tingtongteesood Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 So now we have officially two crazy greedy at head of both sides. I truly suggest to stay away from the protest sites, something will go wrong surely. It always goes wrong when you put a lighter close to a gasoline tank. It will only go wrong when the government decides it wants it to go wrong and sends in the storm troopers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsailor35 Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Perfect choice. Suthep and the Democrats said that nobody trusts her anymore and nobody wants her to lead the country anymore. Let the Thai people speak (and then, Democrats, if you don't win for 23 years in a row, please shut up forever). Here is a better thought, lets bring in UN observers, so no money changes hands and lets also forbid populist policy's and see how well she is liked I have no doubt her motto for upcoming campaign would be, if you vote for us, we will pay you what we owe you for the rice, but if you do not, then you loose. Gee i wonder which way Somachai's will vote who has been waiting to be paid for months "Lets forbid populist policies"! I see your hero, ( lets abolish democracy) Suthep came up with this gem tonight. Saying that his new constitution will contain a clause tthat no government is allowed to launch populist policies. Hahaha, he really is a political pygmy. So no government can announce policies that will be popular!? Absolutely ridiculous, what is he suggesting, all candidates must promise to double taxation, raise food prices by 50%, etc etc. The man is a complete fool who is totally out of his depth. No problem with UN observers, although i doubt Suthep would go along with it. Even he knows that in any election here his party would come a very poor second, thats why he wants to ban elections and take away peoples right to vote. He joins a long list of like minded dictators in that regard. Anyway, for him and all his avid supporters on this forum, i would have thought that Ms Yingluck being picked as the No 1 candidate is the best news they could hear. After all she is wildly unpopular, a figure of fun, even hatred. This must be true because about 90% of the all knowing posters on these threads have been telling us this on an hourly basis for the past month or so. So it naturally follows that in an election nobody would vote for her or the party she represents, right? Oh, hang on a minute ------! Got em by the "short & curlies" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bender Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Bender, are you currently participating in a Bender at the moment? Sup up, have another one quick, I would hate your wit and repartee to whither away come on, dont tell me that your next move will to not allowed sane people to express their point of view? You lose all time, and you will lose again, anywhere, at the urne, on the street, on the forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkkbound Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 They really are quite deluded... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JRSoul Posted December 9, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2013 Of course she is a party list candidate. Can't have her facing an electorate that might ask questions about perjury, parliamentary attendance or lack of it, committees she chairs without attending or accepting responsibility for, the costs and benefits of her incessant travel, her lack of veracity and consistency about her brother's influence, how much she has benefited from the rice scam, how much she would have benefited from the amnesty cash return flow on, etc. These are personal issues before they question her party's policies, economic mismanagement, corruption and willingness to plunge the nation into debt. As a party list candidate she is guaranteed a seat, even if she never uses it, if her party gets only a small number of votes. In systems without a party list, PMs who have proven themselves far from ideal have been given the boot from supposedly safe seats. Here, scum like the Shin clan and Chalerm are guaranteed election. If that doesn't suck, what does? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaddeus Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 They really are quite deluded... Yes, they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaddeus Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Bender, are you currently participating in a Bender at the moment? Sup up, have another one quick, I would hate your wit and repartee to whither away come on, dont tell me that your next move will to not allowed sane people to express their point of view? You lose all time, and you will lose again, anywhere, at the urne, on the street, on the forum Usually, after a couple of beers, I can read almost anything, and either nod in appreciation, or shake my head in desperation. But can someone translate this one for me please. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stradavarius37 Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 I'd love to luck her Ying - any day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bender Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Bender, are you currently participating in a Bender at the moment? Sup up, have another one quick, I would hate your wit and repartee to whither away come on, dont tell me that your next move will to not allowed sane people to express their point of view? You lose all time, and you will lose again, anywhere, at the urne, on the street, on the forum Usually, after a couple of beers, I can read almost anything, and either nod in appreciation, or shake my head in desperation. But can someone translate this one for me please. dont worry i will do it at the urne = ballot box ps: my mistake, i should have not expected from you to be rational and smart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRSoul Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 I'd love to luck her Ying - any day! In Oz we call this the Pauline Hanson Effect, where geriatric males drool over a female politician those with better faculties can only describe as a harridan. BTW she was stupid too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bender Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 (edited) I'd love to luck her Ying - any day! the irony is strada was rambling how much the yellow fan were polite, open mind, etc etc, in another thread i was just reading now: http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/687662-suthep-rejects-house-dissolution/page-4#entry7141130 The Yellow Shirt Label - most of the reasoned, thoughtful news posters are well informed, polite, and welcome open and honest discourse and you talk about doing her some might suffer from personality disorder or i dont get it ps: how low can they go? Edited December 9, 2013 by Bender Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kudel Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 I hope the next pm of Thailand will sue all youre asses for libel and defamation and have the news section on this site shut down for good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokay Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Second verse, same as the first! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MikeOboe57 Posted December 9, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2013 So these buffoons made a belly landing with Yingluck at the helm and first thing after the dust has settled is to put her back in charge and expect a different outcome. A real no-brainer or "Thaksin orders, PTP obeys"? It also shows clearly the attitude of the PTP towards the Thai people. And after her stellar performance Yingluck is still convinced that she is somehow qualified to run for PM again. It seems that when you are an utter failure in your job you lack the mental capability to realize it. Especially when you are surrounded by persons of similar intellect. If the Thais vote for this charade once again they deserve everything that is thrown at them in this forum. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeOboe57 Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 I hope the next pm of Thailand will sue all youre asses for libel and defamation and have the news section on this site shut down for good. Why don't you go back to North Korea? They sorely miss your long-time advice on human rights. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haroldcane Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 ...nobody trusts her anymore and nobody wants her to lead the country anymore... Democrats, if you don't win for 23 years in a row... that's proof that the shin-tax-sin-clan does want NO peace & they are corrupt & greedy thru & thru that's proof that the democrats did not use any corruption for at least "23 years in a row"... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAG Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Of course she is a party list candidate. Can't have her facing an electorate that might ask questions about perjury, parliamentary attendance or lack of it, committees she chairs without attending or accepting responsibility for, the costs and benefits of her incessant travel, her lack of veracity and consistency about her brother's influence, how much she has benefited from the rice scam, how much she would have benefited from the amnesty cash return flow on, etc. These are personal issues before they question her party's policies, economic mismanagement, corruption and willingness to plunge the nation into debt. As a party list candidate she is guaranteed a seat, even if she never uses it, if her party gets only a small number of votes. In systems without a party list, PMs who have proven themselves far from ideal have been given the boot from supposedly safe seats. Here, scum like the Shin clan and Chalerm are guaranteed election. If that doesn't suck, what does? I'll tell you what I think sucks. Forcing an elected government from office by mounting increasingly disruptive protests with a mob, which whilst substantial is nevertheless a fraction of the governments electoral majority, and buoyed up the knowledge that the Police are hamstrung by fear of what will happen if they act effectively. That sucks. Trying to replace an elected parialiament with an appointed council. Don't bother who is appointed, nobody's going to get a say. That sucks. Fascist power grabs. They suck. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post daboyz1 Posted December 9, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2013 I assume the vast majority of posters here are from western style democracies. Yet I find it odd that some here have no problem with Thailand being run by a criminal fugitive. I wonder if they would be fine with this type of government in their home countries? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomacht8 Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Of course she is a party list candidate. Can't have her facing an electorate that might ask questions about perjury, parliamentary attendance or lack of it, committees she chairs without attending or accepting responsibility for, the costs and benefits of her incessant travel, her lack of veracity and consistency about her brother's influence, how much she has benefited from the rice scam, how much she would have benefited from the amnesty cash return flow on, etc. These are personal issues before they question her party's policies, economic mismanagement, corruption and willingness to plunge the nation into debt. As a party list candidate she is guaranteed a seat, even if she never uses it, if her party gets only a small number of votes. In systems without a party list, PMs who have proven themselves far from ideal have been given the boot from supposedly safe seats. Here, scum like the Shin clan and Chalerm are guaranteed election. If that doesn't suck, what does? Sorry for asking again, because i do not know. Was there any election in the PTP to vote for her? Can not belief and never experienced that a decision-making within a party is so f****ing quick! Can somebody, please put some light in this darkness, please? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRSoul Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Of course she is a party list candidate. Can't have her facing an electorate that might ask questions about perjury, parliamentary attendance or lack of it, committees she chairs without attending or accepting responsibility for, the costs and benefits of her incessant travel, her lack of veracity and consistency about her brother's influence, how much she has benefited from the rice scam, how much she would have benefited from the amnesty cash return flow on, etc. These are personal issues before they question her party's policies, economic mismanagement, corruption and willingness to plunge the nation into debt. As a party list candidate she is guaranteed a seat, even if she never uses it, if her party gets only a small number of votes. In systems without a party list, PMs who have proven themselves far from ideal have been given the boot from supposedly safe seats. Here, scum like the Shin clan and Chalerm are guaranteed election. If that doesn't suck, what does? I'll tell you what I think sucks. Forcing an elected government from office by mounting increasingly disruptive protests with a mob, which whilst substantial is nevertheless a fraction of the governments electoral majority, and buoyed up the knowledge that the Police are hamstrung by fear of what will happen if they act effectively. That sucks. Trying to replace an elected parialiament with an appointed council. Don't bother who is appointed, nobody's going to get a say. That sucks. Fascist power grabs. They suck. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app What I also think sucks is replying to my post with an off-topic rant, which relates to almost none of the points I made. I don't support appointed MPs, either in a council or by party list, though a council would possibly have fewer scum and criminals than the PTP party list. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JRSoul Posted December 9, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2013 Of course she is a party list candidate. Can't have her facing an electorate that might ask questions about perjury, parliamentary attendance or lack of it, committees she chairs without attending or accepting responsibility for, the costs and benefits of her incessant travel, her lack of veracity and consistency about her brother's influence, how much she has benefited from the rice scam, how much she would have benefited from the amnesty cash return flow on, etc. These are personal issues before they question her party's policies, economic mismanagement, corruption and willingness to plunge the nation into debt. As a party list candidate she is guaranteed a seat, even if she never uses it, if her party gets only a small number of votes. In systems without a party list, PMs who have proven themselves far from ideal have been given the boot from supposedly safe seats. Here, scum like the Shin clan and Chalerm are guaranteed election. If that doesn't suck, what does? Sorry for asking again, because i do not know. Was there any election in the PTP to vote for her? Can not belief and never experienced that a decision-making within a party is so f****ing quick! Can somebody, please put some light in this darkness, please? It was quick because only one person had to decide, the rest followed orders, and the election was for the press release. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomacht8 Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Of course she is a party list candidate. Can't have her facing an electorate that might ask questions about perjury, parliamentary attendance or lack of it, committees she chairs without attending or accepting responsibility for, the costs and benefits of her incessant travel, her lack of veracity and consistency about her brother's influence, how much she has benefited from the rice scam, how much she would have benefited from the amnesty cash return flow on, etc. These are personal issues before they question her party's policies, economic mismanagement, corruption and willingness to plunge the nation into debt. As a party list candidate she is guaranteed a seat, even if she never uses it, if her party gets only a small number of votes. In systems without a party list, PMs who have proven themselves far from ideal have been given the boot from supposedly safe seats. Here, scum like the Shin clan and Chalerm are guaranteed election. If that doesn't suck, what does? Sorry for asking again, because i do not know. Was there any election in the PTP to vote for her? Can not belief and never experienced that a decision-making within a party is so f****ing quick! Can somebody, please put some light in this darkness, please? It was quick because only one person had to decide, the rest followed orders, and the election was for the press release. That sounds bad. I just want to know if was any election inside the PTP to vote for her new leaders (today)? How they can do it? Was there a party conference with all party members? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
englishoak Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 ...nobody trusts her anymore and nobody wants her to lead the country anymore... Democrats, if you don't win for 23 years in a row... that's proof that the shin-tax-sin-clan does want NO peace & they are corrupt & greedy thru & thru that's proof that the democrats did not use any corruption for at least "23 years in a row"... this place is sometimes too funny for making the joke of the week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blumenkraft Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 I assume the vast majority of posters here are from western style democracies. Yet I find it odd that some here have no problem with Thailand being run by a criminal fugitive. I wonder if they would be fine with this type of government in their home countries? ...or if they would much prefer an unelected 'People's Council'..? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haroldcane Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 ...blahblahblahblah.....IF their is some problem with their party, so my little advice, leave the party and make a new one!ps: you are completely weird, no logic at all! give another greedy & corrupt policeman the chance to ransack thailand & pocket billions he'll buy a completely new party himself fully furnished with at least 300+ other greedy & corrupt politicians (hard to find?) who immediately will be 'elected' by poor uneducated corrupt & greedy voters whom he promises to get rich. THAT was the complete tax-sin logic plus he is used to choose his cronies for stupidity & obedience do you think the royal army would act against the will of the king? who reminded them a few days ago that the leaders of the armed forces should "...focus on doing their duties … which are the security and stability of the country..." do you really believe, that picking yinglack again is good for "the security and stability of the country"? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackrich Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Can't believe some people are complaining and moaning about Yingluck being on the ballot. The entire country has to put up with the nutcase Suthep for months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smedly Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 ok so we have all the debates going on here on TV and we have various opinions so I'll ask one question to both sides of the camp give me 5 valid reasons why PTP should stay give me 5 valid reasons why PTP should go - actually you can give me 10 if you like and when I say go I mean gone as in completely gone maybe even through an airport but I'd prefer they stay and get jailed for all the money they stole anyway back to the 5 reasons I suspect this will go unanswered 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haroldcane Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Bender, are you currently participating in a Bender at the moment? Sup up, have another one quick, I would hate your wit and repartee to whither away come on, dont tell me that your next move will to not allowed sane people to express their point of view? You lose all time, and you will lose again, anywhere, at the urne, on the street, on the forum Usually, after a couple of beers, I can read almost anything, and either nod in appreciation, or shake my head in desperation. But can someone translate this one for me please. bender seems to be a german, where 'urne' is a word for a ballot-box http://www.dict.cc/?s=urne he may not even understand the english slang 'bender' 55555 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimamey Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Perfect choice. Suthep and the Democrats said that nobody trusts her anymore and nobody wants her to lead the country anymore. Let the Thai people speak (and then, Democrats, if you don't win for 23 years in a row, please shut up forever). Here is a better thought, lets bring in UN observers, so no money changes hands and lets also forbid populist policy's and see how well she is liked Foreign observers have been suggested before for an election but apparently somebody in the government of the time didn't want that........ http://www.mcot.net/site/content?id=4ff673890b01dabf3c02ae6e#.UqXemyeneIw I think this was the first time I took much notice of him and it seemed a stupid comment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surangw Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 thais pic their collective noses, and this is what they come up with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now