Jump to content

Police spokesman confirms Bangkok bombings are not act of terrorism


webfact

Recommended Posts

Police spokesman confirms bombings are not act of terrorism

302711-imagejpeg-468275-wpcf_728x413.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The police spokesman told members of the diplomatic corp and international organizations in Thailand that the bombings at Erawan Shrine and Sathon pier on August 17-18 were definitely not acts of terrorism.

The spokesman, Pol Lt-Gen Prawuth Thavornsiri gave a briefing to update 56 members of the diplomatic corp and representatives of international orgnaisations about the progress in the police investigation into the two bombings.

He also told the envoys that the suspects held in custody of the Malaysian police under suspicion of involvement in the bombing incidents were not involved in the incidents.

He said that the two bombing incidents were not acts of terrorism but was just a vengeful attack. He didn’t elaborate.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/police-spokesman-confirms-bombings-are-not-act-of-terrorism

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2015-09-24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It wasn't terrorism.

Just some (allegedly) p1ssed off Uighurs that decided to maim and kill innocent folks.

Definitely NOT terrorism though.

I wonder if they did a survey.

Were you terrified when the bomb went off?

Nah. Not me. I wasn't terrified = it wasn't terrorism.

Edited by jaywalker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the assumption that the police think that they can get away with anything they choose to say that is so annoying. Those days are GONE, sirs, at least until you start to censor internet as do China and get rid of the social media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from the FBI website ..posted for the Thai Police as they obviously dont know:

"International terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:

  • Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
  • Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
  • Occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.*

"Domestic terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:

  • Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
  • Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
  • Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.

* FISA defines "international terrorism" in a nearly identical way, replacing "primarily" outside the U.S. with "totally" outside the U.S. 50 U.S.C. § 1801©.

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/terrorism/terrorism-definition

Edited by terryp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"BANGKOK: -- The police spokesman told members of the diplomatic corp and international organizations in Thailand that the bombings at Erawan Shrine and Sathon pier on August 17-18 were definitely not acts of terrorism."

Police spokesperson confirms he has no idea what he is talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"He said that the two bombing incidents were not acts of terrorism but was just a vengeful attack. He didnt elaborate."

Hard to elaborate on something you made up on the spot.

Just think, there's at least one member who thinks the BIB deliberately bugger around in public as part of some specialist investigative technique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the assumption that the police think that they can get away with anything they choose to say that is so annoying. Those days are GONE, sirs, at least until you start to censor internet as do China and get rid of the social media.

Which they are already doing (hence the increase in use of VPN's here), and going further also, with the "Great Firewall of Thailand" in the works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a strange thing to say. For normal people bombing a civilian area and killing innocents is an act of terrorism, especially when there is a second bomb attempt.

The only thing I can think of is that he means that there are no political demands being made. So, does he also mean its now finished? The bombers have said, ok, done what we said we would do, got our revenge now we can go back to our normal lives?

It baffles me how the Thai authorities can make such ridiculous statements before they have caught and convicted these people. Do they not realise how stupid they look to the outside world and rather then in still confidence this kind of statement actually makes you more nervous about their ability to deal with such an incident and the people guilty of the atrocities.

Thai people should get rid of this "face" issue in their lives, to me it serves no useful purpose and only makes living in the modern world more difficult. I can't think of 1 single benefit of attempting to save face at every turn. Better to be straight and honest as much as possible and deal with these issues with the right frame of mind.

For me another sad day for Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

terrorism

[ter-uh-riz-uh m]

noun

1.

the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.

Does not exclude vengeful attacks. The fact they're rounding up complicit individuals from across the wider region all of whom seem aligned with a certain ideology seems to be a big hint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cops have been falling all over themselves since this started by saying it's not terrorism.

Blowing up a bomb in a crowded area in a country not at war to inflict maximum damage to innocent civilians is TERRORISM.

Do they think they diplomats are a bunch of first graders?

When they say stupid crap like this, don't they realize they look like complete idiots?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In general, IMHO they would not call this an act of terrorisme as to give victims and or their relatives the chance to collect help and financial pay outs from their insurance companies as where with a act of terrorism most would not give any compensation as it it is widely known as an exclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...