Jump to content

Purported ISIS militants post list of 1,400 U.S. 'targets'


webfact

Recommended Posts

Purported ISIS militants post list of 1,400 U.S. 'targets'
By Dugald McConnell and Brian Todd, CNN

(CNN) A group calling itself the Islamic State Hacking Division this week posted online a purported list of names and contacts for Americans it refers to as "targets," according to officials.

Though the legitimacy of the list is questionable, and much of the information it contains is outdated, the message claims to provide the phone numbers, locations, and "passwords" for 1400 American government and military personnel as well as purported credit card numbers, and excerpts of some Facebook chats.

"We are extracting confidential data," the message says, "and passing on your personal information to the soldiers of the khilafah, who soon with the permission of Allah will strike at your necks in your own lands!"

Full story: http://us.cnn.com/2015/08/13/world/isis-militants-american-targets/index.html

cnn.com.jpg
-- CNN 2015-08-14

Link to comment
Share on other sites


its rather easy for a willing individual, hitman

i never understood why they are called isis? islamic state is is not isis

edit: nevermind i saw its for "irak and syria"

Edited by srl1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cavemen with computers. Idiots with ideologies. Fools with foolhardy foolishness.

Extemporaneous excrement soon to be exterminated.

I am peaceful. They are not.

We are many.

They are few.

vampire.gif

Roses are red and violets are blue . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i never understood why they are called isis? islamic state is is not isis

We should not allow them the right to be referred to as Islamic, because what they represent is a perverse distortion of the faith and its followers.

They should be referred to as "Daish". Not only is this an acronym of the groups full name (al-Dawla al-Islamiya fi al-Iraq wa al-Sham) but depending on how you pronounce it in Arabic, it can mean "a bigot that imposes his/her views on others".

It has been reported that the leaders of "Daish" hate this name.

Which, as far as I'm concerned, is great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i never understood why they are called isis? islamic state is is not isis

We should not allow them the right to be referred to as Islamic, because what they represent is a perverse distortion of the faith and its followers.

They should be referred to as "Daish". Not only is this an acronym of the groups full name (al-Dawla al-Islamiya fi al-Iraq wa al-Sham) but depending on how you pronounce it in Arabic, it can mean "a bigot that imposes his/her views on others".

It has been reported that the leaders of "Daish" hate this name.

Which, as far as I'm concerned, is great.

You can call them whatever you like, the fact is they are Islamic puritans. As for Imposing ones views on others, what is Sharia law if not that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now any Islamic Terrorist worth his salt would quickly realise that their real enemies are the banksters and not those on any hacked list. And yet those trouble making parasites and war for profit merchants never, ever get targetted (or jailed or prosecuted for that matter).

Just as well I'm not the conspitatorial type or I'd start wondereing if the Islamic terrorists are in fact indirectly working for said banksters. Cause by my thinking if a whole bunch of senior bankers in the usual criminal firms started getting knocked off you would suspect that the wars for profit might settle down real quick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now any Islamic Terrorist worth his salt would quickly realise that their real enemies are the banksters and not those on any hacked list. And yet those trouble making parasites and war for profit merchants never, ever get targetted (or jailed or prosecuted for that matter).

Just as well I'm not the conspitatorial type or I'd start wondereing if the Islamic terrorists are in fact indirectly working for said banksters. Cause by my thinking if a whole bunch of senior bankers in the usual criminal firms started getting knocked off you would suspect that the wars for profit might settle down real quick.

Banksters and in turn arms manufacturers(all linked together) are truly in favor of war as they supply the winners and losers with fire power. To be a big war winner you have to come down on both sides of the fence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...