eddie61 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 "You know, elephants, we trade ivory, falang no understand". I await her sheepish response to why this shouldn't be outlawed. Get Chalerm on the job: its a cultural tradition "elepant, him hab big ivoly, dat mean big monee". Dit foleign elepant, maybe neegro, him no thai elepant, thai peepen make big monee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loptr Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 After much fanfare, I predict that there will be a crackdown on ivory trade in Thailand. Chalerm will froth at the mouth, Yingluck will swoon at the thought of rubbing elbows with Leo and at the end of it all, nothing will be done to stop the ivory trade. Lip service is much cheaper than action. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biplanebluey Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Don't hold your breath Leo. NO its ok Leo------ quote "we will give them a warning and maybe a second warning"----- OK Leo ,how's that for action? having frightened the shit out of them all ivory trade finished------- Thank you and god bless you Yinluck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsetBkk Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Wait It's not banned in TL? The more i know, the less I want to know I was thinking the same thing. I thought there was an international ban on this barbaric business. There is, but unfortunately Thailand's stance on most issues is "The UN is not my father". It is illegal to trade ivory from African elephants in Thailand, but legal to trade ivory from Thai elephants. The result is of course that African ivory is smuggled into Thailand, where it is then claimed to originate from Thai elephants, and wupti, it all becomes legal. Why it is legal to trade Thai ivory I think only Thais know - it may have to do with the infamous Thainess? Greed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
howzat Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Funny thing is I just been looking at an article about a well known politician who has a resort size home at Thanya Golf course and one of his state rooms has has an unusual number of magnificent full size tusks of an extraordinary size on display as mere ornaments. Not a good advert for young Leonardo's cause but am sure the said politician is a good mate of our beloved de facto pm in Dubai. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Payboy Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 We gonna take no orders from no beach bum. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsetBkk Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 <snip>Somkuan Maliwan, a representative from an ivory shop, said most ivoryproduct buyers were foreigners. "So, it will be hard to provide cooperation on this requirement. For others, we are willing to cooperate," she said. -- The Nation 2013-02-19 So if a Thai comes into his ivory shop and says "I want to buy ivory", he will say "No have. I am cooperating with the requirements of DNP chief Theerapat Prayurasiddhi." But if a farang says the same thing, he will say "How much do you want?". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harrry Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 (edited) Now if whales had ivory japan would be happy. They could have a scientific project on how whales can live without tusks. Edited February 19, 2013 by harrry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim walker Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 He must need his head looked as if he thinks anyone in Thailand will stop killing their wildlife and stop making money, that’s what the Ivory trade and tiger trade is all about money money and as we all know Thais are obsessed with greed and money. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lite Beer Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Thailand steps up measures to prevent illegal ivory trade. By Digital Media BANGKOK, Feb 19 - Thailand's National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department has instructed local ivory traders to beware of involvement with the illegal ivory trade. Deputy Director-General Theerapat Prayoonsit presided over a meeting of 60 local traders to educate them about the new regulations in order to prevent illegal ivory trade. The department asked for cooperation from ivory traders not to sell ivory products to foreigners as the goods may be shipped to other countries and the action is against the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Mr Theerapat said 277 foreigners bought ivory from Thailand and were arrested in other countries, so the kingdom was branded as the centre of ivory trade and a transit route of African ivory trade. Under the new regulations, ivory traders need to have certificates of origin to verify their products as well as commodity lists to report the amount of ivory and the products which are made from it. Sellers also have to keep record of their customers and have their papers identifying them. The department will instruct traders across the country before February 21, when department officials will start inspecting traders' operations. If they fail to follow the regulations, legal action will be taken against them. (MCOT online news). -- TNA 2013-02-19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loptr Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Thailand steps up measures to prevent illegal ivory trade. By Digital Media BANGKOK, Feb 19 - Thailand's National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department has instructed local ivory traders to beware of involvement with the illegal ivory trade. Right on cue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Thailand steps up measures to prevent illegal ivory trade. By Digital Media BANGKOK, Feb 19 - Thailand's National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department has instructed local ivory traders to beware of involvement with the illegal ivory trade. Deputy Director-General Theerapat Prayoonsit presided over a meeting of 60 local traders to educate them about the new regulations in order to prevent illegal ivory trade. The department asked for cooperation from ivory traders not to sell ivory products to foreigners as the goods may be shipped to other countries and the action is against the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Mr Theerapat said 277 foreigners bought ivory from Thailand and were arrested in other countries, so the kingdom was branded as the centre of ivory trade and a transit route of African ivory trade. Under the new regulations, ivory traders need to have certificates of origin to verify their products as well as commodity lists to report the amount of ivory and the products which are made from it. Sellers also have to keep record of their customers and have their papers identifying them. The department will instruct traders across the country before February 21, when department officials will start inspecting traders' operations. If they fail to follow the regulations, legal action will be taken against them. (MCOT online news). -- TNA 2013-02-19 I guess a certificate of origin just got quite expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeycountry Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 (edited) Wait It's not banned in TL? The more i know, the less I want to know I was thinking the same thing. I thought there was an international ban on this barbaric business. From what I understand: It's illegal to kill elphants/rhinos for their ivory, BUT you can trade ivory from animals that die of natural causes. This might be old info. Anybody that has more information please share, as I am also a bit grey about this issue. That is correct info. However, it is not possible to see on the ivory how or why the elephant died, so all ivory from Thai elephants then in effect becomes legal. Further, it can be difficult to distinguish African and Thai ivory, unless properly examined, so African Ivory is easily traded as Thai ivory once it gets into Thailand. Edited February 19, 2013 by monkeycountry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Of course Thai elephants are apparently dying in their thousands every year. Oooh, the shame of our reputation..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeycountry Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 (edited) Thailand steps up measures to prevent illegal ivory trade. By Digital Media BANGKOK, Feb 19 - Thailand's National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department has instructed local ivory traders to beware of involvement with the illegal ivory trade. Deputy Director-General Theerapat Prayoonsit presided over a meeting of 60 local traders to educate them about the new regulations in order to prevent illegal ivory trade. The department asked for cooperation from ivory traders not to sell ivory products to foreigners as the goods may be shipped to other countries and the action is against the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Mr Theerapat said 277 foreigners bought ivory from Thailand and were arrested in other countries, so the kingdom was branded as the centre of ivory trade and a transit route of African ivory trade. Under the new regulations, ivory traders need to have certificates of origin to verify their products as well as commodity lists to report the amount of ivory and the products which are made from it. Sellers also have to keep record of their customers and have their papers identifying them. The department will instruct traders across the country before February 21, when department officials will start inspecting traders' operations. If they fail to follow the regulations, legal action will be taken against them. (MCOT online news). -- TNA 2013-02-19 Thailand in a nutshell. Instead of a complete ban, which will make it very hard for anyone to do business, Thailand as always opts for the muddy middle way, so business can continue, and everyone involved, including police and politicians, can collect bribes. I am sure the customers will survive without ivory, so the only reason Thailand is doing it's best to eradicate elephants, is in order to protect the businesses of 60 ivory traders and some bribe collectors. What a shameful day to be Thai - but in my humble opinion every day is! Edited February 19, 2013 by monkeycountry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Payboy Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Thai elephants are not famous for their ivory. Most famous byproduct of Thai elephants now is beer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbamboo Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 (edited) Can you wait three months, Leo? If so we have just the man for the job. Edited February 19, 2013 by bigbamboo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 The other paper reports celebs are behind a petition of 500k to be presented to yingluck to stop this trade. Come on leo, get on the plane and bring cnn, bbc, and al jazeera. She can't say no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacksuitdandruff Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I had a "Hands Off My Pants" initiative a few years back. Didn't work very well then, not sure if it will work now again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soupdragon Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Thai elephants are not famous for their ivory. Most famous byproduct of Thai elephants now is beer. Or (crap) coffee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavender19 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 What line will Yingluck take to try to stand on both sides of the fence? The standard answer: That's a good question and the proper authority will give the proper answer at the proper time. Or, You Not Thai .You No Understand! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 For a country, with the elephant as one of its more iconic symbols to be trading in ivory is an abomination. If they can get offended over rosetta stone.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpippy Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Just in case you were curious about the hypocrisy of this environmental phase Leo is going through, and the involvement of Thai government... From Wikipedia: Controversy arose during the making of the film (The Beach) due to 20th Century Fox's bulldozing and landscaping of the natural beach setting of Ko Phi Phi Lee to make it more "paradise-like". The production altered some sand dunes and cleared some coconut trees and grass to widen the beach. Fox set aside a fund to reconstruct and return the beach to its natural state; however, lawsuits were filed by environmentalists who believed the damage to the ecosystem was permanent and restoration attempts had failed.[4] The lawsuits dragged on for years. In 2006, Thailand's Supreme Court upheld an appellate court ruling that the filming had harmed the environment and ordered that damage assessments be made. Defendants in the case included 20th Century Fox and some Thai government officials.[5] After the film premiered in Thailand in 2000, some Thai politicians were upset at the way Thailand was depicted in the film and called for it to be banned. The depiction of the drug culture was said to give Thailand a bad image and having a statue of Buddha in a bar was cited as "blasphemous".[6] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endure Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Just in case you were curious about the hypocrisy of this environmental phase Leo is going through, and the involvement of Thai government... From Wikipedia: Controversy arose during the making of the film (The Beach) due to 20th Century Fox's bulldozing and landscaping of the natural beach setting of Ko Phi Phi Lee to make it more "paradise-like". The production altered some sand dunes and cleared some coconut trees and grass to widen the beach. Fox set aside a fund to reconstruct and return the beach to its natural state; however, lawsuits were filed by environmentalists who believed the damage to the ecosystem was permanent and restoration attempts had failed.[4] The lawsuits dragged on for years. In 2006, Thailand's Supreme Court upheld an appellate court ruling that the filming had harmed the environment and ordered that damage assessments be made. Defendants in the case included 20th Century Fox and some Thai government officials.[5] After the film premiered in Thailand in 2000, some Thai politicians were upset at the way Thailand was depicted in the film and called for it to be banned. The depiction of the drug culture was said to give Thailand a bad image and having a statue of Buddha in a bar was cited as "blasphemous".[6] That was 13 years ago. Aren't people allowed to change or atone for their former mistakes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevvy Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Wow, the guy who was in 'The Beach' is barking orders at the Thai PM. So he's an authority on animal rights too. So gifted. Funny thing is, the Thai PM will probably ask for his autograph first. not barking just asking ... if anyone can stop trade good luck as we need this to stop .. so he has stood up and asked the PM and then he gets shit put on him from people like like .. 3 cheers for him 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacovl46 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Wow, the guy who was in 'The Beach' is barking orders at the Thai PM. So he's an authority on animal rights too. So gifted. Funny thing is, the Thai PM will probably ask for his autograph first. He didn't bark orders, he asked! Big difference! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hav Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 (edited) I haven't seen the link to the petition itself on here yet. I doubt if PM Yingluck will undertake anything to conserve elephants. Anyway, it is worth a try: http://action.panda....mpaign.id=17713 Edited February 19, 2013 by hav Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phronesis Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Is it me...or is Leonardo slowly morphing into Jack Nicholson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khaowong1 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Just in case you were curious about the hypocrisy of this environmental phase Leo is going through, and the involvement of Thai government... From Wikipedia: Controversy arose during the making of the film (The Beach) due to 20th Century Fox's bulldozing and landscaping of the natural beach setting of Ko Phi Phi Lee to make it more "paradise-like". The production altered some sand dunes and cleared some coconut trees and grass to widen the beach. Fox set aside a fund to reconstruct and return the beach to its natural state; however, lawsuits were filed by environmentalists who believed the damage to the ecosystem was permanent and restoration attempts had failed.[4] The lawsuits dragged on for years. In 2006, Thailand's Supreme Court upheld an appellate court ruling that the filming had harmed the environment and ordered that damage assessments be made. Defendants in the case included 20th Century Fox and some Thai government officials.[5] After the film premiered in Thailand in 2000, some Thai politicians were upset at the way Thailand was depicted in the film and called for it to be banned. The depiction of the drug culture was said to give Thailand a bad image and having a statue of Buddha in a bar was cited as "blasphemous".[6] Why am I not surprised that they found this film bad for Thailand's image.. On the other hand, how many bars have you been into in Thailand and not seen a statue of the Buddha somewhere with candles and incense sticks, fruit and flowers displayed all over it? Maybe they will have a arrest warrant ready for him or maybe ban him from entering the country.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianCR Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 (edited) Wow, the guy who was in 'The Beach' is barking orders at the Thai PM. So he's an authority on animal rights too. So gifted. Funny thing is, the Thai PM will probably ask for his autograph first. Guess he has more money (and power) than you so good luck to him Edited February 19, 2013 by BrianCR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now