Jump to content

Pheu Thai Party Denies Flood Relief Boat Scams


webfact

Recommended Posts

Just be thankful you weren't waiting for Abhisits government to pay out;

Ha ha touche - fair enough, well done PPdon wai.gif

Pathetic actually.

Every time this current government faces any criticism whatsoever, rather than either condemn or defend whatever the accusation is. PPdon scurries around trying to find some comparable dirt that a previous government, preferably a Democrat led one, is allegedly guilty of.

Always the same MO with the red shirts: "Well yes, Thaksin is corrupt, but others are corrupter"..."Well yes, the PTP are inept, but the Dems were inepter"...."Well yes, the red shirts did burn parts of Bangkok to the ground, but the yellow shirts are worser - they closed the airport"

It truly is like debating with five year olds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems irony, despite it's depth and weight, flies right over the heads of some.

How does depth and weight fly? And its is spelled without an apostrophe in this case. It seems you need a bit of help with your writing.

Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.

That made me grin this morning OzMick, take a bow. wai.gif

Credit should go where it is due. That is a Marx Brothers quote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just be thankful you weren't waiting for Abhisits government to pay out;

Ha ha touche - fair enough, well done PPdon wai.gif

Pathetic actually.

Every time this current government faces any criticism whatsoever, rather than either condemn or defend whatever the accusation is. PPdon scurries around trying to find some comparable dirt that a previous government, preferably a Democrat led one, is allegedly guilty of.

Always the same MO with the red shirts: "Well yes, Thaksin is corrupt, but others are corrupter"..."Well yes, the PTP are inept, but the Dems were inepter"...."Well yes, the red shirts did burn parts of Bangkok to the ground, but the yellow shirts are worser - they closed the airport"

It truly is like debating with five year olds.

It was a truthful response that WEKA accepted with grace. How I am I supposed to debate under your rules - do I reply "well 2 months seems reasonable to me"? I offered a comparison as an example as to how reasonable the timescale was. My arguments do not attack the poster, unlike you and your ilk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a truthful response that WEKA accepted with grace. How I am I supposed to debate under your rules - do I reply "well 2 months seems reasonable to me"? I offered a comparison as an example as to how reasonable the timescale was. My arguments do not attack the poster, unlike you and your ilk.

If you think that 2 months is reasonable then yes, why not say that? Fishing around for examples in which it has taken more time for pay outs to have been made, doesn't prove anything as with regards whether the time taken in this case is reasonable. All it does is reflect your inability to actually address possible failings in this administration without rushing off to Google and find a comparison of an administration that has done equally as bad or worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...