Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.
ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.

Trump warns Iran of strikes on power plants if Hormuz Strait not reopened within 48 hours

US President Donald Trump has threatened to launch strikes on Iran’s power infrastructure if the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened within 48 hours, escalating tensions in an already volatile conflict.

Get today's headlines by email

In a message posted on social media, Trump said the United States would “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants if Tehran failed to ensure the safe passage of ships through the strategic waterway.

Ultimatum over key oil route
“If Iran doesn’t FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz, within 48 HOURS… the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS,” he wrote, adding that the largest facilities would be targeted first.

The Strait of Hormuz, located off Iran’s southern coast, is one of the world’s most important shipping routes, handling roughly a fifth of global oil supplies. Since the outbreak of the conflict, Iran has effectively blocked the passage, disrupting energy markets and raising global concerns over supply.

Mixed signals on military strategy
The warning comes amid conflicting messages from Washington about the direction of the military campaign. Just a day earlier, Trump suggested that US operations in the region could soon be scaled back, saying the country was “very close to meeting our objectives”.

Despite that statement, the latest threat indicates the administration is prepared to escalate further if key demands are not met. Trump also said the US would assist Gulf nations in securing the strait “if asked”, signalling a willingness to expand involvement in safeguarding maritime routes.

Strategic and economic stakes
The closure of the strait has had significant implications for global energy flows, with the route serving as a critical artery for oil exports from the Gulf. Any prolonged disruption risks further volatility in oil prices and broader economic consequences worldwide.

Iran has not publicly responded to the latest ultimatum, but the warning adds to mounting pressure as hostilities continue across the region.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Starmer Faces Party Divisions at Home Amid Mounting Pressure from Overseas Conflict

As the UK government grapples with an escalating international crisis, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is facing growing unrest within his own party, highlighting political tensions at a critical moment.

Get today's headlines by email

While previous generations of British politicians often presented a united front during times of international conflict, divisions within the governing party have become increasingly visible. Despite holding a strong parliamentary majority, Labour is showing signs of internal friction, with some ministers acknowledging widespread unease.

Internal strains resurface
Concerns have been raised about public confidence in political leadership, particularly as the conflict in the Middle East threatens global energy stability. The government’s recent decision to allow the United States to use British bases has added to the pressure, with uncertainty over public support for deeper involvement.

Policy clashes and leadership tensions
Disagreements over domestic policy—especially immigration—have intensified the situation. Proposals led by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood have drawn criticism from within Labour ranks, including from senior figures such as Angela Rayner. Critics are considering pushing for a parliamentary vote if key elements of the plan are not revised.

Some within government argue that stricter immigration policies reflect public sentiment, while others warn that internal disputes risk damaging the party’s credibility. The handling of these disagreements has become more cautious following earlier legislative setbacks.

Tensions escalated further after public remarks questioning the government’s direction, prompting speculation about future leadership ambitions. Although such discussions are seen by some as poorly timed given the international situation, they underline ongoing uncertainty within the party.

Electoral pressure and uncertain outlook
Upcoming local elections are expected to test voter confidence, with polls suggesting a fragmented political landscape. The results could influence internal party dynamics and potentially reshape Labour’s leadership structure later in the year.

At the same time, rival parties are positioning themselves to capitalise on any perceived weaknesses. While some challengers have faced recent setbacks, competition remains strong, adding to the pressure on the government.

Balancing crisis and governance
Amid these challenges, ministers are attempting to demonstrate effective governance, including plans to fund local community projects as part of a broader effort to maintain public support.

However, with global tensions rising and domestic divisions unresolved, the government faces a difficult balancing act. The coming months are likely to determine whether it can maintain stability both at home and on the international stage.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 March 2026
webfact
webfact

UK border chief steps down amid continued small boat crossings

The head of the UK’s Border Security Command, Martin Hewitt, is set to step down after just 18 months in the role, in a move that comes amid ongoing pressure over illegal Channel crossings. Hewitt, a former senior police officer, had been appointed by Prime Minister Keir Starmer as part of efforts to crack down on people-smuggling networks and reduce the number of migrants arriving in small boats.

Get today's headlines by email

The Home Office confirmed he will leave his position at the end of the month, with interim arrangements being put in place while a permanent successor is sought.

Continued migration pressures
Hewitt’s tenure coincided with persistently high numbers of small boat crossings across the English Channel, despite government pledges to curb the flow. Last year recorded one of the highest annual totals for such crossings.

During his time in office, Hewitt acknowledged the challenges involved, including delays in action by France to intercept migrant boats before they depart.

He also warned that efforts to deter crossings would take time to deliver results, reflecting the complexity of tackling international smuggling networks.

Political criticism intensifies
Opposition politicians have used his departure to criticise the government’s broader migration strategy. Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the situation was the result of policy failures rather than Hewitt’s leadership.

Critics have also pointed to the Labour government’s decision to scrap the previous administration’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, a policy that had been intended as a deterrent but faced legal challenges.

Reform UK representatives echoed concerns about border control, arguing that successive governments had failed to effectively manage migration.

Government response
In a statement, the Home Office thanked Hewitt for his leadership, highlighting his role in coordinating efforts between government agencies, law enforcement and international partners.

Officials also pointed to the passage of new legislation aimed at strengthening border security and tackling organised immigration crime.

Hewitt’s appointment had initially been presented as a key step in a renewed strategy to address illegal migration. His departure now raises fresh questions about the effectiveness of current policies and the government’s ability to deliver on its commitments.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Italy referendum puts Meloni’s leadership to the test

Voters in Italy are heading to the polls in a constitutional referendum that has become a key political test for Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, as debate intensifies over proposed changes to the country’s judicial system.

Get today's headlines by email

The vote focuses on reforms that would separate the career paths of judges and prosecutors and establish new governing bodies for each, alongside a disciplinary court. The government argues the changes would make the justice system more efficient and accountable, while critics warn they could undermine judicial independence.

Campaign turns into political showdown
Although the referendum is formally about legal reform, it has increasingly been framed as a verdict on Meloni’s leadership. The prime minister has actively campaigned for a “yes” vote, seeking to mobilise support, including among younger voters.

Opposition parties, trade unions and civil society groups have rallied behind the “no” campaign, portraying the proposal as a threat to democratic checks and balances. Critics argue the reforms could weaken the judiciary’s ability to act independently of government influence.

Meloni has rejected those claims, insisting the changes are necessary and accusing opponents of turning the vote into a political protest against her administration.

Divided opinions over reforms
Italy’s justice system has long faced criticism for slow proceedings and inefficiency. However, the proposed reforms do not directly address case backlogs, leaving some voters uncertain about their practical impact.

Supporters of the changes argue that separating judges and prosecutors could reduce internal influence and improve fairness. Some legal experts have also raised concerns about longstanding internal factions within the judiciary.

Opponents, however, remain sceptical. They point to Italy’s post-war constitution, designed to safeguard democratic institutions, and warn that altering it under a right-wing government carries risks.

Political stakes for Meloni
The referendum comes after more than three years in power for Meloni, whose tenure has been marked by relative political stability in a country known for fragile coalitions.

While she has made clear she would not resign if the vote fails, analysts say a defeat could weaken her authority and embolden political rivals. Polling suggests turnout may be a decisive factor, with lower participation potentially favouring the “no” camp.

The broader political climate also adds pressure, with economic concerns and global tensions weighing on public sentiment.

A victory could strengthen Meloni’s position and open the door to further institutional reforms. A loss, however, would represent her first major political setback and raise questions about her government’s future direction.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump faces pivotal choices as uncertainty clouds Iran war strategy

Three weeks into the conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran, President Donald Trump is confronting increasingly complex decisions, as mixed signals from Washington highlight uncertainty over the next phase of the war.

Trump has described the conflict as “very complete” and suggested it may be “winding down”. However, developments on the ground point in a different direction, with continued airstrikes and the deployment of additional US forces to the region.

Conflicting signals on strategy
Despite the president’s claims of progress, military activity has remained intense. US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets continue, while Iranian missiles and drones are still being launched across the region.

Trump has also issued new threats, warning that if Iran does not fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours, the US could begin targeting Iranian power plants.

At the same time, his administration has outlined a set of objectives that include weakening Iran’s military capabilities, damaging its defence infrastructure, and curbing its nuclear programme. Notably absent from these goals is direct control over the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil route.

Military options under consideration
While Trump has publicly denied plans to deploy ground troops, the movement of US forces suggests preparations for a broader range of options. Marine units are being sent to the Middle East, raising the possibility of more direct involvement.

Analysts have speculated that one potential target could be Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export hub. Seizing or disabling the facility could significantly reduce Iran’s revenue and increase pressure on its leadership.

However, such a move carries risks. Iranian officials have warned that any escalation could trigger wider disruption, including threats to other major shipping routes and energy infrastructure.

Political and financial pressures
The uncertainty surrounding the war is also reflected in Washington. Reports that the administration may seek more than $200bn in emergency funding have prompted caution among lawmakers, including some Republicans.

Concerns have been raised about the potential for a prolonged and costly conflict, particularly if it involves ground operations.

As the situation evolves, the direction of the war remains unclear. Trump’s shifting rhetoric and the continued build-up of military forces suggest that the conflict may be approaching a critical turning point, with significant implications for regional stability and global energy markets.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 March 2026

webfact
webfact

European powers link Hormuz security mission to ceasefire conditions

Italy, Germany, and France have indicated they are willing to help safeguard shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, but only once a ceasefire is in place in the region. The position follows a joint statement issued by a group of countries, including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan and Canada.

Get today's headlines by email

The statement condemned recent disruptions to maritime traffic and expressed readiness to support efforts ensuring the safe passage of commercial vessels.

Conditions for intervention
Despite the earlier show of unity, officials in Rome, Berlin and Paris later clarified that they are not currently considering immediate military involvement. Instead, discussions have focused on a potential multinational initiative that would only be launched after tensions ease and hostilities come to an end.

The countries also criticised actions attributed to Iran, including the mining of waters, drone and missile attacks, and the effective shutdown of the vital shipping corridor. They called for an immediate halt to such activities.

Strategic importance of the strait
The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the most critical maritime routes in the world, linking the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It lies between Iran to the north and Oman and the United Arab Emirates to the south.

A significant portion of global oil supplies passes through the narrow channel, with exports from countries such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar and the UAE relying heavily on the route. Any disruption poses serious risks to global energy markets and supply chains.

Broader military context
The situation comes amid wider tensions in the region, with the United States considering additional military funding. The Pentagon has reportedly asked the White House to approve a request to Congress exceeding $200bn to sustain ongoing operations linked to the conflict involving Iran.

For now, European governments appear to be prioritising de-escalation, making clear that any direct role in securing the strait will depend on a cessation of fighting.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump plans to deploy ICE agents to airports amid DHS funding standoff

President Donald Trump has said he will send federal immigration agents to US airports starting Monday, escalating a political confrontation over funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). In a series of social media posts, Trump said officers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would be tasked with enforcing security measures at airports, including “the immediate arrest of all Illegal Immigrants who have come into our Country”.

Get today's headlines by email

He warned that the move would go ahead unless Democrats agreed to what he described as “proper security” measures, urging immigration agents to “get ready”.

Shutdown dispute intensifies
The announcement comes as a partial shutdown of DHS continues, following a deadlock in the Senate between Republicans and Democrats over funding. Lawmakers have failed to reach agreement on legislation that would finance both airport security operations and immigration enforcement.

A key point of contention has been whether funding for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) should be linked to additional resources for ICE.

Democrats have pushed for a stand-alone bill to fund TSA, warning that airport security staff have gone unpaid for weeks, leading to staff shortages and long queues at airports. Republicans, however, have insisted on combining funding measures with broader immigration provisions.

Political blame game
Senior Democrats accused Republicans of using TSA workers as leverage to secure expanded immigration enforcement powers. Senator Patty Murray said it was “plain wrong” that airport security officers were not being paid while negotiations continued.

Republicans, in turn, blamed Democrats for the disruption. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the situation at airports was deteriorating because of the opposition’s refusal to back DHS funding proposals.

Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer criticised Republicans for tying funding to immigration policies, calling the situation unacceptable for both workers and travellers.

Operational impact grows
The ongoing shutdown has already affected airport operations nationwide, with TSA officers calling in sick in large numbers due to missed pay. This has resulted in longer waiting times and increased pressure on airport security systems.

ICE, which received separate funding last year, has not been directly impacted by the shutdown, allowing the agency to continue its operations.

Negotiations to resolve the impasse are ongoing, with bipartisan talks expected to resume. However, Trump’s proposed deployment of immigration agents signals a further escalation in the dispute, raising questions about how airport security responsibilities could shift if no agreement is reached.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 March 2026

webfact
webfact

Trump draws backlash over reaction to Mueller’s death

President Donald Trump has sparked strong criticism after publicly welcoming the death of former FBI director Robert Mueller. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote: “Robert Mueller just died. Good, I’m glad he’s dead. He can no longer hurt innocent people!” The remark quickly drew condemnation from political figures and commentators across the spectrum.

Get today's headlines by email

Mueller, who led the high-profile investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US election, had long been a target of Trump’s criticism. The president repeatedly attacked Mueller during and after the probe, describing it as politically motivated.

However, Trump’s reaction to Mueller’s death marked a significant escalation in tone, prompting accusations that the comments were inappropriate and disrespectful. Critics argued that such statements undermine norms of political discourse, particularly following the death of a public servant.



Allies of Mueller highlighted his decades of service, including his leadership of the FBI and his role as special counsel. Many noted that, despite intense political pressure during the investigation, Mueller maintained a low public profile and avoided direct confrontation with Trump.

The backlash to Trump’s comments reflects the continuing divisions surrounding the Russia investigation and its legacy. While Trump supporters have long criticised the probe, others view Mueller as a figure who upheld the rule of law during a politically charged period.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Robert Mueller, Former FBI Director And Special Counsel In Trump-Russia Probe, Dies At 81

Robert Mueller, the former FBI director who later led the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US election, has died at the age of 81. His family confirmed his death in a brief statement, asking for privacy.

Get today's headlines by email

A spokesperson for the law firm WilmerHale, where Mueller worked after leaving public office, described him as “an extraordinary leader and public servant” whose career was marked by integrity and dedication.

Veteran lawman and public servant passes away
Mueller had been diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease in 2021, according to earlier reports from his family.

Mueller served as FBI director from 2001 to 2013, spanning the administrations of George W. Bush and Barack Obama. He was confirmed by the Senate shortly before the 11 September 2001 attacks and quickly found himself leading the agency during a national crisis.

In the years that followed, Mueller reshaped the FBI’s mission, shifting its focus toward counterterrorism and the prevention of future attacks. Reflecting on that period, he later said the agency’s success could no longer be measured simply by arrests or prosecutions but by its ability to stop threats before they materialised.

Bush praised Mueller’s leadership, saying he had helped guide the country through a critical period and played a key role in preventing further attacks on US soil. Obama also paid tribute, calling him one of the finest directors in the bureau’s history.

High-profile Russia investigation
In 2017, Mueller was appointed special counsel to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election and any potential links to the campaign of Donald Trump. The inquiry became one of the most politically sensitive investigations in recent US history.

Mueller’s report concluded that Russia had interfered in the election in a “sweeping and systematic” manner. However, it did not establish a criminal conspiracy between Trump’s campaign and Moscow.

The investigation drew strong criticism from Trump, who repeatedly attacked Mueller during and after the inquiry. Following news of Mueller’s death, Trump posted a sharply critical message on social media.

Tributes and legacy
Despite political divisions surrounding his later work, Mueller was widely respected across party lines for much of his career. James Comey, who succeeded him at the FBI, described him as “a great American” and a mentor.

Former attorney general Eric Holder also praised Mueller, calling him “the ultimate public servant” who consistently chose the more difficult path in service of the country.

Before his law enforcement career, Mueller served as a Marine Corps officer during the Vietnam War, earning several military honours, including the Bronze Star and Purple Heart.

Born in New York and raised in Philadelphia, he went on to build a long career in public service, including senior roles at the Justice Department and as a federal prosecutor.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 March 2026
webfact
webfact

US Weighs Operation to Seize Iran’s Nuclear Stockpiles Amid Ongoing Conflict

The administration of Donald Trump is examining options to secure or remove Iran’s nuclear materials, according to officials familiar with internal discussions. The deliberations come as the US-led military campaign alongside Israel enters a more uncertain phase, with no clear timeline for further escalation.

Get today's headlines by email

Sources said no final decision has been taken on whether such an operation would proceed. However, planning has focused on potential involvement by the Joint Special Operations Command, a highly specialised US military unit tasked with sensitive missions, including counter-proliferation efforts.

A White House spokesperson confirmed that contingency planning falls within the Pentagon’s responsibilities but did not provide further detail.

Shift in military objectives
Initial phases of the conflict centred on weakening Iran’s conventional military capabilities, including air defences, missile systems and infrastructure linked to the Revolutionary Guard. Despite extensive airstrikes, Iran has continued to launch retaliatory attacks across the region and disrupt key shipping routes.

More recently, attention has turned to a longer-term objective repeatedly outlined by Trump: preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. In a social media post, the president said the US was “very close to meeting our objectives” while also suggesting military operations could be scaled back.

Nuclear material poses complex challenge
According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran had accumulated roughly 972 pounds of uranium enriched to 60% purity as of last year. While not weapons-grade, the material is considered close to the threshold required for nuclear weapons.

Much of this stockpile is believed to be stored underground at sites previously targeted in US strikes, complicating any effort to access or remove it.

IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi warned that handling such material would be technically demanding. He described the uranium, stored as uranium hexafluoride gas, as difficult to transport safely, noting that any mission to retrieve it would be highly complex.

Risks and uncertainties remain
US officials have indicated that seizing the nuclear material remains one of several options under consideration. However, experts caution that such an operation would involve significant logistical and security risks, particularly in an active conflict zone.

Previous intelligence assessments have suggested that Iran was not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon, and Tehran has consistently maintained that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. Nonetheless, its enrichment activities have raised international concern.

Diplomatic efforts to curb Iran’s nuclear programme had been under way before the conflict escalated, including proposals to dilute enriched uranium stockpiles. Those talks have since stalled.

As the situation develops, the question of how to address Iran’s nuclear capacity remains central to US strategy, with military and diplomatic paths both carrying considerable uncertainty.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 March 2026

webfact
webfact

Judge Blocks Pentagon Press Restrictions, Citing Constitutional Violations

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has struck down a Pentagon policy restricting journalists’ access, ruling that it breached constitutional protections for free speech and due process. The decision followed a legal challenge brought by The New York Times, which argued the rules unfairly limited reporting on the US military.

Get today's headlines by email

U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman concluded that the policy violated both the First and Fifth Amendments. He found that the measures imposed by the Defence Department were overly broad and created uncertainty for reporters attempting to carry out routine journalistic work.

Court rules in favour of media freedom
In his ruling, Friedman emphasised that seeking information is a fundamental part of journalism and warned that the policy risked discouraging reporters from asking questions out of fear of losing access.

The contested policy, introduced in October 2025, required journalists to sign agreements acknowledging that their access to the Pentagon could be revoked if they were deemed a potential security risk. This included actions such as attempting to obtain information considered sensitive, even if it was not classified.

Friedman said the criteria were too vague, potentially leaving journalists unsure whether standard reporting practices could result in penalties. He noted that such ambiguity could lead to self-censorship, undermining the role of the press in holding government to account.

The judge also criticised what he described as “viewpoint discrimination", arguing that the policy appeared to favour certain outlets while excluding others seen as less supportive of the administration.

Impact on media access
The ruling effectively blocks enforcement of the policy and orders the restoration of press credentials for affected journalists. It applies broadly to media organisations that had lost access after refusing to comply with the new rules.

Many major news outlets had rejected the policy when it was introduced, arguing that it placed unacceptable limits on their ability to gather and report information. The restrictions had significantly reduced the number of journalists able to report from inside the Pentagon.

Press freedom advocates welcomed the court’s decision, describing it as a reaffirmation of the importance of independent reporting, particularly during periods of military conflict.

Government response and next steps
The Pentagon has said it disagrees with the ruling and plans to appeal. Officials have defended the policy as a necessary measure to protect national security and prevent unauthorised disclosures.

However, the court’s decision underscores the ongoing tension between security concerns and the public’s right to access information about government actions. Judge Friedman noted that transparency is especially critical during times of conflict, when citizens rely on accurate and diverse reporting to form their views.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 March 2026

webfact
webfact

Iran Fires Missiles at Diego Garcia, Warns British Lives ‘In Danger’

Iran has fired missiles towards the joint US-UK military facility on Diego Garcia, escalating tensions after Britain backed expanded American military action in the region. According to reports, two intermediate-range ballistic missiles were launched, but neither struck the base.

Get today's headlines by email

Officials cited by US media said one missile was intercepted by a US warship, while the other failed before reaching its target. The attempted strike highlights the growing risk to key Western military installations amid the widening conflict.

The base, located in the Chagos Islands, is a critical hub for long-range operations and has been used extensively by the United States for missions in the Middle East.

UK decision prompts warning from Tehran
The missile launch came shortly before the UK formally approved the use of its bases for US operations targeting Iranian missile capabilities linked to the Strait of Hormuz. British officials described the move as part of “collective self-defence” aimed at protecting shipping routes and regional stability.

In response, Iran issued a stark warning. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Britain’s decision risked endangering its own citizens. Writing on social media, he accused Prime Minister Keir Starmer of putting “British lives in danger” by allowing US forces to operate from UK-controlled sites.

Tehran has indicated it will exercise what it describes as its right to self-defence, raising fears of further retaliation.

Strategic importance of Diego Garcia
Diego Garcia lies roughly 3,800 kilometres from Iran and hosts a major airbase capable of supporting long-range bombers, alongside fuel depots, radar systems and a deep-water port. Its location makes it a vital staging point for operations across the Middle East and surrounding regions.

The UK has agreed to transfer sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius while retaining access to the base under a lease arrangement, ensuring its continued military use.

Political divisions and regional fallout
The UK government condemned the missile launch as a “reckless” act that threatens both British interests and allies. It confirmed that Royal Air Force assets remain active in defending personnel and infrastructure across the region.

However, the decision to expand US access to British bases has sparked political criticism at home. Opposition figures have questioned the shift in policy and called for parliamentary oversight, arguing that the move risks drawing the UK deeper into the conflict.

US President Donald Trump also weighed in, suggesting Britain had been slow to act while continuing to press allies for greater involvement in securing the vital shipping route.

Meanwhile, Iran has intensified attacks across the Gulf and continues to disrupt traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a key artery for global oil supplies.

Rising economic concerns
The escalating conflict is beginning to have broader economic consequences. The UK government is expected to convene an emergency meeting to assess the impact on energy prices and the cost of living, as disruptions to oil shipments ripple through global markets.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Iran Deployment Plans Advance as US Prepares Ground Troop Options

The United States is making extensive preparations for the possible deployment of ground forces into Iran, according to multiple officials familiar with internal discussions.

Get today's headlines by email

Senior military leaders have reportedly submitted detailed requests outlining what would be required to support such an operation, as President Donald Trump considers his next steps in the ongoing conflict involving Iran.

Military planning intensifies behind the scenes
Officials emphasised that these preparations are part of standard contingency planning, designed to provide the president with a wide range of military options. However, the scope and detail of the planning underline the seriousness with which the Pentagon is treating the possibility of escalation.

Mixed signals from the White House
Despite the behind-the-scenes activity, public messaging from the administration has been cautious and, at times, contradictory. Speaking to reporters at the White House,

Trump denied any immediate intention to deploy troops, stating: “No, I'm not putting troops anywhere.” He added, however, that if such a decision were made, it would not necessarily be disclosed in advance.

The White House press secretary reinforced this position, stressing that military planning does not equate to a final decision. She said it was the Pentagon’s responsibility to ensure the president has “maximum optionality", while reiterating that no ground deployment is currently planned.

Troop movements and readiness
Even without a confirmed decision, US forces are already being repositioned in the region. Elements of the 82nd Airborne Division are being prepared for potential deployment, alongside units from the Army’s Global Response Force and the Marine Corps’ expeditionary forces.

Thousands of Marines are in transit to the Middle East. A second Marine unit, consisting of roughly 2,200 personnel and supported by three warships, has recently departed from California. Another unit, previously redirected from the Pacific, is still en route.

These movements are intended to strengthen US readiness and ensure rapid response capability should the situation deteriorate further.

Expanding options amid uncertainty
The increased military activity reflects broader uncertainty over how the conflict may evolve. While officials have not outlined specific scenarios that would trigger a ground operation, preparations suggest the administration is considering a wide spectrum of outcomes.

For now, the US position remains one of strategic flexibility—publicly cautious, but operationally prepared.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Iranian Man Among Two Arrested After Attempt To Access UK Nuclear Submarine Base

A man identified as Iranian has been arrested alongside a woman after attempting to gain access to a major UK naval facility that houses the country’s nuclear submarine fleet.


Get today's headlines by email

Police Scotland said the 34-year-old man and a 31-year-old woman were detained at around 17:00 on Thursday. Authorities confirmed the man’s nationality, while the woman is not believed to be Iranian.

Attempted Entry And Arrest
According to the Royal Navy, the pair “unsuccessfully attempted” to enter the base. It is understood they did not try to force entry but instead requested access, which was refused. They were arrested shortly afterwards.

Police said investigations are ongoing, and officials have not released further details about the circumstances or possible motives behind the incident.

A Royal Navy spokesperson declined to comment further, citing the active inquiry.

Heightened Security Concerns
The arrests come at a time of increased tensions following military strikes involving the United States and Israel against Iran, and subsequent retaliatory actions across the region.

UK Defence Secretary John Healey said the government was reviewing the national terrorism threat level, which currently stands at “substantial”, indicating that an attack is considered likely.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer said security measures for British military bases and personnel had been raised to their highest level, although it remains unclear whether this applies to domestic facilities as well as overseas deployments.

Strategic Importance Of Faslane
Faslane is the central hub of the UK’s nuclear deterrent. It is home to the Royal Navy’s fleet of Vanguard-class submarines, which carry Trident ballistic missiles.

The site also hosts Astute-class submarines, which are nuclear-powered but conventionally armed. Nearby, the Royal Naval Armaments Depot at Coulport stores the country’s nuclear warheads.

The UK has maintained a continuous at-sea nuclear deterrent since 1969, ensuring that at least one submarine is always on patrol.

Longstanding Protest Site
The base has been a focal point for anti-nuclear activism for decades. A permanent peace camp has existed outside Faslane since 1982, originally established in opposition to the deployment of the Trident missile system.

Activists continue to hold demonstrations and vigils at the site, campaigning against nuclear weapons.

Ongoing Investigation
Authorities have not indicated whether the incident is linked to wider geopolitical tensions, and no charges have yet been announced.

Police Scotland said inquiries remain ongoing as they work to establish the full circumstances surrounding the attempted entry.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 March 2026
webfact
webfact

US Eases Restrictions On Iranian Oil Sales Amid Surge In Global Energy Prices

The United States has temporarily relaxed sanctions on certain Iranian oil exports, as it seeks to stabilise global energy markets disrupted by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that a limited, short-term authorisation has been granted to allow the sale of Iranian oil already loaded onto tankers and currently at sea.

Get today's headlines by email

The move represents a notable shift in longstanding US policy and comes as fuel prices rise sharply worldwide due to supply disruptions.

Short-Term Measure To Boost Supply
According to the Treasury Department, the waiver applies specifically to crude oil and petroleum products of Iranian origin that have already been shipped. The authorisation is set to remain in effect until 19 April.

Officials estimate that the measure could release around 140 million barrels of oil into global markets in the coming weeks.

The decision is part of broader efforts by Washington to increase supply as the war continues to affect production and shipping routes, particularly through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.

Concerns Over Limited Impact
Energy analysts have questioned how much difference the move will make to global prices. Some experts say the additional supply is relatively small compared with overall demand and may only provide temporary relief.

There are also concerns about the potential consequences of allowing Iranian oil sales while the US is engaged in military operations against Tehran.

David Tannenbaum, a sanctions specialist, described the decision as contradictory, warning it could effectively enable Iran to generate revenue that might support its ongoing activities.

Similarly, Rachel Ziemba, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, said the policy raises practical challenges, particularly in ensuring that proceeds from oil sales do not reach the Iranian government.

Strategic And Political Considerations
US President Donald Trump offered little clarity on the broader strategy when asked about the policy shift, stating only that his administration would take necessary steps to manage rising energy costs.

Before the conflict, much of Iran’s oil exports were purchased by China at discounted rates due to existing sanctions. Officials now suggest the waiver could redirect some of those supplies to other countries, including India, Japan and Malaysia.

However, details on how such redistribution would be managed remain unclear.

Wider Energy Market Pressures
The policy change comes amid mounting pressure on global energy supplies. The conflict has significantly disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a key route through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil normally passes.

Although some shipments have been rerouted, analysts estimate that the war has removed about 10% of global oil supply from the market.

The US has already taken additional steps to ease the strain, including releasing oil from strategic reserves and easing some restrictions on Russian exports—moves that have drawn criticism from European leaders.

Ongoing Uncertainty
Despite these efforts, concerns persist about the long-term impact of the conflict on energy markets. Continued attacks on critical infrastructure, including major gas facilities in the region, have heightened fears that supply capacity could be constrained for years.

While the temporary waiver may offer short-term relief, analysts say it underscores the scale of the current energy crisis and the limited options available to governments seeking to contain it.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 March 2026


webfact
webfact

Jury Finds Elon Musk Misled Investors During Twitter Takeover Battle

A US jury has concluded that Elon Musk made misleading public statements during his high-profile 2022 attempt to acquire Twitter, siding with investors who claimed they suffered financial losses as a result. The unanimous verdict was delivered in a federal court in San Francisco after two days of deliberations. The case was brought by a group of investors who argued they relied on Musk’s public comments and social media posts when making trading decisions.

Get today's headlines by email

Jurors found that some of Musk’s remarks about the platform—particularly concerning the number of fake accounts and uncertainty over completing the $44bn deal—were intentionally misleading.

Statements Deemed Misleading
During the trial, Musk had defended his actions, saying he did not intend to deceive investors and that his statements had been misinterpreted. However, the jury rejected that argument.

The panel determined that Musk’s comments contributed to fluctuations in Twitter’s share price between May and October 2022, a critical period during the takeover process.

Financial Impact On Investors
According to the verdict, Musk’s statements artificially reduced the company’s stock value by between $3 and $8 per share. This decline affected investors who bought or sold shares during that time.

As a result, those involved in the class action lawsuit could now be entitled to financial compensation, potentially amounting to thousands of dollars each.

The lead plaintiff, an investor from Oregon, told the court he sold shares at a loss after concluding from Musk’s public remarks that the deal would not go ahead. He later saw the acquisition completed at a significantly higher price, reinforcing his claim of financial harm.

Legal And Market Implications
Legal analysts say the ruling highlights the potential consequences for high-profile executives whose statements can influence financial markets.

One trial lawyer said the outcome sends a strong signal that individuals who move markets through public comments can be held accountable for the impact of their words.

This is not the first legal challenge linked to Musk’s use of social media. He previously faced a lawsuit from shareholders of Tesla over his posts, although he was cleared of wrongdoing in that case.

Takeover Turmoil
The dispute centred on a turbulent period when Musk publicly questioned Twitter’s user data, particularly the prevalence of automated or fake accounts. At one point, he indicated the acquisition was “on hold” before later attempting to withdraw from the deal entirely.

Twitter responded by launching legal action to compel Musk to proceed with the purchase. In October 2022, he completed the acquisition at the originally agreed price of $54.20 per share.

The platform was subsequently rebranded as X.

Ongoing Fallout
The case underscores the broader risks associated with corporate communications in the digital age, especially when executives use social media to discuss major business transactions.

Lawyers for both sides have not commented publicly on the verdict.

While the ruling does not end Musk’s legal challenges, it represents a significant development in holding influential figures accountable for statements that can affect financial markets.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Iran Warns Global Tourist Sites Could Be Targeted As US Signals Possible Military Drawdown

Iran has warned that tourist and recreational locations around the world could become targets as the conflict in the Middle East enters its third week and uncertainty grows over the direction of US military involvement. The warning came as US President Donald Trump suggested his administration may soon scale back operations, despite simultaneously increasing military deployments to the region.

Get today's headlines by email

In a social media post, Trump said the United States was “very close” to achieving its objectives and was considering “winding down” its military campaign. However, the statement contrasted with moves to reinforce US forces, including the deployment of additional warships and around 5,000 Marines.

Conflicting Signals From Washington
The reinforcements will join an estimated 50,000 US personnel already stationed in the region. The administration has also requested significant additional funding from Congress to support the war effort.

At the same time, Washington announced a temporary easing of sanctions on certain Iranian oil shipments in an attempt to stabilise global energy markets amid rising fuel prices.

Escalating Regional Violence
Fighting has continued across multiple fronts. Israel reported a fresh missile launch from Iran early on Saturday, while Saudi Arabia said it intercepted 20 drones over its eastern oil-producing region within a matter of hours.

The latest exchanges followed Israeli airstrikes on Tehran during the Persian New Year holiday, Nowruz. Iran has since intensified attacks on Gulf states after strikes on its major South Pars gas field.

The conflict has also severely disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global oil supplies. The resulting supply constraints have driven up energy costs worldwide, contributing to wider economic pressures.

Iran Issues Global Threat
Iranian officials have broadened their rhetoric beyond the region. A senior military spokesperson warned that “parks, recreational areas and tourist destinations” linked to the country’s adversaries could be targeted internationally.

Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, in a message marking Nowruz, praised the resilience of the Iranian people and rejected the idea that military strikes could destabilise the country’s leadership.

He has not appeared publicly since assuming leadership following the death of his predecessor, Ali Khamenei, who was killed in earlier strikes.

Meanwhile, Iranian state media reported that senior Revolutionary Guard spokesperson Ali Mohammad Naeini had been killed in an airstrike, shortly after stating that missile production remained ongoing.

Wider Impact And Rising Costs
The conflict is having global repercussions. NATO has withdrawn several hundred personnel from Iraq after attacks on military bases hosting international forces.

Oil infrastructure has also been affected. A drone strike on a major Kuwaiti refinery caused a fire, underscoring the vulnerability of key energy facilities in the region.

Global oil prices have surged to around $108 per barrel, compared with about $70 before the conflict began.

Analysts say the disruption to supply chains, particularly through the Strait of Hormuz, is a major factor.

Casualties continue to rise. More than 1,300 people have reportedly been killed in Iran, while Israeli strikes in Lebanon have displaced over one million people. Deaths have also been reported in Israel, the occupied West Bank and among US forces.

No Clear End In Sight
Despite suggestions of a possible US drawdown, there are no signs of an imminent resolution. The war’s objectives remain unclear, with shifting explanations from Washington and its allies ranging from weakening Iran’s military capabilities to encouraging political change.

With tensions escalating and threats expanding beyond the region, the conflict appears set to continue, with significant implications for global security and the economy.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 March 2026

webfact
webfact

UK Expands Approval For US Use Of Bases In Strait Of Hormuz Operations

The United Kingdom has agreed to broaden its support for United States military operations by allowing American forces to use British bases for strikes linked to the protection of shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz. Previously, Prime Minister Keir Starmer had limited such access to defensive actions aimed at preventing threats to British lives and interests. However, officials confirmed on Friday that ministers had approved an expansion of permitted operations, framing the move as part of “collective self-defence” to safeguard vessels navigating the strategically vital waterway.

Get today's headlines by email

The Strait of Hormuz is a key global oil transit route, and disruptions there have raised concerns about economic impacts worldwide.

Shift In Military Support
A Downing Street spokesperson said the decision followed escalating attacks attributed to Iran on commercial shipping, including vessels linked to the UK and its allies.

Ministers concluded that additional measures were necessary to counter missile capabilities targeting ships in the region.

Despite the shift, the UK government stressed it would not take part directly in offensive strikes. Officials said the underlying principles guiding Britain’s involvement in the conflict had not changed and reiterated calls for de-escalation.

US President Donald Trump criticised the timing of the decision, suggesting the UK had acted too slowly despite its close alliance with Washington.

Meanwhile, Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi accused Britain of increasing risks to its own citizens, warning that Tehran would view the move as participation in hostile actions.

Political Backlash At Home
The decision has drawn strong reactions from across the UK political spectrum. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch described the move as a significant reversal of previous policy.

Opposition figures also called for greater parliamentary oversight. Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Calum Miller urged the government to allow MPs to vote on the arrangement, arguing that the UK risked being drawn deeper into the conflict.

Green Party co-leader Zack Polanski echoed those concerns, calling the development a worrying escalation and demanding parliamentary scrutiny.

Strategic Importance Of The Strait
The Strait of Hormuz has seen a dramatic drop in shipping traffic since the conflict intensified. Before the crisis, roughly 138 vessels passed through daily, carrying about a fifth of the world’s oil supply. Recent figures suggest that number has fallen significantly, highlighting the disruption caused by ongoing hostilities.

UK military planners are now working alongside US Central Command to explore ways to secure safe passage for tankers. However, the situation remains volatile, with continued threats of retaliatory attacks.

Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper has condemned Iran’s actions, calling for an immediate halt to strikes on civilian and energy infrastructure. In response, Tehran has maintained it will exercise its right to self-defence.

Calls For De-escalation
While the UK has expanded its support for US operations, officials insist their priority remains a rapid de-escalation of the conflict. Downing Street said ministers were seeking a swift resolution to prevent further regional instability and economic fallout.

However, with tensions continuing to rise and diplomatic efforts under strain, the decision underscores the increasingly complex role the UK faces as the conflict widens.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 March 2026

webfact
webfact

Chuck Norris: Action Star And Martial Arts Icon Dies At 86

Tributes have been paid to Chuck Norris, the US martial artist and film star, following his death at the age of 86. His family confirmed he died on Thursday, describing him as a man of “faith, purpose, and an unwavering commitment” to those he loved. In a statement, they said he had inspired millions worldwide through his work, discipline and kindness. “He may have a warrior exterior, but his heart was so full of love,” his daughter, Danilee Norris, said.

Get today's headlines by email

Figures from the entertainment industry were quick to honour his legacy. Actor Sylvester Stallone described him as “All American in every way” and a “great man”, while Dolph Lundgren said he had long viewed Norris as a role model.

Tributes from Hollywood and beyond
US President Donald Trump also paid tribute, saying he had “the highest respect” for Norris, calling him “a really tough cookie”.

Other actors, including Lorenzo Lamas, shared messages of support for his family.

From martial arts champion to screen star
Born Carlos Ray Norris in Oklahoma in 1940, he joined the US Air Force as a teenager. It was during a posting in South Korea that he began training in martial arts, eventually earning black belts across multiple disciplines, including karate and taekwondo.

Norris rose to prominence in competitive karate during the 1960s before transitioning to film. His breakthrough came when Bruce Lee cast him as a rival fighter in the 1972 film The Way of the Dragon.

He went on to build a successful career in action cinema, starring in films such as The Delta Force and Missing in Action. His popularity peaked with the television series Walker, Texas Ranger, which ran from 1993 to 2001 and made him a household name.

Later life and cultural impact
In later years, Norris remained active in entertainment, appearing in films including The Expendables 2. He also became widely known through internet culture, as “Chuck Norris facts” memes exaggerated his toughness and strength in humorous ways.

Outside acting, he promoted fitness, founded martial arts schools and was a vocal supporter of conservative political causes in the United States.

A lasting legacy
Norris is survived by his wife, Gena O’Kelley, and his five children. His granddaughter, Greta Norris, described him as both a global icon and a devoted family member.
“To the world, he was a symbol of strength,” the family said. “To us, he was the heart of our family.”


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Farage suspends Cameo activity after controversial video messages emerge

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has paused his activity on the video platform Cameo following reports that he recorded personalised messages linked to a convicted offender and a far-right event. A spokesperson for Reform UK said the decision was taken for “security reasons”, after scrutiny of clips produced by Farage through the service.

Get today's headlines by email

The platform allows public figures to create tailored video messages for paying customers. Since becoming a Member of Parliament in 2024, Farage has declared earnings of more than £80,000 from the service.

Reports of controversial messages
The move comes after media reports that some of the recordings included remarks about a Canadian neo-Nazi gathering and comments about a US congresswoman.

In one case, Farage was said to have delivered a message for a man later identified as having been convicted of violent disorder. The report said he expressed sympathy, telling the recipient to “keep your head up” and continue believing “in the right things”.

Other clips cited included remarks about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, as well as a message reportedly calling for the release of rapper Sean Combs following legal proceedings against him.

Defence from party officials
Responding to the reports, a Reform UK spokesperson said Farage had used the platform “in good faith” and was not aware of the backgrounds of those requesting messages beyond the information provided.

They added that any subsequent use or interpretation of the recordings by third parties was outside his control.

Farage’s Cameo profile had promoted his videos as suitable for occasions such as birthdays, retirements and other personalised messages, highlighting his “straight-talking” style.

Political criticism and wider reaction
Opposition politicians criticised the recordings, with Liberal Democrat MP Max Wilkinson describing the activity as a “cash grab” and questioning Farage’s judgement.

Separate criticism arose over a wedding message in which Farage appeared to joke about Welsh guests, prompting backlash from politicians in Wales. Darren Millar called the remarks a “gross insult”, while Labour representatives also condemned the comments.

A Reform member in the Welsh parliament said the party supports Wales as a bilingual nation and emphasised that people should feel welcome regardless of language.

Platform use under scrutiny
The controversy has drawn attention to the growing use of Cameo by politicians, as well as the risks associated with personalised content created for paying customers.

Farage has not publicly commented in detail since the reports, but his account remains inactive while the issue is reviewed.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Labour shifts Brexit messaging as party seeks to win back pro-EU voters

Comments by senior figures in the UK government suggest a noticeable change in how Labour is approaching Brexit, with growing emphasis on rebuilding closer ties with Europe as economic pressures persist. Speaking this week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said that Brexit had caused “deep damage”, while stressing the government was not seeking to reverse the decision to leave the European Union. Instead, she signalled a stronger push to improve cooperation with European partners where it benefits the UK economy.

Get today's headlines by email

Her remarks reflect a broader shift already hinted at by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who previously said Brexit had harmed economic performance and called for a closer working relationship with the EU.

Economic concerns drive rethink
Labour’s 2024 election platform committed to limited changes to the post-Brexit trade deal negotiated under Boris Johnson, including reducing trade barriers on food exports through regulatory alignment.

However, the party maintained firm “red lines”, ruling out rejoining the single market, customs union or restoring freedom of movement.

Recent statements suggest ministers now see deeper cooperation with the EU as a potential route to boosting growth, which has remained modest despite government targets. Reeves indicated that aligning regulations more closely with the EU in certain sectors could help improve economic performance.

Other senior figures have been more explicit. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has described Brexit as an obstacle to growth, while Foreign Secretary David Lammy said its economic impact was “self-evident”.

Political pressures from within and beyond
The shift also comes amid pressure from within Labour. London Mayor Sadiq Khan has called for rejoining the EU’s single market and customs union, and even proposed campaigning to rejoin the bloc in future.

At the same time, the party faces a complex electoral landscape. While Labour originally hardened its Brexit stance after losing support among Leave voters in 2019, more recent polling suggests its current difficulties stem more from losing pro-EU voters to other parties.

Data indicates a significant share of Labour’s 2024 support came from voters who favour closer ties with the EU, or even rejoining. Since then, many have shifted to parties such as the Greens and Liberal Democrats, both of which advocate reversing Brexit in the long term.

Balancing competing voter demands
This presents a strategic dilemma. While appealing to pro-Brexit voters remains important, Labour may also need to regain support among those who backed remaining in the EU.

Polling suggests most Labour voters support closer relations with Europe, but there is also strong backing within the party’s base for eventually rejoining the EU altogether.

However, specific policy proposals—such as aligning UK regulations with EU standards to ease trade—can divide opinion when framed as a trade-off between sovereignty and economic benefits.

Opponents, including the Conservatives and Reform UK, are likely to argue that closer alignment undermines Brexit by returning decision-making to Brussels.

As a result, Labour’s evolving Brexit strategy may prove politically sensitive, requiring the party to persuade voters that any changes strike the right balance between economic growth and national control.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 March 2026

webfact
webfact

Kim Jong Un appears with daughter on tank during North Korean military drills

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has been pictured riding a tank alongside his teenage daughter during a military training exercise, in a high-profile appearance that is likely to fuel ongoing speculation about succession in the country. Images released by the state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on Friday showed Kim and his daughter, widely reported to be Kim Ju Ae, taking part in drills involving tank units and infantry forces.

Get today's headlines by email

According to KCNA, the exercise took place on Thursday and included live-fire drills as well as manoeuvres designed to test combat readiness. Kim was said to have emphasised the need to complete preparations for war.

Military display and leadership messaging
Photographs from the event showed both father and daughter dressed in dark clothing, riding together in an olive-green tank alongside soldiers. In some images, the girl is seen emerging from the tank hatch, while Kim appears seated on top, smiling during the exercise.

The appearance follows a series of recent public outings in which the pair have attended military-related events together, including weapons tests and factory visits.

Growing public role for Kim’s daughter
Kim Ju Ae, believed to be around 13 years old, has increasingly appeared at official engagements since late 2022. North Korean state media has referred to her using terms such as the leader’s “most beloved” or “respected” child, and has highlighted their close relationship.

In recent weeks, she has been seen accompanying her father to a munitions factory, where both reportedly fired pistols, and observing the launch of multiple rocket systems. She has also appeared at major national celebrations and accompanied Kim on an overseas visit to Beijing last year.

Her frequent presence at such events has led to speculation among analysts that she may be being positioned as a potential successor.

Debate over succession
South Korea’s intelligence agency recently assessed that Kim may be moving towards formally designating his daughter as heir. However, some experts remain cautious about that conclusion, pointing to Kim’s relatively young age and the traditionally male-dominated structure of North Korea’s leadership.

The question of succession remains closely watched, given the country’s opaque political system and the hereditary nature of its leadership.

Regional tensions continue
The latest military drills come amid ongoing tensions on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea often conducts exercises and weapons tests in response to joint military activities by the United States and **South Korea, which it views as rehearsals for invasion.

This week, US and South Korean forces concluded an 11-day command post exercise, though field training operations are continuing.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 March 2026

webfact
webfact

Trump likeness approved for US commemorative gold coin ahead of 250th anniversary

A federal panel made up of presidential appointees has approved plans for a commemorative gold coin featuring Donald Trump, as part of preparations marking the United States’ 250th anniversary in 2026. The decision was taken by the Commission of Fine Arts, which voted in favour of a 24-carat coin design showing the sitting president in the Oval Office. The design includes the dates “1776” and “2026”, referencing the country’s founding and upcoming semiquincentennial.

Get today's headlines by email

U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach described the proposal as a “beautiful commemorative gold coin”, saying it reflects the “enduring spirit” of the nation.

Panel backs presidential design
He added that featuring the current president on the coin was appropriate, calling Trump’s image “emblematic” for the milestone celebration.

However, the proposal still requires final approval from the Treasury Department, led by Scott Bessent, which will consider input from both the Commission of Fine Arts and the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (CCAC).

Disagreement among advisory bodies
The process has not been without controversy. According to officials, the CCAC declined to review the proposed designs despite being given multiple opportunities by the U.S. Mint.

Beach said this meant the Mint had fulfilled its legal obligation to consult the committee, noting that its role is advisory and that the Treasury secretary retains final authority over design decisions.

Previous reporting indicated that some members of the CCAC had opposed the idea of featuring Trump on a commemorative coin.

Separate from circulating coin plans
The commemorative gold coin is distinct from a separate initiative authorised under the Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act of 2020, which allows for the minting of $1 coins during 2026 to mark the anniversary.

Officials said earlier draft designs for those circulating coins also included Trump’s likeness, though that project remains under review.

Broader anniversary plans
The coin proposal comes as part of wider efforts to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the United States. Trump has previously made light-hearted remarks suggesting he would like to be credited with organising the milestone.

He has also been linked to other initiatives tied to the anniversary, including national events and commemorative projects.

The Treasury Department has not yet confirmed when a final decision on the coin’s design will be made.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Former FBI chief Comey subpoenaed in wide-ranging Trump-era probe

Former FBI director James Comey has been issued a subpoena as part of a broad investigation led by a federal prosecutor appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump, according to sources familiar with the matter. The inquiry, being conducted by Jason A. Reding Quiñones in Florida, is examining earlier investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 US election, as well as related prosecutions involving Trump and his associates. Supporters of the former president have described the effort as a “grand conspiracy” probe.

Get today's headlines by email

The subpoena issued to Comey is among more than 130 reportedly sent out in connection with the inquiry, highlighting the scale of the investigation.

Expanding investigation
Officials have not disclosed whether the subpoenas seek documents, testimony, or both. Under US law, federal prosecutors have significant authority to issue such requests, which are typically not reviewed by a judge unless challenged in court.

Neither Comey’s legal representatives nor the office of Quiñones immediately commented on the development.

Focus on 2016 election inquiries
The investigation stems from long-standing claims by Trump and his allies that law enforcement and intelligence agencies mishandled inquiries into alleged Russian interference during the 2016 election.

Previous investigations, including a bipartisan Senate review and a probe led by special counsel Robert Mueller, concluded that Russia did attempt to influence the election. However, they did not find evidence that Trump’s campaign conspired with Moscow.

Another review conducted by special counsel John Durham found no proof of a criminal conspiracy by officials in the Obama administration to fabricate intelligence regarding Russia.

Despite these findings, some Trump allies argue that elements of the alleged misconduct fall within legal time limits for prosecution, allowing investigators to revisit aspects of the case.

Previous legal efforts
The subpoena marks the latest legal development involving Comey, who was dismissed as FBI director by Trump in 2017.

The Trump administration previously attempted to prosecute him over testimony given to Congress, but that case was dismissed after a judge ruled that the prosecutor had been improperly appointed.

The Justice Department has since appealed that decision.

Ongoing scrutiny
The current investigation reflects continuing political and legal divisions over the origins and handling of the Russia inquiry, nearly a decade after the events in question.

While it remains unclear what specific evidence prosecutors are seeking from Comey, the scope of the subpoenas suggests the inquiry could continue to expand in the months ahead.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 March 2026
webfact
webfact

Middle East conflict shifts focus from Ukraine as Russia eyes new offensives

The ongoing war in Iran is placing increasing strain on Ukraine, as diplomatic efforts stall and Vladimir Putin prepares for potential new military advances. US-led peace talks aimed at ending the war in Ukraine have slowed significantly as attention shifts to the escalating crisis in the Middle East. Analysts say the diversion of political and military resources is creating an opportunity for Moscow to intensify pressure on Kyiv.

Get today's headlines by email

Rising global energy prices linked to the conflict have boosted Russian revenues, strengthening its ability to sustain military operations. At the same time, US defence resources, including air defence systems, are being heavily used in the Gulf region, raising concerns about reduced support for Ukraine.

Oil revenues and shifting priorities
European allies have pledged continued backing for Kyiv, but disagreements over a proposed €90bn support package have highlighted growing divisions. Tensions have also surfaced within NATO, particularly after reluctance from European members to commit naval forces to secure shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has sought to maintain US engagement, including offering military expertise to counter Iranian drone threats. However, US President Donald Trump has indicated such assistance is not required.

Russia prepares battlefield push
Along the front line, which stretches more than 1,200 kilometres, Russian forces are believed to be preparing for renewed offensives in the coming months.

Military analysts say Moscow is concentrating efforts on capturing remaining Ukrainian-held areas in the eastern Donetsk region, while also considering advances in other sectors. Increased artillery fire and drone strikes suggest preparations are under way to weaken Ukrainian defences ahead of ground assaults.

War conditions have evolved into a prolonged conflict of attrition, with small-scale engagements dominating the battlefield. The widespread use of drones has limited the ability of either side to conduct large manoeuvres.

Ukrainian resistance and counterattacks
Ukrainian forces have attempted to disrupt Russian plans with counteroffensives in regions including Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhia. These operations aim to prevent Russian troops from establishing positions that could support further advances toward key industrial centres.

According to battlefield assessments, Ukrainian strikes on Russian supply lines and equipment may force Moscow to divide its resources between defence and offensive operations.

Despite these efforts, US intelligence officials say Russia continues to hold an advantage. Tulsi Gabbard told lawmakers that Moscow retains the upper hand and is likely to continue a slow, grinding campaign until its objectives are met.

Uncertain path to peace
Diplomatic negotiations have so far produced no breakthrough, with both sides remaining far apart on key demands.

Russia is insisting that Ukraine withdraw from territories it claims to have annexed and abandon its NATO ambitions—conditions Kyiv has rejected. Ukraine, meanwhile, is seeking a ceasefire and long-term security guarantees.

Observers say Moscow may be prolonging talks while attempting to secure further gains on the battlefield.

Meanwhile, Ukraine’s leadership has expressed concern that the war in Iran is weakening international focus on its own conflict.

Zelenskyy warned that delays in negotiations and shifting global priorities could have serious consequences, particularly if shortages of critical military supplies deepen in the months ahead.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 March 2026

webfact
webfact

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications
Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.