Report counts some 2,300 journalists killed in past 25 years

[rooster59]

Report counts some 2,300 journalists killed in past 25 years

RAF CASERT, Associated Press


BRUSSELS (AP) — In the last quarter century, at least 2,297 journalists and media staff have been killed for doing nothing more than trying to inform the world on war, revolution, crime and corruption. And killers continue to act with impunity, the International Federation of Journalists announced in a new report.

The annual total stood at 40 in the federation's first year of counting, 1990, but has not dipped under the 100-mark since 2010.

"The last ten years were the most dangerous," said IFJ General Secretary Anthony Bellanger in an interview, with 2006 the worst year of all with 155 killed.

And despite vows of protection from as high as the United Nations, the IFJ said it produced the report "25 years of contribution towards safer journalism" to underscore a worsening climate of impunity which has helped killers get away with murder and turn journalists into soft targets.

"The IFJ estimates that only one of ten killings is investigated," the report said, with actual convictions lower still.

"That is the diplomatic issue. Let's stop the impunity that protects the killers," Bellanger said.

The 79-page report will be made public next week, but The Associated Press obtained a copy ahead of a debate Monday at the British Parliament on "deaths of professional and citizen journalists in conflict zones." The IFJ will also take the report to a major UNESCO meeting in Paris next Thursday devoted to the same issue.

"We bring this report to show to all that it really is time to do something about it," said Bellanger.

Last year stood out for the attacks on the Paris office of the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, where two Islamic extremists killed 12 people at the satirical newspaper's office. The IFJ's total tally of the year stood at 112.

The IFJ says it bases its information on a variety of sources, including national affiliates in about 140 nations, police sources and political reports. It has published annual reports since 1990, focusing on the killings of journalists and media staff in work-related incidents. The totals center on deaths of media professionals in targeted assassinations, cross fire incidents and bomb attacks.

Beyond the sustained high totals, Bellanger said that there is also a disturbing trend in which kidnappers who seize journalists kill them, all too often without even seeking ransom.

The targeting of journalists has continued unabated this year too. Earlier this month, a suicide car bomb attack in the Afghan capital, Kabul, targeted a bus owned by Afghanistan's biggest media organization, Moby Group and a Taliban spokesman claimed responsibility saying Moby's Tolo TV was the target. Seven media workers were killed.

Over the past 25 years, Iraq has topped the list of most dangerous countries, the scene of 309 killings, the overwhelming majority of them since the 2003 U.S. led invasion and war.

In second place is the Philippines, with 146 killings, while Mexico and its drugs-related violence is third with 120. Those two nations also underscore the IFJ's "recurring finding of our reports that there are many more killed in peacetime situations than in war-stricken countries."

-- (c) Associated Press 2016-01-31

[Hayduke]

Unfortunate...

But do journalists really expect to report on dangerous situations without being exposed to danger? It would sort of defeat the purpose of being there in the first place.

When you sign on and choose your line of work you have to accept whatever risks might be involved. And the truth is that the media is largely in the business of finding and selling dangerous, extreme and often obscene realities. So many of the 'blockbuster' stories are to be found in wild parts where journalists (along with just about anyone else) are often seen as fair game and/or targets of opportunity.

Granted, terrorists, kidnappers and other assorted lunatics are responsible for their actions and should be held accountable. Absolutely.

But if you walk into the middle of a firefight waving a camera or any sort of implement around you shouldn't be surprised (or especially indignant) if someone shoots at you.

Something about heat and kitchens comes to mind

Edited January 31, 2016 by Hayduke

[JohnDodd]

" In a time of universal deceit...telling the truth is a Revolutionary act.." G. Orwell.

[exbikey]

A regrettably high number of deaths. But as Hayduke says, if you choose to work in areas of conflict you take the risk. Thanks to those reporters that do take the risks and provide the news coverage for those of us that do not frequent those areas of conflict.

Meanwhile in another statistic reported by the UK's TUC (Trades Union Congress), over the past 25 years in the relatively safe UK construction industry over 2,800 workers have been killed on construction sites. Again a regrettably high number of deaths.

[smotherb]

Unfortunate...

But do journalists really expect to report on dangerous situations without being exposed to danger? It would sort of defeat the purpose of being there in the first place.

When you sign on and choose your line of work you have to accept whatever risks might be involved. And the truth is that the media is largely in the business of finding and selling dangerous, extreme and often obscene realities. So many of the 'blockbuster' stories are to be found in wild parts where journalists (along with just about anyone else) are often seen as fair game and/or targets of opportunity.

Granted, terrorists, kidnappers and other assorted lunatics are responsible for their actions and should be held accountable. Absolutely.

But if you walk into the middle of a firefight waving a camera or any sort of implement around you shouldn't be surprised (or especially indignant) if someone shoots at you.

Something about heat and kitchens comes to mind

The same could be said of the military; could it not?

Hmm, what was it you said, " . . . When you sign on and choose your line of work you have to accept whatever risks might be involved . . . if you walk into the middle of a firefight waving a camera or any sort of implement around you shouldn't be surprised (or especially indignant) if someone shoots at you. . .".

[Scott]

Not all journalists are killed in the middle of military action. They are killed while investigating corruption and other crimes by influential people.