Jump to content

Supreme Court reverses death sentence for two convicts in murder of Aussie auditor in 1999


Recommended Posts

Posted

Supreme Court reverses death sentence for two convicts in murder of Aussie auditor in 1999

25-2-2558-14-37-11-wpcf_725x413.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The Supreme Court today reversed the death sentences for two convicts and upheld life sentence for another for their involvement in the 1999 murder of Australian auditor Michael Wansley in Nakhon Sawan province.

Earlier in 2006, the Appeals Court upheld the death sentence for two convicts, Somchoke Suthiwiriwan and Sompong Buasakul ruled by the first court.

At today’s hearing of the Supreme Court’s final judgement of their appeals, the court reversed the death sentence for Somchoke and Sompong after their appeals has ground to listen to.

It then handed down life sentence for both of them.

But for the first defendant, Boonpan Suthiwiriwan, the court upheld his life sentence handed by the appeals Court.

All were former executives of Kasetthai sugar mill in Nakhon Sawan.

The three and the sugar mill owner, Pradit Siriviriyakul, were charged for masterminding the murder of 58-year-old Wansley. He was shot dead on March 10, 1999, while on his way to audit the books of the sugar mill in Nakhon Sawan.

Only the owner Pradit Siriviriyakul was acquitted after the first court gave him the benefit of doubt.

According to the indictment filed with the court in 2006, Pradit hired Boonpan, Somchoke, Sompong and hit man Somchai Jaihao to kill Wansley because he had uncovered financial irregularities in the business, which was in the process of debt restructuring. Somchai has been tried and given a life sentence by Nakhon Sawan Court.

On September 5, 2006, the lower court sentenced Boonpan to life, condemned Somchoke and Sompong to death and acquitted Pradit. The public prosecutor and co-plaintiffs then submitted an appeal to get Pradit punished while the three other defendants appealed for acquittal.

The Appeals Court was told Boonpan arranged for a motorcycle and a gun, while Somchoke and Sompong helped the alleged gunmen Somchai and Pichet Khaewsamduang (who was acquitted by a lower court in a separate trial) in fleeing to Bangkok. The Appeals Court upheld the lower-court rulings handing down a life sentence to Boonpan and death sentences to the other two men.

Finding weakness in evidence against Pradit, the Appeals Court upheld his acquittal by the lower court on benefit of doubt.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/supreme-court-reverses-death-sentence-two-convicts-murder-aussie-auditor-1999

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2015-02-25

Posted

The Owner walks, hope it wasn,t because of corruption. Personally when in trouble in Asia, i have had to pay the Judge. I should have paid him sooner, as dithering cost me double.

Posted

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

This was the case in which the banks owed a few hundred million USD hired Deloittes to investigate dodgy financials. Of course the owner, from a wealthy well-known family was acquited but the pawns got death, now reversed. A judge was bribed ( and sacked) but the owner, charged with murder ("...it's good that the farang is dead but make sure it can never be traced back to us") walked free on bail.

Correct

Posted

The hit men deserved life sentences, Pradit should have already been executed. Again, in Thailand, the rich and powerful escape any punishment.

You missed that bit, didn't you, the gunman got life.

Posted

Top court upholds convictions in murder of Australian auditor Wansley
WansleyKesinee Taengkhiao
The Nation

BANGKOK: -- THE SUPREME Court yesterday upheld a lower-court ruling that had sentenced a former executive of Kaset Thai Sugar Co to life imprisonment for his role in the 1999 murder of Australian auditor Michael Wansley.

The three defendants were Bunpan Suthiwiriyawan, former chief of personnel and public relations for Kaset Thai Sugar in Nakhon Sawan; Bunpan's brother Somchok, who was former staff member of Thai Identity Sugar in Uttaradit; and another man identified as Sompong Buasakul.

The three men had been charged with conspiring to commit murder, although they denied the charges.

In the original case, prosecutors accused mill owner and Kaset Thai Sugar manager Pradit Siriviriyakul of hiring Bunpan, Somchok and Sompong to murder Wansley by firing at him while he was travelling to the sugar mill in Nakhon Sawan province in a van.

It was alleged that Wansley - who was auditing the mill on behalf of South Sathorn Planners Co - had uncovered fraud at the mill, which was under debt rehabilitation, and had refused to keep quiet about it.

Prosecutors said the Australian auditor died instantly after the bullets hit his head and body.

The Criminal Court on September 5, 2006, sentenced Bunpan to life in prison for being an accomplice in the murder, handed down death sentences to Somchok and Sompong for committing murder, and acquitted Pradit for lack of solid evidence that he had hired the three to commit the crime.

Prosecutors took the case to a higher court, asking that Pradit be punished, while the other three defendants also appealed against their sentences. The Court of Appeals on July 13, 2011, upheld the lower court's ruling. The three defendants lodged an appeal with the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision to sentence Bunpan to life imprisonment because there was solid and circumstantial evidence plus witness testimonies to incriminate Bunpan for being an accomplice in the murder.

However, the court struck down the lower courts' ruling to sentence Somchok and Sompong to death and instead sentenced them to life imprisonment for being accomplices in the murder.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Top-court-upholds-convictions-in-murder-of-Austral-30254865.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-02-26

Posted

The hit men deserved life sentences, Pradit should have already been executed. Again, in Thailand, the rich and powerful escape any punishment.

You missed that bit, didn't you, the gunman got life.

You missed the bit. To say "The gunman deserved life sentences" is equivalent to saying "The gunmen got what they deserved, being life sentences..."

It's called an elliptical inference. Maybe look it up? thumbsup.gif

  • Like 1
Posted

Boy, always the whiners. Look boys and girls they only escape if you let them. It is always up to you in the end. If you were here in the old days you would understand what I am talking about but, few here still do. It was not always like this. So I suppose one gets the justice they will accept.

Posted

So if the owner didn't organise and fund the hit, who did?

I think the point has been made in this case and many others that the more money you have, the more "doubt" or "lack of evidence" or "insufficient evidence" etc etc will be fired at the judge!

Posted

All the posters having a go at Prayuth, obviously they cannot read as the acquittal of the rich guy was back in 2006; if these posters are examples of western brain power give me Thai anytime!!!!!

Posted

Off topic deflection posts have been removed as well as the replies.

A post containing Thai language has been removed. English is the only acceptable language anywhere on ThaiVisa including Classifieds, except within the Thai language forum, where of course using Thai is allowed.

Posted

Although this case had a tragic result for the auditor and his family it is breathtakingly hypocritical for US and UK citizens to criticize the Thai justice system. Recall that an unprovoked attack on Iraq was initiated by both the US and UK-a war crime-and there was wanton destruction of the Iraqi civilian infrastructure-another war crime. There was industrial scale torture and murder facilitated by a worldwide network of black sites and equally black worldwide aerial delivery system of victims. The death toll probably exceeds a million people both from direct results of bombing and the indirect result of disease and untreated injuries.

Have the authors of THIS barbarism been hanged? While it is perfectly proper to be outraged at a blatant miscarriage of justice it would be better to look homeward at the grotesque and massive miscarriages of justice perpetrated by the leaders of Western society. Recall "the mote in thy neighbor's eye while ignoring the beam in thine own?"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...