Jump to content

World leaders vow vigorous response after Paris terror spree


webfact

Recommended Posts

World leaders vow vigorous response after Paris terror spree
By JULIE PACE and VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV

ANTALYA, Turkey (AP) — World leaders vowed a vigorous response to the Islamic State group's terror spree in Paris as they opened a two-day meeting in Turkey on Sunday, with President Barack Obama calling the violence an "attack on the civilized world" and Russian President Vladimir Putin urging "global efforts" to confront the threat.

But beyond the tough talk and calls for action, there was little indication of how leaders intended to escalate the assault on the extremist group. The attacks in the heart of Europe — combined with earlier incidents in Lebanon and Turkey, as well as the downing of a Russian airliner in Egypt — suggest the Islamic State is reaching beyond its base in Iraq and Syria, an expansion the West has feared.

"The skies have been darkened by the horrific attacks that took place in Paris just a day and a half ago," Obama said shortly after arriving in Antalya, a seaside resort city just a few hundred miles from the Syrian border. He waved off a question from reporters about whether he would authorize additional action against IS.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the summit host, pledged leaders would produce a "strong message" about fighting international terrorism, though he, too, did not spell out specific steps.

Putin urged nations to pool their efforts to combat terrorism, adding that the fight must respect international law, the U.N. Charter and each nation's sovereign rights and interests.

"We understand very well that it's only possible to deal with the terror threat and help millions of people who lost their homes by combining efforts of the entire global community," Putin said.

While U.S. officials said Obama viewed the attacks in France as an act of war, they cautioned he had no plans to overhaul his strategy for dismantling the Islamic State group and said he remained staunchly opposed to an American ground war in Syria. Instead, they foreshadowed an expansion of steps the U.S. is already taking, namely airstrikes and train-and-equip missions for rebels inside Syria.

The Paris violence ratcheted up the urgency at the previously scheduled Group of 20 summit, an annual meeting of leading rich and developing nations. At least 129 people were killed in Friday's coordinated attacks around Paris.

In Turkey, five police officers were injured when a suicide bomber blew himself up during a police raid on a suspected IS hideout near the Syrian border. Turkish security forces also rounded up 20 suspected IS militants in and around Antalya before the summit.

The crisis in Syria was already expected to be on the leaders' agenda given an uptick in diplomatic maneuvering over ways to wind down Syria's civil war. The conflict has stretched into its fifth year, left more than 250,000 people dead and 11 million displaced, and created a vacuum for the Islamic State and other extremist groups to thrive.

Foreign ministers gathered in Vienna over the weekend to discuss a new plan to end the war. The proposal appears to be based largely on a Russian initiative and envisions negotiations between embattled Syrian President Bashar Assad's government and opposition groups starting by Jan. 1.

But hopes for a major breakthrough were softened by open questions about the proposal — such as Assad's future and the list of opposition groups to be deemed terrorists and barred from participating.

Obama and Putin huddled on the sidelines of the summit for 35 minutes to discuss the proposal, as well as Russia's military moves in Syria. Putin began launching airstrikes in Syria about a month ago, a campaign he says is aimed at the Islamic State group, but the U.S. views as an effort to strengthen Assad's grip on power.

Obama appeared to take a softer tone with Putin in their talks. According to a White House readout of the meeting, the U.S. president "noted the importance of Russia's military efforts" aimed at IS.

Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said the leaders share similar "strategic goals" for defeating the Islamic State extremists "but tactical differences remain."

Russia is Syria's biggest benefactor, and Putin's buy-in is crucial to any political transition. The Russian leader was also scheduled to meet with German Chancellor Angela Merkel late Sunday.

Obama, meanwhile, huddled with Saudi Arabia's King Salman, another crucial player in the effort to end the Syrian war. The Saudis are staunch opponents of Assad and a major funder of rebel groups in the country.

A more immediate option facing leaders was the possibility of France asking for help from its NATO allies. Only once in its 66-year-history — after 9/11 — has NATO's communal defense obligation been invoked.

Obama deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said it was up to France whether to invoke Article 5 of the NATO charter.

European Union leader Donald Tusk called on G-20 leaders to show "full determination" against terrorism and urged cooperation to prevent terror financing — a step that nations have already been pursuing for more than a year. And United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said the response should be "robust, but always within the rule of law."

In addition to the terror threat, this year's G-20 agenda also included efforts to hasten global economic growth, with a particular focus on addressing the effects of China's economic slowdown. In a draft of the final G-20 communique obtained by The Associated Press, leaders renewed their goal to grow their collective GDP by another 2 percent by 2018.
___

AP writers Josh Lederman in Antalya, Turkey, and Suzan Fraser in Ankara, Turkey, contributed to this report.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2015-11-16

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Why do 150 people has to die and scores injured for the world leaders to launch ' a vigorous attack '?

Why will it be an act to appease public sentiments and sense of anger and than it will fizzle to nothing

and no action?

what happened to past vows to response to other atrocities IS have done?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do anyway really think any government in power will do anything about this or any other atrocity, sure they will go out vigorously and try to catch the perpetrators, make headline after headline about what they are doing about it. The bottom line is governments love this, keep the masses scared out of their minds! Its how they've been keeping the sheep in order for hundreds of years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah "the world leaders"....

For starters, only idiots follow leaders.

Also, only idiots elect leaders.

Admittedly, leaders have always been good at keeping their followers stupid.

That truth was revealed in the 18th century already.

But of course, there is nothing wrong with being inspired by great minds.

Mandela, Ben Bella, George Habash, Fidel & Che, Lumumba, Nasser, Bronstein, Godwin, and others.

In times like this, it could be helpful to hear the opinion of people like that.

Yes, I am only dreaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny the meeting would be in Turkey, the country that has been used to ship supplies to ISIS and buying their oil. More vacuous words from Ergodan not brought to account.

Trump actually had a point, why the ISIS oil never gets hit?

Trump is a business man, he knows why the IS oil fields never get hit.

And he agrees with that philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will that include policies of treating Muslim citizens the same as non Muslim citizens?

Such as not allowing them to try to impose Sharia Law, or ignore laws they don't like or intimidate non Muslims?

Cameron is a great talker - sadly not a doer.

I bet Muslims in Russia don't do Sharia patrols, or try and bully Russian citizens about drinking and how girls should dress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have heard it all before. After the London bombing in 2005 by Muslims Tony Blair promised to close down radical Mosques, none were ever touched and hate preachers are are still at large in the UK today spewing their hatred of the west, while claiming benefits of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that did not get that much coverage due to all the other news and developments following this barbaric event was...Putin and Obama felt the need to talk, not even in private, just the two of them and two interpreters, in a corner, for over half an hour, first time I have ever seen Putin look sincere...

Maybe the start of US and Russia working together on world piece, IS has just scored an own goal...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's actually a simple solution to this problem. Pay North Korea an obscene amount of money to go in there and take out ISIS. If they win, one problem solved. If they lose and get wiped out, another problem solved.

Well well well.

Who would have thought it?

Berkshire likes bashing too.

Of course Berkshire does not bash Thais.

But Berkshire bashes like the best!

Go Berkshire go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's actually a simple solution to this problem. Pay North Korea an obscene amount of money to go in there and take out ISIS. If they win, one problem solved. If they lose and get wiped out, another problem solved.

Well well well.

Who would have thought it?

Berkshire likes bashing too.

Of course Berkshire does not bash Thais.

But Berkshire bashes like the best!

Go Berkshire go!

Well it's always great to be recognized as "the best" for something. Of course you know my comment was in jest, but what problem do you have with my rather creative solution to this most sticky problem? Kim Jong-un is desperate for cash. The west is desperate for an army to sacrifice, not to mention avoiding the blowback from radical jihadists who'll want to exact revenge (what terrorist in his right mind would want to go to North Korea?). It's a win-win for everybody....well, sort of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's actually a simple solution to this problem. Pay North Korea an obscene amount of money to go in there and take out ISIS. If they win, one problem solved. If they lose and get wiped out, another problem solved.

Well well well.

Who would have thought it?

Berkshire likes bashing too.

Of course Berkshire does not bash Thais.

But Berkshire bashes like the best!

Go Berkshire go!

Well it's always great to be recognized as "the best" for something. Of course you know my comment was in jest, but what problem do you have with my rather creative solution to this most sticky problem? Kim Jong-un is desperate for cash. The west is desperate for an army to sacrifice, not to mention avoiding the blowback from radical jihadists who'll want to exact revenge (what terrorist in his right mind would want to go to North Korea?). It's a win-win for everybody....well, sort of.

Lightning never strikes twice at the same place, BUT...

First the white knight turns out to be an expert basher.

Next mr serious claims to have a sense of humour.

Well, the people of N Korea might not see the humour of being bombed and massacred while their glorious leader has fun in his bunker.

And the poor oppressed muslims in ISland might not think it is funny to be nuked.

But as long as TV Forum members are being entertained, who cares?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have heard it all before. After the London bombing in 2005 by Muslims Tony Blair promised to close down radical Mosques, none were ever touched and hate preachers are are still at large in the UK today spewing their hatred of the west, while claiming benefits of course.

While I do not go along in the anti muslim frenzy, yes, it is beyond everything that politicians are now talking (talking...) about closing hatred preaching mosques.

That should have happened a long time ago, right after the first hate speech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...