Reds in bid to foil Democrat rally
The Nation on Sunday March 10, 2013 1:00 am

KHON Kaen: -- Hundreds of red shirts yesterday gathered in Khon Kaen University before a Democrat Party rally at the venue.

They also set up a stage on a loudspeaker truck with leaders giving a speech at the same time as the Democrats. Udon Thani red shirts leader Kwanchai Sarakham (Praipana) observed the rally in the area.

Party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva, former secretary-general Suthep Thaugsuban, spokesman Chavanond Intarakomalyasut, MP Issara Somchai and Withoon Nambutr took part in the rally.

Democrat MP Satit Wongnongtaey posted on Twitter that the red shirts had sealed the entrance to the university and had told the people via community radio that the Democrats' rally had been cancelled. However, the rally, which was scheduled to scrutinise the government on the amnesty law and its loans, went on as scheduled.

In Bangkok, a 76-year-old woman yesterday filed a complaint at the Democrat Party headquarters claiming a journal of the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration had doctored and published her picture.

The woman, Chitawan Putthikasetrin, was accompanied by a group of red shirts called Young United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship yesterday.

-- The Nation 2013-03-10

Don't you just love the freedom of speech policy of these red thugs?

The red shirts are just a bunch of pathetic criminal thugs. Just imagine if they won Bangkok when looking at the way these scum act in KK.

Anyone can have freedom of speech, so long as they wear red.

If the entrance was sealed, how did the rally go on as planned? The Democrats and supporters were already inside? I guess this is red style democracy - it's my way or the highway.

They do not want people to hear the otherside as it will establish the truth about the rice pledging scheme and the fiasco it has become

If the entrance was sealed, how did the rally go on as planned? The Democrats and supporters were already inside? I guess this is red style democracy - it's my way or the highway.

KK likes to claim it's the " red centre " of Thailand. If you remember at the time of the rioting in Bkk they blocked Highway 2 south and stopped an army train because it was taking soldiers south. Freedom of Speech is a joke here

Reminds one of the tactics used by the REd Brigade in many ways also the tactics used by the old Nazi party and their allies,shout down the opposition plant false information regarding meetings and venues etc, plant trouble makers in the crowd.

The Red Shirt sponsors have no doubt come to realise overt thuggery and widespread intimidation willful damage to property and arson tends to antagonize people.

Plan number two is being put into action, covert disruption of the system, low level intimidation and inconvenience to destroy what little democracy there currently is and to pave the way to a one party country governed by a megalomaniac and his clan and their brown nosing acolytes.

The increasing of the aforementioned groups looting of the state coffers all to benefit a few and the people of Thailand are on their way to becoming vassals bound by debt bondage.

This just shows the world just what a lot of thugs , this red shirt movement really are, their political arm should rein in these donkeys , as sometimes this sort of behaviour will in time turn against them , as people (even This) will become pissed off with them all and vote them out big time, having said that the red shirts political arm are generally the instigators of these peaceful meetings.

Wasn't there a policy implemented by DPM, Minister for everything Chalerm recently, that if one party booked a venue then opposition had to stay a certain distance away and not impede?

Perhaps that was only in Bangkok. Or perhaps it's only a one way street.

Come on red defenders, let's hear from your side please. So far this is a very one sided discussion for some reason.

The woman, Chitawan Putthikasetrin, was accompanied by a group of red shirts called Young United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship yesterday

Funny!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb_qHP7VaZE

The confusion here is, the Red Shirts are the PTP equivalent of the Hitler brown shirts, or the Moe Red Guard. The Red Shirts were sent there by the ruling party, to cause hate and discontent.

This just shows the world just what a lot of thugs , this red shirt movement really are, their political arm should rein in these donkeys , as sometimes this sort of behaviour will in time turn against them , as people (even This) will become pissed off with them all and vote them out big time, having said that the red shirts political arm are generally the instigators of these peaceful meetings.

It simply shows a few democratic people of Thailand what they are about. I doubt this even made news in Laos, and certainly not overseas...

-mel.

Wasn't there a policy implemented by DPM, Minister for everything Chalerm recently, that if one party booked a venue then opposition had to stay a certain distance away and not impede?

Perhaps that was only in Bangkok. Or perhaps it's only a one way street.

I believe that policy only holds true for red shirt demonstrations.

For others the policy is to get a policeman for every protestor and try to block of the protest site.

At least with that policy they double the size of the audience.

Of course I imagine the BIB assigned to keep the protest violence free unless they are the ones committing it are pre approved by the Red Shirts. Maybe even Jatuporn himself.

It strikes me that more and more defending the red shirts is becoming a matter of yelling lying and denial. Absulutly no evidenced to back up any thing they say.

I don't remember was there a maximum level of intelligence you could have to qualify for red shirt school on Democracy.

Say some thing like if you got out of the third grade after three years in it you were to over qualified for their school.

Wasn't there a policy implemented by DPM, Minister for everything Chalerm recently, that if one party booked a venue then opposition had to stay a certain distance away and not impede?

Perhaps that was only in Bangkok. Or perhaps it's only a one way street.

I believe that policy only holds true for red shirt demonstrations.

For others the policy is to get a policeman for every protestor and try to block of the protest site.

At least with that policy they double the size of the audience.

Of course I imagine the BIB assigned to keep the protest violence free unless they are the ones committing it are pre approved by the Red Shirts. Maybe even Jatuporn himself.

It strikes me that more and more defending the red shirts is becoming a matter of yelling lying and denial. Absulutly no evidenced to back up any thing they say.

I don't remember was there a maximum level of intelligence you could have to qualify for red shirt school on Democracy.

Say some thing like if you got out of the third grade after three years in it you were to over qualified for their school.

You know hellodolly it would be very enlightening to know just exactly what is the corriculum of these red schools that K Thida supposedly set up. If anyone on this forum knows this please respond. I am not saying this to cast aspersions at the reds, I would really like to know.

Wasn't there a policy implemented by DPM, Minister for everything Chalerm recently, that if one party booked a venue then opposition had to stay a certain distance away and not impede?

Perhaps that was only in Bangkok. Or perhaps it's only a one way street.

I believe that policy only holds true for red shirt demonstrations.

For others the policy is to get a policeman for every protestor and try to block of the protest site.

At least with that policy they double the size of the audience.

Of course I imagine the BIB assigned to keep the protest violence free unless they are the ones committing it are pre approved by the Red Shirts. Maybe even Jatuporn himself.

It strikes me that more and more defending the red shirts is becoming a matter of yelling lying and denial. Absulutly no evidenced to back up any thing they say.

I don't remember was there a maximum level of intelligence you could have to qualify for red shirt school on Democracy.

Say some thing like if you got out of the third grade after three years in it you were to over qualified for their school.

You know hellodolly it would be very enlightening to know just exactly what is the corriculum of these red schools that K Thida supposedly set up. If anyone on this forum knows this please respond. I am not saying this to cast aspersions at the reds, I would really like to know.

I would like to know also.

Wasn't there a policy implemented by DPM, Minister for everything Chalerm recently, that if one party booked a venue then opposition had to stay a certain distance away and not impede?

Perhaps that was only in Bangkok. Or perhaps it's only a one way street.

I believe that policy only holds true for red shirt demonstrations.

For others the policy is to get a policeman for every protestor and try to block of the protest site.

At least with that policy they double the size of the audience.

Of course I imagine the BIB assigned to keep the protest violence free unless they are the ones committing it are pre approved by the Red Shirts. Maybe even Jatuporn himself.

It strikes me that more and more defending the red shirts is becoming a matter of yelling lying and denial. Absulutly no evidenced to back up any thing they say.

I don't remember was there a maximum level of intelligence you could have to qualify for red shirt school on Democracy.

Say some thing like if you got out of the third grade after three years in it you were to over qualified for their school.

You know hellodolly it would be very enlightening to know just exactly what is the corriculum of these red schools that K Thida supposedly set up. If anyone on this forum knows this please respond. I am not saying this to cast aspersions at the reds, I would really like to know.

I would like to know also.

Well judging by the actions of the graduates it had to be some thing requiring a lack of being in touch with reality.

I would imagine there was one session on yelling louder than any one who disagrees with you. Judging by there use of matches at the time there was probably a class on arson and with the goings on in Bangkok at the time a course on fire arms and barricade building.

If any one missed it I have a very low opinion of the school.

Wasn't there a policy implemented by DPM, Minister for everything Chalerm recently, that if one party booked a venue then opposition had to stay a certain distance away and not impede?

Perhaps that was only in Bangkok. Or perhaps it's only a one way street.

I believe that policy only holds true for red shirt demonstrations.

For others the policy is to get a policeman for every protestor and try to block of the protest site.

At least with that policy they double the size of the audience.

Of course I imagine the BIB assigned to keep the protest violence free unless they are the ones committing it are pre approved by the Red Shirts. Maybe even Jatuporn himself.

It strikes me that more and more defending the red shirts is becoming a matter of yelling lying and denial. Absulutly no evidenced to back up any thing they say.

I don't remember was there a maximum level of intelligence you could have to qualify for red shirt school on Democracy.

Say some thing like if you got out of the third grade after three years in it you were to over qualified for their school.

You know hellodolly it would be very enlightening to know just exactly what is the corriculum of these red schools that K Thida supposedly set up. If anyone on this forum knows this please respond. I am not saying this to cast aspersions at the reds, I would really like to know.

I would like to know also.

Well judging by the actions of the graduates it had to be some thing requiring a lack of being in touch with reality.

I would imagine there was one session on yelling louder than any one who disagrees with you. Judging by there use of matches at the time there was probably a class on arson and with the goings on in Bangkok at the time a course on fire arms and barricade building.

If any one missed it I have a very low opinion of the school.

Quoting Ronald Reagan "there you go again". Why don't you stop beating around the bush and tell us what you really think :-).

Wasn't there a policy implemented by DPM, Minister for everything Chalerm recently, that if one party booked a venue then opposition had to stay a certain distance away and not impede?

Perhaps that was only in Bangkok. Or perhaps it's only a one way street.

I believe that policy only holds true for red shirt demonstrations.

For others the policy is to get a policeman for every protestor and try to block of the protest site.

At least with that policy they double the size of the audience.

Of course I imagine the BIB assigned to keep the protest violence free unless they are the ones committing it are pre approved by the Red Shirts. Maybe even Jatuporn himself.

It strikes me that more and more defending the red shirts is becoming a matter of yelling lying and denial. Absulutly no evidenced to back up any thing they say.

I don't remember was there a maximum level of intelligence you could have to qualify for red shirt school on Democracy.

Say some thing like if you got out of the third grade after three years in it you were to over qualified for their school.

You know hellodolly it would be very enlightening to know just exactly what is the corriculum of these red schools that K Thida supposedly set up. If anyone on this forum knows this please respond. I am not saying this to cast aspersions at the reds, I would really like to know.

I would like to know also.

I bet they don't teach English!

It's all quite scary that red schools are being set up, I wasn't aware of that little gem.

Wasn't there a policy implemented by DPM, Minister for everything Chalerm recently, that if one party booked a venue then opposition had to stay a certain distance away and not impede?

Perhaps that was only in Bangkok. Or perhaps it's only a one way street.

I believe that policy only holds true for red shirt demonstrations.

For others the policy is to get a policeman for every protestor and try to block of the protest site.

At least with that policy they double the size of the audience.

Of course I imagine the BIB assigned to keep the protest violence free unless they are the ones committing it are pre approved by the Red Shirts. Maybe even Jatuporn himself.

It strikes me that more and more defending the red shirts is becoming a matter of yelling lying and denial. Absulutly no evidenced to back up any thing they say.

I don't remember was there a maximum level of intelligence you could have to qualify for red shirt school on Democracy.

Say some thing like if you got out of the third grade after three years in it you were to over qualified for their school.

You know hellodolly it would be very enlightening to know just exactly what is the corriculum of these red schools that K Thida supposedly set up. If anyone on this forum knows this please respond. I am not saying this to cast aspersions at the reds, I would really like to know.

There is more aptly : There is no MINIMUM IQ for a Red School.;

Not standards of morality and actions employable.

The primary curriculum requirement is;

Believe and Repeat Often

As to the topic, the false and stolen concept ; that these people are actually a party of Democracy,

is completely undermined by their long standing and consecutive repressions of dissenting voices.

Though the name says Democracy, the playbook they are clearly working from is a bastardisation

of the Maoist methodology that took over China. Enlist and co-opt the rich as backers,

until they are no longer useful, convince the poor that they are fighting for their own cause,

even if they are no more than expendable pawns, and utterly control the ruling class umbrella

of controllers with a combination of riches, personal prestige aggrandisement, and threats to

their position and face. And it works faster today, because of the communications methods of today,

while concurrently becomes more unwieldy because of the same communications speed, and demands

faster response times, to block out or stifle dissenting view points that might actually

be considered by the poor pawns in the plan. If they suddenly comprehend they are not

going to see daylight for all their risk and effort, then they will turn like a dog

beaten by it's master one times too many.

Any country that incorporates the word Democratic in it's official name more often than not isn't. I wonder how long the lifespan of 'The Kingdom of Thailand' will be.

This just shows the world just what a lot of thugs , this red shirt movement really are, their political arm should rein in these donkeys , as sometimes this sort of behaviour will in time turn against them , as people (even This) will become pissed off with them all and vote them out big time, having said that the red shirts political arm are generally the instigators of these peaceful meetings.

If the PT want yet another reason why the people voted against their candidate in BKK here it is. No one wants to be bullied.

The Thai kids might like to dress like Nazis but the red shirts sometimes behave like them.

I believe that policy only holds true for red shirt demonstrations.

For others the policy is to get a policeman for every protestor and try to block of the protest site.

At least with that policy they double the size of the audience.

Of course I imagine the BIB assigned to keep the protest violence free unless they are the ones committing it are pre approved by the Red Shirts. Maybe even Jatuporn himself.

It strikes me that more and more defending the red shirts is becoming a matter of yelling lying and denial. Absulutly no evidenced to back up any thing they say.

I don't remember was there a maximum level of intelligence you could have to qualify for red shirt school on Democracy.

Say some thing like if you got out of the third grade after three years in it you were to over qualified for their school.You know hellodolly it would be very enlightening to know just exactly what is the corriculum of these red schools that K Thida supposedly set up. If anyone on this forum knows this please respond. I am not saying this to cast aspersions at the reds, I would really like to know.

I would like to know also.

I bet they don't teach English!

It's all quite scary that red schools are being set up, I wasn't aware of that little gem.

Actually this is not completely new. These 'red democracy schools' appeared at least a year back.

At that time there were reports that there was no curriculum, no literateure or handouts on democracy, just replays of hate speeches and handouts of hate literature and hate based DVDs etc.

Would certainly be interesting to get some up to date information on their activities / structure / content / literature etc.

Wasn't there a policy implemented by DPM, Minister for everything Chalerm recently, that if one party booked a venue then opposition had to stay a certain distance away and not impede?

Perhaps that was only in Bangkok. Or perhaps it's only a one way street.

I think you'll find he meant if PT and their fascist supporters booked a venue everyone else had to stay away. However if their storm troopers don't like the dems or anyone else holding an event they can do whatever they like.

Wasn't there a policy implemented by DPM, Minister for everything Chalerm recently, that if one party booked a venue then opposition had to stay a certain distance away and not impede?

Perhaps that was only in Bangkok. Or perhaps it's only a one way street.

I believe that policy only holds true for red shirt demonstrations.

For others the policy is to get a policeman for every protestor and try to block of the protest site.

At least with that policy they double the size of the audience.

Of course I imagine the BIB assigned to keep the protest violence free unless they are the ones committing it are pre approved by the Red Shirts. Maybe even Jatuporn himself.

It strikes me that more and more defending the red shirts is becoming a matter of yelling lying and denial. Absulutly no evidenced to back up any thing they say.

I don't remember was there a maximum level of intelligence you could have to qualify for red shirt school on Democracy.

Say some thing like if you got out of the third grade after three years in it you were to over qualified for their school.

You know hellodolly it would be very enlightening to know just exactly what is the corriculum of these red schools that K Thida supposedly set up. If anyone on this forum knows this please respond. I am not saying this to cast aspersions at the reds, I would really like to know.

I would like to know also.

I bet they don't teach English!

It's all quite scary that red schools are being set up, I wasn't aware of that little gem.

I believe the school song is a version of Prodigy's "fire starter".

Wasn't there a policy implemented by DPM, Minister for everything Chalerm recently, that if one party booked a venue then opposition had to stay a certain distance away and not impede?

Perhaps that was only in Bangkok. Or perhaps it's only a one way street.

I think you'll find he meant if PT and their fascist supporters booked a venue everyone else had to stay away. However if their storm troopers don't like the dems or anyone else holding an event they can do whatever they like.

Or perhaps it was an 'on the moment' but meaningless ear medicine induced response.

Let the DAAD shout for their bespoke democracy,the democratic system isn't perfect but... right is always right even if the majority oppose it and wrong is always wrong though the majority oppose it,that's why countries have constitutions to serve ALL not just the majority.The PT party wish to abolish the Administrative Court system as we know it...can the constitutional court be far behind...dont those guys in black remind you of Münich in the 30s-Orwells pigs had their Napoleon too.

Come on red defenders, let's hear from your side please. So far this is a very one sided discussion for some reason.

hello

Red democracy in action, Amazing Thailand