Performance Test:

[Guest Reimar]

Windows 7 beta 1 performance test

How does Windows 7 beta 1 compare to Vista and XP in terms of performance? That’s a question that’s been hitting my inbox regularly over the past few weeks. Let’s see if we can’t answer it!

Before I go any further I feel I need to make a point, and make it clear. The build I’m testing of Windows 7 (build 6.1.7000.0.081212-1400) is a beta build, and as a rule beta builds are usually more geared towards stability than performance. That said, the performance of this build should give us a clue as to how the OS is coming along.

Rather than publish a series of benchmark results for the three operating systems (something which Microsoft frowns upon for beta builds, not to mention the fact that the final numbers only really matter for the release candidate and RTM builds), I’ve decided to put Windows 7, Vista and XP head-to-head in a series of real-world tests to find out which OS comes out top.

The tests

There are 23 tests in all, most of which are self explanatory:

1. Install OS - Time it takes to install the OS

2. Boot up - Average boot time to usable desktop

3. Shut down - Average shut down time

4. Move 100MB files - Move 100MB of JPEG files from one hard drive to another

5. Move 2.5GB files - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from one hard drive to another

6. Network transfer 100MB files - Move 100MB of JPEG files from test machine to NAS device

7. Network transfer 2.5GB files - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from test machine to NAS device

8. Move 100MB files under load - Move 100MB of JPEG files from one hard drive to another while ripping DVD to .ISO file

9. Move 2.5GB files under load - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from one hard drive to another while ripping DVD to .ISO file

10. Network transfer 100MB files under load - Move 100MB of JPEG files from test machine to NAS device while ripping DVD to .ISO file

11. Network transfer 2.5GB files under load - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from test machine to NAS device while ripping DVD to .ISO file

12. Compress 100MB files - Using built-in ZIP compression

13. Compress 1GB files - Using built-in ZIP compression

14. Extract 100MB files - Using built-in ZIP compression

15. Extract 1GB files - Using built-in ZIP compression

16. Install Office 2007 - Ultimate version, from DVD

17. Open 10 page Word doc - Text only

18. Open 100 page Word doc - Text and images only

19. Open simple Excel doc - Basic formatting

20. Open complex Excel doc - Including formula and charts

21. Burn DVD - Win 7 beta 1 .ISO to disc using CDBurnerXP

22. Open 10 page PDF - Text only, using latest Adobe Reader 8

23. Open 100 page PDF - Text and images, using latest Adobe Reader 8

These series of tests will pitch Windows 7 build 7000 32-bit against Windows Vista SP1 32-bit and Windows XP SP3 32-bit. The scoring for each of the tests is simple. The winning OS scores 1, the runner up 2 and the loser scores a 3. The scores are added up and the OS with the lowest score at the end wins.

Source

[Pib]

I've run Vista Home Premium for the last 1-2 years and have pretty much determined it's just a slower and more prettier (eye candy) version of XP which does some functions a little differently. Hopefully Windows 7 will be a "fast" version of Vista "with some significant improvements" versus just some hyped, so-called improvements.

With above said, sincere thanks for the feedback on the beta Windows 7; hopefully, it will be a major improvement and quickly make Vista just a bad memory which wasted every one's time and money. Keep the info coming...thanks.

Edited January 2, 2009 by Pib

[zzdocxx]

Interesting, thanks.

[freitag1]

Thanks Reimar, this article gives me hope. I never switched to Vista full time even though I have a dual boot setup with Home Premium and XP. I hope they really get it right this time, its kinda annoying having all these Mac friends who work with an excellent OS while you still roll on XP (with hundreds of modifications that makes it almost as good at least).