Popular Post
2 hours ago, impulse said:

when they subpoena the records.

When they subpoena what records -- Hoffman providing any funding to the Kaplan law firm is legit but there may be other issues with his NGO. Perjury against Carroll would require that she knowingly misled during her deposition and that the misleading was germane to the facts of the case.

  • Popular Post
On 5/28/2026 at 10:59 PM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Yes. Democrats are above the law. Did you have a point to make?

I seem to remember a pre Trump 2.0 democrat narrative of everyone being equal under the law, while they knew full well it was horse pucky.

Most of the judges were Republicans, this was the law. You can argue about who and why cases are brought but in court judges and particularly juries bring balance.

When they subpoena what records -- Hoffman providing any funding to the Kaplan law firm is legit but there may be other issues with his NGO. Perjury against Carroll would require that she knowingly misled during her deposition and that the misleading was germane to the facts of the case.

Correspondence back and forth, indicating what day he started funding her case, whether that was before or after she swore under oath that she wasn't receiving any funding, and whether there were any terms and conditions attached to the funding. She may be a dingbat (read some excerpts from her book- she apparently got SA'ed a lot, by rich guys), but I suspect Hoffman's group has the receipts.

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, impulse said:

Correspondence back and forth, indicating what day he started funding her case, whether that was before or after she swore under oath that she wasn't receiving any funding, and whether there were any terms and conditions attached to the funding. She may be a dingbat (read some excerpts from her book- she apparently got SA'ed a lot, by rich guys), but I suspect Hoffman's group has the receipts.

All of that is already on record at both the district court and appeals court. via Gemini:

This detail refers to the E. Jean Carroll vs. Donald Trump civil lawsuits.

Donald Trump's defense team attempted to use external funding—specifically, that billionaire Reid Hoffman's nonprofit helped fund Carroll's legal costs—to question her credibility, arguing she concealed this support during her deposition.

However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rejected this defense. A unanimous panel upheld the initial judgment and affirmed that:

  • Carroll had simply forgotten about the limited outside funding her counsel had secured.

  • There was no evidence that she was involved in obtaining the funds, had interacted with the donor, or was even aware of the funder's political stance.

  • Litigation funding was deemed irrelevant to the central facts of the case

All of that is already on record at both the district court and appeals court. via Gemini:

This detail refers to the E. Jean Carroll vs. Donald Trump civil lawsuits.

It's not on record until they subpoena the secret squirrel stuff. Which they can do now that the DOJ is looking into it.

I don't have a clue what they'll find (if anything). Maybe it'll be a nothing burger. But I am curious.

I'd also like to see them subpoena the NY Dem correspondence to see why they really extended the statute of limitations to allow the suit. But I'm not holding my breath. I think the Uniparty has an agreement not to investigate each other like that.

3 minutes ago, impulse said:

I'd also like to see them subpoena the NY Dem correspondence to see why they really extended the statute of limitations to allow the suit.

via Gemini:

Donald Trump's attempt to dismiss a lawsuit by E. Jean Carroll under New York's Adult Survivors Act (ASA) by claiming the law is unconstitutional was rejected as "absurd" by a federal judge. Trump argued the law violated his due process rights, but the judge dismissed the motion, and Trump was subsequently held liable for sexual abuse and defamation.

The Motion: In December 2022, Trump's legal team filed a motion to dismiss E. Jean Carroll's battery lawsuit, arguing the ASA was a "clear abuse of legislative power" that inherently violated the due process rights of defendants.

The Ruling: In January 2023, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled against Trump's challenge. He compared the ASA to the previously upheld Child Victims Act, noting that the constitutionality arguments against the law were groundless and lacked merit

On 5/28/2026 at 9:00 PM, BLMFem said:

Let's do a summary, shall we?thumbsup

Joe Biden autopen - dropped

Letitia James - tossed out

Jerome Powell - dropped

Mark Kelly - Grand Jury failed to indict

James Comey case #1 - tossed out

Lisa Cook - still part of the Fed

Adam Schiff - no charges

See where I'm going with this?😂

Just an update. Comey case # 2 isn't doing so great either. What a surprise!thumbsup

"A rookie federal prosecutor who brought a case accusing former FBI Director James Comey of threatening President Donald Trump’s life by posting a photo of seashells on Instagram has stepped off the case. Matthew Petracca, who had been recently hired as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of North Carolina, is no longer on the Comey case, according to a court filing."

via Gemini:

Donald Trump's attempt to dismiss a lawsuit by E. Jean Carroll under New York's Adult Survivors Act (ASA) by claiming the law is unconstitutional was rejected as "absurd" by a federal judge. Trump argued the law violated his due process rights, but the judge dismissed the motion, and Trump was subsequently held liable for sexual abuse and defamation.

The Motion: In December 2022, Trump's legal team filed a motion to dismiss E. Jean Carroll's battery lawsuit, arguing the ASA was a "clear abuse of legislative power" that inherently violated the due process rights of defendants.

The Ruling: In January 2023, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled against Trump's challenge. He compared the ASA to the previously upheld Child Victims Act, noting that the constitutionality arguments against the law were groundless and lacked merit

You're missing the point.

The Dems and lefties claim that extending the statute was a response to MeToo and the Weinstein case.

I want to see what they were really discussing when they were organizing to allow E Jean Carroll to sue Trump 30 years (or so, since she doesn't even remember what year it happened) after the fact. I'd be dollars to donut holes that the objective was to keep Trump off the ballot, and had very little to do with "justice" for the victims.

Of course, we'll probably never know since that would require subpoenas for the internal DNC correspondence.

  • Author
8 minutes ago, impulse said:

You're missing the point.

The Dems and lefties claim that extending the statute was a response to MeToo and the Weinstein case.

I want to see what they were really discussing when they were organizing to allow E Jean Carroll to sue Trump 30 years (or so, since she doesn't even remember what year it happened) after the fact. I'd be dollars to donut holes that the objective was to keep Trump off the ballot, and had very little to do with "justice" for the victims.

Of course, we'll probably never know since that would require subpoenas for the internal DNC correspondence.

The sealed files might have some goodies in it. Goodies for political fodder and or corruption.

Edited by riclag

There is no doubt that Carroll attorney Roberta Kaplan was involved the NY State Survivor Act. And Carroll already had filed the first defamation case against Trump while he still in office so he already was in their sights as a defendant in a Carroll case.

via Gemini:

Yes, as chairwoman of the advocacy organization Time's Up, prominent civil rights attorney Roberta "Robbie" Kaplan lobbied New York State lawmakers to pass the Adult Survivors Act (ASA)

NB And Kaplan was the lead attorney at The Supreme Court for the Defense of Marriage Act 2013.

Edited by JerryM

  • Author

Its always retaliation/ vindictive with these leftist. Trump got nothin to do with the review, its all on you Mr. Hoffman.The DOJ is investigating Reid Hoffman’s nonprofit for potential money laundering, conspiracy, and obstruction related to its funding of E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits against Trump.

Reid Hoffman says reported DOJ investigation into his nonprofit that funded E. Jean Carroll's case is 'retaliation'

https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/reid-hoffman-says-reported-doj-172856774.html

31 minutes ago, JerryM said:

NB And Kaplan was the lead attorney at The Supreme Court for the Defense of Marriage Act 2013.

Note that should read Kaplan was lead attorney Supreme court in DEFEAT of the Defense of Marriage Act declaring Section 3 only man & woman unconstitutional.

Edited by JerryM

The DoJ is maybe not looking solely at Mr. Hoffman as to money laundering related to Ms. Carroll's attorney finances.

They are maybe suggesting that Hoffman funneled money through middlemen before going to other non-profit entities,

Edited by JerryM

  • Author
6 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

E. Jean claimed in her sealed 2023 deposition that she had totally forgot about the Hoffman nonprofit funding her lawsuit at the time of her 2022 testimony, where she denied any outside funding.

She similarly could not recall the exact year of the alleged Bergdorf Goodman incident either, initially describing it as late 1995 or early 1996 before settling on spring 1996 at trial.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/justice-dept-reid-hoffman-e-jean-carroll-trump-lawsuits/

Edited by riclag

Top federal prosecutor in Chicago denies investigation into E. Jean Carroll, disputing media reports -- Updated May 29, 2026

WASHINGTON (AP) — The top federal prosecutor in Chicago denied Thursday evening that his office had opened an investigation into E. Jean Carroll, the longtime advice columnist who has said Donald Trump sexually assaulted her in a New York department store 30 years ago, hours after multiple news organizations reported that the Justice Department was investigating whether she had lied during the course of civil litigation against Trump.

But Andrew Boutros, the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, issued a statement roughly 24 hours after the first report was published saying that his office “has not opened — and has never opened — a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll.

Multiple news organizations, including The Washington Post and NBC News, cited unnamed sources in reporting Thursday that the investigation was actually centered on Hoffman’s nonprofit, which the person familiar with the matter confirmed to AP.

https://apnews.com/article/justice-department-trump-carroll-columnist-ec802c40674fabeefab4dd8ed51aa4b6

Edited by JerryM

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.