Jump to content

Thai Justice Minister targets 40 for overseas lese majeste offenses


webfact

Recommended Posts

Justice minister targets 40 for overseas lese majeste offenses
By Digital Content

14231857321174-640x390x1.jpg

BANGKOK, Feb 6 -- Profiles of 40 persons abroad were sent to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs seeking their extradition from the countries where they stay while offending the royal institution, according to Justice Minister Paiboon Koomchaya.

The minister said the Department of Special Investigation and other law enforcement agencies had compiled the profiles for him.

The movement to seek extradition is in response to Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha’s order to stop offenses to the monarchy.

Gen Paiboon said that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will distribute the information so that other countries would realize that Thai people were concerned about the movements of the wrongdoers.

Although some countries have no extradition agreements with Thailand, the information including evidence of the persons’ offences would emphasize the concerns of the Thai public, the justice minister said.

“I would like the countries where the suspects [are] to be aware of the feelings of Thai people, so clear evidence is submitted to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

"Those countries will know that Thailand is worried and wants to bring the culprits to punishment," he said.

"This is the first time [we have] provided information and evidence to clearly identify the persons and their whereabouts,” Gen Paiboon said. (MCOT online news)

tnalogo.jpg
-- TNA 2015-02-06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm.... some TVPosters seem to be unaware that (at least some of) these fugitives from justice have

(a. jumped the queues of legitimate refugees (e.g. Eakapop Luara)

(b. continued to make some rather inflammatory and blatantly insulting of His Majesty and "The Palace" (e.g. Eakapop Luara, again, though his Facebook activities have been curtailed/closed because of his behaviour since arriving in his host country

The chaps that they seek are not just "Mummy, the Emperor has no clothes!" type lese majeste offenders. In some cases I am sure that there are many other enquiries to be advanced once they can speak to the fugitive......

Edited by wirat69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm.... some TVPosters seem to be unaware that (at least some of) these fugitives from justice have

(a) jumped the queues of legitimate refugees (e.g. Eakapop Luara)

(B) continued to make some rather inflammatory and blatantly insulting of His Majesty and "The Palace" (e.g. Eakapop Luara, again, though his Facebook activities have been curtailed/closed because of his behaviour since arriving in his host country

The chaps that they seek are not just "Mummy, the Emperor has no clothes!" type lese majeste offenders. In some cases I am sure that there are many other enquiries to be advanced once they can speak to the fugitive......

That's their opinion though. There are people.Back home in they uk that have as much hate aimed towards the crown. There are groups and associations supporting having a republic, then there's guys like David icke And just supporters speculating some serious accusations towards them, Muhammad Alfyed took them to court for conspiracy to muder....

You Can dressed It up however you went But Know is archaic and is used more as s tool By governments and politicians to hurry each other. There are many more issues than 40 people speaking therr minds abroad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The greater majority of those countries will not extradite persons on these charges, there are laws in place in other countries, however they are seldom if ever used.

Lese-majesty laws in the UK. do exist on the statute book, however they are as said seldom or ever used nowadays. I know people are not prosecuted anymore for it.

Contempt of the Sovereign is an offence under the common law of England.

Paragraph 369 of Volume 11(1) of Halsbury's Laws of England (2006) suggests that the last prosecution for this (Les Majeste) offence was R v Price in 1840. I would suggest you worry more about the libel-laws. They sting just the same.

Contempt of the Sovereign is not the same as Lese Majeste

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...