Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.
ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.

Iran Says US ‘Negotiating With Itself’ as Trump Claims Diplomatic Progress

Iran has rejected assertions by Donald Trump that negotiations are under way between Washington and Tehran, with military officials accusing the United States of “negotiating with itself” amid the ongoing conflict.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking on Wednesday, Ebrahim Zolfaqari, a spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, mocked US claims of diplomacy.

Tehran rejects claims of talks
“Has the level of your inner struggle reached the stage of you negotiating with yourself?” he said, according to Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency. “Don’t call your failure an agreement.”

Iranian authorities have consistently denied that any direct or indirect discussions are taking place, despite repeated statements from Trump suggesting otherwise.

The US president told reporters at the White House that Washington was speaking to the “right people” in Iran and that Tehran was keen to reach a deal. “They are talking to us, and they’re making sense,” he said.

Confusion over reported proposal
The conflicting accounts come amid reports that the United States has put forward a ceasefire framework. According to The Wall Street Journal, the proposal includes a series of demands such as dismantling key nuclear facilities, halting uranium enrichment, suspending Iran’s ballistic missile programme and reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

In return, sanctions relief and assistance for a civilian nuclear programme were reportedly offered.

However, Iranian officials have not confirmed receiving such a plan. Reza Amiri Moghadam said no negotiations had taken place, while noting that countries including Pakistan were attempting to facilitate dialogue.

Reports have suggested Islamabad may have acted as an intermediary, delivering proposals between the two sides.
Despite this, uncertainty remains. Journalists in Tehran have described a lack of clarity, with officials publicly contradicting US statements and denying any diplomatic engagement.

Fighting continues alongside diplomacy claims
The dispute over talks comes as hostilities continue. Israel has carried out further strikes on Iranian targets, including infrastructure in Tehran, with Iranian media reporting casualties in residential areas.

Iran, in turn, said it had launched missiles towards Israeli locations, including military and urban areas. There were no immediate reports of casualties from the latest exchanges.

Meanwhile, the United States is reportedly preparing to reinforce its military presence in the region. Around 1,000 troops from the 82nd Airborne Division are expected to deploy, adding to tens of thousands of US personnel already stationed in the Middle East.

The developments highlight a dual-track approach, with diplomatic signals emerging alongside continued military escalation.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Two-Hour Confrontation at Leeds Hospital: Patient Recounts How He Stopped Hospital Bomb Plot

A patient in the UK who helped prevent a planned hospital bombing has described how he calmed the attacker by engaging him in conversation and even embracing him, ultimately persuading him to abandon the plot.

Get today's headlines by email

Nathan Newby, 35, intervened during an incident at St James' Hospital in 2023, where he spent around two hours talking to Mohammad Farooq, who had planned an हमला using a homemade explosive device.

Two-hour confrontation at Leeds hospital
Newby, who had been receiving treatment for a chest infection, said he noticed Farooq behaving nervously near a maternity ward. “He looked out of place so I went over to see if he was alright,” he said.

Farooq had been closely watching a bag placed nearby. After gaining his trust, Newby persuaded him to reveal its contents — a pressure cooker bomb containing around 10kg of explosives. A court later heard the device was estimated to be significantly larger than the one used in the Boston Marathon bombing.

“I thought there's no way of getting away now so I might as well stay with the guy,” Newby said, explaining that leaving could have triggered panic.



Building trust to defuse the situation
Newby remained with Farooq, attempting to distract him and understand his mindset. He said he deliberately spoke about his own personal struggles to create a connection and reduce tension.

At one point, Farooq asked for a hug, which Newby agreed to. “He then said, ‘I want you to phone the police before I change my mind,’” Newby recalled.

Using Farooq’s phone, Newby contacted emergency services while subtly recording the interaction. During the call, he also asked Farooq about other weapons. Farooq revealed knives and an imitation firearm, which Newby encouraged him to set aside.

Armed police arrived shortly afterwards and arrested Farooq without the device being detonated.

Court findings and recognition
A trial at Sheffield Crown Court heard that Farooq, a hospital employee, had planned to target staff, particularly nurses, due to personal grievances. He had also previously considered attacking RAF Menwith Hill before switching to the hospital.

Farooq was convicted of preparing acts of terrorism and sentenced to a minimum of 37 years in prison.

Judge Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb described Newby’s actions as “extraordinary”, while prosecutors said his intervention had “almost certainly saved many lives.”

Police also praised his actions, noting how narrowly the attack had been prevented.

Honour for bravery
Newby is set to receive the George Medal, recognising acts of exceptional courage.

Reflecting on the incident, he said the experience only fully sank in afterwards. “It’s just crazy that if I hadn’t been there… he would have gone for it,” he said.

Despite the recognition, Newby played down his actions, saying: “I like to think that anybody would do that… it’s just how I am.”

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026
webfact
webfact

No Prosecutions in Israel for Palestinian Civilian Killings in West Bank Since 2020, Report Finds

Israel has not brought prosecutions against its citizens for the killing of Palestinian civilians in the occupied West Bank since the start of the decade, according to an analysis of legal data and public records, raising concerns over a lack of accountability.

Get today's headlines by email

Data reviewed by rights groups and legal experts indicates that, despite hundreds of reported cases, no indictments have been issued for killings of Palestinians by Israeli civilians or security forces in the West Bank since 2020.

Growing concerns over impunity
The findings have prompted criticism from former senior Israeli officials, including ex-prime minister Ehud Olmert, who called for intervention by the International Criminal Court.

Olmert warned that failure to address violence could have serious consequences for both Palestinians and Israelis, urging international legal authorities to step in if domestic enforcement fails.

A separate letter signed by dozens of former military, intelligence and police leaders described what they called “organised” violence against Palestinians, warning that continued inaction could pose a broader threat.

Violence and limited legal action
According to United Nations data, at least 1,100 Palestinian civilians have been killed in the occupied West Bank since 2020, with a significant proportion reported to be children. The majority of deaths have been attributed to Israeli security forces, though attacks by civilians have also increased.

Legal advocacy group Yesh Din reported that more than 96% of police investigations into settler violence between 2020 and 2025 were closed without indictments. Out of hundreds of cases, only a small number resulted in convictions.

In cases involving alleged harm by Israeli soldiers, the proportion of indictments was even lower. Of more than 1,700 complaints filed, including hundreds relating to fatalities, fewer than 1% led to charges.

Experts say delays, closed investigations and limited prosecutions have contributed to what they describe as a system that struggles to deliver accountability.

Internal criticism and legal pressure
Criticism has also come from within Israel’s legal and political establishment. Former justice ministers and senior legal figures have warned that the current approach risks undermining the rule of law.

Some have argued that the lack of prosecutions could weaken Israel’s position in international courts, where domestic legal action is often seen as a key factor in determining jurisdiction.

Human rights lawyer Michael Sfard said the system had historically relied on a small number of cases to demonstrate accountability but that such prosecutions had largely ceased in recent years.

Broader political context
Violence in the occupied West Bank has intensified following the October 2023 attacks by Hamas and the subsequent war in Gaza. Reports of arson, assaults and other incidents involving Israeli settlers have increased, with many cases documented but not pursued in court.

At the same time, Israel’s military leadership has acknowledged the issue. The current chief of staff has called for stronger action to address settler violence and prevent further escalation.

Analysts note that the issue remains deeply tied to the broader political and security situation in the region, with differing views inside Israel over responsibility and the role of state institutions.

Despite calls for reform, there is little indication so far that prosecution patterns will change in the near term.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Kim Cites Iran Conflict to Reinforce North Korea’s Nuclear Stance

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has used the ongoing conflict involving Iran to justify his country’s decision to retain nuclear weapons, warning that recent events demonstrate the risks faced by states without a strong deterrent.

Get today's headlines by email

In a speech to North Korea’s Supreme People’s Assembly, Kim criticised United States actions abroad, describing them as aggressive and destabilising. While he did not directly name Iran, his remarks came against the backdrop of the current war and appeared to draw clear parallels.

Nuclear stance declared “irreversible”
He said the situation “clearly proves” that Pyongyang was right to resist pressure to dismantle its nuclear arsenal, adding that the country’s nuclear status is now “irreversible”.

The comments reflect a long-standing position by North Korea that nuclear weapons are essential for national survival, particularly in light of US military interventions overseas. Analysts have noted that the conflict with Iran reinforces Pyongyang’s belief that nuclear capability deters external threats.

Implications for US diplomacy
The remarks come as Donald Trump has signalled a willingness to reopen talks with Kim, potentially reviving stalled diplomacy that collapsed in 2019.

However, Kim’s latest stance suggests any future negotiations would differ significantly from previous efforts centred on denuclearisation. Instead, Pyongyang is likely to demand recognition as a nuclear-armed state and an end to what it calls hostile US policies.

This marks a significant challenge for Washington, which has historically insisted that North Korea abandon its nuclear programme as a condition for improved relations.

Expanding arsenal and military ties
North Korea is widely believed to possess dozens of nuclear warheads and has continued to develop delivery systems capable of reaching long distances, including the US mainland.

Recent months have seen a series of weapons demonstrations, including missile launches and tests of systems described by state media as nuclear-capable. Kim has pledged to further expand both the number of weapons and the means of deploying them.

At the same time, Pyongyang has strengthened ties with Russia, including military cooperation linked to the war in Ukraine. Analysts say this relationship has provided North Korea with resources and technical insights that could enhance its weapons programmes.

Limited opening for talks
Despite the firm tone, Kim has not ruled out future engagement with the United States. He has indicated a willingness to meet again, but only under conditions that accept North Korea’s nuclear status.

For now, his message appears clear: while dialogue may remain possible, giving up nuclear weapons is not under consideration.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Australia ABC Journalists Stage First Strike in Two Decades Over Pay and AI Concerns

Journalists at Australia’s national broadcaster, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, have staged their first strike in 20 years, walking off the job in a dispute over pay, working conditions and concerns about the potential use of artificial intelligence.

Get today's headlines by email

Hundreds of staff stopped work for 24 hours from Wednesday morning after a majority of union members rejected a pay offer they said failed to keep pace with rising living costs. The strike has led to significant disruption across the broadcaster’s output.

Walkout disrupts major programmes
Flagship programmes, including the evening current affairs show 7.30 and key breakfast broadcasts, are not airing as scheduled. In their place, audiences are being served reruns, pre-recorded segments and some international content.

Radio stations such as Triple J and ABC Classic are also operating with reduced live programming, relying largely on music playlists during the stoppage.

Pay dispute and contract concerns
At the centre of the dispute is a proposed pay deal offering a total increase of 10% over three years. This includes a 3.5% rise in the first year, followed by smaller increments in subsequent years. However, staff argue the offer falls short of inflation, which stood at 3.8% in January.

A one-off bonus payment was also proposed, though it would exclude casual workers, who make up a significant share of the workforce.

The offer was rejected by around 60% of participating union members, triggering industrial action. Workers are also calling for improved pay for unsociable hours, clearer career progression and a reduction in reliance on temporary contracts.

Concerns about job security have been heightened by the broadcaster’s refusal to rule out the future use of AI technologies in its operations.

Management defends offer
ABC managing director Hugh Marks said the proposal represented the highest level of pay increase the publicly funded organisation could afford.

He described the offer as “financially responsible” and competitive within the media sector, adding that it balanced multiple financial pressures faced by the organisation.

Despite this, union representatives argue the package does not adequately reflect the cost-of-living challenges facing employees or the importance of public service journalism.

Staff voice uncertainty over future
Demonstrations were held outside ABC offices in Sydney and Melbourne, where several hundred workers gathered to show support for the strike.

Veteran journalist David Marr described public broadcasting as vital to the future of journalism, warning it must offer fair wages and job security to retain talent.

Some employees, particularly those on short-term contracts, expressed anxiety about speaking publicly, citing fears over job stability. One worker said she was weighing up leaving for a permanent role elsewhere despite considering her current position a “dream job”.

Unions representing staff, including the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance, have called on management to return to negotiations.

The dispute is expected to be referred to the Fair Work Commission as both sides seek a resolution.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25


webfact
webfact

US Approves Rapid Deployment of 82nd Airborne Troops to Middle East

Donald Trump has approved the deployment of troops from the 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East, according to US media reports, as tensions continue between Washington and Iran.

Get today's headlines by email

The decision places a contingent of elite US forces on high alert, with deployment expected potentially within hours. Officials cited in reports said the force would likely include a battalion from the 1st Brigade Combat Team, alongside Major General Brandon Tegtmeier, the division’s commander, and supporting staff.

Rapid response forces on standby
Based at Fort Bragg, the 82nd Airborne Division is designed for rapid global response. The unit states it can deploy within 18 hours of receiving orders and specialises in parachute assaults and securing strategic objectives ahead of larger military operations.

The move comes amid ongoing US engagement with Iran, although no specific timeline for troop movement has been confirmed.

History of overseas deployments
The 82nd Airborne has played a central role in several major US military operations over recent decades. These include the Gulf War, Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom, as well as missions in Afghanistan under Operation Freedom’s Sentinel.

Its rapid deployment capability has made it one of the US military’s most frequently mobilised units during international crises.

Personal impact on military families
Former soldiers say such deployments often come with little warning. Retired serviceman Marquis Johnson, who previously served in the division, described the experience as fast-moving and unpredictable.

“Within 48 hours you’re pretty much out of there,” he said, noting that troops can be placed on standby and then deployed with minimal notice.

Johnson added that the uncertainty can be particularly difficult for families, especially during periods of heightened global tension. He urged relatives of service members to remain supportive and prepared for sudden departures.

“You can get the word at any moment,” he said, adding that families should cherish time together given the risks involved in military service.

Unclear operational scope
Officials have not disclosed the specific mission or location for the potential deployment. The presence of senior command staff suggests the operation could expand depending on developments in the region.

The decision underscores Washington’s readiness to respond quickly to escalating conditions in the Middle East, though the extent of US involvement remains uncertain.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Danish PM Faces Uncertain Path as Early Election Exit Polls Signal Losses

Exit polls in Denmark suggest a setback for Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and her governing coalition following an early general election, raising uncertainty over who will form the next government.

Get today's headlines by email

According to projections by the Megafon research institute for broadcaster TV 2, all three parties in Frederiksen’s coalition are expected to lose ground. The figures indicate that neither the left-leaning nor right-leaning blocs are likely to secure a parliamentary majority.

Coalition support weakens
Frederiksen’s centre-left Social Democrats are projected to remain the largest party, but with around 21% of the vote—down significantly from their 27.5% share in the 2022 election.

The outcome could leave Lars Løkke Rasmussen, the foreign minister and former prime minister, in a pivotal position. His centrist Moderate party may determine whether Frederiksen can remain in office for a third term.

Campaign shaped by domestic concerns
Frederiksen, 48, called the election months ahead of schedule, apparently hoping her leadership during tensions involving Donald Trump and his interest in Greenland would strengthen her standing with voters.

However, the campaign largely focused on domestic issues, particularly rising living costs, pensions and taxation. Analysts say these concerns appear to have outweighed foreign policy considerations at the ballot box.

A lawmaker from the Social Democrats acknowledged that the government’s attention to international crises, including support for Ukraine, may have come at the expense of domestic priorities.

Fragmented political landscape
Denmark’s proportional representation system typically produces coalition governments, often after prolonged negotiations. No single party is expected to come close to a majority in the 179-seat Folketing.

Frederiksen’s current administration is notable for bridging the traditional divide between left- and right-leaning parties, but that model now faces uncertainty.

Two centre-right figures are positioning themselves as potential alternatives. Defence Minister Troels Lund Poulsen of the Venstre party and Alex Vanopslagh of the Liberal Alliance both aim to form a new government, though exit polls suggest their parties may also struggle to gain decisive ground.

Meanwhile, the anti-immigration Danish People’s Party is projected to improve its performance compared with its weak showing in the previous election.

Greenland issue fades
Despite earlier tensions over Greenland, the issue played a limited role during the campaign. There is broad political agreement in Denmark over the territory’s status within the kingdom.

Relations between Copenhagen and Washington have stabilised in recent months, following earlier disputes over US ambitions in the Arctic region.

With no clear majority emerging, negotiations to form a government are expected to be complex and could determine whether Frederiksen retains power or a new coalition takes shape.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026

webfact
webfact

Fans File EU Complaint Against FIFA Over 2026 World Cup Ticket Pricing

Football supporters have lodged a formal complaint with the European Commission, accusing FIFA of imposing excessive ticket prices for the 2026 World Cup.

Get today's headlines by email

The complaint was submitted by Football Supporters Europe (FSE) alongside consumer group Euroconsumers. They argue that FIFA has exploited its control over ticket sales to introduce unfair pricing practices.

Allegations of Abuse of Market Power
In a joint statement, the groups said FIFA effectively holds a monopoly on World Cup ticket distribution and has used that position to set conditions that would not exist in a competitive market.

Ticket prices initially ranged from around $140 for group-stage matches to as much as $8,680 for the final. Even lower-tier final tickets were priced above $4,000, with costs subject to fluctuation under a dynamic pricing system being used at the tournament for the first time.

Criticism of Dynamic Pricing
Supporters’ groups have strongly criticised the use of dynamic pricing, arguing that it turns access to matches into a bidding process that disadvantages ordinary fans.

Els Bruggeman said the system inflates costs without adding value and risks excluding large numbers of supporters.

FSE has called for ticket prices to be fixed during the next sales phase and for dynamic pricing to be halted for European buyers.

Partial Price Adjustments
Following a backlash when tickets first went on sale, FIFA introduced a limited number of lower-priced tickets, with some available for around $60 across all stages of the tournament. These were allocated to participating teams to distribute among loyal supporters.

However, fan groups argue that the move does not address broader concerns about affordability and transparency in the ticketing process.

Concerns Over Resale Market
Additional criticism has been directed at FIFA’s official resale platform, where tickets have reportedly been listed far above their original prices.

FSE said the governing body takes a commission of around 30% on resale transactions, further increasing costs for fans.

Ronan Evain said supporters were being left with little choice but to pay inflated prices or miss out on attending matches.

FIFA Response
FIFA said it had not formally received the complaint but defended its approach, stating that it operates as a not-for-profit organisation and reinvests World Cup revenues into the development of football globally.

Gianni Infantino has previously pointed to unprecedented demand for tickets, suggesting all matches at the expanded 2026 tournament are expected to sell out.

Growing Scrutiny
The complaint marks a significant escalation in tensions between football authorities and supporter groups, with the issue now set to be examined at the European level.

The 2026 World Cup, to be held across North America, will be the largest in the tournament’s history, increasing both demand and scrutiny over access for fans.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026

webfact
webfact

Severe Storm System Set to Sweep Middle East Amid Ongoing Iran Conflict

A powerful and unusual storm system is forecast to move across the Middle East this week, bringing the risk of flooding, dust storms and severe weather to several countries already affected by conflict involving Iran.

Get today's headlines by email

Weather systems are expected to begin affecting Israel and Lebanon on Wednesday, with scattered rain and thunderstorms developing during the day.

Storm to Intensify Across Region
By Thursday, forecasters say the system will strengthen significantly as it moves eastward, spreading across Syria and into the Arabian Peninsula. The most severe conditions are expected later in the week, with impacts extending to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and Iran.

Risk of Severe Weather and Flooding
The storm is expected to bring intense thunderstorms capable of producing damaging winds exceeding 60 mph, large hail and the possibility of isolated tornadoes.

Heavy rainfall is also forecast, with some areas likely to receive more than an inch of rain in a short period. This could trigger flash flooding, particularly in urban areas.

Cities such as Dubai and Abu Dhabi, which typically receive limited annual rainfall, may be especially vulnerable to flooding if the heaviest downpours materialise.

Dust Storms and Reduced Visibility
In addition to rain and thunderstorms, forecasters warn of large dust storms, known as haboobs, developing across desert regions. These storms can significantly reduce visibility and bring strong, gusty winds.

Such conditions may disrupt transport and daily activities across affected areas.

Impact Extends Into Iran
Parts of Iran are also expected to be affected by the system, with mountainous regions potentially seeing snowfall alongside heavy rain in lower areas.

The arrival of severe weather comes at a time when the region is already facing heightened instability, raising concerns about additional disruption to infrastructure and daily life.

Unusual Weather Pattern
Meteorologists say that while storms do occur in the Middle East, the scale and intensity of this system are unusual for the region.

With impacts expected to last through Friday, authorities across multiple countries are likely to monitor conditions closely as the storm develops.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Russia Launches Nearly 950 Drones in Largest 24-Hour Assault on Ukraine

Russia has carried out its largest aerial assault on Ukraine since the start of the war, launching hundreds of drones and missiles in a coordinated wave of attacks across the country.

Get today's headlines by email

According to Ukraine’s Air Force, a total of 948 drones were deployed within a 24-hour period, alongside dozens of missiles. The strikes hit multiple regions, including western areas that have generally seen fewer attacks during the conflict.

Widespread Strikes Across Cities
In the city of Lviv, a residential building near the historic Bernardine monastery—part of a UNESCO World Heritage site—was damaged. Local officials reported dozens of injuries.

Further west, in the Ivano-Frankivsk region, a maternity hospital was struck, with authorities confirming fatalities and injuries, including a child. Additional damage was reported in Ternopil, though no casualties were recorded there.

In central Ukraine, the city of Vinnytsia also came under attack, leaving at least one person dead and several others injured.

Casualties and Damage
Across the country, at least eight people were reported killed in the combined daytime and overnight strikes, with dozens more injured. Ukrainian officials said that while air defences intercepted many incoming drones and missiles, a significant number still reached their targets.

A spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force described the attack as one of the most extensive since the conflict began, noting that drones entered airspace in large समूह formations from the north and struck a wide geographical area.

Kyiv Condemns Escalation
President Volodymyr Zelensky said the scale of the assault demonstrated that Moscow had no intention of ending the war.

“The scale of the latest attacks clearly shows that Russia has no intention of really ending this war,” he said in a video address.

Russia has not publicly commented on the latest strikes.

Conflict Continues Unabated
The war, which began with Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, continues with near-daily attacks on Ukrainian cities. While eastern regions remain the most heavily targeted, the latest strikes indicate a broader reach across the country.

At the same time, Russian officials reported casualties in their own territory, with a drone strike in the Kursk region said to have killed one person and injured others.

Efforts to broker a peace agreement have stalled in recent weeks, with international attention also focused on rising tensions in the Middle East.

Ongoing Human Impact
Ukrainian officials and public figures have stressed the human cost of the war, warning against growing global fatigue.

Olena Zelenska said the suffering caused by the conflict must not be overlooked amid competing global crises.

The latest escalation underscores the continued intensity of the war, as large-scale attacks persist with no immediate sign of de-escalation.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026

webfact
webfact

UK Meningitis Reporting Delay Raises Concerns Over Outbreak Response

Health authorities in the UK have faced criticism after a delay in reporting a suspected meningitis case, which may have slowed the response to a wider outbreak.

Get today's headlines by email

The UK Health Security Agency was first notified of a case by the Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital on the afternoon of 13 March, despite the patient having been admitted two days earlier.

Missed Early Warning Opportunity
Under the Health Protection Regulations 2010, suspected cases of invasive meningitis must be reported immediately, without waiting for laboratory confirmation.

The hospital, which is operated by East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust, acknowledged that it could have alerted authorities sooner. It said staff waited for a confirmed diagnosis before notifying public health officials.
Impact on Outbreak Response
The delay meant that contact tracing and preventive treatment for close contacts were not initiated as early as they could have been.

By the time a public alert was issued on 15 March, multiple additional cases had emerged. Of 23 suspected or probable cases identified so far, all involving young people, two individuals have died and four were receiving intensive care treatment.

Health officials reported that several patients developed symptoms during the period between the initial hospital admission and the public warning, raising concerns that earlier awareness might have prompted faster medical intervention.

Expert Criticism
Infectious disease specialists have criticised the delay, emphasising the urgency required when dealing with meningitis.

Paul Hunter of the University of East Anglia described the delay as “indefensible,” noting that suspected cases should be reported immediately to allow rapid investigation and preventive measures.

Early treatment is considered critical in meningitis cases, as delays can increase the risk of severe complications, including permanent disabilities.

Questions Over Further Reporting
The UK Health Security Agency also indicated that additional cases may not have been reported promptly, with some patients presenting on 14 March but only being communicated later.

Officials said it remains unclear how much the delays affected the identification of a broader cluster, though a large-scale public health response was launched once the seriousness of the situation became clear.

Internal alerts were subsequently issued across Kent and Medway, ensuring that emergency services and healthcare providers were prepared to respond to further cases.

Ongoing Investigation
Health authorities continue to investigate the outbreak and the timeline of reporting. While no confirmed cases have yet been directly linked to the first patient, officials say earlier notification would have enabled quicker preventive action, including the administration of antibiotics to close contacts.

The incident has raised wider concerns about adherence to reporting protocols and the importance of rapid communication in managing infectious disease outbreaks.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026

webfact
webfact

Democrat Wins Florida District Covering Trump’s Mar-a-Lago in Surprise Upset

A Democratic candidate has secured an unexpected victory in a Florida state House special election, flipping a district that includes President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence.

Get today's headlines by email

Emily Gregory, a first-time candidate, defeated Republican Jon Maples in the race for District 87, an area that includes Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach.

Shock Result in Republican-Leaning District
The result marks a notable shift from the 2024 election, when Republicans won the same district by a margin of 19 percentage points. Gregory’s victory is being viewed as a significant upset in a traditionally conservative area.

Speaking after the result, Gregory said she believed early on that the seat could be competitive, adding that her campaign had identified a path to victory despite the district’s recent voting history.

Momentum Ahead of Midterms
The outcome is the latest in a series of strong performances by Democrats in special elections since the start of Trump’s second term. Party officials say the result could signal growing momentum ahead of the upcoming midterm elections.

Ken Martin, head of the Democratic National Committee, said the win demonstrated broader electoral potential for the party.

“If Democrats can win in Trump’s backyard, we can win anywhere,” he said in a statement.

High-Profile Republican Backing
The Republican candidate had received backing from Trump, who endorsed Maples and encouraged supporters to turn out for the vote. Additional support came from Byron Donalds, a Republican congressman who is currently running for governor of Florida.

Despite these endorsements, the result suggests that local dynamics and campaign strategy may have played a decisive role in the outcome.

Wider Political Implications
Special elections are often seen as indicators of voter sentiment between general election cycles. The latest result may increase Democratic confidence as the country approaches the next round of national and state-level contests.

The US midterm elections, scheduled for November, will determine control of the US House of Representatives, a portion of the Senate, and numerous state offices.

While one race does not determine broader trends, the Florida result is likely to draw attention from both parties as they assess their prospects in the months ahead.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026
webfact
webfact

BlackRock Chief Warns $150 Oil Could Push Global Economy Into Recession

The head of BlackRock has warned that a sustained surge in oil prices driven by tensions involving Iran could trigger a severe global economic downturn.

Get today's headlines by email

Larry Fink said that if geopolitical tensions persist and oil prices remain elevated, the consequences for the global economy could be significant.

Energy Prices Seen as Key Risk
“If Iran remains a threat” and oil prices stay high, he said, the impact would be far-reaching. He outlined a scenario in which crude prices could remain above $100 a barrel for an extended period, potentially reaching $150.

Such levels, he warned, would likely result in “a probably stark and steep recession”.

However, Fink also pointed to an alternative outcome, suggesting that if the conflict were resolved and Iran re-integrated into the international community, energy prices could fall back below pre-war levels.

Market Volatility and Energy Strategy
The ongoing conflict in the Middle East has led to sharp fluctuations in global financial markets, as investors attempt to assess the long-term impact on energy supply and costs.

Fink said countries must adopt a pragmatic approach to energy policy, balancing different sources to ensure stable and affordable supply. He stressed that access to low-cost energy is essential for economic growth and improving living standards.

His comments come as some industry groups have called for increased domestic oil and gas production to reduce reliance on imports during periods of geopolitical instability.

No AI Investment Bubble
Despite concerns over heavy investment in artificial intelligence, Fink rejected suggestions that the sector is experiencing a speculative bubble.

“I do not believe we have a bubble at all,” he said, while acknowledging that some individual projects may fail.

He described a global race for technological leadership and argued that continued investment is essential, particularly in the face of competition from other major economies.

BlackRock has been involved in major deals in the sector, including investments in large-scale data centre infrastructure.

Energy Constraints and Workforce Shifts
Fink identified energy costs as a major constraint on the expansion of AI, particularly in the United States and Europe. He warned that insufficient investment in affordable power generation could hinder technological progress.

At the same time, he suggested that AI would reshape the labour market, creating increased demand for skilled trades such as electricians, welders and plumbers.

He argued that too many people have been encouraged to pursue university education at the expense of vocational training, calling for a rebalancing of priorities as economies evolve.

Broader Economic Outlook
With energy prices closely tied to geopolitical developments, Fink said the direction of the global economy will largely depend on how the current conflict unfolds.

A prolonged period of high oil prices, he indicated, would not only strain households and businesses but could also tip the world into recession.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Fuel Crisis From Iran Conflict Disrupts Daily Life Across Asia

The ongoing conflict involving Iran has triggered a sharp energy crisis across Asia, as restricted access to the Strait of Hormuz disrupts the flow of oil and gas supplies.

Get today's headlines by email

With roughly 20% of global energy shipments typically passing through the strait, its effective closure has sent oil prices higher and unsettled markets worldwide. Asian economies, which rely heavily on these imports, have been among the hardest hit.

Thailand Urges Energy Conservation
In Thailand, authorities have introduced a series of measures to curb energy use. Public campaigns have encouraged people to adjust their daily habits, including limiting air conditioning and working remotely.

At the state broadcaster Thai PBS, news presenters symbolically removed their jackets on air to highlight the need for conservation. One presenter said the gesture aimed to demonstrate awareness of how global events were affecting everyday life.

Officials have sought to reassure the public that energy supplies remain sufficient, even as precautionary steps continue.

Sri Lanka Faces Renewed Strain
In Sri Lanka, the crisis has revived memories of recent economic hardship. Despite improved finances since its 2022 financial collapse, fuel shortages have returned due to supply disruptions.

Authorities have introduced rationing and designated midweek public holidays to reduce consumption. Long queues at fuel stations have disrupted work for many, with some workers saying they have been forced to miss jobs while waiting to secure limited supplies.

Myanmar Imposes Restrictions
In Myanmar, where conflict has already strained the economy, officials have introduced an alternating day system for private vehicle use.

Residents say the restrictions have altered daily routines, including work commutes and social activities. There are also concerns that shortages could lead to the emergence of black markets for fuel.

India Hit by Industrial and Household Shortages
The impact has been particularly severe in India, which depends heavily on imports routed through the Strait of Hormuz.

In Gujarat, a shortage of gas has forced large parts of the ceramics industry to shut down, leaving hundreds of thousands of workers without income. Elsewhere, businesses and households are struggling to secure essential fuel supplies.

In Mumbai, some restaurants have reduced operations or closed temporarily due to a lack of cooking gas. Industry representatives say shortages have made it difficult to maintain normal services.

Long queues for gas cylinders have been reported across the country, even as the government attempts to reassure the public.

Regional Impact Intensifies
Asia receives nearly 90% of the oil and gas transported through the Strait of Hormuz, making the region particularly vulnerable to disruptions.

With no clear resolution to the conflict, the crisis is expected to continue affecting daily life, from transport and employment to food services and energy use.

The situation underscores how geopolitical tensions can rapidly translate into economic hardship for millions, far beyond the immediate conflict zone.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Iran Signals Limited Access to Strait of Hormuz for ‘Non-Hostile’ Shipping

Iran has indicated that only “non-hostile” vessels will be allowed to pass through the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, according to a report citing a communication to international shipping authorities.

Get today's headlines by email

In a letter circulated to members of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), Iran’s foreign ministry said ships could continue transiting the waterway if they coordinated with Iranian authorities and were not linked to countries it considers hostile.

Conditions Set for Transit
The communication reportedly stated that vessels associated with the United States, Israel or other parties involved in military actions against Iran would not qualify for what it described as “innocent” or “non-hostile” passage.
The report, first published by the Financial Times, has not been independently verified.

Impact on Global Energy Supply
The Strait of Hormuz is a vital route for global energy shipments, with roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas typically passing through the narrow channel.

Since the escalation of conflict involving Iran, shipping traffic through the strait has been severely disrupted, contributing to volatility in global energy markets and concerns over supply shortages.

Iran said its actions were “necessary and proportionate” measures aimed at preventing adversaries from using the route to support military operations.

Strategic and Legal Implications
The restrictions outlined by Tehran could have significant implications for international shipping and maritime law, particularly regarding the principle of free navigation through key waterways.

The International Maritime Organization, based in London, oversees global maritime safety and security and includes 176 member states. Its role may become increasingly important as tensions affect shipping routes.

Ongoing Tensions
The announcement comes amid heightened regional tensions following recent military strikes and retaliatory actions involving Iran and its adversaries.

With access to the Strait of Hormuz now uncertain for some vessels, the situation remains fluid, and further developments could have far-reaching consequences for global trade and energy markets.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026

webfact
webfact

UK to Test Social Media Curbs on Teenagers in Nationwide Pilot

The UK government is set to trial restrictions on social media use among teenagers, including app bans, digital curfews and daily time limits, as part of efforts to assess their impact on young people.

Get today's headlines by email

The initiative, led by Liz Kendall, will involve 300 teenagers across the country. Participants will be divided into four groups, each experiencing different levels of restriction.

Pilot to Test Different Restrictions
One group will have access to popular social media platforms completely blocked, effectively simulating a full ban. Two other groups will face partial limits, either restricting usage to one hour per day or preventing access overnight between 21:00 and 07:00. A fourth group will act as a control and continue using apps without changes.

Officials say the aim is to gather real-world evidence on how such measures affect young people’s lives, including their sleep, schoolwork and family relationships.

Policy Debate Over Possible Ban
The pilot runs alongside a government consultation examining whether to introduce a nationwide ban on social media use for under-16s, similar to measures adopted in Australia.

The consultation, which remains open until late May, has already attracted tens of thousands of responses. Ministers say the findings from both the pilot and consultation will inform future policy decisions.

While the idea has gained political backing and support from some campaign groups, critics have warned that restrictions may be difficult to enforce and could drive teenagers to less regulated online spaces.

Calls for Broader Safety Measures
Child protection organisations have urged the government to ensure that technology companies take greater responsibility for online safety.

NSPCC said it supported efforts to improve protections but stressed that platforms must be designed to prevent harmful content reaching young users.

The Molly Rose Foundation also backed the trial approach, arguing that evidence-based policymaking is essential before introducing sweeping restrictions.

Larger Study to Follow
The pilot will be complemented by a separate large-scale research project examining the effects of reduced social media use. Funded by Wellcome Trust, the study will involve around 4,000 students aged 12 to 15.

Researchers from the University of Cambridge and the Bradford Institute for Health Research will lead the project, focusing on outcomes such as mental wellbeing, sleep patterns and school attendance.

Psychologist Amy Orben said the study aims to address a lack of reliable data on how social media affects young people and what impact restrictions might have.

Assessing Real-World Impact
Teenagers and their parents involved in the pilot will be interviewed before and after the trial to evaluate both benefits and challenges, including whether users find ways to bypass restrictions.

The government says the combined findings will help determine whether stronger regulation or outright bans are necessary to protect children online.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Large oil trades before Trump Iran announcement raise questions

Unusually large trades in oil markets shortly before an announcement by US President Donald Trump have raised questions among analysts about whether some investors may have acted on advance knowledge.
Data reviewed by the BBC shows that traders placed hundreds of millions of dollars in bets on falling oil prices minutes before the president said the United States would delay planned strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure.

Get today's headlines by email

Surge in trades ahead of announcement
The activity took place early on Monday, shortly before Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that Washington had held “very good and productive conversations” with Tehran.
At 07:04 Eastern Time (11:04 GMT), the post signalled a potential easing of tensions. Oil prices reacted immediately, dropping sharply by around 14% within minutes.

However, trading volumes had already surged roughly 15 minutes earlier.
On the New York Mercantile Exchange, trades in West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude contracts jumped from several hundred to more than 2,000 within a minute, representing about $170m.
A similar spike was recorded in Brent crude contracts, where volumes rose from just a handful of trades to more than 1,600, worth roughly $150m.

Analysts flag unusual timing
Market observers say the scale and timing of the trades appear unusual, particularly given the lack of public information about any diplomatic progress at that point.
Mukesh Sahdev of XAnalysts described the activity as “abnormal”, noting there had been no clear indication that talks between the United States and Iran were underway.

Rachel Winter of Killik & Co said the pattern had prompted speculation about possible insider trading, although there is no evidence confirming that.
She added that the situation could warrant further investigation by regulators.

White House and market reaction
The White House has been approached for comment. A spokesperson told the Financial Times that the administration does not tolerate illegal profiteering based on insider knowledge.

Markets have been highly volatile amid the Middle East conflict. In the days leading up to the announcement, Mr Trump had warned of possible strikes on Iran’s energy infrastructure if Tehran did not reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Oil prices initially rose when markets reopened on Monday, while stock markets fell. The president’s later comments suggesting progress in talks led to a reversal, with oil prices dropping and equities recovering.

Conflicting statements from Iran
Iranian officials later denied that any talks had taken place, describing the reports as false.
Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf said misleading information was being used to influence financial markets.
The conflicting accounts added to market uncertainty and further price swings.

Previous cases raise further questions
The episode has also drawn attention because similar patterns have been observed in other politically sensitive situations.
In January, a surge in bets on a prediction platform came shortly before developments involving Venezuela’s leadership. One account reportedly made more than $436,000 from a $32,537 wager.

While not directly linked, such cases have fuelled broader concerns about how political events and financial markets can intersect.
Analysts say that while sharp market movements are common during geopolitical crises, the timing and scale of trades in this instance are likely to attract closer scrutiny.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 March 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Oil Prices Climb Back Above $100 Amid Confusion Over US-Iran Talks

Global oil prices have surged back above $100 a barrel following conflicting signals over possible negotiations between the United States and Iran, adding fresh volatility to energy markets.

Get today's headlines by email

Benchmark Brent crude rose by around 4% in Asian trading on Tuesday, reaching $103.94 per barrel. Meanwhile, Nymex Light Sweet climbed 4.1% to $91.75.

Prices Rebound After Sharp Drop
The rebound follows a sharp decline on Monday, when Brent crude fell by more than 10% after Donald Trump said the US would delay planned strikes on Iranian power infrastructure. At the time, he cited “productive” discussions with Tehran and suggested progress towards a potential resolution.

Conflicting Claims Fuel Uncertainty
However, Iranian officials quickly rejected claims that talks had taken place, describing them as an attempt to influence markets. The denial has contributed to renewed uncertainty, pushing oil prices higher once again.

Over the weekend, Trump had warned that the US could target Iranian energy facilities if shipping through the Strait of Hormuz was not restored within 48 hours. Iran responded by threatening to strike key infrastructure across the region.

Those escalating tensions had earlier driven Brent crude as high as $113 per barrel before Monday’s sudden drop.

Strategic Waterway Disruption
The Strait of Hormuz remains a central factor in market movements. The vital waterway, through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas typically flows, has been effectively blocked since the conflict intensified in late February.

The disruption has raised concerns over global supply, contributing to sharp price swings and heightened volatility in recent weeks.

Markets React to Ongoing Conflict
Energy markets have been particularly sensitive to developments since US and Israeli strikes on Iran at the end of February, followed by retaliatory actions from Tehran.

Despite the turbulence in oil prices, Asian stock markets showed signs of stabilising on Tuesday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 rose by 0.8%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng gained 1.6%, and South Korea’s Kospi increased by 2.2%, recovering some losses from the previous day.

Measures to Ease Pressure
Governments have begun taking steps to mitigate the impact of rising energy costs and supply disruptions. The US has temporarily eased sanctions on Russian and Iranian oil shipments already at sea in an effort to stabilise supply.

However, with uncertainty over diplomatic progress and continued tensions in the region, markets remain highly sensitive to developments.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 March 2026

webfact
webfact

Bannon Suggests ICE Airport Deployment Could Be ‘Test Case’ for Elections

Former White House strategist Steve Bannon has suggested that the deployment of immigration officers at US airports could serve as a “test run” for potential involvement in future elections.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking on his “War Room” programme, Bannon discussed the recent use of officers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to support airport operations during the ongoing shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security.

Remarks Spark Controversy
He proposed that the current deployment could be used to refine ICE’s role ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. During the conversation, conservative lawyer Mike Davis suggested immigration agents could be stationed at polling locations, arguing they could help enforce laws prohibiting non-citizens from voting.

Bannon endorsed the idea, describing the airport operation as a useful “test case” and suggesting ICE officers could check identification, drawing parallels with potential election-related duties.

ICE Deployment at Airports
The comments come as ICE and Homeland Security Investigations personnel have been deployed to assist airport security operations across the country. The move follows staff shortages at the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), where many employees have stopped reporting for work amid weeks without pay due to the federal shutdown.

Officials have said ICE officers are not conducting passenger screening but are instead supporting non-specialised tasks such as managing entry and exit points, allowing TSA staff to focus on core security functions.

Donald Trump said the deployment was his idea and indicated it would continue “for as long as it takes” to address disruptions at airports.

Political Reaction and Concerns
Bannon’s remarks have drawn attention as debates continue over the role of federal agencies in election processes. While US law prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections, proposals involving immigration enforcement officers at polling stations are likely to face significant legal and political scrutiny.

The use of ICE personnel has already been controversial, particularly given concerns from civil rights groups about the agency’s enforcement practices.

Context of Ongoing Shutdown
The airport deployment is taking place against the backdrop of a prolonged funding standoff affecting DHS. The shutdown has led to widespread operational challenges, including long queues at airport security checkpoints and increased absenteeism among TSA staff.

Authorities have framed the involvement of ICE officers as a temporary measure to manage disruptions. However, Bannon’s comments have added a new dimension to the debate, linking the move to broader political strategies ahead of future elections.

It remains unclear whether any formal proposals exist to expand ICE’s role beyond its current duties, but the remarks are likely to intensify discussion about election security and the appropriate use of federal agencies.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Lawsuit Filed to Halt Trump-Backed Kennedy Center Renovation Plan

A coalition of preservation and architectural organisations has filed a lawsuit seeking to block a major renovation project at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, arguing the plans would cause lasting damage to the landmark.

Get today's headlines by email

The case, lodged in federal court in Washington, targets Donald Trump in his role as chairman of the centre’s board of trustees, along with board members and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum.

Concerns Over Irreversible Damage
In the 82-page complaint, the groups warn that the proposed works would fundamentally alter the historic character of the building. They argue that large-scale demolition, reconstruction and aesthetic changes could permanently harm the site’s architectural integrity and undermine its role as a national memorial.

The lawsuit also claims the public has not been adequately consulted before decisions with long-term consequences were approved.

While the plaintiffs accept that maintenance work is needed, they contend the current proposal goes far beyond repairs and would effectively transform the structure into something new.

Board Approves Major Overhaul
The legal challenge follows a decision by the centre’s board, appointed under Trump’s leadership, to proceed with a two-year closure and renovation project.

According to plans, the venue will shut after Independence Day celebrations in July, with a full reopening scheduled once construction is completed.

Funding for the project includes $257m allocated by Congress to address long-standing maintenance issues at the site. However, critics argue the scope of the work exceeds what is necessary for preservation.

Political and Legal Challenges
The lawsuit is the latest in a series of disputes over changes at the Kennedy Center since Trump assumed a leading role in its governance. His influence has included appointing new board members and shaping the direction of the institution.

Earlier this month, Joyce Beatty filed a separate legal challenge aimed at preventing the planned closure. She has criticised the speed of the board’s approval process, suggesting there was limited debate before the decision was finalised.

The board had also previously voted to add Trump’s name to the centre, a move that has drawn objections from congressional Democrats.

Uncertain Outcome
The court case now raises questions about whether the renovation can proceed as scheduled. Preservation groups are seeking to halt the project before construction begins, warning that any irreversible changes could not be undone.

Neither the White House nor the Kennedy Center has publicly responded to the lawsuit.
The dispute highlights broader tensions between development plans and historic preservation, as well as ongoing political divisions over the future direction of one of the United States’ most prominent cultural institutions.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 March 2026
webfact
webfact

US Senate Confirms Markwayne Mullin as DHS Chief Amid Ongoing Shutdown

The US Senate has confirmed Markwayne Mullin as secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), placing him in charge of the agency during a prolonged funding crisis and mounting operational challenges.

Get today's headlines by email

Mullin, a Republican from Oklahoma, was approved in a 54–45 vote on Monday. Two Democrats, John Fetterman and Martin Heinrich, joined Republicans in supporting his nomination.

Leadership Change During Crisis
Mullin replaces Kristi Noem, who was dismissed weeks earlier following a controversial immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis in which two American citizens were killed.

His appointment comes as DHS enters its sixth week of a partial shutdown, with no clear resolution in sight. Thousands of employees, including airport security staff, remain unpaid, contributing to widespread disruption.

Absenteeism has risen sharply among Transportation Security Administration (TSA) workers, leading to long queues at airports across the country. More than 400 officers have resigned since the shutdown began.

Political Divisions Persist
Despite Mullin’s confirmation, the political deadlock over DHS funding appears unresolved. Democrats have insisted they will not support reopening the department without new restrictions on immigration enforcement agencies, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection.

These proposed measures include requiring agents to display identification, limiting the use of face coverings and mandating judicial warrants for certain operations.

Republicans have rejected these conditions, and Donald Trump has urged his party to resist compromise, prolonging the standoff.

Scrutiny Over Nomination
Mullin’s nomination faced criticism during the confirmation process. Rand Paul opposed his appointment, questioning his temperament following a tense committee hearing.

Democratic lawmakers also raised concerns about his experience and transparency, particularly regarding a previously undisclosed overseas trip he described as classified.

Gary Peters, a senior Democrat on the Homeland Security Committee, said Mullin had not demonstrated the necessary qualifications to lead the department.

Others emphasised that their opposition was rooted in broader policy disagreements rather than personal objections.

Background and Challenges Ahead
Mullin, 48, previously worked in his family’s plumbing business and had a career as a professional mixed martial arts fighter before entering politics. He was first elected to Congress in 2012 and later won a Senate seat in a special election.

He is a member of the Cherokee Nation and a long-time political ally of Trump.

His new role will test his influence in Washington as lawmakers attempt to resolve the funding impasse and address operational pressures within DHS.

With airport disruptions continuing and tensions over immigration policy unresolved, Mullin takes office at a time of significant uncertainty for one of the US government’s largest and most complex departments.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump Administration to Pay $1bn for Cancellation of US Offshore Wind Projects

The administration of Donald Trump has agreed to pay nearly $1bn in taxpayer funds to French energy firm TotalEnergies in exchange for abandoning planned offshore wind projects in the United States.

Get today's headlines by email

The deal marks a significant shift in policy, with the government effectively compensating a company to halt renewable energy developments before construction begins.

Wind Projects Scrapped
The payment will reimburse TotalEnergies for federal leases it purchased to develop two offshore wind farms off the coasts of New York and North Carolina. The funds will be issued through the US Department of Justice.

Together, the projects had the potential to generate more than four gigawatts of electricity, enough to supply large numbers of homes and businesses.

Instead, the company said it would redirect investment towards fossil fuel developments in the US, including a liquefied natural gas facility in Texas, oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and shale projects elsewhere.

TotalEnergies chief executive Patrick Pouyanné said the decision reflected the administration’s stance that offshore wind was not in the country’s interest.

Policy Shift on Renewable Energy
The agreement follows earlier action by the Interior Department, led by Doug Burgum, which halted approvals for new renewable energy permits. That move effectively stalled offshore wind projects in early development stages.

Officials have argued that offshore wind is costly and less reliable than other forms of energy. Burgum said the focus should instead be on “dependable” power sources to reduce costs for consumers.

However, critics point out that wind energy does not rely on fuel and can offer stable pricing compared with fossil fuels, whose costs fluctuate.

Concerns Over Energy Supply
The decision has raised concerns among energy experts about future electricity supply, particularly as demand rises from data centres, electrification and population growth.

Elizabeth Klein, who previously led offshore energy management efforts under the Biden administration, warned that cancelling the projects could deepen energy shortages and drive up prices, especially along the US East Coast.

Industry groups also criticised the move, arguing that removing planned renewable capacity could increase costs for consumers at a time when energy prices are already under pressure.

Wider Industry Implications
The settlement may set a precedent for other developers. Several companies have indicated they could seek reimbursement if prevented from proceeding with offshore wind projects.

Among them is RWE, which has invested heavily in offshore wind leases in US waters.
The total value of undeveloped offshore wind leases across US coasts exceeds $5bn, raising the prospect of further payouts if similar agreements are reached.

Uncertainty Ahead
It remains unclear whether additional deals are under discussion. The Interior Department has not confirmed whether negotiations are ongoing with other firms.

The agreement highlights the administration’s broader shift away from renewable energy in favour of fossil fuel development, a move that supporters say will strengthen energy security but critics argue could undermine long-term supply and pricing stability.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 March 2026
webfact
webfact

ICE Agents Sent to Airports as Shutdown Leaves US Security Lines in Chaos

US authorities have deployed immigration enforcement officers to major airports as long security queues worsen amid staff shortages caused by an ongoing government shutdown.

Get today's headlines by email

Hundreds of agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have been sent to 14 airports across the country, including hubs in New York, Atlanta and Houston, according to officials.

Staffing Crisis Disrupts Airports
The move comes as growing numbers of employees from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) have failed to report for duty after weeks without pay. The funding lapse began on 14 February and has left thousands of federal workers unpaid.

More than 3,400 TSA staff were absent on Sunday alone, contributing to major delays at airport checkpoints. At some locations, over 40% of staff called in sick, significantly reducing screening capacity.

Passengers have been advised to arrive several hours early, with reports of travellers sleeping inside terminals to avoid missing flights. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said disruption levels were severe and could have lasting effects if the shutdown continues.

ICE Role Limited but Controversial
Officials said ICE personnel would assist with non-specialised duties such as crowd control, allowing TSA officers to concentrate on core security screening.

Acting TSA leadership described the deployment as a way to “support” existing staff and improve efficiency during the crisis.

However, the decision has drawn criticism, particularly given ICE’s primary role in immigration enforcement. Donald Trump said agents could make arrests if necessary, though he stressed this was not their main purpose at airports.

The president also instructed that ICE officers should not wear face coverings while stationed at airports, saying it would not be “an appropriate look” in that setting.

Political Deadlock Deepens
The deployment reflects a broader political impasse in Washington, where lawmakers remain divided over funding for DHS and reforms to immigration enforcement.

Democrats have pushed for restrictions on ICE operations as part of any funding agreement, while Republicans have rejected proposals that would exclude the agency from funding packages.

Trump has urged his party not to accept partial deals, linking the dispute to wider legislative priorities.

Civil Rights Concerns Raised
The use of ICE agents in airports has prompted concerns from civil rights groups. NAACP criticised the move, warning that agents may not be properly trained for airport duties and raising fears about potential profiling.

Airport authorities have also expressed alarm. In a letter to Congress, more than 100 airport leaders warned that the disruption caused by the shutdown was “significant” and likely to worsen without urgent action.

Uncertain Outlook
With no immediate resolution in sight, TSA employees are set to miss another pay cycle, further increasing the risk of continued absences.

As Congress prepares to enter a scheduled recess, the prospect of prolonged disruption at US airports remains high, leaving travellers facing ongoing delays and uncertainty.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Counter-Terror Police Probe Arson Attack on Jewish Ambulances in London

An arson attack targeting ambulances operated by a Jewish charity in north London is being investigated by counter-terrorism officers, police have said, amid concerns over a possible hate crime.

Get today's headlines by email

Four vehicles belonging to Hatzola were set on fire in the Golders Green area in the early hours of Monday. The blaze caused several explosions due to gas canisters stored inside the ambulances, although no injuries were reported.

Investigation Focuses on Possible Motives
The Metropolitan Police said the incident is being treated as an antisemitic hate crime. Detectives are examining CCTV footage that appears to show three individuals dressed in dark clothing pouring accelerant onto the vehicles before igniting them and fleeing.

Commissioner Mark Rowley said officers were exploring multiple lines of inquiry, including whether those responsible may have links to groups connected to the Iranian state. He stressed, however, that it was too early to draw firm conclusions.

Authorities also confirmed that the incident has not formally been declared a terrorist attack at this stage.

An online claim of responsibility by a group calling itself Harakat Ashab al-Yamin al-Islamiya is being assessed, though police said its authenticity remains unverified.

Community Impact and Emergency Response
Fire crews from the London Fire Brigade were called to the scene shortly before 02:00 and brought the blaze under control within two hours. Explosions caused by heated cylinders damaged nearby residential buildings, forcing around 30 people to seek temporary shelter.

Residents described fleeing their homes after hearing loud blasts. The ambulances were parked near a synagogue, heightening concerns within the local Jewish community.

Hatzola, a volunteer-run organisation providing free emergency medical services, has operated in the area since 1979. Its vehicles are used to respond to urgent medical calls and transport patients to hospital.

Political and Public Reaction
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood described the attack as a “wicked crime” and urged anyone with information to come forward. She said perpetrators would be pursued and brought to justice.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the government would fund the replacement of the destroyed ambulances and reiterated the need to confront rising antisemitism.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan called the incident a “dark day” for the city, stressing the importance of solidarity with the Jewish community.

In response, police have increased patrols in affected areas, including deploying additional officers and armed units to protect vulnerable sites. Investigators have also launched an online portal to collect public evidence.

Wider Concerns Over Rising Antisemitism
The attack comes amid reports of increasing antisemitic incidents in the UK, particularly since the escalation of conflict in the Middle East. Community leaders expressed alarm at the targeting of a service dedicated to saving lives.

Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis described the attack as “particularly sickening,” noting that Hatzola serves people of all backgrounds.

Fundraising efforts to replace the damaged vehicles have already raised more than £1m, while emergency services have pledged support to ensure continued response capabilities.

Police said investigations remain ongoing, with all potential motives and connections under review.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Meloni Suffers Setback as Italians Reject Constitutional Reform in Referendum

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has faced her first major political defeat after voters rejected a proposed constitutional reform in a nationwide referendum.

Get today's headlines by email

Final results showed about 54% of voters opposed the changes, while 46% supported them. The outcome is widely seen as a blow to Meloni’s government after the vote became a broader test of her leadership.

Reform Plan Rejected
The proposed reform aimed to introduce a clearer separation between judges and prosecutors within Italy’s legal system. It also included plans for separate governing bodies and a new disciplinary court.

The government argued that these measures would strengthen judicial independence. However, opposition parties warned the changes could disrupt long-standing institutional balances and increase political influence over the judiciary.

Despite the technical nature of the proposals, turnout reached nearly 60%. Analysts had suggested that higher participation might favour the government, but this did not translate into support for the reform.

Vote Seen as Test of Leadership
Although Meloni insisted the referendum was about judicial reform rather than her premiership, the campaign increasingly took on the character of a wider judgement on her time in office.

Even before the full results were confirmed, she acknowledged the outcome, saying voters had made their decision “with clarity". She also described the result as a missed opportunity to modernise the country.

The defeat comes after a period of relative political stability under her right-wing coalition, which had until now avoided significant electoral setbacks.

Opposition Senses Opportunity
Opposition figures have interpreted the result as a sign of shifting public sentiment ahead of a general election expected next year.

Elly Schlein, leader of the Democratic Party, said the vote demonstrated that an alternative to the current government exists.

Former prime minister Matteo Renzi also weighed in, suggesting the government had lost its “momentum” and needed to respond more closely to voters’ concerns.

Pressure Builds on Government
The referendum defeat comes at a challenging time for Meloni. Economic concerns remain, with Italy facing sluggish growth and rising worries about energy costs linked to international tensions.

Meloni has also maintained close ties with Donald Trump, whose policies and ongoing conflict in the Middle East have drawn mixed reactions in Italy.

Unlike Renzi, who resigned after losing a constitutional referendum in 2016, Meloni has ruled out stepping down. However, the latest result has weakened her political standing and raised questions about her government’s future direction.

The vote has also likely complicated plans for further institutional reforms, including proposals to introduce the direct election of the prime minister.

With elections on the horizon, the outcome marks a significant shift in Italy’s political landscape, leaving Meloni in a more vulnerable position than at any point since taking office.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications
Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.