Jump to content

Woolwich Attack: ' Soldier Beheaded' By Ranting Fanatics On Busy London Street


Recommended Posts

Posted

Allahu Akbar” - God is Great

i think this means our god is greatest, Allah Akbar is god is great.

Whichever, but still sounds like a suspected radical Islamist attack by radical fanatics as stated by the OP

  • Like 1
  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

The courts and the justice system are there to punish offenders AFTER they have offended. The courts are powerless to prevent the offences happening, that is the remit of effective, objective, unbiased policing and Government policies to enable such Policing. If the majority of a population who are terrorised do not believe that effective law enforcement is taking place or that the Government is woefully neglectful in it's duties then what do you think is going to happen. The truth is that had effective, honest and fair legislation been in place, then Lee Rigby would be at home with his family, because Choudary and all his hate mongering followers would either be in jail or 'returned to sender'.

I beleive that the security services work to prevent many of these incidents before they even occur, and we will never know about them. Hate speech, or whatever you want to call it, is never acceptable. But it presents a condunrum. Smarter people than you or I are struggling with how you shut a bloke like that down without trampling on the rights of every other law abiding person in society to have their voice. It is an easy and slipperly slope from outlawing your Chodury's of the world to clamping down on normal dissident voices - a la Thailand for instance.

If you have an answer to that one you are a better man than I.

Well, I am sorry but I win then. Hate speech is well defined, in fact an 85 year old woman and many young people have been arrested over the last few days for speaking or tweeting what is defined as hateful speech. All that is required is that the same standard is applied to everyone, including MUslims and then those radicals that are found in breech of the hatred laws would be arrested and dealt with accordingly. This really is not rocket science. This is caused by politicians wanting to secure the votes of 3 million people who are known to be over sensitive and volatile when it comes to any form of criticism of their life style or doctrine. The issue that I think Cameron is perhaps starting to realise is that you can now secure 3 million votes but lose 20 million votes if the present policies remain adhered to. So really, the answer and the implementation of that answer is really simple and it does not breech European Law, it simply sets the same standard across society with NO exceptions.

Can you explain to me what you mean by "over sensitive and volatile when it comes to any form of criticism of their life style or doctrine."? I'd be interested in examples of what you think is a valid form of criticism where overly sensitive offense was taken. I'm not sure governments should be telling people on how they live their lives, but obviously you seem to indicate that they should? I for one would be outraged in a government came in and told me how to live my life.

Maybe I've read your post the wrong way.

Edited by samran
Posted (edited)

I must admit being an Outsider, i find it hard to understand why the British arrest an Old Lady,and some hotheads for causing unrest, yet the Mouthy Islam Clerics spout vile hatred openly an get away with it.Perhaps the Latin Blood in me makes me want to see action Today and reasoning be dammed.!! I can also see why the Brit Patriots here are getting angry with the appeasers.coffee1.gif

To date there have been numerous court cases against radicals, some of them have failed to obtain a conviction. HMG has now established a taskforce, albeit belatedly, to review policies to tackle extremists in the U.K. One of the actions will be to review existing laws and if necessary update them to provide the necessary legislation for law enforcement agencies. To take action outside of the legal process would be counterproductive.

I would guess that the arrest of the Old Lady and others would have only happened if they ignored instructions to move on or were engaged in civil disorder. In the immediate aftermath emotions were very high and law enforcement would have had to take action, permitted by law, to stamp out any potential for escalation of civil disorder such as riots, hate based attacks and so on.

BTW take a look at a convoluted process over many years to try & deport just one radical Islamist preacher in the UK.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17769990

Edited by simple1
  • Like 1
Posted

I must admit being an Outsider, i find it hard to understand why the British arrest an Old Lady,and some hotheads for causing unrest, yet the Mouthy Islam Clerics spout vile hatred openly an get away with it.Perhaps the Latin Blood in me makes me want to see action Today and reasoning be dammed.!! I can also see why the Brit Patriots here are getting angry with the appeasers.coffee1.gif

To date there have been numerous court cases against radicals, some of them have failed to obtain a conviction. HMG has now established a taskforce, albeit belatedly, to review policies to tackle extremists in the U.K. One of the actions will be to review existing laws and if necessary update them to provide the necessary legislation for law enforcement agencies. To take action outside of the legal process would be counterproductive.

I would guess that the arrest of the Old Lady and others would have only happened if they ignored instructions to move on or were engaged in civil disorder. In the immediate aftermath emotions were very high and law enforcement would have had to take action, permitted by law, to stamp out any potential for escalation of civil disorder such as riots, hate based attacks and so on.

BTW take a look at a convoluted process over many years to try & deport just one radical Islamist preacher in the UK.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17769990

Asked to Move On.?. Don't they ask the Islamic Anti Brit Protesters to move on then. Or would they Scream Racist, and sue your Police.Just doesn't seem fair to me.Our Police belt anybody who doesn't fit in with the Portuguese way of life, regardless of Color, Religion, or Creed. You have had a Man Murdered ,yet you still wimp abuut being fair to the Unfair.

  • Like 2
Posted

I must admit being an Outsider, i find it hard to understand why the British arrest an Old Lady,and some hotheads for causing unrest, yet the Mouthy Islam Clerics spout vile hatred openly an get away with it.Perhaps the Latin Blood in me makes me want to see action Today and reasoning be dammed.!! I can also see why the Brit Patriots here are getting angry with the appeasers.coffee1.gif

To date there have been numerous court cases against radicals, some of them have failed to obtain a conviction. HMG has now established a taskforce, albeit belatedly, to review policies to tackle extremists in the U.K. One of the actions will be to review existing laws and if necessary update them to provide the necessary legislation for law enforcement agencies. To take action outside of the legal process would be counterproductive.

I would guess that the arrest of the Old Lady and others would have only happened if they ignored instructions to move on or were engaged in civil disorder. In the immediate aftermath emotions were very high and law enforcement would have had to take action, permitted by law, to stamp out any potential for escalation of civil disorder such as riots, hate based attacks and so on.

BTW take a look at a convoluted process over many years to try & deport just one radical Islamist preacher in the UK.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17769990

Let it be remembered it was only a soldier being decapitated in broad daylight that brought belated (promises of) action from the government. Their statements have been almost comically naive about the nature of the threat faced. Just supposing they do get up to speed concerning the sort of legislation needed I suspect they would be overruled by E.U law, all the more reason imho to vote UKIP as I suspect they would have the will to be proactive instead of being forced into doing something by events.

  • Like 2
Posted

I must admit being an Outsider, i find it hard to understand why the British arrest an Old Lady,and some hotheads for causing unrest, yet the Mouthy Islam Clerics spout vile hatred openly an get away with it.Perhaps the Latin Blood in me makes me want to see action Today and reasoning be dammed.!! I can also see why the Brit Patriots here are getting angry with the appeasers.coffee1.gif

To date there have been numerous court cases against radicals, some of them have failed to obtain a conviction. HMG has now established a taskforce, albeit belatedly, to review policies to tackle extremists in the U.K. One of the actions will be to review existing laws and if necessary update them to provide the necessary legislation for law enforcement agencies. To take action outside of the legal process would be counterproductive.

I would guess that the arrest of the Old Lady and others would have only happened if they ignored instructions to move on or were engaged in civil disorder. In the immediate aftermath emotions were very high and law enforcement would have had to take action, permitted by law, to stamp out any potential for escalation of civil disorder such as riots, hate based attacks and so on.

BTW take a look at a convoluted process over many years to try & deport just one radical Islamist preacher in the UK.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17769990

Asked to Move On.?. Don't they ask the Islamic Anti Brit Protesters to move on then. Or would they Scream Racist, and sue your Police.Just doesn't seem fair to me.Our Police belt anybody who doesn't fit in with the Portuguese way of life, regardless of Color, Religion, or Creed. You have had a Man Murdered ,yet you still wimp abuut being fair to the Unfair.

Read again. I do not wimp on about being "fair to the unfair". You are happy to live in Portugal where police unlawfully assault citizens? I would call that a heading down a facist path and that's not a situation I wish to see in the UK

  • Like 1
Posted

Ulysses G., on 27 May 2013 - 07:36, said:

lemoncake, on 27 May 2013 - 02:35, said:

I still do not believe it was Islamist related, only because MO just does not fit.

There is now a copy cat in France, which they also try to link to Islamist attack.

I am by no means defending Islamists , however it's not their MO. Aim is always to kill as many as possible , not just 1 person

Al Queda has been telling its supporters to do small strikes like this for some time, because there have been so many failures with larger operations. It still gets the headlines and scares the public, which is the point of terrorism. The murderers were yelling Allah-u-Akbar and went on to explain that they were killing this soldier because Muslims were being bombed in Afganistan. There is no doubt at all that these two savages were Islamic radicals.

May well be true, but what is your explanation for apologizing to by standers?

I would have thought, if they were radical Islamists, they would have threatened the by standers or warned them of the same thing happening to them instead of apologizing.

Posted

May well be true, but what is your explanation for apologizing to by standers?

I would have thought, if they were radical Islamists, they would have threatened the by standers or warned them of the same thing happening to them instead of apologizing.

Did they aplogise? I thought they just tried to justify what they had done and said the koran made them do it

Posted

Ulysses G., on 27 May 2013 - 08:54, said:

simple1, on 27 May 2013 - 08:40, said:

Ulysses G., on 27 May 2013 - 07:36, said:

lemoncake, on 27 May 2013 - 02:35, said:

I still do not believe it was Islamist related, only because MO just does not fit.

There is now a copy cat in France, which they also try to link to Islamist attack.

I am by no means defending Islamists , however it's not their MO. Aim is always to kill as many as possible , not just 1 person

Al Queda has been telling its supporters to do small strikes like this for some time, because there have been so many failures with larger operations. It still gets the headlines and scares the public, which is the point of terrorism. The murderers were yelling Allah-u-Akbar and went on to explain that they were killing this soldier because Muslims were being bombed in Afganistan. There is no doubt at all that these two savages were Islamic radicals.

Could be wrong, but I don't believe thier have been any post in this topic claiming the murder was not carried out by two Istamic extremists.

The post that I quoted claimed that the killing of the British soldier was caused by drugs - that the killing was not " Islamist related."

Ulysses, i do not claim anything, was just an observation. In video he has all the signs of being on drugs. If he was radical Islamist it would also be against Islam to take drugs.

This is my only observation

Posted
May well be true, but what is your explanation for apologizing to by standers?

I would have thought, if they were radical Islamists, they would have threatened the by standers or warned them of the same thing happening to them instead of apologizing.

Did they aplogise? I thought they just tried to justify what they had done and said the koran made them do it

In the first video i posted, he said he was sorry others had to see it, but it had to be done(or something like that)
Posted (edited)

good article by Melanie Phillips author of Londonistan, the best book ever about Islamification of the UK:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2331368/Until-leaders-admit-true-nature-Islamic-extremism-defeat-it.html

There is an e-book by a guy named Danny Lockwood. He is a record points scorer in the British Amateur Rugby League, and one time editor of The Dewsbury Reporter.

http://www.newenglishreview.org/Esmerelda_Weatherwax/The_Islamic_Republic_of_Dewsbury_-_Danny_Lockwood/

Some of the events mentioned in the review I recall very well. They were quite a few problems with The Scarborough pub. The muslims excuse was they didn't want a pub in their area. The real reason was the landlord refused to serve them, as was his right in those days. So they went drinking to a pub just down the road.

Edited by Mosha
Posted

After watching those two video clips by the 2 imans for the first time, condemning the murder of Lee Rigby,

i can understand why some people on this forum are referring to them as being a cover up, or

a show to appease the media, or an unmeaning full statement, or bunch of two faced liars.

The reason i say this is because neither of them referred to Lee Rigby by his name as a human being,

instead they referred to him as the "victim" the "soldier and his family and colleagues"

That to me, shows disrespect to Lee Rigby and his family.

Why is it that both separate statements were made in the same manner?

At the time those videos were made, the name of the victim had not been made public.

They did not know his name.

Posted

WOW!!

This thread is only four days old with well over 1,000 posts already. MOST of the posts are united in condemning this atrocious act, yet some of the arguments have still managed to be poles apart and become rather heated (and plenty of posts removed by mods).

Can you only imagine the blood that would be flowing on a similar thread if there was an Islam website forum. No doubt this savage murder could be the spark that ignites the highly flammable and compressed emotions of some young Muslim men.

Dangerous times ahead maybe.

  • Like 1
Posted

Again, 7by7 said this,

"Well, i for one do not think this attack had anything to do with Islam or anything else but drugs.

Looking at the video, and his manner, i believe he was coming down off drugs either speed or ecstasy."

So the behind the scenes morons who have also been arrested for conspiracy to murder were on drugs as well?? Or did they drug these creeps so they'd go and murder a man walking down the street??

Do not be an apologist for these people.

Again, 7by7 said this,

"Well, i for one do not think this attack had anything to do with Islam or anything else but drugs.

Looking at the video, and his manner, i believe he was coming down off drugs either speed or ecstasy."

So the behind the scenes morons who have also been arrested for conspiracy to murder were on drugs as well?? Or did they drug these creeps so they'd go and murder a man walking down the street??

Do not be an apologist for these people.

I did not say that.

  • Like 2
Posted

Over the last few years I've read a fair amount of articles regarding the English Defense league,they all gave me the impression that this is a racist/fascist organization supported by skinhead idiots. Now after reading a few articles by the leader of the EDL, Tommy Robinson,and also having watched a few videos of him he seems to be anything but a racist/ fascist, he's very articulated

seems he only wants for the different communities to get along peacefully,including Muslims. What he seems to be against, is the turning over of our country to the Islamic extremist. Am I correct in my reappraisal Of what the EDL now stands for, and if so, why were they getting bad press.

Not really sure either, i took an interest in them when they first formed but distanced myself as there seemed to be a heavy football hooligan presence, wether or not that is still the case remains to be seen.
Posted

And some of the twisters of the truth (you know who you are) have spent many hours on this thread attempting to whitewash the perpetraters of this evil act ........

I have not seen one single post or comment in this thread, or anywhere on ThaiVisa, which in any way makes any attempt to whitewash this evil act or those who committed it.

Can you link to one of the post to which you refer?

Posted

Again, 7by7 said this,

"Well, i for one do not think this attack had anything to do with Islam or anything else but drugs.

Looking at the video, and his manner, i believe he was coming down off drugs either speed or ecstasy."

So the behind the scenes morons who have also been arrested for conspiracy to murder were on drugs as well?? Or did they drug these creeps so they'd go and murder a man walking down the street??

Do not be an apologist for these people.

>Again, 7by7 said this,

"Well, i for one do not think this attack had anything to do with Islam or anything else but drugs.

Looking at the video, and his manner, i believe he was coming down off drugs either speed or ecstasy."

So the behind the scenes morons who have also been arrested for conspiracy to murder were on drugs as well?? Or did they drug these creeps so they'd go and murder a man walking down the street??

Do not be an apologist for these people.

I did not say that.

Try Lemoncake

Posted

And some of the twisters of the truth (you know who you are) have spent many hours on this thread attempting to whitewash the perpetraters of this evil act ........

I have not seen one single post or comment in this thread, or anywhere on ThaiVisa, which in any way makes any attempt to whitewash this evil act or those who committed it.

Can you link to one of the post to which you refer?

coffee1.gif

Posted (edited)

It seems the people to whom it is not obvious are the apologists and politicians. They play the racism card first off, when faced with what could be termed criticism at worst, but it's OK for idiots like choudary to preach hate, and nothing is done. See Chooka's comment above. The low life scum choudary applauded it, said it was for allah, and it didn't go far enough. Why do we tolerate this??? That is not freedom of speech.

Indeed. If Orwellian 'hate speech' laws are to be applied, they should be applied with equal vigour to all sections of the community. And therein lies the problem; for the most part they are not. Young men and women are arrested for posting anti-Muslim comments on social networking sites, and an 85 year old lady is carted off in handcuffs for telling a few Muslims to go home. Choudary is however allowed to spout his hatred and bile on prime-time television and nothing is done, for fear of upsetting the oh-so-volatile sensibilities of the general Islamic population. Little wonder then that people are losing faith in the criminal justice system and the mainstream politicians who are supposed to oversea its application.

Edited by Rumpole
  • Like 2
Posted

7by7:

Majic,

I have never read the Koran, I have never claimed to have done; I doubt that you have either.

Thank you admitting you do not know what you are talking about, many HAVE read the koran I suggest you do also

7by7:

Majic,

I have never read the Koran, I have never claimed to have done; I doubt that you have either.

Thank you admitting you do not know what you are talking about, many HAVE read the koran I suggest you do also

As said many times;

  • I have read as much of the Koran as you have.
  • Every comment on this horrific murder by those who represent the majority of British Muslims say that it has nothing to do with the teachings of Islam and the thugs who committed it do not represent them or their views.
  • Earlier in this thread are some informative posts from someone who, unlike you and me, actually has studied the Koran; go back and read them.

Criticise and disagree with what I say by all means. Unlike you and so many other contributors to this thread I allow others to hold a different opinion to mine. But before you do, do yourself a favour and actually read all that I have posted first.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...