Maestro Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Already in January 2010 the UK government banned the export of these bomb detectors, previously sold by McCormick to Iraq with the brand name ADE-651 Page last updated at 16:56 GMT, Friday, 22 January 2010 Export ban for useless 'bomb detector'By Caroline Hawley and Meirion JonesBBC Newsnight The UK government has announced a ban on the export to Iraq and Afghanistan of some so-called "bomb detectors". It follows an investigation by the BBC's Newsnight programme which found that one type of "detector" made by a British company cannot work. The Iraqi government has spent $85m on the ADE-651 and there are concerns that they have failed to stop bomb attacks that have killed hundreds of people. Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8471187.stm -- BBC 2010-01-22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestro Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 A video clip uploaded to YouTube by James Randi, who is mentioned in the above BBC report, on 23 January 2010: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveyinasia Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 I can only image how much back peddling and finger pointing will be going on amongst the "Generals" now that these this have finally been deemed as fakes. How much in under the table was paid to these genius's for their part in this joke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corkythecat Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 (edited) Is there any reporting in any of the local media ? Edited April 25, 2013 by corkythecat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webfact Posted April 25, 2013 Author Share Posted April 25, 2013 Army chief urges the public stop criticizing GT200 fraud BANGKOK, 25 April 2013 (NNT) – Thailand's army chief general Prayuth Chan-ocha has asked the public to stop making comments or criticisms about the controversial bomb detector GT200 procurement. Full story: http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/635208-thai-army-chief-urges-the-public-to-stop-criticizing-gt200-fraud/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Funny this. They will accept a certificate for this, but the fda of Thailand won't accept European testing on products. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KunMatt Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Wow, it is astonishing that anybody bought even one of these devices; The GT200 consists of three main components—a swivelling antenna mounted via a hinge to a plastic handgrip, into which sensor cards can be inserted. It requires no battery or other power source and is said to be powered solely by the user's static electricity. The device becomes active when the operator starts moving and detects various substances via "DIA/PARA magnetism"Promotional material issued about the GT200 claims that it can detect a wide variety of items including ammunition, explosives, drugs, gold, ivory, currency, tobacco and "human bodies" at ranges of up to 700 metres (2,300 ft) on the surface, depths of up to 60 metres (200 ft) underground or under 800 metres (2,600 ft) of water, or even from aircraft at an altitude of up to 4 kilometres (2.5 mi) After they bought these devices didn't they think of conducting some tests on the working parameters of the detector so they could know how to train the people who would be using them? At that point during testing or training surely they would realise that the device does not actually work in any way or, if not then, obviously after 5 years of useless readings and multiple fatalities caused by the ineffectiveness of this device then they would realise they are just expensive sticks? Surely? No?? I can find at least 5 occasions where the device was used in real life scenarios to search for bombs and after an all clear was given the undetected bomb detonated. After the first time wouldn't somebody question the reliability of the device or at least question if it was being used in the correct way? No?? There are also hundreds of false positives where hundreds of (probably innocent) people have been jailed because of these sticks. No official questioned whether it was down to the device rather than the hundreds of people who were unlinked to any bombings? No?? It really is quite astonishing that everything above continued for 5 years without 1 person having the logical thinking or balls to question whether a magic contraband detecting stick really works and if so why are all of these people dying from bombs once the magic stick has been used. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
belg Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 so thailand spent 400 million baht on this joke and none of them cared to open one to see what was inside ? niceeeeeeeeezzz... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bangon04 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 "We may also ask for the delivery of evidence in the future." So it hasn't been a complete waste , then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim walker Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 If something sounds too good to be true, then it usually is. I am sure the various magnificent military departments might have learnt a simple lesson from this fiasco, like plug it in and switch it on and test it on real explosives and ivory and people etc.’ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chas39 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Come on. Be fair. The company did have glossy brochures. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Wanchai Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 So? How much was involved this time and who are the Thai people (experts) responsible for due diligence as to their actual ability to 'detect'? That at least should lead DSI to the money trail as to who got paid. The criminal here is the British person, and you all are making it look like the Thais are to blame. You surely stick up for your own kind and down playing his crime. Innit ? Is this what you call cricket ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiyada Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 I think the whole thing is quite funny. Any device that can find drugs, people, ivory and explosives from a distance must be suspect. One can only assume that no one actually cared if they work or not, as long as the cash was in their pocket. Either that, or the top brass are simpletons of the first order, who shouldn't be trusted with a floormop. I don't think those who died relying on the device or all those innocent people that got jailed for the machines supposed results will be of the same mind as you nor the average Thai who once again got ripped off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post simple1 Posted April 25, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted April 25, 2013 So? How much was involved this time and who are the Thai people (experts) responsible for due diligence as to their actual ability to 'detect'? That at least should lead DSI to the money trail as to who got paid. The criminal here is the British person, and you all are making it look like the Thais are to blame. You surely stick up for your own kind and down playing his crime. Innit ? Is this what you call cricket ?? Sure the vendor is a criminal fraudster, but so is the company (majority Thai owned?) in Thailand who acted as his distributor/reseller. You can also logically state the Thai personnel in the various departments who purchased and deployed the product are not just negligent, but traitors to their own people who have been killed or injured due to the device being used operationally. From your many posts negating foreigners it's about time for you to acknowledge the endemic corruption in Thailand that causes so many negative flow on effects for the people of Thailand, such as this case. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bangkokheat Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 traitors indeed simple 1, and they should be tried as such, perhaps that will send a shockwave thru thailand, if not the world, disgusting bastards, another negative tick for thailand 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 So? How much was involved this time and who are the Thai people (experts) responsible for due diligence as to their actual ability to 'detect'? That at least should lead DSI to the money trail as to who got paid. The criminal here is the British person, and you all are making it look like the Thais are to blame. You surely stick up for your own kind and down playing his crime. Innit ? Is this what you call cricket ?? Yes, they also have a global problem with corruption in cricket I hear. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atyclb Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 I am astounded and amazed by Pornthip's siding with the effectiveness of the devices. Pornthip is no ones fool, a very clever, "outside the box' woman well learned in the scientific method. Unless I am mistaken, she completed residency training in pathology at Walter Reade Hospital in USA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Payboy Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 UK invites Thai team to testify as victim in GT200, Alpha 6 scam It really working in Thailand milord, Thai bomb not same-same Inglaaand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 I am astounded and amazed by Pornthip's siding with the effectiveness of the devices. Pornthip is no ones fool, a very clever, "outside the box' woman well learned in the scientific method. Unless I am mistaken, she completed residency training in pathology at Walter Reade Hospital in USA. Well the evidence would tend to suggest otherwise, m'Lord. She is a tool to be called on when needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suradit69 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 (edited) So? How much was involved this time and who are the Thai people (experts) responsible for due diligence as to their actual ability to 'detect'? That at least should lead DSI to the money trail as to who got paid. So these things were marketed at trade fairs "backed by UK government departments," hundreds of people may have died because of the fraud and he (the former UK policeman) may get up to 8 years in prison. A bit of wrist slapping (or back slapping). "Also in January, the United Kingdom banned the export of the detectors to Iraq and Afghanistan, while arresting a former British police officer ..." "McCormick, who faces up to eight years in jail when he is sentenced next month, also sold the detectors to Niger, Syria, Mexico and other countries including Lebanon where a United Nations agency was a client." " A jury at the Old Bailey found Jim McCormick, 57, from near Taunton, Somerset, guilty on three counts of fraud over a scam that included the sale of £55m of devices based on a novelty golfball finder to Iraq. They were installed at checkpoints in Baghdad through which car bombs and suicide bombers passed, killing hundreds of civilians. Last month they remained in use at checkpoints across the Iraqi capital. The court heard the devices had been marketed at international trade fairs that were backed by UK government departments." http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/apr/23/somerset-business-guilty-fake-bombs Edited April 25, 2013 by Suradit69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MobileContent Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 So? How much was involved this time and who are the Thai people (experts) responsible for due diligence as to their actual ability to 'detect'? That at least should lead DSI to the money trail as to who got paid. The criminal here is the British person, and you all are making it look like the Thais are to blame. You surely stick up for your own kind and down playing his crime. Innit ? Is this what you call cricket ?? The English guy is a crook of course but he seem t have sold the devices for 400 million Baht to Thailand and the Thai distributor sold it for around 1100 million Baht. The Thai distributor should have tested the device but to much money was involved. TIT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markaew Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Imagine that. Thailand getting scammed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maidu Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 The prices various Thai agencies paid for the bogus Alpha 6 item varied between Bt.424,000 and Bt.1.85 million. Data below is culled from today's article in Nation newspaper Purchases of GT200 and Alpha 6 devices by 13 government agencies and provincial administrations (Agencies/from company/numbers of unit/unit price/dates of purchase)1. The Department of the Provincial Administration/Jackson Electronics (Thailand)/which purchases 63 Alpha 6 units at Bt530,952 apiece in March 20092. Yala provincial authorities/UCG Engineering/17 Alpha 6 units/Bt1,850,588/August 20093. Phitsanulok provincial authorities/M Land Darch/1 Alpha 6 unit/Bt1,647,800/May 20084. Phuket provincial authorities/UCG/2 Alpha 6 units/Bt550,000/July 20095. The Customs Department/AVA Satcom/6 GT200 units/Bt426,666.66/June 20096. Sing Buri police/UCG/6 GT200 units/Bt550,000/February 20097. Chainat police/AVA/1 GT200 unit/Bt550,000/unknown date8. Songkhla provincial administrative organisation/UCG/5 GT200 units/Bt999,000/March 20099. Phetchaburi provincial authorities/UCG/1 GT200 unit/Bt850,000/September 200910. The Office of Narcotics Control Board/Jackson/10 Alpha 6 units/Bt424,800/July 2008Jackson/5 Alpha 6 units/Bt424,800/August 200811. Central Institute of Forensic Science ThailandAVA/1 GT200 unit/Bt1,120,000/December 2007AVA/1 GT200 unit/Bt1,120,000/September 2008AVA/4 GT200 units/Bt1,120,000/January 2009ASLM Traiding/2 Alpha 6 units/Bt447,000/December 200812. Armed Forces Security Centre Jackson/8 Alpha 6 units/Bt1,300,000/August 200913. The Army’s Ordnance Department/AVA/747 GT200 units in 12 purchases/unknown dates/ At various unit prices of Bt1,250,000, of Bt950,000, of Bt1,291,304.35, and of Bt900,000 Maidu's comment: at least 13 Thai agencies got duped, paying tens of millions of baht for a completely bogus item. If any of the agencies did any independent studies, the they failed there also, unless they knowingly paid ridiculous amounts for bogus items. No matter how you slice it, Thai bureaucracy screwed up majorly. Don't expect them to add to add anything to scientific discussions at an investigation. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KunMatt Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 The prices various Thai agencies paid for the bogus Alpha 6 item varied between Bt.424,000 and Bt.1.85 million. Data below is culled from today's article in Nation newspaper Purchases of GT200 and Alpha 6 devices by 13 government agencies and provincial administrations (Agencies/from company/numbers of unit/unit price/dates of purchase) 1. The Department of the Provincial Administration/Jackson Electronics (Thailand)/which purchases 63 Alpha 6 units at Bt530,952 apiece in March 2009 2. Yala provincial authorities/UCG Engineering/17 Alpha 6 units/Bt1,850,588/August 2009 3. Phitsanulok provincial authorities/M Land Darch/1 Alpha 6 unit/Bt1,647,800/May 2008 4. Phuket provincial authorities/UCG/2 Alpha 6 units/Bt550,000/July 2009 5. The Customs Department/AVA Satcom/6 GT200 units/Bt426,666.66/June 2009 6. Sing Buri police/UCG/6 GT200 units/Bt550,000/February 2009 7. Chainat police/AVA/1 GT200 unit/Bt550,000/unknown date 8. Songkhla provincial administrative organisation/UCG/5 GT200 units/Bt999,000/March 2009 9. Phetchaburi provincial authorities/UCG/1 GT200 unit/Bt850,000/September 2009 10. The Office of Narcotics Control Board/ Jackson/10 Alpha 6 units/Bt424,800/July 2008 Jackson/5 Alpha 6 units/Bt424,800/August 2008 11. Central Institute of Forensic Science Thailand AVA/1 GT200 unit/Bt1,120,000/December 2007 AVA/1 GT200 unit/Bt1,120,000/September 2008 AVA/4 GT200 units/Bt1,120,000/January 2009 ASLM Traiding/2 Alpha 6 units/Bt447,000/December 2008 12. Armed Forces Security Centre Jackson/8 Alpha 6 units/Bt1,300,000/August 2009 13. The Army’s Ordnance Department/AVA/747 GT200 units in 12 purchases/unknown dates/ At various unit prices of Bt1,250,000, of Bt950,000, of Bt1,291,304.35, and of Bt900,000 Maidu's comment: at least 13 Thai agencies got duped, paying tens of millions of baht for a completely bogus item. If any of the agencies did any independent studies, the they failed there also, unless they knowingly paid ridiculous amounts for bogus items. No matter how you slice it, Thai bureaucracy screwed up majorly. Don't expect them to add to add anything to scientific discussions at an investigation. Your list shows the price that government bought the devices from the local Thai agent for. The Thai agent bought them from the UK company for much less than it sold them on for (about a third of the price I believe), so the agencies didn't get scammed, they made the most money from this scam/hoax (along with whatever kickbacks to officials). Whether the agencies and officials knew the devices were fake is another matter. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsailor35 Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 OK, let them testify, and at the same time name the person or minister responsible for buying these stupid tools be named and also make sure the Brits disclose just how much was paid to the persons concerned to push the deal through. One tiny nail in the coffin of corruption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsailor35 Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 (edited) Iraqi General Jihad al-Jabiri is in jail because he approved the purchase of these fake bomb detectors. Where is General Prayuth today The RTA will not admit to anything due to avoiding "Loss of face" but now the whole of the Thai nation will have to suffer loss of face. Thailand will be the joke of the world and considered first rate fools. Edited April 26, 2013 by oldsailor35 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsailor35 Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 To be fair to the Thai authorities, they weren't the only ones taken in. These devices were used in Iraq and Afghanistan. Private Eye have been reporting on this for years. There's going to be a highly entertaining display of Olympic-standard arse covering. Right up there alongside other 3rd world countries ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsailor35 Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 It is good to see the DSI investigating this, and I'd hope-against-hope that the NAAC would prosecute the guilty, and not just some low-level fall-guy either. Who are the NAAC? NACC National Anti-Corruption Commission Who are supposed to represent and protect the nation as a whole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsailor35 Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 The guy should be given an award for selling cr@p into Thailand! I wonder if he managed to sell it to the Chinese too? Offer a big enough "back hander" and you will sell anything in Thailand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsailor35 Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 So? How much was involved this time and who are the Thai people (experts) responsible for due diligence as to their actual ability to 'detect'? That at least should lead DSI to the money trail as to who got paid. The criminal here is the British person, and you all are making it look like the Thais are to blame. You surely stick up for your own kind and down playing his crime. Innit ? Is this what you call cricket ?? Did'nt know that they were bought for the RTA by the British ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now