webfact Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 Holmes jury keeps execution as option as sentencing advancesBy SADIE GURMANCENTENNIAL, Colo. (AP) — Jurors on Monday moved one step closer toward sentencing James Holmes to death for his Colorado movie theater attack, taking less than three hours to reject arguments that the former neuroscience student's mental illness means he should not die.The decision clears the way for one last attempt from both sides to sway the jury, with gripping testimony from victims about their suffering and more appeals for mercy for the man convicted of murdering 12 people and trying to kill 70 more during the 2012 assault at a Batman movie.Holmes, his reactions dulled by anti-psychotic drugs, stood as ordered and appeared emotionless as Judge Carlos Samour, Jr. read the decisions.Robert and Arlene Homes held hands, their fingers interlaced, and directed their eyes at the floor. With each unanimous "yes," it became ever more clear that jurors believe their son's crimes outweighed their testimony. She began to cry, and her husband held out a box of tissues.More tears flowed in the gallery. Rena Medek began silently sobbing when the judge read the name of her 23-year-old daughter Micayla. Ian Sullivan, the father of Holmes' youngest victim, 6-year-old Veronica Moser-Sullivan, closed his eyes when her name was read. Veronica's grandfather, Robert Sullivan, glared at Holmes and nodded his head softly."We are one step closer," Joshua Nowlan said outside court, adding that he's "very happy with the results."Wounded by the gunfire, Nowlan used the cane he now needs to support his legs as a prop during the trial, to show how Holmes sprayed bullets from his assault rifle.The jury was told to return Tuesday morning for the final phase. Then, the nine women and three men will finally decide whether the 27-year-old Holmes should receive a lethal injection, or spend life in prison without parole.Sandy Phillips, whose daughter Jessica Ghawi was killed, said prosecutors advised her that she would be testifying on Tuesday."I'm a little overwhelmed, but at the same time my job is to share Jessie with the jury, and I will do that to the best of my ability," she said outside the courthouse.The same jury swiftly rejected Holmes' insanity defense, deciding that he was capable of telling right from wrong when he carried out the theater attack in the Denver suburb of Aurora on July 20, 2012. Their quick decision on Monday raised expectations that they will choose a death sentence after what prosecutors estimate will be two or three more days of testimony from survivors.But legal experts said there's no way to predict that final decision.Monday's preliminary verdict was highly technical. They found simply that Holmes' mental problems and the portrait his attorneys painted of a kinder, gentler younger man did not outweigh the horrors of his calculated attack on defenseless moviegoers.This next stage can be more challenging for each juror, and to choose capital punishment, they must be unanimous, Denver defense attorney Dan Recht said."They're making the ultimate decision of life or death, quite literally," Recht said. "All they need is one holdout ... We are far from over on this."The defense had argued that mental illness reduced his "moral culpability," and that his personal history made him worthy of mercy. They said it was schizophrenia, not free will, that drove him to murder. They called his former teachers, friends, sister and parents, who said "Jimmy" had been a friendly child who withdrew socially as he grew older.Robert and Arlene Holmes testified that they never suspected their son was mentally ill. But Robert Holmes acknowledged that they rarely communicated in the months before the theater attack, and that in his family, emotions just weren't talked about, even though his own father and sister had been hospitalized with mental illness."He was not a violent person. At least not until the event," Robert Holmes said, referring to the theater attack.Holmes had been a promising scholar in a demanding neuroscience Ph.D. program at the University of Colorado until his life went awry amid the pressures of laboratory work. He broke up with his first and only girlfriend and dropped out of school, abandoning his longtime goal of becoming a scientist. He obtained prescription anti-anxiety and anti-depressant medicine by seeing a campus psychiatrist, but hid the depth of his turmoil from everyone, describing it instead in a secret journal.That eerie notebook — which Holmes mailed to the psychiatrist hours before opening fire in the theater — became key evidence. In it, Holmes diagnosed himself with a litany of mental problems and methodically laid out his plans to kill. He wrote that he tried to fix his own brain, and failed.Shortly after midnight, he slipped into the premiere of a Batman movie, stood before the capacity crowd of more than 400 people, threw gas canisters, and then opened fire, with a shotgun, assault rifle and semi-automatic pistol before surrendering meekly to police outside.___Contributors include Associated Press Writer Thomas Peipert in Centennial, Colo. -- (c) Associated Press 2015-08-04
HeijoshinCool Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 Colorado gunman James Holmes nears death sentence ... And in maybe twenty-five or thirty years, it will actually be carried out.
little mary sunshine Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 Fry the Basta.. Within 48 hours of sentence... That Would be justice!!
BudRight Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 Fry the Basta.. Within 48 hours of sentence... That Would be justice!! Justice would be for his victims to live again and no execution has ever done that. They are to grant the victim's families revenge. A base instinct, not unlike the crime itself.
hawker9000 Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 Fry the Basta.. Within 48 hours of sentence... That Would be justice!! Justice would be for his victims to live again and no execution has ever done that. They are to grant the victim's families revenge. A base instinct, not unlike the crime itself. "Justice would be for his victims to live again and no execution has ever done that." When practiced however, it has ensured that murderer can't murder again, which works for me. And there are plenty of those who'd disagree with you outright (that it's not justice). NO sentence for ANY crime turns back the clock on the crime and rewrites history to say that it never happened. The house doesn't unburn down; the bank doesn't get unrobbed; the automobiles don't uncollide; assault victims don't get unassaulted; rape victims don't get unraped; children don't get unmolested; and murder victims do not get unmurdered. Slagging it as nothing but a "base instinct" is just the typical rubbish and not worth addressing. You might find this article interesting: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420137/Revealed-The-12-convicted-murderers-freed-licence-kill-AGAIN-past-decade.html Oh, and maybe this list somebody took the trouble to put together will also interest you: http://www.wesleylowe.com/repoff.html Just the idea of abolishing the death penalty and sending murderers up for life instead should make a person think. By doing that, you've just created a prisoner with absolutely nothing to lose. How'd YOU like to be the corrections officer guarding these guys? Or even a fellow prisoner? (Is that part of everyone's prison sentence then - the forced risk of being murdered on the inside by one of these "lifers"?) Except for the suicide-terrorist who doesn't even care about dying, I can't imagine a more dangerous class of persons to be creating. And some end up eventually getting paroled anyway, as the bleeding hearts go on to insist they should be since prison is so "inhumane" and "non-rehabilitating"!
Chicog Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 The thing is he obviously is barking mad. So should he be held responsible for his crimes?The focus should surely be on making sure such insane people can never get their hands on firearms. The death sentence in this case will not deter other insane people going off on spree killings.
sdanielmcev Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 The death penalty has nothing to do with justice. Nor does serving jail time. It is retribution.
little mary sunshine Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 Death penalty and quickly...he would never Murder innocent people again!!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now