Jump to content

NLA accepts lawyers' plea to defer Yingluck's impeachment proceedings


Recommended Posts

Posted

NLA accepts lawyers' plea to defer Yingluck's impeachment proceedings
The Nation

BANGKOK: -- The National Legislative Assembly (NLA) yesterday voted to postpone impeachment proceedings against former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra after her lawyers insisted that she needed enough time to prepare her defence as indicated in the NLA meeting protocol.

Yingluck's three lawyers were present at the NLA meeting to explain why they wanted the first round of impeachment proceedings to be deferred by 30 days.

NLA president Pornpetch Wichitcholchai said the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) had delivered the copy of the writ to the NLA on October 14, and that copies of the writ had been distributed among NLA members on October 28.

He added that officials had been instructed to contact Yingluck's lawyers to tell them that the write had been delivered to her, but her legal team said she had not returned from an overseas trip. He then went on to say that he had copies of the writ delivered to Yingluck's home twice - on October 29 and November 7 - and both times somebody had signed to receive the documents.

However, the former PM's lawyer Anek Kamchum said that in accordance with NLA's meeting protocols, the NACC writ should be delivered to the accused at least 15 days before the first meeting on the impeachment proceedings are held. The first such meeting was scheduled to be held yesterday.

He also pointed out that Yingluck had returned to Thailand on November 2, so she did not have enough time to prepare her defence. He said that if the documents were delivered to Yingluck on November 7, as claimed by the NLA president, then she would only have five days to study the 3,870 pages of the writ.

He also called on the NLA president to allow Yingluck's legal team to make copies of the 3,870 pages, even though they were classified documents.

Four NLA members, including Saowanee Suwannacheep and Monthian Buntan, took to the floor asking the lawyers why they did not contact Yingluck while she was overseas to alert her about this development, especially since the news had been widely covered by the media.

Norwit Lalaeng, another member of Yingluck's team of lawyers, said that according to the NLA meeting protocols, the defendant has to receive the documents officially, not be informed over the phone.

The NLA voted 167:16, with seven abstentions, to defer the first meeting of the impeachment proceedings to November 28 as proposed by the NLA whip secretary Somchai Swangkarnwith.

Pornpetch said Yingluck's lawyers would be allowed to copy all the 3,870 pages of the writ, provided the copying was done only during official hours.

The NACC has accused Yingluck of failing to stem corruption and massive losses in the rice-pledging scheme as well as intentionally breaching Article 178 of the 2007 Constitution, Article 11 of the State Administration Act, Article 58 of the Constitution Organic Law on Prevention and Suppression of Corruption Act.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/NLA-accepts-lawyers-plea-to-defer-Yinglucks-impeac-30247651.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2014-11-13

Posted

Here we go again. Justice getting fenestrated in all orifices, next up is another financial announcement about a ridiculously wealthy policeman's portfolio expansion. He really has the Midas touch.

Posted

I see the lawyers conveniently forgot about the Oct 29 date.

Is it the fault of the NLA that Yingluck decided she must go on an overseas trip at that time and did she not stay longer than planned, must they adjust their schedule for a defendant ?

I see she got less than the 30 asked for, more days to think up another excuse to not attend.

  • Like 2
Posted

This is a blow for the yellows on here yet another set back because Yingluck and her team are just to smart for this lot.

Bumping her up the list and rushing to get something anything other is just showing the bias towards yingluck and the PTP.

The fact is she is just to popular and the peoples choice and this mob have no idea what to do about it because the backlash at the polls is already going to sweep the PTP back into power and if she's the leader the yellows will be decimated.

Hence the targeting while those before are on the very very back burner .

  • Like 1
Posted

The lawyers may be getting a little wriggle room on deferring the inevitable, but it won't make a jot of difference to the outcome.

She is toast. She won't even read the massive writ, she wouldn't even understand it. She is an airhead.

The lawyers already had all this, it is those who will be doing the scrutinizing and providing the defence, she is merely the puppet.

If and when she is impeached I hope the NACC then push for criminal prosecution of gross criminal negligence. She after all AWARDED herself the job of chairperson of the scam scheme, and pretty much claimed the salary and refused to do the job at ANY level.

She stole that salary and allowed Thailand to lose over 700 Bn baht in the process.

20 years prison might straighten her out, all her acolytes with her.

You obviously have little understanding of how the Thai justice system works for people of her status.......

  • Like 2
Posted

Norwit Lalaeng, another member of Yingluck's team of lawyers, said that according to the NLA meeting protocols, the defendant has to receive the documents officially, not be informed over the phone.

But obviously the lawyers can inform her of the documents over the phone. I don't even know why they're dodging and avoiding the inevitable, she will be impeached and receive a ban, but like the rest of the family she will never do time. This country will never change until someone with money and influence goes to jail.

  • Like 1
Posted

For all you who complain about given her time to prepare think back to the Airport blockage by the Yellow terrorist who have been dragging this case out for years.

Oh yeah, bad as it was for Tourism, it wasn't 1 trillion Baht worth of blockage. There was a message in the airport blockage, what message was there in Yinglucks case ?? cheat, rob Thailands coffers.

  • Like 1
Posted

This is a blow for the yellows on here yet another set back because Yingluck and her team are just to smart for this lot.

Bumping her up the list and rushing to get something anything other is just showing the bias towards yingluck and the PTP.

The fact is she is just to popular and the peoples choice and this mob have no idea what to do about it because the backlash at the polls is already going to sweep the PTP back into power and if she's the leader the yellows will be decimated.

Hence the targeting while those before are on the very very back burner .

She is popular with those who are part of the 1 trillion loss.

Posted

I see the lawyers conveniently forgot about the Oct 29 date.

Is it the fault of the NLA that Yingluck decided she must go on an overseas trip at that time and did she not stay longer than planned, must they adjust their schedule for a defendant ?

I see she got less than the 30 asked for, more days to think up another excuse to not attend.

She has had good family coaching.

eg. her sister-in-law requested the court delay a hearing against her because she was seeking medical treatment in Singapore for a headache.

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Thaksin_ordered_back_to_Thailand_on_stock-sale_charges

eg. her nephew requested a delay in his court hearing so that he could complete his vacation in Japan.

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2006/12/26/headlines/headlines_30022565.php

  • Like 2
Posted

Just part of the 'delay of justice' game which rich and important people play. Here are some others, besides, 'DELAY'

>>> put on monks robes

>>> claim to be too old or infirm

>>> run off to another country

>>> claim it was someone else in charge

>>>> Claim, (as an excuse by some of Thaksin's former Ministers): when indicted: "Oh, that happened when I was Minister of __fill in the blanks__, but since I'm no longer Minister, then there's no malfeasance."

  • Like 2
Posted

The defence now has their wishes granted , no more deferrals , you have no more excuses , prepare your brief in response and lets proceed with fairness and without fear , get this case over and done with. coffee1.gif

  • Like 1
Posted

For all you who complain about given her time to prepare think back to the Airport blockage by the Yellow terrorist who have been dragging this case out for years.

Oh yeah, bad as it was for Tourism, it wasn't 1 trillion Baht worth of blockage. There was a message in the airport blockage, what message was there in Yinglucks case ?? cheat, rob Thailands coffers.

Apart from your usual soundbites, you don't seem to know much about economics. Most governments run deficits these days. That doesn't mean that they have pocketed the cash themselves.

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/

How do explain that Yingluck and Prayuth both have a similar net worth - around 600 million Baht each? Prayuth's army salary was 117,000 Baht per month. Yingluck's corrupt, but Prayuth's a good saver, right?

  • Like 1
Posted

For all you who complain about given her time to prepare think back to the Airport blockage by the Yellow terrorist who have been dragging this case out for years.

Oh yeah, bad as it was for Tourism, it wasn't 1 trillion Baht worth of blockage. There was a message in the airport blockage, what message was there in Yinglucks case ?? cheat, rob Thailands coffers.

Apart from your usual soundbites, you don't seem to know much about economics. Most governments run deficits these days. That doesn't mean that they have pocketed the cash themselves.

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/

How do explain that Yingluck and Prayuth both have a similar net worth - around 600 million Baht each? Prayuth's army salary was 117,000 Baht per month. Yingluck's corrupt, but Prayuth's a good saver, right?

Your economics are not bright when you call Yinglucks "mistake-I did not do wrong" a Quote "deficit" 1 trillion ??

If you want to put on the table where the money came from --Yingluck/prayuth then do otherwise it is not your business.

Thailands peoples money is the concern here NOT your explanation.

  • Like 1
Posted

For all you who complain about given her time to prepare think back to the Airport blockage by the Yellow terrorist who have been dragging this case out for years.

Oh yeah, bad as it was for Tourism, it wasn't 1 trillion Baht worth of blockage. There was a message in the airport blockage, what message was there in Yinglucks case ?? cheat, rob Thailands coffers.

Apart from your usual soundbites, you don't seem to know much about economics. Most governments run deficits these days. That doesn't mean that they have pocketed the cash themselves.

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/

How do explain that Yingluck and Prayuth both have a similar net worth - around 600 million Baht each? Prayuth's army salary was 117,000 Baht per month. Yingluck's corrupt, but Prayuth's a good saver, right?

Your economics are not bright when you call Yinglucks "mistake-I did not do wrong" a Quote "deficit" 1 trillion ??

If you want to put on the table where the money came from --Yingluck/prayuth then do otherwise it is not your business.

Thailands peoples money is the concern here NOT your explanation.

I'll repeat the question:

How do explain that Yingluck and Prayuth both have a similar net worth - around 600 million Baht each?

  • Like 1
Posted

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

For all you who complain about given her time to prepare think back to the Airport blockage by the Yellow terrorist who have been dragging this case out for years.

Oh yeah, bad as it was for Tourism, it wasn't 1 trillion Baht worth of blockage. There was a message in the airport blockage, what message was there in Yinglucks case ?? cheat, rob Thailands coffers.

we are talking about foot dragging here. why change the subject. plus the cost keeping going up and up every time you post. time you take a few days off of TV and relax and gain your senses back. but of course this is a typical yellow tactic to change the subject when it don't suit them.

Posted

It's very entertaining to see how something so blase can be spun completely away from reallity by TV readers. It's one reason I read TV as much as I do the comics.

Yingluck's attorneries request the NLA follow its own protocols. The NLA votes and agrees to follow its protocols. Yingluck gets 15 more days to review the charges as per protocol. In itself hardly blockbuster news. No conspiracy, no collusion, no conflict of interest - boring news.

Thank goodness for TV readers!

Posted

Your economics are not bright when you call Yinglucks "mistake-I did not do wrong" a Quote "deficit" 1 trillion ??

If you want to put on the table where the money came from --Yingluck/prayuth then do otherwise it is not your business.

Thailands peoples money is the concern here NOT your explanation.

I'll repeat the question:

How do explain that Yingluck and Prayuth both have a similar net worth - around 600 million Baht each?

It is off topic----not your or my business. unless you know where they received the wealth then print it.

So I'll put the question to you ON TOPIC, how is she going to get out of the DEFICIT ???

Posted

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

For all you who complain about given her time to prepare think back to the Airport blockage by the Yellow terrorist who have been dragging this case out for years.

Oh yeah, bad as it was for Tourism, it wasn't 1 trillion Baht worth of blockage. There was a message in the airport blockage, what message was there in Yinglucks case ?? cheat, rob Thailands coffers.

we are talking about foot dragging here. why change the subject. plus the cost keeping going up and up every time you post. time you take a few days off of TV and relax and gain your senses back. but of course this is a typical yellow tactic to change the subject when it don't suit them.

TOPIC Yingluck, DEFICIT. her feet dragging. not your spin about uncle Tom Cobley.

  • Like 1
Posted

This is a blow for the yellows on here yet another set back because Yingluck and her team are just to smart for this lot.

Bumping her up the list and rushing to get something anything other is just showing the bias towards yingluck and the PTP.

The fact is she is just to popular and the peoples choice and this mob have no idea what to do about it because the backlash at the polls is already going to sweep the PTP back into power and if she's the leader the yellows will be decimated.

Hence the targeting while those before are on the very very back burner .

What a desperate post.

They are keeping The Shins on a leash and you don't see that. Love it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...