58 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

On nearly every single cannabis thread you are there, whining on about "Medical use only" have you not yet realised that, A, nobody in the cannabis forum cares what you think, and B, it is not for you to tell people what they can and cannot do

Obviously you care, since you seem to see my shadow in every cannabis thread. You had better check with your supplier about what he served you, if that is the case..

12 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

On nearly every single cannabis thread you are there, whining on about "Medical use only" have you not yet realised that, A, nobody in the cannabis forum cares what you think, and B, it is not for you to tell people what they can and cannot do

Thank you so much !

Troll post removed.

@FigLeaf rule 9. You will not post disruptive or inflammatory messages. You will respect other members and post in a civil manner. Personal attacks, insults or hate speech posted on the forum or sent by private message are not allowed.
 
10. You will not post troll messages. Trolling is the act of purposefully antagonizing forum members by posting controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking other members into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

On 7/21/2026 at 6:24 PM, SiSePuede419 said:

They use drug sniffing dogs in the San Francisco airport too. Walked right past my luggage with rosin and a preroll inside, because I was traveling domestically to another cannabis legal US state.

Um... no. I don't care to police, judge, or even know about your ganja and travel plans. In fact I think that should be legal at every level of government in the USA. But let's at least get this right:

Firstly, airports are under federal jurisdiction. Strictly speaking, that's true only in the sterile area, but once you enter areas where dogs are sniffing, in an area under federal jurisdiction you are indeed. Whether cannabis is legal in either your origin or destination state is not relevant to federal law, under which your rosin and preroll are illegal regardless of state laws. I suppose there might be a valid constitutional question that arises if you are not crossing state lines... good luck with that!

Secondly, while it's plausible that dogs or that particular dog is not trained to find cannabis, there's no way that was because of your particular itinerary. Did the dog ask you about your itinerary? Or maybe it just read your mind, or was able to use its x-ray vision to read your boarding pass. LOL. (I predict you may try to claim you didn't claim what I claim you claimed, but I claim your words very clearly do claim what I claim they claim.)

On 7/21/2026 at 7:24 AM, SiSePuede419 said:

They use drug sniffing dogs in the San Francisco airport too. Walked right past my luggage with rosin and a preroll inside, because I was traveling domestically to another cannabis legal US state.

Your friend might be jumping to conclusions on what the dogs were looking for, once again due to the very important resident who stays there periodically. 😃

Depends on what the dog handler had the dog looking for.

On 7/25/2026 at 3:44 AM, tai4de2 said:

Um... no. I don't care to police, judge, or even know about your ganja and travel plans. In fact I think that should be legal at every level of government in the USA. But let's at least get this right:

Firstly, airports are under federal jurisdiction. Strictly speaking, that's true only in the sterile area, but once you enter areas where dogs are sniffing, in an area under federal jurisdiction you are indeed. Whether cannabis is legal in either your origin or destination state is not relevant to federal law, under which your rosin and preroll are illegal regardless of state laws. I suppose there might be a valid constitutional question that arises if you are not crossing state lines... good luck with that!

Secondly, while it's plausible that dogs or that particular dog is not trained to find cannabis, there's no way that was because of your particular itinerary. Did the dog ask you about your itinerary? Or maybe it just read your mind, or was able to use its x-ray vision to read your boarding pass. LOL. (I predict you may try to claim you didn't claim what I claim you claimed, but I claim your words very clearly do claim what I claim they claim.)

The dog may not have been prompted to look for drugs either.

On 7/27/2026 at 3:01 AM, blaze master said:

Depends on what the dog handler had the dog looking for.

There is no way that is true,it does not work that way.

On 7/23/2026 at 9:03 PM, Hummin said:

Obviously you care, since you seem to see my shadow in every cannabis thread. You had better check with your supplier about what he served you, if that is the case..

You seem very fired up and against Cannabis use,have you ever tried it?

2 hours ago, jvs said:

You seem very fired up and against Cannabis use,have you ever tried it?

Not more fired up than I am against ignorant tourist or expat who does not understand simple things. I am not against cannabis users, cannabis, or alcohol. It is what some users do that puts others in a bad light, but that seems far fetched to some here who get fired up by my opinions.A

As a skydiver from the 80s who lived in Florida, what do you think? Yes, I smoked my share of prime Mexican grass before I turned 20 and I enjoy alcohol, I do, and I still enjoy a good party once in a while. That does not make me a hypocrite, does it? I just do not like drunk people, alcoholics, or public annoyance.

The Thais are also addressing ignorant dope tourism. Are they also getting unnecessarily fired up?

3 hours ago, Hummin said:

Not more fired up than I am against ignorant tourist or expat who does not understand simple things. I am not against cannabis users, cannabis, or alcohol. It is what some users do that puts others in a bad light, but that seems far fetched to some here who get fired up by my opinions.A

As a skydiver from the 80s who lived in Florida, what do you think? Yes, I smoked my share of prime Mexican grass before I turned 20 and I enjoy alcohol, I do, and I still enjoy a good party once in a while. That does not make me a hypocrite, does it? I just do not like drunk people, alcoholics, or public annoyance.

The Thais are also addressing ignorant dope tourism. Are they also getting unnecessarily fired up?

Ok,i see what you mean.

The problem was a little complicated by the rules.

Anyone could buy Cannabis but you can not smoke outside,not in your hotel room or condo and no longer in the shop itself.

So that was a genuine problem.

Edibles would be a better way to go.

7 hours ago, jvs said:

There is no way that is true,it does not work that way.

Oh I see you're a trained customs officer.

1 hour ago, blaze master said:

Oh I see you're a trained customs officer.

No i am not but i have trained dogs for police and security work and i know exactly

how that works.

Do you think someone can tell a dog what to look for?

Also a big difference between looking for contraband or explosives.

Back to you.

26 minutes ago, jvs said:

Also a big difference between looking for contraband or explosives.

Back to you.

This should answer your queries.

7 hours ago, jvs said:

No i am not but i have trained dogs for police and security work and i know exactly

how that works.

Do you think someone can tell a dog what to look for?

Also a big difference between looking for contraband or explosives.

Back to you.

A little more info on the matter....

14 hours ago, jvs said:

Ok,i see what you mean.

The problem was a little complicated by the rules.

Anyone could buy Cannabis but you can not smoke outside,not in your hotel room or condo and no longer in the shop itself.

So that was a genuine problem.

Edibles would be a better way to go.

you never could smoke it in Public, or in the shop, ( although plenty of cannabis cafes around)
You CAN and it was/legal to smoke in ,private ( ur hotel room, condo, house)
as there ( at least here in phuket (NO POLICING) people smoke in public without a worry

6 hours ago, blaze master said:

A little more info on the matter....

So you come up with some obscure article that says absolutely nothing!

On 7/27/2026 at 3:01 AM, blaze master said:

Depends on what the dog handler had the dog looking for.

A handler can not control what a dog is looking for,not possible!

A dog can only search for what it has been trained to search for,you can not say to a dog,ok look for Cannabis now but ignore cocaine.

On 7/27/2026 at 3:05 AM, blaze master said:

The dog may not have been prompted to look for drugs either.

Again the same thing,there is no way this is possible!!!!!

You can train a dog for just one scent at the time,once he has mastered that you can introduce another drug and so on.You can never let him look for one thing only if he has been trained to alert for different things.

Why do you think there are different dogs used for finding drugs and others for explosives?

You have no idea about this,just admit it.

3 minutes ago, jvs said:

So you come up with some obscure article that says absolutely nothing!

A handler can not control what a dog is looking for,not possible!

A dog can only search for what it has been trained to search for,you can not say to a dog,ok look for Cannabis now but ignore cocaine.

Again the same thing,there is no way this is possible!!!!!

You can train a dog for just one scent at the time,once he has mastered that you can introduce another drug and so on.You can never let him look for one thing only if he has been trained to alert for different things.

Why do you think there are different dogs used for finding drugs and others for explosives?

You have no idea about this,just admit it.

Good grief. Even when presented information.

Go away.

33 minutes ago, blaze master said:

Good grief. Even when presented information.

Go away.

nah,don't think so.

maybe you can find some AI info to answer my question?

i think it was a pothead that legalized weed in the first instance

On 7/30/2026 at 8:03 PM, jvs said:

Do you think someone can tell a dog what to look for?

You claim to be a police dog trainer but you don't know the answer to a very basic question? 😄

You can’t just tell a dog with words what to look for, LOL.

But with consistent training, you can absolutely teach it what to look for, often with incredible precision.

God, what a joke. Let me guess you just trained the dogs to detect the scents of Black and Hispanic people, who are almost always guilty.

Training shortcut. 😄

Also have heard a former police officer tell about his police dog that had a secret command so the dog would "trigger".

That's also another big timesaver. Command the dog to trigger on a suspicious person or vehicle just to save time getting a legal search warrant.

If the dog finds nothing, then blame it on the pooch.

Dogs can't be racist. 😎

On 8/2/2026 at 11:58 AM, mordothailand said:

i think it was a pothead that legalized weed in the first instance

I think it was a bigoted racist opiate abuser who banned it in the very first instance

5 hours ago, SiSePuede419 said:

You claim to be a police dog trainer but you don't know the answer to a very basic question? 😄

You can’t just tell a dog with words what to look for, LOL.

But with consistent training, you can absolutely teach it what to look for, often with incredible precision.

God, what a joke. Let me guess you just trained the dogs to detect the scents of Black and Hispanic people, who are almost always guilty.

Training shortcut. 😄

Also have heard a former police officer tell about his police dog that had a secret command so the dog would "trigger".

That's also another big timesaver. Command the dog to trigger on a suspicious person or vehicle just to save time getting a legal search warrant.

If the dog finds nothing, then blame it on the pooch.

Dogs can't be racist. 😎

Sure,let me have it!

First of all i have never trained a dog to detect scents of Black and or Hispanic people,i will leave that to the US police.

NO,you can not just tell a dog with words what to look for!

Meaning,if a dog is trained to detect Cannabis only he can only detect Cannabis!

If a dog is trained to detect more then one kind of narcotics then he will always be searching for those narcotics all at The same time!

You can not tell that dog to look for Cannabis and tell him to ignore other narcotics!

It is not possible!

Why is that so hard for you to comprehend?

You tell me, why are there no more dual alert dogs working in the airport?

I am sure you can google the answer?

The Health Minister continues with the lies as enforcement continues while no new laws have yet to be passed.

On 8/3/2026 at 4:10 AM, jvs said:

First of all i have never trained a dog to detect scents of Black and or Hispanic people,i will leave that to the US police

typical euro lie. impossible too.

the fact that you think that shows you are a racist, in line with the other hate you regularly spew

most police k9s are trained in europe btw

12 hours ago, Yagoda said:

typical euro lie. impossible too.

the fact that you think that shows you are a racist, in line with the other hate you regularly spew

most police k9s are trained in europe btw

Yes i know, i am one of those trainers and sent certified KNPV dogs to the US because thet do not have the quality dogs or the skills to train them.

For the rest, you are just being you, a sad individual full of hate.

gone to the dogs . Please Admin. close!