Jump to content

Poor No Longer Willing To Be Told To Sacrifice By Wealthy: Theerayuth


webfact

Recommended Posts

"Poor no longer willing to be told to sacrifice by wealthy: Theerayuth" #1^

"There is no short-term solution to Thailand's ongoing political conflict"

What political conflict?

The opposition are constantly promoting the refrain that if they ar5e not in power, things must be in political shambles.

Last year's election resolved political conflict, as elections are wont to do.

The beauty of elections.....validates some, and repudiates others.....end of political conflict.

"A key factor, Theerayuth said, was for people from both sides of the political divide to acknowledge the existence of one another"

Not sure if this is possible, when one side is hard-wired to believe the other side has no political awareness. Who holds the other side in contemptuous disdain and politically unequal.....even when they are the ones on the political sidelines.

An arrogance that is accordingly amusing.

"While praising Yingluck for her "smart" fashion sense and photogenic quality.."

A subtle little put-down isn't it. Either by this guy, or by a reporter isolating this comment out-of-context.

Suggesting she is devoid of political acumen.

Her success strongly suggests otherwise.

"He said Thaksin and the ruling Pheu Thai Party clung to three strategies: widening the party's grass-roots base of support; co-opting the checks-and-balances system provided by the courts; and then targeting so-called independent organisations as well as the military"

Obviously an Opposition operative.

Denigrating some key rationale for Constitution Reform from a different direction.

The following reasons to revisit the constitution after the coupists fiddled with it, directly challenge this guy's assertions:

Under the constitution, procedures to create independent organizations and select their members lack public participation and go against the principle of democracy.

Independent organizations and the judiciary are allowed to operate without a system of checks and balances, which adversely affects the justice system and results in double
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should try substituting the headline:

Poor no longer willing to be told to sacrifice by wealthy.....to

The People no longer willing to be told to sacrifice by politicians. Same meaning.

In Thailand, there will always be a short fall of 25-30% in each and every governmental project or purchase. And we all know where and to which pocket it goes. We, the people, pay for it.

Thanks to the Internet and fast spread of information (though not always true), the people are getting smarter.

Edited by tomyummer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a lot more respect for Thais than I do for Americans(my former homeland). At least Thais will stand up and demand a higher wage. The poor in America just think it's their fault or something that they're poor. They never even protest anymore. They are very ignorant to say the least. They even vote for right wing politicians! Is it any wonder the wage inequality there keeps growing? In Thailand the exact opposite is happening. The wealth seems to be much more evenly distributed in Thailand than the US. What a disgrace!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thammasat University sociology lecturer:

'While praising Yingluck for her "smart" fashion sense and photogenic quality - he predicted that by year's end the PM would be named one of the best-dressed female leaders in the world'

The man is a clown. Doesn't exactly impress one with the quality of some faculty members working at Thammasat these days does it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thammasat University sociology lecturer:

'While praising Yingluck for her "smart" fashion sense and photogenic quality - he predicted that by year's end the PM would be named one of the best-dressed female leaders in the world'

The man is a clown. Doesn't exactly impress one with the quality of some faculty members working at Thammasat these days does it?

I think Teerayut was making a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem stems from absurd ideas like the sufficiency theory. After Thaksin the poor have woken up, the ghost will not go back in the bottle and the sufficiency theory should be changed in a theory that says to the elite that they have sufficient means and need to pay more taxes to develop the country. It is a great thing the poor have woken up and go after what is really theirs.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the only way out of poverty is thrue education, and that takes at least a generation...

lazy uneducated farmers who did not study at all and keep on burning forest and making babies by the dozen without being able to support them or even themselfves (drinking, gambling away the money) surely are not helping at all

they send their uneducated daughters to pattaya to send them their stash each month or pray they find a good buffalo farang to help out the sick buffalo

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem stems from absurd ideas like the sufficiency theory. After Thaksin the poor have woken up, the ghost will not go back in the bottle and the sufficiency theory should be changed in a theory that says to the elite that they have sufficient means and need to pay more taxes to develop the country. It is a great thing the poor have woken up and go after what is really theirs.

Indeed the genie is out of the bottle and neither the Dems nor the army will get it back in. Until they realise this and act accordingly they will always be a second rate force in Thailand.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thammasat University sociology lecturer:

'While praising Yingluck for her "smart" fashion sense and photogenic quality - he predicted that by year's end the PM would be named one of the best-dressed female leaders in the world'

The man is a clown. Doesn't exactly impress one with the quality of some faculty members working at Thammasat these days does it?

I think Teerayut was making a joke.

I agree that it was a small light-hearted joke surrounded by extremely serious big-picture ideas. I agree with just about all of what Theerayuth has said, including his criticisms of the old establishment and royalty-biased history.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Pheu Thai MP Pracha Prasopdee strongly attacked Theerayuth yesterday for having an outdated view of politics and blaming Thaksin. He said the current political problems were caused by those who wielded influence from behind the scenes, so Theerayuth should have attacked these influential people instead of criticising Thaksin."

I thought that Taksin was one of "those who wielded influence from behind the scenes". Although, his invisibility cloak seems to have stopped working.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem stems from absurd ideas like the sufficiency theory. After Thaksin the poor have woken up, the ghost will not go back in the bottle and the sufficiency theory should be changed in a theory that says to the elite that they have sufficient means and need to pay more taxes to develop the country. It is a great thing the poor have woken up and go after what is really theirs.

Indeed the genie is out of the bottle and neither the Dems nor the army will get it back in. Until they realise this and act accordingly they will always be a second rate force in Thailand.

Include nor PTP and Thaksin in the inability to get the genie back in the bottle.

Until such time as a government comes along that is truly sincere in their desire to help the poor (and not the manipulative, deceitful, empty rhetoric those two entities deceitfully proclaim to), there is no genie being freed in the first place.

.

.

Edited by Buchholz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Poor no longer willing to be told to sacrifice by wealthy" except if he's a billionaire with a square face, pays them 500 baht for a vote and 7.5 million baht if you attack hospitals and burn down Bangkok.

7.5 million!!! really, who got paid that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thammasat University sociology lecturer:

'While praising Yingluck for her "smart" fashion sense and photogenic quality - he predicted that by year's end the PM would be named one of the best-dressed female leaders in the world'

The man is a clown. Doesn't exactly impress one with the quality of some faculty members working at Thammasat these days does it?

I think Teerayut was making a joke.

Thammasat University sociology lecturer:

'While praising Yingluck for her "smart" fashion sense and photogenic quality - he predicted that by year's end the PM would be named one of the best-dressed female leaders in the world'

The man is a clown. Doesn't exactly impress one with the quality of some faculty members working at Thammasat these days does it?

I think Teerayut was making a joke.

A slight touch of sarcasm maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was making some sense until the photogenic and fashion sense comment. Showed his true colours, or colour rather. I switched off then.

He is a sociologist, and would understand that much of the population are preoccupied with unimportant things like fashion and beauty (often moreso than what the person does or thinks), so he was being sarcastic. It is surprising that some people took his comment about Yingluck's fashion sense seriously. He is overall critical of all sides.

Edited by hyperdimension
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the Thai Banks supported by the government will tell you there is no inflation:

All you "little people" out there -- there is no inflation. It's all in your mind. See! We have a paper issued by the government saying there is no inflation. It's all in your head "little people". And your empty stomach? That's all in your head too.

Of course there is no inflation. If there was - officially - the central bank issued debt would become unserviceable. As long as there is no inflation, the government keeps spending big, government officials rake their 10 to 30% off the top, banks win by "loaning" huge sums of money to the government, bank executive make obscene bonuses -- the average middle and lower class Thai get shafted.

Considering that the average bank exec, politician, and upper-level bureaucrat probably never sets foot in a market to buy food and everyday consumer goods, they can easily ignore the fact that many of these items have jumped 10, 20, 30 per cent or more in the last couple of years -- I've seen it and it affects me. I can only imagine how it is affecting someone making 8k to 15k baht per month.

So it will be a "big surprise" that "nobody could have seen coming" when the next influx of red shirted protesters surge into Bangkok and other cities complaining about income disparity and the inability to adequately care for their families. We might actually start seeing some "orange shirts" out there when the middle class break ranks and start dying there yellow shirts "red".

Edited by connda
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One post with thinly veiled references to the monarchy has been removed from view.

Per forum rules:

2) Not to express disrespect of the King of Thailand or anyone else in the Thai royal family, whether living or deceased, nor to criticize the monarchy as an institution. Speculation, comments and discussion of either a political or personal nature are not allowed when discussing HM The King or the Royal family. Discussion of the lese majeste law or lese majeste cases is permitted on the forum, providing no comment or speculation is made referencing the royal family. To breach this rule will result in immediate ban.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"While praising Yingluck for her "smart" fashion sense and photogenic quality.."

A subtle little put-down isn't it. Either by this guy, or by a reporter isolating this comment out-of-context.

Suggesting she is devoid of political acumen.

You are contradicting yourself here, as you yourself, in Can PM Yingluck Win Over A Foreign Audience?, made a statement that is extremely denigrating and disrepectful of a Prime Minister whose party was democratically elected by such a large swathe of the electorate, supporting the notion that she is just good for her looks on the international stage:

As a result she has no difficulties with Foreign audiences. I have seen many instances where significant international figures were only too happy to be photo-opped with the well respected and photogenic Thai Prime Minister.
Edited by hyperdimension
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen several accounts of this same press-conference, on Twitter and in the other English paper, Nation's Pravit seems to have added a few points no one cared to report on or even mention before, and span it the "red" way.

Come to think of it, it's pretty sad that the genie can't be put back in the bottle regarding sufficiency vs unlimited growth supported by unlimited borrowing, ie living beyond your means.

Meanwhile the "people" government quietly rolled back the plan to tax the idle land held by the richest owners and boldly cut corporate taxes for them instead, while the poor folk all over the country live in anticipation of the promised salary hikes for Bangkokians and price rises for everybody else.

Good times a-coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thammasat University sociology lecturer:

'While praising Yingluck for her "smart" fashion sense and photogenic quality - he predicted that by year's end the PM would be named one of the best-dressed female leaders in the world'

The man is a clown. Doesn't exactly impress one with the quality of some faculty members working at Thammasat these days does it?

Actually this line seems to be taking the piss,

while pretending to complement her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"While praising Yingluck for her "smart" fashion sense and photogenic quality.."

A subtle little put-down isn't it. Either by this guy, or by a reporter isolating this comment out-of-context.

Suggesting she is devoid of political acumen.

You are contradicting yourself here, as you yourself, in Can PM Yingluck Win Over A Foreign Audience?, made a statement that is extremely denigrating and disrepectful of a Prime Minister whose party was democratically elected by such a large swathe of the electorate, supporting the notion that she is just good for her looks on the international stage:

As a result she has no difficulties with Foreign audiences. I have seen many instances where significant international figures were only too happy to be photo-opped with the well respected and photogenic Thai Prime Minister.

Yes, taking a picture with her, isn't the same as actually listening to her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...