Jump to content

Police coy over new probe into Koh Tao murders


webfact

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 446
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

jdinasia is not going to win my poster of the year but certainly is in the running for endurance poster of the year. The "Gebrselassie" of ThaiVisa. I honestly don't know how he does it.

I am not the topic. Why remark about a person instead of the post?

Truly not a valid debating practice, and you say that this is debate.

It is a kind of compliment.....seriously, you drain me. I won't block people on the whole but you post so much that I have to skim read your posts so maybe don't give them enough credence. Is that my fault or yours?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This mafia style Omerta code of silence on Koh Tao will not last forever, people know who the real killers are, that is obvious, justice has patience but the B2 and victims family deserve justice now.

Samui judge has now ordered that the prosecutors must complete the investigation by 20th Nov https://twitter.com/Atomicalandy

So are 'people know who did it' and someone who has credible evidence to prove who did it the same thing?
The men who committed the crime know who did what. It's likely their friends also know. With such a heinous crime in their backyard, there are surely islanders and others in the loop who either know who did it, or have strong ideas about happened. In typical Thai fashion, they're not speaking up. Similar to the nearly 20 eyewitnesses who saw the son of a VIP rich man shoot a cop (at point blank range) in Bangkok, yet not one witness had the courage or moral terpitude to speak up in public or in court to tell the truth.

For Thais, telling the truth is usually considered silly and naive. It can also get a person killed.

It's doubtful there's such a thing as a 'Silent Witness Program' in Thailand. Even if there was, it would be hard for Thais to break out their habit of not speaking out about what's true about a crime. Also, Thais are so family oriented, and it's a small country, so even if a person tried giving testimony incognito, that person could readily be hunted down and killed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This mafia style Omerta code of silence on Koh Tao will not last forever, people know who the real killers are, that is obvious, justice has patience but the B2 and victims family deserve justice now.

Samui judge has now ordered that the prosecutors must complete the investigation by 20th Nov https://twitter.com/Atomicalandy

So are 'people know who did it' and someone who has credible evidence to prove who did it the same thing?

Put that to the reporter I quoted from http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/thailand-beach-murders-police-must-4306103

Your friendly Mirror reporter gave no source for his opinion either -- There is a sinister undercurrent here I cannot quite put my finger on. Great courtroom stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This mafia style Omerta code of silence on Koh Tao will not last forever, people know who the real killers are, that is obvious, justice has patience but the B2 and victims family deserve justice now.

Samui judge has now ordered that the prosecutors must complete the investigation by 20th Nov https://twitter.com/Atomicalandy

So are 'people know who did it' and someone who has credible evidence to prove who did it the same thing?

Put that to the reporter I quoted from http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/thailand-beach-murders-police-must-4306103

Your friendly Mirror reporter gave no source for his opinion either -- There is a sinister undercurrent here I cannot quite put my finger on. Great courtroom stuff.

He was there not you, I would say his opinion would be much more valuable than somebody who had not spent a week there questioning all the locals,

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

jdinasia is not going to win my poster of the year but certainly is in the running for endurance poster of the year. The "Gebrselassie" of ThaiVisa. I honestly don't know how he does it.

I am not the topic. Why remark about a person instead of the post?

Truly not a valid debating practice, and you say that this is debate.

Sorry, I thought you'd recognise that this wasn't debate. It is clearly an aside. If you took it as an attack then you have very thin skin indeed or have just lost perspective as you have spent a lot of time being attacked (I agree that many of them have been personal and that is not correct). As I have said before I am not really interested in your view because you don't really add anything new. Sure you are trying to smash some "out there" theories but you are also smashing potential truths in a case with very few. You are acting like the prosecution proposing the "our evidence is irrefutable" line every time. The rest of the world does not accept that. Even the most sensible of people can only say that the investigation is flawed due to the evidence we have. People jumping onto theories with little/no supporting evidence are just thinking out loud.

I think the only place I agree with you is that there are some theories that are so outside that they are no worth considering however you have no diplomacy in dealing with them so are just going to get prodded. You've turned yourself into a game. This is not a court so people won't behave like it is.

As I said before I don't know how you keep going. I want to have admiration but instead it just makes me feel tired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course they can. He is seen on the CCTV footage.

Not him, but don't let a good conspiracy theory die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your friendly Mirror reporter gave no source for his opinion either -- There is a sinister undercurrent here I cannot quite put my finger on. Great courtroom stuff.

Here's a better quote from that article.

Many people here clearly know what REALLY happened that night.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your friendly Mirror reporter gave no source for his opinion either -- There is a sinister undercurrent here I cannot quite put my finger on. Great courtroom stuff.

Here's a better quote from that article.

Many people here clearly know what REALLY happened that night.

So do those who clearly know what really happened have anything that could be construed as evidence or is all just hearsay?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course they can. He is seen on the CCTV footage.

Not him, but don't let a good conspiracy theory die.

Says who?

The investigation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This mafia style Omerta code of silence on Koh Tao will not last forever, people know who the real killers are, that is obvious, justice has patience but the B2 and victims family deserve justice now.

Samui judge has now ordered that the prosecutors must complete the investigation by 20th Nov https://twitter.com/Atomicalandy

So are 'people know who did it' and someone who has credible evidence to prove who did it the same thing?

Put that to the reporter I quoted from http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/thailand-beach-murders-police-must-4306103

Your friendly Mirror reporter gave no source for his opinion either -- There is a sinister undercurrent here I cannot quite put my finger on. Great courtroom stuff.

He was there not you, I would say his opinion would be much more valuable than somebody who had not spent a week there questioning all the locals,

If he was there and talked to all the locals, why didn't he manage a story about who people say did it?

If you can't tell a real story, resorting to innuendo will still sell a few papers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post removed

10) Do not discuss moderation publicly in the open forum; this includes individual actions, and specific or general policies and issues. You may send a PM to a moderator to discuss individual actions or email support (at) thaivisa.com to discuss moderation policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have experts in gait analysis confirmed that this isn't Nomsod? They haven't? Why not?

Other police forces use this technique. Why not the RTP? They do want to catch the real killers, don't they?

Forensic gait analyst identifies suspects by their gait

http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/gazette/vol76no3/expert-eng.htm

technology can spot and identify criminals in surveillance footage with increasing accuracy.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/from-grainy-cctv-to-a-positive-id-recognising-the-benefits-of-surveillance-8434644.html

there are many other distinctive conditions to look out for. The suspect might display circumduction, where they swing their leg out to the side when they are walking. Or abduction of the arm, where it moves out to the side when moving.

"You could probably do a certain element of this yourself - all humans have to recognise someone by the way they move," says Linane

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7348164.stm

I'm sure Scotland Yard will have experts look at this footage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7348164.stm

A burglar has been caught because of his bow-legged walk, but how easy is it to catch a criminal by analysing their gait?

John Rigg was both lucky and unlucky when he was caught on CCTV near a house he had burgled.

Lucky because it didn't catch his face. Unlucky because the footage showed his walk, which was, to the casual observer, rather like John Wayne's.

Edited by StealthEnergiser
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Koh Tao Murder: Prosecutor Requests More Time

SURAT THANI — The public prosecutor in charge of the Koh Tao murder case says he needs more time to work on the investigation before the two Burmese men arrested by police can be tried in court.

Despite police's earlier insistence that the case was “perfect,” Tawatchai Siengjiew, chief of Region 8 Public Prosecutor Office, said today that the investigation is only "80 percent completed

http://www.khaosodenglish.com/detail.php?newsid=1415364373

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seems to be a crucial failing in the the investigation process here. I can only comment on the way it is carried out in the UK, with any case that needs investigating, from a burglary to a murder then its handed over to the detectives who have specialized training. The local beat bobby has no say and is not even privy to the information gathered in the investigation. Its only with professionals carrying out the work that complex cases get solved.

Not sure about Thailand but it appears that the police in general are the investigators with no specialized units for detective work? If this is true then of course the result is a sham, let alone all the other factors involved with this case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Koh Tao Murder: Prosecutor Requests More Time

SURAT THANI — The public prosecutor in charge of the Koh Tao murder case says he needs more time to work on the investigation before the two Burmese men arrested by police can be tried in court.

here's how that sentence should read, after it gets crunched through the Truth Machine:

....needs more time to work on the frame-up before the two Burmese scapegoats arrested by police can be found guilty in court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.






×
×
  • Create New...