I'm not really interested in what punishment is handed out to locals. It's irrelevant, as were are discussing deportation of foreigners after committing a criminal offense. I'm well aware of how the dollar value can be related to the sentencing, also mitigating circumstances. Would it / should it matter if the phone stolen was the latest iPhone worth around $2000AUD, or a cheap basic Chinese phone worth around $150AUD? The guilty mind is still present. The phone example can be compared to assault. A foreigner punches someone in the face just one time. It could be a Thai, or foreigner. The nationality of the victim is irrelevant. That punch could be inaccurate and the only injury is some bruising, or, the punch could be accurate and breaks the victim's jaw. I see it as an assault, which is a criminal offense, showing the foreigner has a tendency for violence, so after prosecution, conviction, and fining / sentencing, he should be deported. In the above cases, why should the foreigner be allowed to stay in Thailand because it was a cheap phone, or he threw an inaccurate punch? Theft is theft, and an assault is an assault. I know many would differential between one punch to the face and kicking the sh*t out of the guy's head when he is on the ground, but the injuries would be taken into account when sentencing. I am separating sentencing from deportation, and in my opinion, once a foreigner commits a criminal office, he should lose the "privilege" of being able to remain living in Thailand.