U.S. House approves new Russia sanctions, defying Trump

[webfact]

U.S. House approves new Russia sanctions, defying Trump

By Patricia Zengerle and Amanda Becker

 

A combination photo of Donald Trump Jr. from July 11, 2017, Jared Kushner from June 6, 2017 and Paul Manafort from August 17, 2016. REUTERS/Brian Snyder, Carlo Allegri (R)/Files

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to slap new sanctions on Russia, and force President Donald Trump to obtain lawmakers' permission before easing any sanctions on Moscow, in a rare rebuke of the Republican in the White House.

 

House members backed the measure, which also imposes sanctions on Iran and North Korea, by a near unanimous margin of 419-3, with strong support from Trump's fellow Republicans as well as Democrats, despite objections from Trump, who wanted more control over the ability to impose sanctions.

 

The sanctions bill coincided with lawmakers taking steps to show they are willing to push hard as they investigate possible meddling by Russia in the 2016 presidential election and potential collusion by Republican Trump's campaign.

 

Moscow has denied it worked to influence the election in the Republican candidate's favor, and Trump has denied his campaign colluded.

 

House Speaker Paul Ryan called the bill "one of the most expansive sanctions packages in history."

 

Ed Royce, Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said the three countries threaten U.S. interests, and said the North Korea restrictions were important given Pyongyang's repeated missile tests.

 

House members added the North Korea sanctions package, which passed the House by 419-1 in May, to the Iran and Russia bill after becoming frustrated with the Senate's failure to advance the measure.

 

The combined sanctions bill must pass the Senate before it can be sent to the White House for Trump to sign into law or veto. The latest version of the legislation has run into objections from some Senate members, who are unhappy that the House added new sanctions on North Korea after holding up the measure for more than a month.

 

Senate leaders have not said when they might consider the House bill, and said that, with the Senate mired in debate over efforts to overhaul the U.S. healthcare system, they did not know whether it would come up before lawmakers leave Washington for their summer recess.

 

The White House said the president had not yet decided whether he would sign the measure if it reaches his desk. Rejecting the bill - which would potentially hamper his hopes of pursuing improved relations with Moscow - would carry a risk that his veto could be overridden by lawmakers.

 

Senator Bob Corker, the Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he was not sure the bill would "fly through" the Senate.

 

"The only language we agreed to was Iran and Russia. So adding North Korea on, I just don’t know how we’re going to deal with it yet," Corker told reporters. "The better route would have been to send over what had been agreed to."

 

The bill has raised concerns in the European Union, where the legislation could result in fines for companies helping Russia build gas pipelines like the 9.5 billion euro ($11.1 billion) Nord Stream 2 project.

 

INVESTIGATIONS

 

The intense focus on Russia, involving several congressional probes and a separate investigation by a Justice Department-appointed special counsel, has overshadowed Trump's agenda.

 

The scrutiny has angered and frustrated the president, who calls the investigations a politically motivated witch hunt fueled by Democrats who cannot accept his upset win in last November's election against Democratic Party candidate Hillary Clinton, a former U.S. secretary of state.

 

Without offering evidence, Trump lashed out on Twitter on Tuesday about "Ukrainian efforts to sabotage" his presidential campaign in order to aid Clinton. The Ukrainian embassy in Washington denied the accusations.

 

The Senate Judiciary Committee said on Tuesday it wanted Paul Manafort, a former campaign manager for Trump, to appear at a hearing as part of its investigation.

 

Also on Tuesday, Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, spent three hours with the House of Representatives intelligence panel, his second straight day on Capitol Hill answering questions about his contacts with Russians during the campaign.

 

Kushner had a "very productive session" with the House Intelligence Committee, Democratic representative Adam Schiff after the meeting.

 

Republican representative Michael Conaway said Kushner was "straightforward and forthcoming. He wanted to answer every question that we had."

 

Kushner, who is now a top aide in Trump's White House, told reporters on Monday he had no part in any Kremlin plot.

 

(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle and Amanda Becker; additional reporting by Doina Chiacu, Steve Holland, Susan Cornwell, Susan Heavey and Karen Friefeld; Writing by Roberta Rampton; Editing by Frances Kerry, James Dalgleish and Grant McCool)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2017-07-26

[connda]

Symbolic at best although it also drives a wedge into EU-US relationships.  Russia simply works around the sanctions and grows stronger economically in the process.  One day in a perfect world maybe countries will decide to normalize relations and concentrate on mutually beneficial trade and commerce instead of waging endless war.  But don't hold your breath.  
https://tucker.liberty.me/the-russia-sanctions-are-about-controlling-americans/

[Jamin123]

The sanctions, Russian adoption and Russian money Not confusing after reading the below article:

 

The financier Bill Browder has emerged as an unlikely central player in the ongoing investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 elections. Sergei Magnitsky, an attorney Browder hired to investigate official corruption, died in Russian custody in 2009. Congress subsequently imposed sanctions on the officials it held responsible for his death, passing the Magnitsky Act in 2012. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s government retaliated, among other ways, by suspending American adoptions of Russian children.

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/bill-browders-testimony-to-the-senate-judiciary-committee/534864/?utm_source=quorumcall&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=goodwill

[Rancid]

If the US wants to impose sanctions then that is their right, although interesting to note that Congress that voted in the bill seems to have a popularity/trust rating with the American people of about, if I recall correctly, 20%, even worse than Trump.

 

Also seems EU allies are less than impressed as it seems to be really about stopping Russian gas pipelines into Europe. Their alternative apparently would be to purchase much more expensive US fracked LPG shipped across the ocean. Hmm, this gas/oil thing does seem to pop up a lot.

[RobFord]

http://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2017/07/16/bill-browder-full-interview-gps.cnn

Excellent interview with Bill Browder explains why the Magnitsky Act is so important to Putin, but is Putin really the richest man in the world?


Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

[dunroaming]

How much of this is meant to undermine Trump's relationship with Putin?

[Jingthing]

3 minutes ago, dunroaming said:

How much of this is meant to undermine Trump's relationship with Putin?

Well, if he signs the bill, it means that he FINALLY will be acknowledging that he agrees that Russia meddled in the election. He really doesn't want to ever do that. But if he vetoes it (which will be turned over anyway) then he's signaling his typical egotistic stubbornness  (and suspicious softness on Putin) wins again. Either way, on this one, he can't really win. Considering what a bizarre clown he is, that's always good. 

Edited July 26, 2017 by Jingthing

[craigt3365]

5 hours ago, RobFord said:

http://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2017/07/16/bill-browder-full-interview-gps.cnn

Excellent interview with Bill Browder explains why the Magnitsky Act is so important to Putin, but is Putin really the richest man in the world?


Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

Putin is the richest man in the world due to corruption and supporting the oligarchs in Russia.  Without them, he'd be gone.

[dunroaming]

3 minutes ago, craigt3365 said:

Putin is the richest man in the world due to corruption and supporting the oligarchs in Russia.  Without them, he'd be gone.

Well there are many fabulously rich people in the world but only one who has the US President as their puppet!  I guess that tops everyone else.