Jump to content

Pilot forced to drop animal due to windy weather: Ministry


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

Pilot forced to drop animal due to windy weather: Ministry

By The Nation

 

b6ec70c0046c93b1df02216fc10aeed7.jpeg

 

Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment permanent secretary Wijarn Simachaya on Thursday said bad weather had caused a helicopter pilot to drop an Asian black bear in February, resulting in the bear’s death.

 

The helicopter transport was meant to return the animal safely to the wilderness. 

 

He said the death was still being investigated by the Office of Aviation for Natural Resource Conservation and the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP). 

 

He added that the ministry’s separate fact-finding probe should provide a clear answer about the causes of the tragedy by the end of the month. 

 

Wijarn said the DNP had airlifted wild animals before, but the weather conditions were bad that day with gusty winds, resulting in the helicopter shaking violently and forcing the pilot had to drop the bear. 

 

“It’s a tragedy that no one wants to see happen. We’ll take this lesson to improve the aviation system and airlifts of wild animals,” said Wijarn.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/news/national/30312841

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-4-20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A load slung under a chopper can cause all sorts of stability problems for the pilot. A sudden wind change causing the pilot to make a correction that can swing the load causing another balance problem. Approaching a cliff with the wind coming off the cliff can mean the helicopter to be affected by downward or sideways winds again causing the slung load to swing. Think about a sudden side wind hitting a caravan towed behind your car, massive swinging and the caravan takes control of the car, it's a similar effect. In a chopper the only option is drop the load.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a load of complete bull....

 

The first things that are checked in detail before any underslung lift by a helicopter are condition of the lifting/slinging equipment, load weight (can the helicopter take it), dimension of the load , drop zone condition and weather/wind conditions on route. It is possible for the weather to change but an experienced pilot would be able to assess and act accordingly. The only reason a load should be prematurely dropped is a technical fault with the helicopter.

 

Correct prior planning by an experienced pilot and support team would have meant a happy bear not a dead bear.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I first arrived, I'd overheard a long staying English friend remark to another 'Trust the Thais to <deleted> it up'. I was a tad taken aback at the time but in the twenty years since the rose coloured tint had completely disappeared from my glasses. About two years in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, dageurreotype said:

When I first arrived, I'd overheard a long staying English friend remark to another 'Trust the Thais to <deleted> it up'. I was a tad taken aback at the time but in the twenty years since the rose coloured tint had completely disappeared from my glasses. About two years in.

Does that mean that all the planes that crashed on landing due to wind shear at airports all over the world were piloted by xxxxxx, you fill in the blanks.

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, overherebc said:

Does that mean that all the planes that crashed on landing due to wind shear at airports all over the world were piloted by xxxxxx, you fill in the blanks.

?

I don't know, you tell me.

 

The case in question was a short flight into the hills to release the bear. Prior planning and thought should have highlighted all possible risks. If wind shear was one of them then this should have been taken into consideration and other means of transporting the bear assessed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have the people responsible for this fiasco never heard of risk assessment.

Before i retired every job i did could not be carried out without a risk assessment being done.

Many times i would think what nonsense, but when you see fiascos like this 1 you can understand the need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Holmsedale25 said:

I don't know, you tell me.

 

The case in question was a short flight into the hills to release the bear. Prior planning and thought should have highlighted all possible risks. If wind shear was one of them then this should have been taken into consideration and other means of transporting the bear assessed.

On the point of wind shear, the reason in can catch out even experienced pilots is that it doesn't have a big sign pointing to it, it's invisible, it's wind. When a plane enters an invisible upward, downward or sideways moving piece of air as well as it's forward speed it moves upward, downward or sideways at the exact same speed as that piece of air. That's why in a plane that hits turbulence if you're not strapped in and the plane drops suddenly you stay where you are. In real terms the luggage locker comes down and belts you, you don't go up and hit it.

You can be made aware of it pre-flight but you have no control over when you are going to encounter it.

Edited by overherebc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

 

He added that the ministry’s separate fact-finding probe should provide a clear answer about the causes of the tragedy by the end of the month. 

Inept, incompetent officials who couldn't plan their way out of a wet paper bag are the cause. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the original version; bear was in chopper sedated and partially covered by net, regained consciousness earlier than hoped, all hell broke loose, bear went into free fall. (sad about the bear, but the pilot's intercom must make some hilarious listening)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armed forces all the world over are still doing studies into the instabilities introduced due to slung loads, some still ongoing into the reasons for Australian British and American helicopter pilots having to drop loads instead of crashing.

But don't let facts get in the way of Thai bashing from your early morning bar stools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, colinneil said:

Have the people responsible for this fiasco never heard of risk assessment.

Before i retired every job i did could not be carried out without a risk assessment being done.

Many times i would think what nonsense, but when you see fiascos like this 1 you can understand the need.

I too had to do risk assessments. The reason is so the company will.not be responsible..you are. It's all lawyer stuff.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

Inept, incompetent officials who couldn't plan their way out of a wet paper bag are the cause. 

Nor come up with a respectable and  half believable excuse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, elgordo38 said:

I agree and it bears investigation. Bears and bulls and the Dow jumped 200 points last night. Time to get back in the market its a sign. 

lottery numbers would be more useful. 

Edited by Artisi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, overherebc said:

A load slung under a chopper can cause all sorts of stability problems for the pilot. A sudden wind change causing the pilot to make a correction that can swing the load causing another balance problem. Approaching a cliff with the wind coming off the cliff can mean the helicopter to be affected by downward or sideways winds again causing the slung load to swing. Think about a sudden side wind hitting a caravan towed behind your car, massive swinging and the caravan takes control of the car, it's a similar effect. In a chopper the only option is drop the load.

 

6 hours ago, Holmsedale25 said:

I don't know, you tell me.

 

The case in question was a short flight into the hills to release the bear. Prior planning and thought should have highlighted all possible risks. If wind shear was one of them then this should have been taken into consideration and other means of transporting the bear assessed.

Umh, shouldn't the pilot have been aware that he was going to be flying near cliffs, and of the wind effects involved?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wind shear was not the issue here. The pilot, who I can only imagine had very limited experience slinging, used a lanyard that was far to short and exceeded the aircrafts speed limitations (VNE) while carrying an underslung load. 
 
 


What was the length of the lanyard he used? What should it have been?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SABloke said:

 


What was the length of the lanyard he used? What should it have been?

 

At the moment they are still doing studies into that all over with various countries armed forces. The problem has so many variables they might take a long time to come up with a 100% formula to address the problem. It happens more often than people are aware of.

This one is getting a lot of attention because it's a bear. If it had been 10 sacks of rice it would be a different story or a non story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the moment they are still doing studies into that all over with various countries armed forces. The problem has so many variables they might take a long time to come up with a 100% formula to address the problem. It happens more often than people are aware of.
This one is getting a lot of attention because it's a bear. If it had been 10 sacks of rice it would be a different story or a non story.


I understand this. My comment was a sarcastic one, because Wingman categorically stated that the lanyard was too short: to make such a statement one should have the 'facts'. He clearly doesn't in this case and is just making assumptions wrapped in the guise of an "expert opinion" ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, elgordo38 said:

Market has better odds all the stocks keep going up. Asia follows the Dow Europe follows Asia its an upward spiral. Investors are winners. Companies fudge their quarterly profits with the governments blessing, they borrow our savings at next to nothing, Large corporations have large algorithym programs that make them winners 99.9% of the time all with the governments blessing how can we loose.!!!!

The bear was the loser in this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...