I have cancer - a personal perspective

oncearugge · September 21, 2015

As implied the radiotherapy is likely to be a palliative measure which will hopefully reduce distressing symptoms at the expense of some short term nausea/vomiting which appropriate medication will help relieve.

I have nothing further to add except to second Sheryl's opinion in respect of chemotherapy.

I send my best wishes to the OP and would encourage her to keep in touch.

Cpkt8 · September 21, 2015

We are treating in Singapore now. Thank you so much for your advices and support. I will speak to the doctors tomorrow again.

Nick167 · September 21, 2015

Thre is an Singaporean Indian Doctor called Dr Prasad or something, he was in Thailand before. He specialises in antioxidants and interleukin therapies and has been curing a lot of people of cancer...I believe he is in Sydney at the moment working for the St Vincents Medical Grp.

Patsycat · September 21, 2015

Gosh, what a thread.

I just want to give you all a big hug.

fang37 · September 21, 2015

Let it be.

dennis123 · September 22, 2015

Sorry to hear you had to go through all of this Fang, hope you don't have much pain from your leg anymore.

I never had someone close to me that suffered from cancer so can't comment much on that, yes I had two uncles die from it but I was young and they lived far away so there wasn't much of a family bound.

Do feel a bit guilty when I start threads about some smallish health issues and than read your story. Stay strong and I hope you're recovering and feeling better day by day.

Respect for all the people that go through this and don't curse the whole hospital/room they're lying in.

Cpkt8 · September 30, 2015

Have anyone done Immunotherapy before? The doctor suggests x3 sessions of immunotherapy for my husband, 1 and half years to 3 years life expectancy.

Today he has gone for 6th radiation for his brain cancer. The CT biopsy indicates that his lung cancer is from his bladder tumor.

fang37 · October 6, 2015

Never heard of it. Checked it on the web.

Would I do it? Probably not.

1.5 to 3 yrs life expectancy.

There should be one decision maker ONLY - hubby.

You may not agree - honesty is the best policy.

Sheryl · October 6, 2015

Do you know the name of the drug?

xylophone · October 6, 2015

Went to a seminar in Puket where these drugs were explained and discussed and I asked if any of them were available in Thailand, and the answer was NO.

However the oncologist did suggest that a hospital can apply to the government to have one imported, but they will be horrendously expensive, whereas in some countries they are part funded by the health system.

fang37 · October 6, 2015

Unavailability - helpful?

Actually, it is. Options are now fewer.

Cpkt8 · October 7, 2015

He's not able to express himself, sometimes his talk doesn't even make sense. How can I let him make decisions now, specially life and death decision? I'm hoping his mind would be clearer soon. It's been almost a week after the last radiation, has not seen any improvement yet.

As what the radiation doctor said, it takes about a month after radiation for improvement. I'm monitoring his condition, if by then when there's no hope I'll ....

Every day every moment is very precious to me. I want the best for him, I want him to be as comfortable as possible. But that cancer thing is such a horrifying illness, it eats away the life of a person bit by bit. I'm trying very very hard to control my emotion in front of him. Putting a smile in front of him, trying to be cheery to encourage him. Unfortunately got scolded by him for being cheery several times. I know he's in pain, that's why I don't put it to heart.

Dear Fang37, I'm sorry that you're suffering as well and have to listen to my rant. I sincerely hope you don't give up hope for yourself and your loved ones. I hope for miracle for all cancer patients.

Cpkt8 · October 7, 2015

I'm not told of what drug, just immunotherapy. Each session cost S$14,000 at Gleneagles hospital in Singapore. Was told this has much lesser side effects than chemo.

I have not decided yet whether to go ahead with the immunotherapy. I'm still monitoring my husband's brain condition. It's been almost a week after the 6th radiation. I'm really hoping for miracle.

Cpkt8 · October 7, 2015

My husband is getting treated in Singapore. Yes it's very very costly here. But as long as there's hope for my husband, I don't mind eating bread every day.

fang37 · October 7, 2015

If you dearly love him, stale (3+ day old)bread is a far better display of affection.

Cpkt8 · October 7, 2015

I've eaten 10 days old bread (kept in freezer of course), 3 days is nothing. Naughty fang37!

DisparateDan · October 7, 2015

The OP's narrative is why I keep this on my bookmarks.

http://www.dignitas.ch/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=22〈=en

fang37 · October 7, 2015

"Dignitas" - great intentions BUT I have no $$$ -

Cpkt8 · October 14, 2015

Hi Sheryl,

Just found out the drug is Anti-PD1. Do you know this? Thanks.

oncearugge · October 14, 2015

Here is a research abstract re the use of Anti-PD1

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22658128

oxo1947 · October 14, 2015

How Doctors Die

It’s Not Like the Rest of Us, But It Should Be

by Ken Murray

Years ago, Charlie, a highly respected orthopedist and a mentor of mine, found a lump in his stomach. He had a surgeon explore the area, and the diagnosis was pancreatic cancer. This surgeon was one of the best in the country. He had even invented a new procedure for this exact cancer that could triple a patient’s five-year-survival odds—from 5 percent to 15 percent—albeit with a poor quality of life. Charlie was uninterested. He went home the next day, closed his practice, and never set foot in a hospital again. He focused on spending time with family and feeling as good as possible. Several months later, he died at home. He got no chemotherapy, radiation, or surgical treatment. Medicare didn’t spend much on him.

It’s not a frequent topic of discussion, but doctors die, too. And they don’t die like the rest of us. What’s unusual about them is not how much treatment they get compared to most Americans, but how little. For all the time they spend fending off the deaths of others, they tend to be fairly serene when faced with death themselves. They know exactly what is going to happen, they know the choices, and they generally have access to any sort of medical care they could want. But they go gently.

Of course, doctors don’t want to die; they want to live. But they know enough about modern medicine to know its limits. And they know enough about death to know what all people fear most: dying in pain, and dying alone. They’ve talked about this with their families. They want to be sure, when the time comes, that no heroic measures will happen—that they will never experience, during their last moments on earth, someone breaking their ribs in an attempt to resuscitate them with CPR (that’s what happens if CPR is done right).

Almost all medical professionals have seen what we call “futile care” being performed on people. That’s when doctors bring the cutting edge of technology to bear on a grievously ill person near the end of life. The patient will get cut open, perforated with tubes, hooked up to machines, and assaulted with drugs. All of this occurs in the Intensive Care Unit at a cost of tens of thousands of dollars a day. What it buys is misery we would not inflict on a terrorist. I cannot count the number of times fellow physicians have told me, in words that vary only slightly, “Promise me if you find me like this that you’ll kill me.” They mean it. Some medical personnel wear medallions stamped “NO CODE” to tell physicians not to perform CPR on them. I have even seen it as a tattoo.

To administer medical care that makes people suffer is anguishing. Physicians are trained to gather information without revealing any of their own feelings, but in private, among fellow doctors, they’ll vent. “How can anyone do that to their family members?” they’ll ask. I suspect it’s one reason physicians have higher rates of alcohol abuse and depression than professionals in most other fields. I know it’s one reason I stopped participating in hospital care for the last 10 years of my practice.

How has it come to this—that doctors administer so much care that they wouldn’t want for themselves? The simple, or not-so-simple, answer is this: patients, doctors, and the system.

To see how patients play a role, imagine a scenario in which someone has lost consciousness and been admitted to an emergency room. As is so often the case, no one has made a plan for this situation, and shocked and scared family members find themselves caught up in a maze of choices. They’re overwhelmed. When doctors ask if they want “everything” done, they answer yes. Then the nightmare begins. Sometimes, a family really means “do everything,” but often they just mean “do everything that’s reasonable.” The problem is that they may not know what’s reasonable, nor, in their confusion and sorrow, will they ask about it or hear what a physician may be telling them. For their part, doctors told to do “everything” will do it, whether it is reasonable or not.

The above scenario is a common one. Feeding into the problem are unrealistic expectations of what doctors can accomplish. Many people think of CPR as a reliable lifesaver when, in fact, the results are usually poor. I’ve had hundreds of people brought to me in the emergency room after getting CPR. Exactly one, a healthy man who’d had no heart troubles (for those who want specifics, he had a “tension pneumothorax”), walked out of the hospital. If a patient suffers from severe illness, old age, or a terminal disease, the odds of a good outcome from CPR are infinitesimal, while the odds of suffering are overwhelming. Poor knowledge and misguided expectations lead to a lot of bad decisions.

But of course it’s not just patients making these things happen. Doctors play an enabling role, too. The trouble is that even doctors who hate to administer futile care must find a way to address the wishes of patients and families. Imagine, once again, the emergency room with those grieving, possibly hysterical, family members. They do not know the doctor. Establishing trust and confidence under such circumstances is a very delicate thing. People are prepared to think the doctor is acting out of base motives, trying to save time, or money, or effort, especially if the doctor is advising against further treatment.

Some doctors are stronger communicators than others, and some doctors are more adamant, but the pressures they all face are similar. When I faced circumstances involving end-of-life choices, I adopted the approach of laying out only the options that I thought were reasonable (as I would in any situation) as early in the process as possible. When patients or families brought up unreasonable choices, I would discuss the issue in layman’s terms that portrayed the downsides clearly. If patients or families still insisted on treatments I considered pointless or harmful, I would offer to transfer their care to another doctor or hospital.

Should I have been more forceful at times? I know that some of those transfers still haunt me. One of the patients of whom I was most fond was an attorney from a famous political family. She had severe diabetes and terrible circulation, and, at one point, she developed a painful sore on her foot. Knowing the hazards of hospitals, I did everything I could to keep her from resorting to surgery. Still, she sought out outside experts with whom I had no relationship. Not knowing as much about her as I did, they decided to perform bypass surgery on her chronically clogged blood vessels in both legs. This didn’t restore her circulation, and the surgical wounds wouldn’t heal. Her feet became gangrenous, and she endured bilateral leg amputations. Two weeks later, in the famous medical center in which all this had occurred, she died.

It’s easy to find fault with both doctors and patients in such stories, but in many ways all the parties are simply victims of a larger system that encourages excessive treatment. In some unfortunate cases, doctors use the fee-for-service model to do everything they can, no matter how pointless, to make money. More commonly, though, doctors are fearful of litigation and do whatever they’re asked, with little feedback, to avoid getting in trouble.

Even when the right preparations have been made, the system can still swallow people up. One of my patients was a man named Jack, a 78-year-old who had been ill for years and undergone about 15 major surgical procedures. He explained to me that he never, under any circumstances, wanted to be placed on life support machines again. One Saturday, however, Jack suffered a massive stroke and got admitted to the emergency room unconscious, without his wife. Doctors did everything possible to resuscitate him and put him on life support in the ICU. This was Jack’s worst nightmare. When I arrived at the hospital and took over Jack’s care, I spoke to his wife and to hospital staff, bringing in my office notes with his care preferences. Then I turned off the life support machines and sat with him. He died two hours later.

Even with all his wishes documented, Jack hadn’t died as he’d hoped. The system had intervened. One of the nurses, I later found out, even reported my unplugging of Jack to the authorities as a possible homicide. Nothing came of it, of course; Jack’s wishes had been spelled out explicitly, and he’d left the paperwork to prove it. But the prospect of a police investigation is terrifying for any physician. I could far more easily have left Jack on life support against his stated wishes, prolonging his life, and his suffering, a few more weeks. I would even have made a little more money, and Medicare would have ended up with an additional $500,000 bill. It’s no wonder many doctors err on the side of overtreatment.

But doctors still don’t over-treat themselves. They see the consequences of this constantly. Almost anyone can find a way to die in peace at home, and pain can be managed better than ever. Hospice care, which focuses on providing terminally ill patients with comfort and dignity rather than on futile cures, provides most people with much better final days. Amazingly, studies have found that people placed in hospice care often live longer than people with the same disease who are seeking active cures. I was struck to hear on the radio recently that the famous reporter Tom Wicker had “died peacefully at home, surrounded by his family.” Such stories are, thankfully, increasingly common.

Several years ago, my older cousin Torch (born at home by the light of a flashlight—or torch) had a seizure that turned out to be the result of lung cancer that had gone to his brain. I arranged for him to see various specialists, and we learned that with aggressive treatment of his condition, including three to five hospital visits a week for chemotherapy, he would live perhaps four months. Ultimately, Torch decided against any treatment and simply took pills for brain swelling. He moved in with me.

We spent the next eight months doing a bunch of things that he enjoyed, having fun together like we hadn’t had in decades. We went to Disneyland, his first time. We’d hang out at home. Torch was a sports nut, and he was very happy to watch sports and eat my cooking. He even gained a bit of weight, eating his favorite foods rather than hospital foods. He had no serious pain, and he remained high-spirited. One day, he didn’t wake up. He spent the next three days in a coma-like sleep and then died. The cost of his medical care for those eight months, for the one drug he was taking, was about $20.

Torch was no doctor, but he knew he wanted a life of quality, not just quantity. Don’t most of us? If there is a state of the art of end-of-life care, it is this: death with dignity. As for me, my physician has my choices. They were easy to make, as they are for most physicians. There will be no heroics, and I will go gentle into that good night. Like my mentor Charlie. Like my cousin Torch. Like my fellow doctors.

Ken Murray, MD, is Clinical Assistant Professor of Family Medicine at USC.

Sheryl · October 14, 2015

Anti-PD1 described the mode of action, it is not the drug name. Is it by any chance atezolizumab or Keytruda? And is this a clinical trial?

Whichever it is, you need to understand that there is no guaranteed survival time to be had. There is only an average survival time that other patients on average have had; there will have been patients who had less and patients who had more. Your husband's result may or may not prove average. And there will be side effects though indeed they are usually less severe than conventional chemo. Diarrhea and fatigue are the most common.

What does your husband say about all this?

Tolley · October 14, 2015

Keytruda is listed on the pharmaceutical benefits scheme in Australia for melanoma.

It has had pretty spectacular results in some patients with melanoma. Response rates of 38 percent were recorded in clinical trials which means tumours shrunk more than 30 percent

It has also been used on other types of cancers in trials with some success.

Side effects can be almost nothing to quite a lot depending on the person.

Effects are normally cumulative. ie the more infusions you have the more likely you will get a toxic reaction.

Overall Immunotherapy represents some hope for late stage cancer patients with a chance of increased survival with less toxic side effects than most of the current treatments.

I would think it would be well worth doing.

fang37 · October 14, 2015

There is always coming out as the magic treatment. So far, it costs a lot of $$$. Yet, outcome unchanged.

I also emphasise that the patient should make the final decision re any treatment. It is his/her life!

MaeJoMTB · October 14, 2015

Can I ask how old your husband is?

oncearugge · October 14, 2015

The cost of the suggested treatment is also likely to be very high unless the treatment is being offered as part of a clinical trial.

You should check that your insurance company will meet the cost.

Cpkt8 · October 16, 2015

Thank you for your reply Sheryl. I have no idea what is the exact drug name, just heard its Anti-Pd1 so I thought that's the name.

My husband has not been really in sober mind till now. He's been dozing on and off. He could not talk. When he's awake, I can't communicate with him either. He is recovering from shingles developed 10 days ago.

I've already an answer in my mind- not to continue with immunotherapy. He's getting weaker day by day. Didn't see any improvement after radiation. He can't take solid food now and has to drink fluid with thickener added.

I've been telling him every day every opportunity I had that how much I love him. Sometimes there's no response, sometimes his eyes turned watery. When he tried to speak out but couldn't, he got very frustrated and ignored everyone the whole night.

Doctor has arranged for hospice care. They should be visiting soon. My husband doesn't know the whole truth about his condition. How could I break that out to him? He knows he has brain cancer only, and has been so depressed. I can't imagine if he knows about the lung as well, how he's going to react.

ronz28 · October 16, 2015

Must see series on Cancer Prevention and treatment:

https://go2.thetruthaboutcancer.com/global-quest/episode-1/

https://go2.thetruthaboutcancer.com/global-quest/episode-2/

https://go2.thetruthaboutcancer.com/global-quest/episode-3/?a_aid=1619624

Free viewing now but they say that won't last.

fang37 · October 16, 2015

Fact - I do have cancer.

My options today?

xen · October 16, 2015

Your posts always affect me - i guess knowing that i will be in a similar situation to your husband in time . I hope ( and know my ) my wife will be as compassionate and loving as you are to your husband , I really admire you for that and for everything you are doing for him. Just wish i could help in some way .

Sign In

I have cancer - a personal perspective

Recommended Posts

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

Create an account

Sign in

Recently Browsing 0 members

Announcements

Topics

Popular Now