Jump to content

Likely About-Turn On Thaksin's Passport Seen As A Move To Save The Govt


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

ANALYSIS

Likely about-turn on Thaksin's passport seen as a move to save the govt

Nuntida Puangthong

The Nation on Sunday

BANGKOK: -- The Foreign Ministry's likely U-turn on the issue of former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra's passport reflects a strategy of "nipping in the bud" any threat to the Yingluck government after realising the dangers of a political backlash if it refuses to revoke the passport issued to the fugitive leader last year.

The Foreign Ministry early this week was preparing to issue a letter to the Ombudsman's Office, stating that it will not review its issuance of a Thai passport to Thaksin. But the latest development is that the ministry has had a change of heart.

The ministry on Friday submitted a letter to the Ombudsman's Office requesting that the office give it another 30 days to collect complete information and relevant documents to clarify its issuance of a travelling document to Thaksin.

Acting on a complaint filed by Somsak Kosaisuk, former core leader of the People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD), the Ombudsman's Office submitted its recommendation on September 13 that the Foreign Ministry review the issue of Thaksin's passport. The ministry must respond to the Ombudsman within 30 days.

The decision whether Thaksin's passport should be cancelled is not so complicated that the ministry needs more time to scrutinise the matter. When it first received the request from the Ombudsman's Office, the ministry did not seem to be perturbed. The U-turn could be interpreted as a change in the government's stance on the matter.

Reports said that the ministry's review of its decision could point towards Thaksin's passport being revoked again.

Thaksin's Thai passport was revoked the first time after his government was brought down by the September 19, 2006 coup. Two months after General Surayud Chulanont was installed as PM, Thaksin's special passport as PM and his ordinary passport were revoked. The Foreign Ministry cited its 2005 ministerial directive number 8 that PM and diplomats must give up their special passport after leaving the office. According to the protocol, the Foreign Ministry can resort to revoking travelling documents in such circumstances.

Thaksin was given back his ordinary passport when Noppadon Pattama became Foreign Minister in 2008 but his passport was revoked again by the Abhisit government.

After the April 11, 2009 riots, when the red shirts forced the cancellation of a summit of Asean leaders in Pattaya, then foreign minister Kasit Piromya cited Foreign Ministry directive No 23 (7) to revoke Thaksin's passport on the grounds that his stay overseas had caused damage to the country and to foreign countries. Kasit said that Thaksin had incited the red shirts to stage riots, which posed a security threat to the country.

Since the passport issue has been regarded by Thaksin as a political subject, once his sister became the premier, he got his passport back. The Yingluck government pointed out that it has a different political perspective from those of the Surayud and Abhisit governments on the matter.

But what's behind the government's sudden change of heart over whether to revoke Thaksin's passport?

The answer is this issue can be used by the judicial activists to exercise their mandate.

If the Foreign Ministry ignores or rejects the recommendation, the matter would not be put to rest but likely be brought to the Administrative Court by the Ombudsman's Office.

The Foreign Ministry cannot rule out the possibility that the Administrative Court would order the ministry to revoke Thaksin's passport. If this is the case, the Yingluck government would come under attack from many state agencies. First, the National Anti-Corruption Commission can take action against relevant state officials from directors-general, the ministry's permanent secretary, the Foreign Minister and PM Yingluck Shinawatra.

The fact is that Thaksin does not really need the Thai passport because he has a Montenegro passport that he can use to travel everywhere except to Thailand. The revocation of the passport once again will only be a blow to his ego.

But it looks like he has to give in otherwise he would be opening a legal channel for the judicial activists to exercise their power and history may repeat itself. His nominee PM may be replaced again.

One strategy the Pheu Thai Party must stick to is to avoid doing anything that could lead to the party being disbanded. Thaksin knows too well he must nip in the bud this impending storm over his passport.

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2012-10-14

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

And the press keeps making him the center of attention. Preposterous. That can only mean that the press knowingly propagandizes Thaksin as the de facto leader of Thailand. Why else would they keep running 2-3-4 stories a day centered on him?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It takes only a few days, for the flooded Foreign Ministry to issue a new passport & get it to the disgraced former-PM in the UAE, but it will take up to 30 days to collate and review the information in their own Bangkok offices upon which that was based, and then draft the reply to the Ombudsman ?

Things must go better, for the men at the Ministry, when they're flooded-out ! laugh.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a little bit of luck this will all blow up in their face and force the government to actively pursue Thaksin for the crime he has been convicted of and the ones he stands to go to trial for. All ready a arrest warrant is out for just one of those crimes he is accused of many more to follow,

Even invalidating his passport might not be enough to get the PT out of the coming storm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the press keeps making him the center of attention. Preposterous. That can only mean that the press knowingly propagandizes Thaksin as the de facto leader of Thailand. Why else would they keep running 2-3-4 stories a day centered on him?

The press keep running stories on him because, if you hadn't noticed, he is running the country. Kind of makes him newsworthy wouldn't you say?

But does pander to his ego.

Would be nice if stories could concentrate on the PM. Bit difficult I know. Nailing a jelly would be easier than finding any action to accuse her of

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a little bit of luck this will all blow up in their face and force the government to actively pursue Thaksin for the crime he has been convicted of and the ones he stands to go to trial for. All ready a arrest warrant is out for just one of those crimes he is accused of many more to follow,

Even invalidating his passport might not be enough to get the PT out of the coming storm.

I'm not sure why they didn't realise giving Thaksin back his passport was going to cause them problems. It's not that difficult to work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a little bit of luck this will all blow up in their face and force the government to actively pursue Thaksin for the crime he has been convicted of and the ones he stands to go to trial for. All ready a arrest warrant is out for just one of those crimes he is accused of many more to follow,

Even invalidating his passport might not be enough to get the PT out of the coming storm.

I'm not sure why they didn't realise giving Thaksin back his passport was going to cause them problems. It's not that difficult to work out.

What is difficult to work out, is just why this minor issue, compared to the many major issues in Thailand, is elevated to the pinnacle of government business......

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting , had no idea they revoked his passport straight after the coup.

Strange! This item from 2007-01-11 mentioned that the diplomatic passport was revoked, but NOT the normal one.

"Thaksin, however, is permitted to to carry an ordinary Thai passport that will enable him to travel abroad but without the privileges of the diplomatic one with the red cover."

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2007/01/11/headlines/headlines_30023853.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think thaksin is more a "unwanted criminal" Many of those in the present government and even including some in the prior three governments were probably party to his scams. I doubt that any of them trust the others involved to honor and 'code of honor' about ratting each other out If he returned and he and all witnesses were called before the various courts, I can invision a real destruction derby in the Thai political system.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way round it. Thaksin is a wanted criminal.

It is a somewhat confusing conundrum.

The thai judicial system says he is, but the International judicial system (Interpol) says he isn't

Nothing confusing at all, but red supporters would certainly like the conviction to be annulled. A little difficult when Thaksin did not challenge the evidence against him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way round it. Thaksin is a wanted criminal.

It is a somewhat confusing conundrum.

The thai judicial system says he is, but the International judicial system (Interpol) says he isn't

Nothing confusing at all, but red supporters would certainly like the conviction to be annulled. A little difficult when Thaksin did not challenge the evidence against him.

Well Interpol are obviously confused as they havn't issued any warrants for his arrest.

Why would you say that was?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way round it. Thaksin is a wanted criminal.

It is a somewhat confusing conundrum.

The thai judicial system says he is, but the International judicial system (Interpol) says he isn't

Nothing confusing at all, but red supporters would certainly like the conviction to be annulled. A little difficult when Thaksin did not challenge the evidence against him.

Well Interpol are obviously confused as they havn't issued any warrants for his arrest.

Why would you say that was?

K. Thaksin is sentenced to two years imprisonment. He jumped bail. He's a fugitive criminal. There are arrest warrants out to get him.

Interpol only gets involved upon request. The first request from the then government was met with a need for all papers to be properly translated. Neither the previous nor the current government could be bothered. As such Interpol doesn't have an official opinion on Thaksin.

In the mean time here in Thailand k. Thaksin is and remains a fugitive criminal in self-exile smile.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Interpol are obviously confused as they havn't issued any warrants for his arrest.

Why would you say that was?

Does that mean that anyone with a conviction that is on the run, that doesn't have an Interpol arrest warrant, isn't really on the run?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Interpol are obviously confused as they havn't issued any warrants for his arrest.

Why would you say that was?

Does that mean that anyone with a conviction that is on the run, that doesn't have an Interpol arrest warrant, isn't really on the run?

No, it just means that Interpol are not after him.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a little bit of luck this will all blow up in their face and force the government to actively pursue Thaksin for the crime he has been convicted of and the ones he stands to go to trial for. All ready a arrest warrant is out for just one of those crimes he is accused of many more to follow,

Even invalidating his passport might not be enough to get the PT out of the coming storm.

I'm not sure why they didn't realise giving Thaksin back his passport was going to cause them problems. It's not that difficult to work out.

What is difficult to work out, is just why this minor issue, compared to the many major issues in Thailand, is elevated to the pinnacle of government business......

Is all this Government activity intended to benefit Thailand or the ruling party?

Umm! Possibly the answer to your question?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Likely about-turn on Thaksin's passport seen as a move to save the govt

Wouldn't it have been such a major leap forward for this country, and perhaps displayed a glimmer of hope if the news heading had said

Likely about-turn on Thaksin's passport seen as a move to save the principles of democracy
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Interpol are obviously confused as they havn't issued any warrants for his arrest.

Why would you say that was?

Does that mean that anyone with a conviction that is on the run, that doesn't have an Interpol arrest warrant, isn't really on the run?

No, it just means that Interpol are not after him.

I am sure that the democratic "grown ups" at Interpol gave due consideration to the points you raise, but then quite correctly concluded that the charges and "conviction" against taksin S were politically motivated by the ruling military govenment at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a strict interpretation of Thai nationality law Thaksin should have lost his Thai nationality after he first naturalised as an alien. See Section 22 of the Nationality Act below:

"Section 22. A person of Thai nationality who has been naturalized as an alien, or who has renounced Thai nationality, or whose Thai nationality has been revoked, shall lose Thai nationality."

Although there is no evidence that the current Nationality Act has ever been interpreted strictly in this respect the Interior Ministry which is responsible for policing Thai nationality is on record as saying that Thais who naturalise as aliens should renounce their Thai nationality because the law doesn't recognise dual nationality. The Democrats could have pursued this line and had his Thai citizenship formally revoked when they were in power. There was ample evidence that Thaksin had naturalised as an alien after Nicaragua announced it had appointed him an ambassador and Thaksin himself announced to the media in Montenegro he had become a Montenegrin. Even without that, the fact that he continued to travel the world freely after his Thai passports had been revoked would have been sufficient evidence. Even though the law has not been interpreted in this way in recent decades, it is obvious that it could be and the Thai justice system habitually gives special treatment to certain individuals which could go either way. They probably didn't try it because they didn't control the Interior Ministry which was then in the hands of Newin and because their leader and deputy leader are both British-Thais.

I am not suggesting that this should have been done and think it would have had negative ramifications for all other Thai dual citizens, if it had. However, I am surprised that no one tried it or even suggested it at the time. This new passport issue might bring it up though.

Edited by Arkady
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Interpol are obviously confused as they havn't issued any warrants for his arrest.

Why would you say that was?

Presume Interpol is waiting for Thailand to issue an International Arrest Warrant coffee1.gif do not think Interpol can issue an warrant on their own initiative, imaginee if Interpol nabbed TS Tomorrow and then Thailand said they do not want him back, they would look a bit stupid,wouldn't they? cheesy.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""