The several articles covering this story not one of the red supporters has of yet offered their enlighten opinion. Come on boys give us the real truth in all of this.

Thing is, to use an example:

Say, if (in my delicious dreams) the mighty spurs thrashed arsenal 6 - 0 then the gunner's fans are hardly likely to want to, or be able to comment on it (to show their team in a favourable light after such an abject showing), are they!!!!

It seems then, that the red shirt supporters have simply chosen not to comment on this topic to avoid being ridiculed as their case is so weak and indefencible.

Maybe they are all on another visa run. But you are correct there is no defence for the indefensible.

Slur away chaps, just makes you look even sillier.

Ok my fine feathered friend can you tell me why they are not commenting on this thread? Without slurs of course dear Phil.

The several articles covering this story not one of the red supporters has of yet offered their enlighten opinion. Come on boys give us the real truth in all of this.

Thing is, to use an example:

Say, if (in my delicious dreams) the mighty spurs thrashed arsenal 6 - 0 then the gunner's fans are hardly likely to want to, or be able to comment on it (to show their team in a favourable light after such an abject showing), are they!!!!

It seems then, that the red shirt supporters have simply chosen not to comment on this topic to avoid being ridiculed as their case is so weak and indefencible.

Maybe they are all on another visa run. But you are correct there is no defence for the indefensible.

Slur away chaps, just makes you look even sillier.

Was THAT a retort ?

philw: Slur away chaps, just makes you look even sillier.

Dap: Was THAT a retort

I think it was "the best defence is an offence" post. Obviously there is no defence at all.