webfact Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Jeng Dokjik banished from politics for 5 years BANGKOK: -- A former core member of the red-shirt movement Yossawarit Chuklom, alias Jeng Dokjik, was on Tuesday banished from politics for five years after he was found guilty of concealing his assets by the Supreme Court’s criminal division for political office holders. The court also sentenced to one-month jailterm which was suspended for one year and fined 4,000 baht for similar offence. The former advisor to agriculture minister of the government of prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra was charged by the National Anti-Corruption Commission after it was discovered that he did not declare his assets after having left the advisory post for more than a year. Full story: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/jeng-dokjik-banished-from-politics-for-5-years/ -- © Copyright Thai PBS 2016-12-07 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Another honest mistake? Following the footsteps of his master... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatOngo Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 WOW! Four thousand baht.........there goes the family fortune! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 13 minutes ago, webfact said: The former advisor to agriculture minister of the government of prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra Was his advice was part of the rice scheme? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 That picture sums up what he thinks of the verdict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuchulainn Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Yes, lets fight fight fight for democracy for Thailand so our gallant politicians can serve the people and the electorate with honesty and clarity. And these are the people you get. Fine; let vermin like this bleed you dry, then!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The manic Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Clearly a selective use of a law. Let's see it applied across the board to the military and their yellow shirt bosses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 13 minutes ago, The manic said: Clearly a selective use of a law. Let's see it applied across the board to the military and their yellow shirt bosses. Why not apply the law to ALL politicians of whichever colour or party? But he admitted breaking the law and pleaded guilty. He was smart enough to become a politician, smart enough to become a political advisor but not smart enough to comply with the law after leaving office. What is selective about that? He had a whole year to comply with the law which has been around a fair amount of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilSA1 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 "banished from politics for five years "should be a life time banishment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintLouisBlues Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 14 minutes ago, NeilSA1 said: "banished from politics for five years "should be a life time banishment. "A week is a long time in politics" Harold Wilson, former UK prime minister Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sungod Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 3 hours ago, The manic said: Clearly a selective use of a law. Let's see it applied across the board to the military and their yellow shirt bosses. Clearly, I think you have selective memory, Sondhi Limthongkul, convicted and currently serving time in jail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaphod reborn Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 3 hours ago, The manic said: Clearly a selective use of a law. Let's see it applied across the board to the military and their yellow shirt bosses. Sorry red-shade Man. It is applied across the board. This politician got an extremely light sentence, but the NACC imposed the 5-year ban from office for a black and white violation of the anti-corruption law. He only failed to file his asset disclosure after taking office. So, suspended sentence, ridiculously low fine, but a 5-year ban from politics. Seems like the proper thing to do. If you know of any politicians who failed to disclose their assets after assuming office, please contact the NACC. As far as I am aware, no one in the junta's corps have been accused of failing to file their asset statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuchulainn Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 ^ Red shade man!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tukkytuktuk Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Jeng Dokjik with a name like that I would have thought he came from Norway not Thailand. Anyways he looks happy to get out of politics. Its a dangerous profession to be in at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bark Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 2 hours ago, NeilSA1 said: "banished from politics for five years "should be a life time banishment. He looks old to me. I give him 7 more years tops ! So the 5 year ban is just about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chainarong Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 (edited) 5 hours ago, The manic said: Clearly a selective use of a law. Let's see it applied across the board to the military and their yellow shirt bosses. Don't know about the yellow , but you wont see any Junta spiffs there, that's for sure, not for awhile anyway, what happens between now and 2025 is anybody's guess, depends on how lethargic or down trodden the people are, can't expect the students to change the course of Thai political history every time..... Edited December 7, 2016 by chainarong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Deerhunter Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 5 hours ago, Cuchulainn said: ^ Red shade man!! Red shade(s). Are they the same as rose-coloured spectacles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjaak327 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 (edited) 7 hours ago, zaphod reborn said: Sorry red-shade Man. It is applied across the board. This politician got an extremely light sentence, but the NACC imposed the 5-year ban from office for a black and white violation of the anti-corruption law. He only failed to file his asset disclosure after taking office. So, suspended sentence, ridiculously low fine, but a 5-year ban from politics. Seems like the proper thing to do. If you know of any politicians who failed to disclose their assets after assuming office, please contact the NACC. As far as I am aware, no one in the junta's corps have been accused of failing to file their asset statement. Why would this be a red shade man. I hope you are aware that the lot currently running the show have broken pretty much every law, and subsequently replaced it with their very own set of rules, rules that don't apply to them anyway. Assest declaration ? don't make me laugh, there were some questions about Prayuth and Prayuth's brother assest declarations, the result, don't ask difficult questions or else.. you cannot make this stuff up... The poster you responded to is correct, there is ample factual evidence to suggest the law is not applied equally to everyone. And.. to take the law seriously, it should. Edited December 7, 2016 by sjaak327 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjaak327 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 7 hours ago, sungod said: Clearly, I think you have selective memory, Sondhi Limthongkul, convicted and currently serving time in jail. Not sure if he is actually serving any time, at least he wasn't charged with failure to declare assets, he was convicted for fraud and the fraud wasn't political either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srikcir Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 15 hours ago, webfact said: banished from politics for five years Just in time for the next elections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 16 hours ago, sjaak327 said: Why would this be a red shade man. I hope you are aware that the lot currently running the show have broken pretty much every law, and subsequently replaced it with their very own set of rules, rules that don't apply to them anyway. Assest declaration ? don't make me laugh, there were some questions about Prayuth and Prayuth's brother assest declarations, the result, don't ask difficult questions or else.. you cannot make this stuff up... The poster you responded to is correct, there is ample factual evidence to suggest the law is not applied equally to everyone. And.. to take the law seriously, it should. "broken pretty much every law" - a tad hyperbolic. But please do share the details of your claims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaphod reborn Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 17 hours ago, sjaak327 said: Why would this be a red shade man. Seems like he was the one who brought up the yellow-shirts first, even though none of them have held a national political office in 6 years. Only a red supporter would have raised the issue with respect to the junta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjaak327 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 On 8-12-2016 at 10:36 AM, zaphod reborn said: Seems like he was the one who brought up the yellow-shirts first, even though none of them have held a national political office in 6 years. Only a red supporter would have raised the issue with respect to the junta. One would say the current lot are holding a political office. Yes I understand they don't have a legitimate mandate, but politics IS what they are doing On 8-12-2016 at 9:29 AM, Baerboxer said: "broken pretty much every law" - a tad hyperbolic. But please do share the details of your claims. Hmm, do I really need to explain this. Pray tell how executing a coup, tearing up the constitution and write your own is legal ? You keep making me laugh.Talking about the law and legal and xompletely ignoring how the other side treated the law... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now