Rc2702 Posted January 20, 2017 Posted January 20, 2017 23 hours ago, BangrakBob said: https://tomkinstimes.com/2017/01/easier-to-embrace-a-comfortable-lie-than-an-uncomfortable-truth/ Cracking article by Chris Rowland, I'm not sure whether to post here or on the United thread Nice site thanks. Good article. 1
wilai Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 Matip cleared to play, with immediate effect. 1
Chicog Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 For those that don't speak Spanish, Llorente just shouted "Vamos" to the crowd, or loosely translated: "Let's Go!" or "Come on!".
Chicog Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 You're OK lads, Swansea have never won a league game at Anfield.
3 minus 2 Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 i bumped into a scoucer in the gym and i meant to tell him that i really rated llorrente ,,,,,, great header,, 2-1 ,game on
Chicog Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 Pulled the tiger's tail. Mind you Swansea have rather been riding their luck.
3 minus 2 Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, Chicog said: Pulled the tiger's tail. Mind you Swansea have rather been riding their luck. you think so ,, plenty of liverpool possession , but dont think they tested the keeper, still they should now go on and win
Chicog Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 10 minutes ago, 3 minus 2 said: you think so ,, plenty of liverpool possession , but dont think they tested the keeper, still they should now go on and win I don't know if that's your fault or mine. 1
3 minus 2 Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 2 minutes ago, Chicog said: I don't know if that's your fault or mine. i'm blaming bob
Bredbury Blue Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 Damn, i was watching Eddie the Eagle movie as i thought it was a banker.
BangrakBob Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 3 hours ago, 3 minus 2 said: i'm blaming bob Feckers the pair of ya!
BangrakBob Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 We never seem to have a plan B. Again very flat, no urgency, pace, fluidity. Too many games and not enough depth. Whether Matip got to train in the last session of not I would have had him on the park instead of Klavan. I'm now of the opinion Can is just not good enough. Worst showing by Hendo I've seen in a long time. How do you go to OT and they get a late equalised goal and the next week Swansea put 3 past you at home. We've not won a game without Mane. Going to be a long run in and a difficult job to hang on to 4th.
3 minus 2 Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 disagree wwith hoddle yeah looks balanced but with cities pace and guile wimmer is efinatly exploitable behind rose. whoops sori guys wrong thread !!!!!
petermik Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 I read a comment last week from a scouse contributer on this forum saying United were long ball merchants and ale-house footballers,I would like his take on Liverpools tactics in the last 20 minutes of this game 2
carmine Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 I read an interesting piece regards Klopp's tactics for this in that Liverpools forward play is based around the pace of Mane, yet in his absence Klopp still tried to play the same rather than adapt in his absence. Thoughts? Second point was in his decision to play two sitting midfielders, at Anfield to the bottom of the league side thats conceded the most goals? Valid points?
meatboy Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 gee i have just seen the result,hang on let me look again. are you alright STEVIE ? nevermind what chicog was watching i would have loved to watch the antics of KLIPPITY KLOP. i feel there will be more than a few on that ferry cross the mersy. 1
BangrakBob Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 7 hours ago, carmine said: I read an interesting piece regards Klopp's tactics for this in that Liverpools forward play is based around the pace of Mane, yet in his absence Klopp still tried to play the same rather than adapt in his absence. Thoughts? Second point was in his decision to play two sitting midfielders, at Anfield to the bottom of the league side thats conceded the most goals? Valid points? Our attack is not based around Mane, but he is a massive part of it. His pace is so often the catalyst that pull the gaps open for the likes of Coutinho, Firmino and Lallana. Mane is missed big time, and it is obviously quite evident. I don't understand why Klopp hasn't thrown Ojo in, in Mane's absence. Instead Lallana slots in and that is why you have Can playing with Gini and Hendo. i'd prefer Ojo or even Sturridge out wide and Lallana back with Gini and Hendo holding. You have to remember we've had a lot of injuries throughout the season, and Klopp has been having to constantly tinker, cover and change the starting line up because of this and now the amount of games being played in January and we have lost the momentum. It just exposes the fact we have a great starting 11 when fit and available, but lack of quality in depth is very obvious. 2
BangrakBob Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 17 hours ago, petermik said: I read a comment last week from a scouse contributer on this forum saying United were long ball merchants and ale-house footballers,I would like his take on Liverpools tactics in the last 20 minutes of this game What you are on about last 20 mins? Throwing Matip on injury time is hardly comparable. 1
meatboy Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 what games i have seen,i would say MR.KLOP is as frustrated as most LIV. supporters.they just havent got the players. milner and henderson are just about it.
carmine Posted January 23, 2017 Posted January 23, 2017 2 hours ago, meatboy said: what games i have seen,i would say MR.KLOP is as frustrated as most LIV. supporters.they just havent got the players. milner and henderson are just about it. Huh?!!! 2
StevieH Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 On 22/01/2017 at 6:01 PM, BangrakBob said: Our attack is not based around Mane, but he is a massive part of it. His pace is so often the catalyst that pull the gaps open for the likes of Coutinho, Firmino and Lallana. Mane is missed big time, and it is obviously quite evident. I don't understand why Klopp hasn't thrown Ojo in, in Mane's absence. Instead Lallana slots in and that is why you have Can playing with Gini and Hendo. i'd prefer Ojo or even Sturridge out wide and Lallana back with Gini and Hendo holding. You have to remember we've had a lot of injuries throughout the season, and Klopp has been having to constantly tinker, cover and change the starting line up because of this and now the amount of games being played in January and we have lost the momentum. It just exposes the fact we have a great starting 11 when fit and available, but lack of quality in depth is very obvious. yeah that's about the size of it. what is annoying is that it was clear in the summer that we were going to miss mane when the ACN came around. we knew about it well in advance, he was obviously klopp's number one signing and vital to the way he wants to play, and we didn't get any real cover in for him. and that's coming home to roost now. our squad is thin, our owners are skinflints and we operate to make a profit apparently. that's not how you win trophies in this day and age though. i do think jurgen got it wrong against swansea though, in line with carmine's comment above. henderson, can and wijnaldum is way too deep and functional a midfield three for that match. and it moves lallana from his best position at the top of that three as well, which really hurts us. you start, particularly for home games against teams you need to be beating, with firmino through the middle, coutinho off the left, lallana at the top of the three so he can break the lines and you fill in the other spots from there. if that means starting young ojo on the right with a remit to run at them and scare them with pace, you do it. because both origi and sturridge have shown they can't do that job and moving firmino out of the middle to play one of them two as a number 9 just weakens us again. in short, we're about 3 or 4 top quality players light. we should have tried to sign someone this january but it's always a horribly difficult time to get anyone. we ballsed up in the summer. we'll probably balls up again this summer, because our owners. it's frustrating. 2
wilai Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 8 hours ago, StevieH said: in short, we're about 3 or 4 top quality players light. we should have tried to sign someone this january but it's always a horribly difficult time to get anyone. We did Stevie....Draxler......But PSG blew us out of the water wages wise...more than twice as much I heard Bugger has started brilliantly for them as well!
Chicog Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/liverpool-ready-pay-philippe-coutinho-9685431 1
StevieH Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 good news. interesting that there's no buyout clause in it apparently. not that i guess that matters if barcelona come along with £100m anyway. 2
smokie36 Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 7 hours ago, StevieH said: good news. interesting that there's no buyout clause in it apparently. not that i guess that matters if barcelona come along with £100m anyway. Always haply to see quality players remain in the premiership. Hope he along with others make their stay a long one. 2
Rc2702 Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Great stats for coutinho too. 163 apps since 2013 and still only 24. A beauty by Rodgers at 8.5m
champers Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Liverpool do glory nights and I don't think they will lose 2 on the bounce. 3-1. 1
mrbojangles Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 A couple of posts removed. Sorry guys, you know the rules about gambling
Recommended Posts