Jump to content

Yingluck's fate on rice scheme to be known tomorrow


webfact

Recommended Posts

Yingluck's fate on rice scheme to be known tomorrow

9-2-2014-12-47-43-PM1-wpcf_728x413.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The Office of the Attorney-General will decide by tomorrow whether it will prosecute ex-Premier Yingluck Shinawatra in the Supreme Court's Criminal Division for Political Office Holders for her role in the controversial rice-pledging scheme which incurred enormous loss to the country from alleged corruption.

Deputy spokesperson of the Office Mrs Santanee Disayabutr said under a constitutional organic law related to holders of political positions, the attorney-general is required to prosecute the accused politician within 30 days after it received investigation case file from the National Anti Corruption Commission (NACC).

She said the 30-day time frame ends tomorrow and the attorney needs to come up with a decision.

However there is also an exception if the attorney-general saw the case file is still not substantial to prosecute her on the charge, then it will notify the NACC for more investigation.

However if the attorney-general saw the case file complete, then it could go ahead with the prosecution immediately with no need to require the accused appearing in the court.

But this process must require that the accused has known residence in the country, she said.

Meanwhile Mr Wanchai Rujanawong, director-general of the Foreign Case Office, and spokesman of the office of the Attorney-General said the case was being handled by the attorney-general.

He said if the attorney-general has finished his study of the case file, he will make it known to the public at a press conference.

Earlier the attorney-general has appointed a team of public prosecutors to scrutinise the NACC’s case file against former prime minister Yingluck regarding the rice pledging scheme that incurred a loss of 500 billion baht.

The team has taken 30 days to complete examination of the 4,000-page case file of the NACC which has decided to indict Ms Yingluck of gross negligence of duty in supervising the rice pledging scheme causing extensive damage to the state.

Earlier Attorney-General Trakul Vinichaipark disclosed that Ms Yingluck had asked the Office of Attorney-General to question 50 more witnesses.

However, he said that the team of prosecutors would have to examine the case file first to determine whether the case was strong enough or not and whether more evidences are to be needed.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/yinglucks-fate-rice-scheme-known-tomorrow/

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2014-09-03

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I think that a deal has been closed, and this is why she came back from her overseas trip. She won't be prosecuted, and someone else will have to face the court.

Quite possible.

Probably one of the many deals that are likely to have been brokered between the old and the new recently.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that a deal has been closed, and this is why she came back from her overseas trip. She won't be prosecuted, and someone else will have to face the court.

She did that overseas trip so that if she actually decides to run she can do it again without raising suspicion.

Edited by lapd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a procedural issue. Tomorrow's deadline is for the AG do decide whether to proceed with criminal charges on the evidence as presented. That's possible, but unlikely.More likely is that they'll move to the next step, which is to establish a joint AG-NACC committee to organise evidence according to the specific criminal charges and to seek additional evidence or witnesses as they jointly deem appropriate. That takes time. Afterwards, the AG can opt to prosecute or not; if not the the NACC can prosecute in its own right.

Once a prosecution is started, the matter is entirely in the hands of the court.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that a deal has been closed, and this is why she came back from her overseas trip. She won't be prosecuted, and someone else will have to face the court.

Of course, some deal again...Thaksin doesn't cause troubles and the family can stay and keep the money.

Than in 2 years he'll start making troubles again.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something does not gel with regard to the way this whole issue is being handled and there is a strong possibility that a deal has been brokered. Since her reported return to Thailand there has been no evidence of her presence in this country, no press coverage,interviews or shopping trips, so those looking for justice should not hold their breath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"the attorney-general is required to prosecute the accused politician within 30 days after it received investigation case file from the National Anti Corruption Commission (NACC)."

I think they should have added "If there is enough evidence against said politician". According to that statement....they have to charge the person regardless.................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a PM is responsible for all illegal acts done by others in Govt.all PM's would goto jail. Its a crazy system.

If the PM is the chairman/chairwomen of the project, an illegal act done in the project, yes, that chairman/chairwomen have to go to jail.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wot I don't understand is that the corruption that cost the country billions which politicians actually noticeably benefitted. For example new big houses being built on golf courses with exotic coloured Rolls Royces etc standing in the drives. Surely someone somewhere would have named and shamed. Where have all these billions gone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

She was the chairwoman of the rice committee and have assumed the responsibility.
She has almost never attend meetings.
Clear supervision violation.
She had no idea?
Then she lied to the people, everything was ok and yes corruption-free.
Well gambled 500 billion away, to …..?
(I hope the NACC still looking for the missing money!)
At least she should return some money.
She did get money for work she never did.
It's a shame how here the elites simply can get away with it.
On the whole, an irresponsible kindergarten, which has cost lives and the taxpayers, a lot of money.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If she is prosecuted, she becomes a martyr with very high political credit (not the same as credibility at all)., She'd be the Thai An Yung Sukki. I really don't see much commentary on the fallout, just lots of opinions concerning culpability.

The political reality is something different. If prosecuted or not, the people that voted for her are not going to suddenly swing to the Democrat side. The Powers That Be, not the same as the politicians here at all, definitely need her out of the picture without a backlash. There really are a lot of smart Thais, just not often in the public sector. I don't think either side behind the scenes is really comfortable with the situation. No clear cut winners afterwards if any missteps take place, They can ban her from politics, but all she has to do is endorse someone.

then it's right back to square one, again, with another inevitable coup.

Amazing Thailand.

I am interested in seeing how this plays out.

Well, if you seize all the family properties and money in Thailand, than she will be much less martyr than if she stays in jail.

Reasons are enough, most if not all family members are in some obvious corrupt business.....Even Thaksins ex-wife complained about his other sister can't get enough.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just political games, there never was a case to answer.

One must consider she may have been played by her brother and got in way over her head with regards to her advisors (see brother). When I recall her public appearances she never really said anything other than standard political motherhood crap. I too think a deal has been struck. I think her and her brother believe they had better pull their heads in, at least in the short term. I doubt the real players with Thaskin,( i e the family ), would allow his sister to be shoved under the bus as it were.

There is no doubt the rice scheme was rorted. But I kinda think she was to naieve to know what was about. Other than the idiotic new rules to control booze, I think the new government is doing O K. lol . Let us just hope it all works out for the benenefit of all Thai's and of course, all of us expats as well !

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...