Lite Beer Posted October 20, 2012 Posted October 20, 2012 NBTC member defends 3G auction, rejects bribe talk Somroutai Sapsomboon The Nation on Sunday BANGKOK: -- National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) member Suthiphon Thaveechaiyagarn yesterday denied rumours that NBTC members were bribed to hold the 3G auction in a way that favoured existing business operators, saying the stories were spread by ill-intentioned people. "I was a court judge for 10 years. I received the ... King Scholarship, I was a secretary-general of the Election Commission and I am a person of consistency. A single year here [at the NBTC] cannot change me," he said. "I have my future ahead of me, I have my family to take care of, I don't have any reason to be corrupt or be bought. I have no financial problems. If I had any financial problem or wanted to make money, I wouldn't be doing this job. Please be fair to me. I know myself best; if I did anything bad, I would be ashamed," he said. The NBTC has been criticised heavily since the 3G auction last week. The main complaints include the fact that the auction might have violated the state bidding law and that it might have favoured the existing industry operators. Suthiphon, one of the four members of the watchdog's telecom committee who voted to endorse the results of Tuesday's auction, said rumours had circulated that the nine NBTC commissioners who had voiced support for the auction's methods and rules were paid off. There are a total of 11 NBTC commissioners. He declined to say whether he had discussed the rumours with the other NBTC members. He said the appropriate response to the rumours was a personal decision for each member, but he was confident that they were not true. The two NBTC members not accused in the rumours are Supinya Klangnarong and Prawit Leesatapornwongsa. Before the auction, Suthiphon said, he was worried it wouldn't succeed. When the auction was finished, he was worried that the result - which saw the bid prices end up only slightly above the reserve price - would be problematic. He added that he was later relieved to learn, in discussions with the other commissioners, that the outcomes of such auctions were similar in many countries. "After the auction, I am not worried, but I am saddened that I worked hard for the country's sake only to be blamed and face accusations of bribery. Earlier, I expected that if it was a success, I would be proud. Now I am proud, but also sad because I have been blamed every day," he said. The commissioner said he would be able to explain everything about the bidding, especially its legal aspects. He was confident that the NBTC had followed the laws strictly. "Anyone who has doubts can take action according to the [legal] process. I assure them that nothing was done in violation of the state bidding law. But someone might take action against us for malfeasance. However, I still insist that we followed the law. Even if finally the court says we were malfeasant, I repeat: I don't think we were malfeasant. At any rate, the finished auction cannot be scrapped," Suthiphon said. He said the NBTC could not just change the bidding regulations upon learning there were only three bidders. The NBTC might have faced malfeasance charges if it had changed the rules, the commissioner said. "We would have done that [changed the rules] if we could. But we couldn't. When we drafted the regulations we didn't know that there would be only three bidders. But if we had just amended the announcement, that would be abusing the law and simply doing what we wanted," he said. "If we had set the reserve price at Bt6.440 billion per slot, we would have faced charges of intervention as we would be preventing minor operators from taking part in the auction and favouring only the major ones." "A coin has two sides; we have to be careful. I think Thai society now is too paranoid. Thai society needs to be careful and listen to information from all sides. I'd like Thailand to look ahead and figure out how to make the most of the auction, as I don't want it to end up in paranoia and political issues," Suthiphon said. He refused to say how the auction had become a political issue. "I cannot say it. But what I heard was that rumours were intentionally spread that we were bribed." Suthiphon said that before the NBTC handed the licences to the operators, the companies would have to provide to the NBTC the details of their fee rates and service standards. "The NBTC will do its best to protect the people's interests," he said. -- The Nation 2012-10-21
arthurboy Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 The scaremongers are at it yet again. Imagine what could/ will happen when everyone in Thailand has access to social media via affordable smart phones and 3G. Imagine the great unwashed with the capability to upload vid. and voice clips along with their opinions. Scary eh? But for who?
asiawatcher Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 Still trying to figure out all the positive denial, more denial, painting his background of credibility but then closes himself out with this... "But someone might take action against us for malfeasance. However, I still insist that we followed the law. Even if finally the court says we were malfeasant, I repeat: I don't think we were malfeasant." Why suddenly allude to charges and the court and a probable/possible outcome? I don't get it.
Tatsujin Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 (edited) I'll be a monkeys uncle if bribery, corruption and/or outright stealing were not involved in this process. It seems that (especially) within Government and Business circles, if a Thai opens their mouth you can guarantee that lies are coming out of it. Edited October 21, 2012 by Tatsujin 1
whybother Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 He said the NBTC could not just change the bidding regulations upon learning there were only three bidders. It's the government's fault that there were only 3 bidders. The government put so many restrictions on foreign involvement and investment that the foreign investors won't get directly involved, and they won't get involved with the smaller players because they have no control over their investment. 2
Thai at Heart Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 The point of an auction is not singularly to generate as much up front cash as possible. It's to achieve a mix of about 10 varying priorities.
MaxLee Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 All that advanced technology acquisition doesn't mean sh******* without the proper infrastructure. Thailand has huuuuge problem with infrastructure, which in other cases can end deadly...
whybother Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 All that advanced technology acquisition doesn't mean sh******* without the proper infrastructure. Thailand has huuuuge problem with infrastructure, which in other cases can end deadly... And the more money the licencees spend on the licences, the less they will spend on infrastructure. 1
MaxLee Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 (edited) "I was a court judge for 10 years. I received the ... King Scholarship, I was a secretary-general of the Election Commission and I am a person of consistency. A single year here [at the NBTC] cannot change me," he said."I have my future ahead of me, I have my family to take care of, I don't have any reason to be corrupt or be bought. I have no financial problems. If I had any financial problem or wanted to make money, I wouldn't be doing this job. Please be fair to me. I know myself best; if I did anything bad, I would be ashamed," he said. So there you have it,... "the paper Tiger from NBTC shows his true fangs,... stubborn as it's typical for Thai people who think they can do whatever they want because of their high status position, this Bastard moron.... All that advanced technology acquisition doesn't mean sh******* without the proper infrastructure. Thailand has huuuuge problem with infrastructure, which in other cases can end deadly... And the more money the licencees spend on the licences, the less they will spend on infrastructure. That's exactly the main problem I.N.F.R.A.S.T.R.U.C.T.U.R.E. whether for road safety, public transportation system, Telecommunication broadband network, train system or whatsoever, the FAT arrogant people in the government haven't invested a penny in improving these things, but use the money only for themselves and their puppet master. Bad infrastructure can mean DEATH in extreme cases Edited October 21, 2012 by MaxLee 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now