Jump to content

Bomb joke forces delay of Thai Lion Air’s flight in Hat Yai


webfact

Recommended Posts

Bomb joke forces delay of Thai Lion Air’s flight in Hat Yai

 

81_SL.jpg

 

HAT YAI: -- A Thai Lion Air's flight from Hat Yai to Don Mueang airport in Bangkok was delayed for two and a half hours yesterday following a bomb joke that forced the evacuation of all passengers and re-checking of all the luggage's on board.

 

The incident happened as Lion Air’s Flight SL703 was about to leave Hat Yai international airport for Don Mueang airport at 10.05am.

A hostess alerted the pilot immediately after she heard a group of about six passengers talked about a bomb in the aircraft’s luggage compartment as an announcement was made in the plane asking the passengers to shut down their mobile phones and other communication equipment before takeoff.

 

According to the Bangkok Post, this prompted the pilot to ask all the 160 passengers, who were already seated, to disembark for security checks of the luggage compartment.

 

The group of six passengers were invited for questioning. Following the security checks, no bombs were found.

 

A new announcement was made that Thai Lion Air Flight SL703 would depart for Don Mueang from Hat Yai airport at 12.30 pm, after a delay of about two and a half hours.

 

Full story: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/bomb-joke-forces-delay-of-thai-lion-airs-flight-in-hat-yai/

 
thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2016-12-05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The six passengers were booked for questioning at Klong Hoikhong police station.

But only Ms Waewdee Buddaraksa, 28, an official of the Department of Agriculture Extension was detained and charged for creating disorder in the plane. Five of her colleagues were freed but kept as witnesses."

 

What does "booked for questioning" mean??

 

"Booked" in this sense means "charged". But clearly they were not charged. Who wrote this, an idiot?

 

"Five of her colleagues were freed but kept as witnesses" is again ambiguous. "Freed" meaning not charged, "Freed" meaning released? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "not freed"? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "freed but not allowed to go"? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "missed their flight"? Who knows? Better ask the trainee reporter who cobbled this together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The were invited for questioning?  

 

Too bad they don't live in a western country where they would have been dragged from the plane, handcuffed, detained for several hours, and prohibited from flying.  Now that's a punchline.  

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The picture in the OP reminded me of using Beirut airport in the early 1980's. The hold baggage would be lined up on the tarmac beside the plane for the passengers to identify before boarding. I mainly used Beirut as a transit between Saudi and Athens and the terminal building was heaving with heavily armed 'security' personnel. A bit scary looking back but at the time didn't really have an issue over safety concerns. Maybe the increasing overload of such news items feeds the present day safety paranoia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Briggsy said:

"The six passengers were booked for questioning at Klong Hoikhong police station.

But only Ms Waewdee Buddaraksa, 28, an official of the Department of Agriculture Extension was detained and charged for creating disorder in the plane. Five of her colleagues were freed but kept as witnesses."

 

What does "booked for questioning" mean??

 

"Booked" in this sense means "charged". But clearly they were not charged. Who wrote this, an idiot?

 

"Five of her colleagues were freed but kept as witnesses" is again ambiguous. "Freed" meaning not charged, "Freed" meaning released? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "not freed"? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "freed but not allowed to go"? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "missed their flight"? Who knows? Better ask the trainee reporter who cobbled this together.

Thais that translate for journalism mostly do not know the nuances of our language and are stupid to it but it does make for fun reading and you can joke about it later 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For starters, these " jokers " should be made to pay the airfare plus say 1500 baht to each fellow passenger for inconvenience and discomfort caused by these morons. And then charged!

 

Edited by 2peteok
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Briggsy said:

"The six passengers were booked for questioning at Klong Hoikhong police station.

But only Ms Waewdee Buddaraksa, 28, an official of the Department of Agriculture Extension was detained and charged for creating disorder in the plane. Five of her colleagues were freed but kept as witnesses."

 

What does "booked for questioning" mean??

 

"Booked" in this sense means "charged". But clearly they were not charged. Who wrote this, an idiot?

 

"Five of her colleagues were freed but kept as witnesses" is again ambiguous. "Freed" meaning not charged, "Freed" meaning released? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "not freed"? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "freed but not allowed to go"? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "missed their flight"? Who knows? Better ask the trainee reporter who cobbled this together.

 

Normal standard of reporting from Thai PBS. Their writer(s)of English don't really have much of a clue. You'd think that someone high up in the company reads the nonsense they put out so it seems they don't really care if they look ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was another case down there a few months ago when some geek claimed he had made a 'bomb joke' to impress a stewardess.

 

Not the sort of pickup line I would have attempted.

 

Must be something in the water down in Hat Yai.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, dabhand said:

The picture in the OP reminded me of using Beirut airport in the early 1980's. The hold baggage would be lined up on the tarmac beside the plane for the passengers to identify before boarding. I mainly used Beirut as a transit between Saudi and Athens and the terminal building was heaving with heavily armed 'security' personnel. A bit scary looking back but at the time didn't really have an issue over safety concerns. Maybe the increasing overload of such news items feeds the present day safety paranoia. 

Same as Srinigar,India.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good candidates for the "no fly list". 

Glad to see that security took the precautions that they did.   In the 90's I flew out of Luxor , Egypt .    I was quite astonished that the entire (noticeable)  security prior to boarding, was the gate attendant asking ticket holders if they had any bombs , guns , or anything dangerous.  Since no one raised their hand , we proceeded with boarding . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Briggsy said:

"The six passengers were booked for questioning at Klong Hoikhong police station.

But only Ms Waewdee Buddaraksa, 28, an official of the Department of Agriculture Extension was detained and charged for creating disorder in the plane. Five of her colleagues were freed but kept as witnesses."

 

What does "booked for questioning" mean??

 

"Booked" in this sense means "charged". But clearly they were not charged. Who wrote this, an idiot?

 

"Five of her colleagues were freed but kept as witnesses" is again ambiguous. "Freed" meaning not charged, "Freed" meaning released? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "not freed"? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "freed but not allowed to go"? "Kept as witnesses" meaning "missed their flight"? Who knows? Better ask the trainee reporter who cobbled this together.

 

 

Quote

What does 'booked for questioning' mean??

 

Perhaps the reporter is a fan of Hawaii Five O:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The were invited for questioning?  
 
Too bad they don't live in a western country where they would have been dragged from the plane, handcuffed, detained for several hours, and prohibited from flying.  Now that's a punchline.  
 
 
 
 

Yes ageed. But that would mean Thailand becoming a nanny state, as so many on this forum dispise. Too many rules and regulations and laws?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, JoePai said:

Ridiculous headline - a bomb threat is NO joke - wake up people

They/she made a stupid joke about a non-existent bomb among themselves that was overheard by the stewardess ... it was not a threat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Docno said:

They/she made a stupid joke about a non-existent bomb among themselves that was overheard by the stewardess ... it was not a threat.

 

There are certain rules that you must abide by in modern society.  

 

1.  Don't talk about Fight Club.

 

2.  There is one, and only one, acceptable answer to, "Does this make me look fat?"  

 

3.  Don't make jokes about bombs on planes.  

 

While you're correct that it was not a threat, it did end up delaying the flight for everyone else on the flight while the flight crew had to investigate whether or not a bomb was on board.  So, they cost the airline thousands of dollars and they inconvenienced a planeload full of people.  

 

They're not terrorists but they are a-holes and a-holes shouldn't be allowed to fly.  

 

Flying isn't a right.  Airlines ban people from flying on their aircraft all the time.  When someone acts drunk and belligerent they can be banned for life from a particular airline.  How are these idiots any different?  

 

And this isn't like they made a joke a fart joke and they were unaware that fart jokes were frowned upon.  Anybody who can fog a piece of glass with their breath knows you don't make jokes about bombs on planes.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jerojero said:


Yes ageed. But that would mean Thailand becoming a nanny state, as so many on this forum dispise. Too many rules and regulations and laws?

 

There's a huge, huge gap between a nanny state and anarchy, where everyone does whatever the heck they please.  If you make a bomb joke the airline has to investigate.  So your joke is causing thousands of dollars in delays to the airline and your actions have caused everyone else on the plane to have their travel delayed.  That's not about too many rules and regulations.  That's about conducting yourself in a manner that does not cause harm or damage to other people.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, 2peteok said:

For starters, these " jokers " should be made to pay the airfare plus say 1500 baht to each fellow passenger for inconvenience and discomfort caused by these morons. And then charged!

 

How about them being liable for the total cost of the delay and search which is likely substantial?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is its a Hi-So thing, the kids were and she isn't.  So she just made it up and was the sole cause of this. The other flight attendants likely never heard them say it so they didn't.  Thai justice at work.   This will teach a lowly attendant for reporting anything in the future anyway. Good work guys. Rich looking man boards with something strapped to his body you think, just zip it honey and hope its just a medical device. If its not a bomb and you report it you may be worse off than if it was a bomb. At least you won't lose face as this one will/has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...