Oxx Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Expats who've been living abroad for more than 15 years won't be allowed to vote in the referendum, despite potentially being significantly affected. However, Irish, Cypriots, Maltesers living in the UK can vote, as can Bangladeshis, Kenyans, Nigerians and Malaysians living in Gibraltar. Yet another kick in the teeth for (mostly elderly) British expats from Her Majesty's government. Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/28/david-cameron-and-former-union-boss-warn-brexit-would-be-a-disas/ Link to comment
Ricardo Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Yet again the U.K. demonstrates its respect for (some of) its citizens, and denies them their democratic rights, yet strangely still expects them to pay tax on any of their income-arising within the U.K. ? And yet they still like to hold themselves as a shining-example of democracy ! Perhaps it's because, having real-world experience of living and/or earning-a-living in other countries, these citizens can't be trusted to vote as the politicians tell them to ? ! Link to comment
Oxx Posted April 29, 2016 Author Share Posted April 29, 2016 Yet again the U.K. demonstrates its respect for (some of) its citizens, and denies them their democratic rights, yet strangely still expects them to pay tax on any of their income-arising within the U.K. ? Reminds me of the 1750s slogan of American colonists "No taxation without representation". Still the UK taxes us expats without giving us representation. Even worse, it gives representation to random foreigners who don't pay the UK a single penny in tax and don't even live in the UK. Link to comment
khwaibah Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Been voting by absent ballot overseas for over 20 years. Just received a new ballot today by e-mail. Yes sir in 1776 the USA did the correct thing and toss you hooligans out. Link to comment
Oxx Posted April 29, 2016 Author Share Posted April 29, 2016 Been voting by absent ballot overseas for over 20 years. Just received a new ballot today by e-mail. Yes sir in 1776 the USA did the correct thing and toss you hooligans out. Off topic, but personally I would rather give up the right to vote in my home country than be subject to taxation on my worldwide income by that country. I rather like not having to pay a single centime in tax on investment income (or capital gains) anywhere in the world. After all, I really don't understand why politicians and unelected bureaucrats think they know better than me how best to spend my money. So perhaps the US of A makes voting easier for expats, but it's one of only two countries in the world that taxes expats on their overseas income, the other being Eritrea. Perhaps, on balance, things would have been better for you colonial types if we hooligans hasn't been tossed. Link to comment
khwaibah Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Been voting by absent ballot overseas for over 20 years. Just received a new ballot today by e-mail. Yes sir in 1776 the USA did the correct thing and toss you hooligans out. Off topic, but personally I would rather give up the right to vote in my home country than be subject to taxation on my worldwide income by that country. I rather like not having to pay a single centime in tax on investment income (or capital gains) anywhere in the world. After all, I really don't understand why politicians and unelected bureaucrats think they know better than me how best to spend my money. So perhaps the US of A makes voting easier for expats, but it's one of only two countries in the world that taxes expats on their overseas income, the other being Eritrea. Perhaps, on balance, things would have been better for you colonial types if we hooligans hasn't been tossed. The first 90,000 USD is not taxable. Link to comment
Oxx Posted April 29, 2016 Author Share Posted April 29, 2016 Been voting by absent ballot overseas for over 20 years. Just received a new ballot today by e-mail. Yes sir in 1776 the USA did the correct thing and toss you hooligans out. Off topic, but personally I would rather give up the right to vote in my home country than be subject to taxation on my worldwide income by that country. I rather like not having to pay a single centime in tax on investment income (or capital gains) anywhere in the world. After all, I really don't understand why politicians and unelected bureaucrats think they know better than me how best to spend my money. So perhaps the US of A makes voting easier for expats, but it's one of only two countries in the world that taxes expats on their overseas income, the other being Eritrea. Perhaps, on balance, things would have been better for you colonial types if we hooligans hasn't been tossed. The first 90,000 USD is not taxable. I'm no expert on Uncle Sam's lust for tax, but I believe the $90+K exclusion only applies to earned income, so dividends, interest and capital gains from investments are still taxed worldwide, as is rental income. Plus you only get the tax exemption on earnings income if you actually file a tax return. It really is an onerous (and inequitable) regime. Still, it it's good enough for Eritrea, it's good enough for America. Link to comment
spode Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Been voting by absent ballot overseas for over 20 years. Just received a new ballot today by e-mail. Yes sir in 1776 the USA did the correct thing and toss you hooligans out. Off topic, but personally I would rather give up the right to vote in my home country than be subject to taxation on my worldwide income by that country. I rather like not having to pay a single centime in tax on investment income (or capital gains) anywhere in the world. After all, I really don't understand why politicians and unelected bureaucrats think they know better than me how best to spend my money. So perhaps the US of A makes voting easier for expats, but it's one of only two countries in the world that taxes expats on their overseas income, the other being Eritrea. Perhaps, on balance, things would have been better for you colonial types if we hooligans hasn't been tossed. The first 90,000 USD is not taxable. It's up to 100,000 now (for the 2015 tax year). reference: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i2555.pdf Link to comment
StatlerandWaldorf Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 So let's put it simply. Someone who has contributed to the country for many years and has chosen to live outside of the U.K. for whatever reason is denied their democratic right to a vote. Someone who has not worked a single day in their life, has contributed nothing to the country and is basically a parasite, is held in higher regard and is afforded the right to vote. The U.K. has now foregone it's right to preach to Thailand about democracy and human rights. HMG, keep your opinions to yourselves. Link to comment
monkey4u Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 For any English who failed in school The plural of Maltese is Maltese Maltesers are a chocolate covered sweet Link to comment
Gillyflower Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 I have a VERY small Canadian pension, but 1/4 of it is withheld as Non Resident Tax, that is I pay both provincial and federal taxes Whether I can vote or not, I don't know and don't care. Don't want to. I have another VERY small UK pension - it has just been raised by 27p per week. As far as I know I don't pay taxes, because up there in Liverpool they never send any notification, not like France and Canada. Also don't know whether I can vote, it's ditto with the Canadian idea. .But I do sympathise with UK expats who receive a decent pension and all that has been said above. The only thing I don't understand is why many of you who haven't lived in the UK for years, would want to vote or have a say in the politics. I haven't lived in Oz for over 40 years and given what I read, don't want to vote there either. I just learnt that I missed out by a couple of months, of being a work colleague of that frightful female who was PM a while back. We both worked for a Melbourne firm of solicitors. Link to comment
Oxx Posted April 29, 2016 Author Share Posted April 29, 2016 (edited) For any English who failed in school The plural of Maltese is Maltese Maltesers are a chocolate covered sweet Before criticising my English (a) check the grammar of your statement "For any English who failed in school", ( get a sense of humour, and © check out Maltesers - they're a wonderful, white, fluffy breed of dog. Not sure what they taste like dipped in milk chocolate, though. Edited April 29, 2016 by Oxx Link to comment
George FmplesdaCosteedback Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 It's not just voting rights, you lose the right to free NHS care if you go back looking for it. Link to comment
soc Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Been voting by absent ballot overseas for over 20 years. Just received a new ballot today by e-mail. Yes sir in 1776 the USA did the correct thing and toss you hooligans out. Didn't leave until 1783. Do we owe rent for those 7 years? Link to comment
soalbundy Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Been voting by absent ballot overseas for over 20 years. Just received a new ballot today by e-mail. Yes sir in 1776 the USA did the correct thing and toss you hooligans out. but i believe you have to pay taxes to uncle Sam no matter where you earn it. Link to comment
soc Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Been voting by absent ballot overseas for over 20 years. Just received a new ballot today by e-mail. Yes sir in 1776 the USA did the correct thing and toss you hooligans out. Off topic, but personally I would rather give up the right to vote in my home country than be subject to taxation on my worldwide income by that country. I rather like not having to pay a single centime in tax on investment income (or capital gains) anywhere in the world. After all, I really don't understand why politicians and unelected bureaucrats think they know better than me how best to spend my money. So perhaps the US of A makes voting easier for expats, but it's one of only two countries in the world that taxes expats on their overseas income, the other being Eritrea. Perhaps, on balance, things would have been better for you colonial types if we hooligans hasn't been tossed. l had Filipinos working for me in New Guinea in the 70s that paid Philippine tax as well as local PNG tax. While there, the Australian govt tried to bring in a double taxation for us OZ expats but it was dropped when expats started mass resignations. My combined tax bill would have been 63%(32% from OZ & 31% from PNG). l was about to put my resignation in when the proposed tax was dropped. Link to comment
gandalf12 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 I am British and I expect nothing from the UK government. I remember back in 1979 when it looked as if there was going to be major backlash against foreigners in Zambia. The British Embassy continued telling everyone there wasnt a problem. We found out later the Ambassador and family had been flown out and the RAF were on emergency standby in Nairobi Link to comment
abrahamzvi Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 I am British and I expect nothing from the UK government. I remember back in 1979 when it looked as if there was going to be major backlash against foreigners in Zambia. The British Embassy continued telling everyone there wasnt a problem. We found out later the Ambassador and family had been flown out and the RAF were on emergency standby in Nairobi To be exact, there has never been a British Embassy, nor an ambassador in Zambia. Only a High Commission and a High Commissioner. Link to comment
nong38 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 The 15 year rule is another law that has come from the EU beaurocratic machine, it did not originate in the UK, we just doing what we are told and why 15 years? Just goers to show the Brussels view on democracy really. Its wrong that all these people should be voting in our referendum but its the current law so we just have to get on with it and get the vote out to defeat it. Link to comment
NickJ Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Well.....only the informed have a right to there opinion......as they say? Link to comment
mpyre Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 (edited) Been voting by absent ballot overseas for over 20 years. Just received a new ballot today by e-mail. Yes sir in 1776 the USA did the correct thing and toss you hooligans out. Off topic, but personally I would rather give up the right to vote in my home country than be subject to taxation on my worldwide income by that country. I rather like not having to pay a single centime in tax on investment income (or capital gains) anywhere in the world. After all, I really don't understand why politicians and unelected bureaucrats think they know better than me how best to spend my money. So perhaps the US of A makes voting easier for expats, but it's one of only two countries in the world that taxes expats on their overseas income, the other being Eritrea. Perhaps, on balance, things would have been better for you colonial types if we hooligans hasn't been tossed. The first 90,000 USD is not taxable. I'm no expert on Uncle Sam's lust for tax, but I believe the $90+K exclusion only applies to earned income, so dividends, interest and capital gains from investments are still taxed worldwide, as is rental income. Plus you only get the tax exemption on earnings income if you actually file a tax return. It really is an onerous (and inequitable) regime. Still, it it's good enough for Eritrea, it's good enough for America. I'm an American, and I could not agree with you more. Shameful tax regime in America...you're always working for the plantation owners, no matter where you live, and they never let you forget it...only the US and Eritrea do this for Christ sake...American exceptionalism at its worst! Edited April 29, 2016 by mpyre Link to comment
George FmplesdaCosteedback Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 The 15 year rule is another law that has come from the EU beaurocratic machine, it did not originate in the UK, we just doing what we are told and why 15 years? Just goers to show the Brussels view on democracy really. Its wrong that all these people should be voting in our referendum but its the current law so we just have to get on with it and get the vote out to defeat it. You are right about the EU imposing laws on the member states, and many of which have come about not in a diplomatic way but made by Eurocrats who are in the pockets of multinational companies who evade paying tax. Thanks a lot Messrs Junker and Tusk, we have had enough. It might be an advantage however for the Leave campaign as the expats living in EU states other than the UK would be likely to vote remain. Better off out, and let them sink on the good ship Euro... Link to comment
akentryan Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 If you are an American living in Thailand try to open a bank account without filing out US tax forms. The new FATCA rules are designed to catch Americans hiding their millions in Thailand and other places. Passive income is still taxed, if you earn enough, and requires the filing of a US tax return. They are not so much interested in getting tax money from us but in finding out much we have stashed offshore and where it came from. Does the US provide the same info on Thais having bank accounts in the USA? I doubt it. Link to comment
khwaibah Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 If you are an American living in Thailand try to open a bank account without filing out US tax forms. The new FATCA rules are designed to catch Americans hiding their millions in Thailand and other places. Passive income is still taxed, if you earn enough, and requires the filing of a US tax return. They are not so much interested in getting tax money from us but in finding out much we have stashed offshore and where it came from. Does the US provide the same info on Thais having bank accounts in the USA? I doubt it. Yes they do. Reciprocal agreement was just signed by both countries on this subject. Link to comment
duanebigsby Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 I'm an American, and I could not agree with you more. Shameful tax regime in America...you're always working for the plantation owners, no matter where you live, and they never let you forget it...only the US and Eritrea do this for Christ sake...American exceptionalism at its worst! No, Canada does it too. If you can manage to jump through the hoops, you can get non-resident status but it's bloody close to impossible if you still have bank account, furniture, friends, etc back home. Link to comment
Oxx Posted April 30, 2016 Author Share Posted April 30, 2016 (edited) No, Canada does it too. If you can manage to jump through the hoops, you can get non-resident status but it's bloody close to impossible if you still have bank account, furniture, friends, etc back home. Canada has the same system as everywhere apart from Eritrea and the USA: it taxes based upon residency. Eritrea and the USA tax based upon citizenship. And the Canadian system isn't nearly as draconian as you suggest. You simply have to "severe all significant residential ties". The "significant residential ties" are defined by the CRA as: "a home in Canada; a spouse or common-law partner in Canada; and dependants in Canada". Nothing at all to do with bank accounts, furniture and friends. Edited April 30, 2016 by Oxx Link to comment
duanebigsby Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 No, Canada does it too. If you can manage to jump through the hoops, you can get non-resident status but it's bloody close to impossible if you still have bank account, furniture, friends, etc back home. Canada has the same system as everywhere apart from Eritrea and the USA: it taxes based upon residency. Eritrea and the USA tax based upon citizenship. And the Canadian system isn't nearly as draconian as you suggest. You simply have to "severe all significant residential ties". The "significant residential ties" are defined by the CRA as: "a home in Canada; a spouse or common-law partner in Canada; and dependants in Canada". Nothing at all to do with bank accounts, furniture and friends. I and another friend tried it. I was told I am a resident in Canada for tax purposes until I claimed no bank account, no mailing address in Canada, no investments in Canadian stocks, or no furniture in the barn in storage on the family farm. If you managed it great, me ....not. Link to comment
emilymat Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 Except a 15 year absent UK citizen Link to comment
emilymat Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 The text to that image said "Today we recognise the people who continue to give everyone a voice" Link to comment
IMA_FARANG Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 (edited) Been voting by absent ballot overseas for over 20 years. Just received a new ballot today by e-mail. Yes sir in 1776 the USA did the correct thing and toss you hooligans out. Off topic, but personally I would rather give up the right to vote in my home country than be subject to taxation on my worldwide income by that country. I rather like not having to pay a single centime in tax on investment income (or capital gains) anywhere in the world. After all, I really don't understand why politicians and unelected bureaucrats think they know better than me how best to spend my money. So perhaps the US of A makes voting easier for expats, but it's one of only two countries in the world that taxes expats on their overseas income, the other being Eritrea. Perhaps, on balance, things would have been better for you colonial types if we hooligans hasn't been tossed. The first 90,000 USD is not taxable. ........................................................................... Not necesaaruly true You only can get that overseas income exemption if you work for a U.S. company but are paid OUTSIDEof the U.S for that work. I know, i filed for that overseas exem[tion for many years as i worked as civiliuan consultant for a U.S. company outside the U.S. If you are working for a foriegn company you are NOT necessarily eligable for that overseas tax esemtion. That is why on the 2555 form for that "overseas tax exenption" the first thing the IRS wants is the U.S. business of the U.S. company you work for. Without that U.S. busness adress of your employer you might not be eligable for that 2555 foriegn income exem[tion. Edited May 1, 2016 by IMA_FARANG Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now