Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So many times the 3 local media outlets have stories contradict one another, so this thread is dedicated to rooting out who gets it right, most of the time, (or even someof the time )

The shooting of the woman the other night is a good story to start with

Media Source A (MS- A ) tells us the cop suspected has turned himself in and denies the charge.

Media Source B ( MS- B ) pretty much follows this, but adds bizarrely, DNA from the bullet will be tested to see if it matches the cop's DNA Surely the reporter is adding conjecture and it will actually be a ballitics test the bullet undergoes- ( hopefully the cop's gun, too)

Media Source C (MS- C) has it the cop had admitted it, but denies trying to kill the woman, just firing a shot 'cause,... well you know...Had a conflict with the bar.. They even have a named quote from a supervising officer who claims they haven't decided yet whether to charge him with homocide , or attempted homocide.

(However since the woman died from the shot, seems attempted would be out of the equation..)

Edited by EBlair48
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...