Jump to content

Playboy to stop publishing nude photos


Recommended Posts

Posted

<deleted> Feminists!!!!!

The dysfunctional feminists had Zoo magazine ban this year in Australia which caused them to go bust and Men's Fitness published for the first time a woman on the front of their magazine.

Next in the west will be charged with rape if they touch a woman without her consent. The west gets worst every year...

Huh?blink.png

You don't know how to get free porn on your computer? crazy.gif

Posted

Cory Jones, a top editor at Playboy or somebody way up there must be gay. That soves the mystery! All the terrible airbrushing ruined it for me a long time ago.

Blame it on the gays. Too funny.

Posted

Not much makes sense in that country anymore. The shock jocks have run rampant over the place and Playboy is simply too mild it seems in that environ there with just nudity and they obviously would not do full pornography so, this is a type of sensationalism for them, I guess. Hard to know what their logic was, if any.

Posted

Since it said "fully nude", I'm assuming it just means no beaver shots. Playboy never showed much pink anyway. Maybe they're doing it to get back on the Walmart shelves.

Posted

Playboy without nudity defeat the purpose of its existence, like an airplane with out

wings and car without wheels, what are they going to show now? fully dressed bunnies?

it's like looking at your sister,, who's going to buy it? surly not for the culinary and home

keeping articles in it....

Apparently, it's a business move. With circulation in the gutter--why would you buy expensive pictures of nudes when you can get movies of nudes free--perhaps a change of strategy is in order.

Posted (edited)

Yes, as I suspected it was just reported on the news that the policy change has NOTHING to do with prudishness or PC.

It has to do with falling sales and that young people see the magazine as for older people and irrelevant, as they can all get instant porn online and the idea of print porn, cleansed or not, is very passe.

They NEED younger readers for the AD REVENUE. U.S. culture, the youth rule.

Cheers.

Edited by Jingthing
Posted

It was only ever for all the true stories it printed, anyway.

I haven't even seen one for maybe 30 years, let alone picked one up. Like xxx movies, after you've seen a dozen or so, you've seen them all.

You've been watching the wrong ones. ;-)

There is a anyway a logic error: "after you've seen a dozen or so, you've seen them all."

"I haven't even seen one for maybe 30 years"

maybe there were some major new developments in the last 30 years.

Posted

The yet-to-be-defined keyword here is "total nudity." What does that mean? Bare breasts but no muffin? Or what?

It appears the perrinial lie, "I only read Playboy for the articles", is finally coming true.

Meanwhile the article's stats say a lot about the PC conservatism of mellinials.

Ah, is not until March. What's to say it's not just Heffy making a win win publicity stunt. See what people have to say and at the same time polish the extra tarnish from the dumping one of his bunnies gave him in a book. Then he can say but honey bunnies look what I just tried to do for you. It's them, not me.

Posted

When I was in the Army in Sattahip 72-75, the Playboy magazines came with the Nude pictures cut out - by the Thai Govt we were told, we quit buying them.

thumbsup.gif

whistling.gif but the ones from the Philipines had all the picures intact so the crew members would buy them there for us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...