Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.
The Balearic Islands' parliament is preparing to debate a proposed ban on non-residents purchasing homes in Majorca, Minorca, Ibiza, and Formentera. This proposal, put forward by the political party Més per Mallorca, will be reviewed on February 24.

Get the latest headlines in your email

MP Lluís Apesteguia stated that the proposed ban would prioritize homes for residents, discouraging speculative investment in the region's property market. He affirmed that this restriction complies with EU rules and existing case law.

Apesteguia emphasized the importance of making housing accessible to locals rather than being dominated by investment funds. He questioned whether homes should cater primarily to investors or local residents, as reported by the Majorca Daily Bulletin.

The rising interest from foreign buyers in the Balearic Islands and other popular Spanish holiday destinations has led to increased property prices, prompting local protests. Sebastià Sagreras, representing the People's Party of the Balearic Islands, announced that the party would oppose the ban.

Marc Pons, former president of Menorca's council, acknowledged EU regulations might hinder the proposal, suggesting the need for alternative solutions to the housing issue.

Vox spokesperson Manuela Cañadas criticized the proposal as "demagogic," according to the Majorca Daily Bulletin.

According to real estate publication Idealista, the Balearic Islands are Spain's most expensive province for property. The report highlighted 25 municipalities experiencing record resale prices, with Ibiza’s Sant Joan de Labritja at the top. The average price per square meter there is £7,830 (€8,959).

Majorca also saw significant price increases, with Colonia de Sant Pere experiencing a 37.5% rise. Idealista noted the islands' enduring attractiveness to international buyers, offering luxury, a Mediterranean lifestyle, and solid investment potential.

Apesteguia stressed that the current market makes housing unattainable for most local citizens. He stated that the bill aims to ensure homes are primarily for residents, not just investors.

Tourism and investment are crucial to the Balearic economy, but local needs are a growing concern among policymakers. The ongoing debate highlights the challenge of balancing economic development with ensuring affordable housing for residents.

As this proposal reaches parliament, it continues to spark discussions about the future of housing in the Balearic Islands and how best to address both the desires of international investors and the needs of local populations.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 20 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Donald Trump has directed the Pentagon and other US agencies to release government files related to UFOs and extraterrestrial life. He made the announcement on his Truth Social platform, citing public interest in the subject.

Get the latest headlines in your email

The announcement came after Trump accused former President Barack Obama of disclosing "classified information." Obama had suggested during a podcast interview that aliens might exist. Trump told reporters on Air Force One, "I don't know if they're real or not," and noted he might help Obama by declassifying the information.

In his social media post, Trump instructed government agencies to release files related to "alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs)." He described these topics as highly complex and important.

Obama later clarified his stance, stating he had not seen evidence that aliens have contacted Earth. However, he emphasized that "statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there's life out there."

Trump mentioned he does not have a personal opinion on the existence of extraterrestrial visitors. He acknowledged that while he seldom discusses the topic, it fascinates many people.

Speculation grew when Lara Trump, Trump's daughter-in-law, suggested he was ready to speak on the issue. She mentioned on a podcast that the president had a speech prepared about aliens which he would deliver at an appropriate time.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, when asked about this, responded with laughter, stating, "A speech on aliens would be news to me."

Interest in unidentified flying objects and possible government secrets about extraterrestrial life has increased recently. This public curiosity was reignited after leaked Navy videos showed unknown objects, prompting discussions about their origins and implications.

The topic of UFOs remains a subject of widespread intrigue. Many people believe the government possesses undisclosed information about extraterrestrial encounters. The release of these files could potentially shed light on long-held mysteries regarding UFOs and alien life.

Trump's decision to release these files underscores a growing demand for transparency regarding unidentified phenomena. As the files become public, they are expected to stimulate further debate and investigation into the existence of extraterrestrial beings.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 20 Feb 2026

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's arrest, while seemingly catastrophic for the Royal Family, may ultimately strengthen their position. Since Andrew's controversial 2019 interview with Emily Maitlis, Prince William has reportedly been displeased with his uncle's actions, seeing them as a blemish on the family.

Get the latest headlines in your email


William's desire to distance Andrew from the Royal Family has been evident, particularly during a tense interaction at the Duchess of Kent's funeral. King Charles expressed his concern over Andrew’s arrest for suspected misconduct, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation.

While anti-monarchy group Republic views this incident as a potential turning point, allies of King Charles, such as broadcaster Jonathan Dimbleby, argue it could fortify the monarchy. Charles's decisive actions last October, stripping Andrew of titles and military honors, demonstrate a clear intent to separate the Royal Family from Andrew's personal issues.

The Epstein scandal has long cast a shadow over the Royals. However, focusing the current investigation solely on Andrew could draw a critical line between him and the rest of the family, helping them to regain public confidence.

King Charles's consistent reference to his brother as "Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor" signals a deliberate distancing from the controversies associated with him. This strategy may allow the Royal Family to cleanly separate their identity from Andrew's, potentially emerging from the scandal with renewed strength.

In conclusion, while Andrew's legal troubles present immediate challenges, they also offer an opportunity for the Royal Family to reinforce their integrity and resilience. The outcome of the investigation could serve as a pivotal moment, helping them navigate past this adversity with unity and clarity.

Key Takeaways
Andrew’s arrest poses challenges but may strengthen the Royals.
King Charles's swift actions serve to distance the family from controversy.
Drawing a line between Andrew and the Royals could enhance their public image.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
As tensions between the US and Iran escalate, the deployment of significant US military assets, including the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group, signals more than diplomatic maneuvering. The movement of another carrier, the USS Gerald R Ford, towards the Middle East, along with other military reinforcements, suggests that Washington is preparing a range of military options.

Get the latest headlines in your email


These deployments could serve as diplomatic leverage but also indicate that indirect negotiations between Tehran and Washington might be at an impasse, potentially leading to military action if neither side shifts its stance.

The critical question arises: why does Iran, facing the world’s most powerful military and its strongest regional ally, remain defiant? The answer lies in the US's stringent conditions for negotiations, which Tehran views as tantamount to surrender.

From Tehran's perspective, the US demands—including ceasing uranium enrichment, limiting missile range, and halting support for regional groups—are not just negotiation points but core components of Iran’s security framework. These elements are fundamental to what Iran terms its "Axis of Resistance," a network aimed at deterring threats and exerting regional influence.

Iran’s ballistic missile program compensates for its outdated air force and limited access to advanced military technology. The nuclear program, although officially peaceful, is considered crucial for its deterrent value. Mastery of uranium enrichment grants Iran a "threshold capability" that offers strategic leverage, as it signifies potential capacity for weaponization pending a political decision.

Iran’s leadership, notably Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, views accepting US conditions as potentially more dangerous than enduring a limited conflict. While a military confrontation, however damaging, may be survivable, yielding its strategic deterrence would fundamentally weaken Iran's defense posture and regional stature.

Yet, the risks of military engagement are multifaceted. A US campaign would likely target Iran's leadership and security apparatus, impacting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and potentially destabilizing domestic control. The resulting power vacuum from key leadership losses could destabilize the country further, especially amid lingering public discontent following violent crackdowns on protests.

For Washington, while the military might exists to meet objectives, war is inherently unpredictable. Miscalculations could escalate conflict beyond initial plans, destabilizing the region and creating unforeseen challenges. Previous conflicts have demonstrated how quickly wars can spiral, complicating goals and management.

Internally, Iran faces significant economic pressures from ongoing sanctions, inflation, and economic stagnation. Escalating tensions further strain the economy, risking public backlash if livelihoods are threatened. Tehran’s defiance serves to project strength locally while signaling resilience to international pressures, although this stance potentially limits diplomatic flexibility.

Ayatollah Khamenei confronts stark choices between the "worst" option, strategic surrender, and what may appear as the "best of the worst," engaging in limited military confrontation. Publicly, Iran seems to lean towards the latter, despite the profound dangers involved.

Both nations face substantial uncertainties with risks of miscalculation. A conflict could redefine regional stability and power dynamics, affecting global interests. As the situation develops, the stakes remain high for Tehran and Washington, encapsulating a complex interplay of geopolitical aspirations and the harsh realities of potential warfare.


Key Takeaways
Rising US-Iran tensions with military assets deployed in the Gulf.
Iran resists US demands, seeing them as threats to its core security.
The potential for conflict introduces significant regional and global risks.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Members of Donald Trump's Board of Peace have announced over $7 billion in aid for Gaza as part of a relief package aimed at reconstruction and stability. The announcement came during the board's inaugural meeting in Washington, amidst concerns from Western allies that the board could overshadow the United Nations.

Get the latest headlines in your email

This relief effort is part of the second stage of a US-brokered ceasefire, focusing on Hamas's disarmament and rebuilding Gaza. However, current indications suggest Hamas is not moving towards disarming, with its influence in Gaza reportedly extending.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Gaza’s reconstruction is contingent on demilitarization. The conflict began with a Hamas-led attack on Israel in October 2023, which led to a strong military response. The ensuing conflict has left Gaza’s infrastructure severely damaged, with an estimated $70 billion worth of destruction.

Countries such as the UK, Canada, France, and Germany have opted not to join the Board of Peace, wary of its potential to bypass the UN. Addressing these concerns, Trump assured that the US intends to work closely with the UN, emphasizing the importance of stability investments.

Key contributors to the relief package include Kazakhstan, UAE, and Saudi Arabia. The UN is set to provide $2 billion for humanitarian aid, while FIFA will contribute $75 million towards soccer-related projects in the region.

Efforts are underway to establish a new transitional Palestinian police force, with 2,000 applications already received. This force, backed by the International Stabilisation Force, aims to maintain security and disarm non-state groups such as Hamas.

Despite the plans, skepticism remains regarding Hamas's disarmament. Success in this area is crucial, as reconstruction and governance require a stable security environment supported by the local population. Hamas has indicated that disarmament would require Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.

Trump’s approach, combining investment and development strategies, is seen as unconventional. His administration touts it as "new thinking" in conflict resolution. Meanwhile, questions persist about sustaining Gaza’s development amidst ongoing political divisions.

Key Takeaways
Trump’s Board announces $7bn aid for Gaza reconstruction.
Disarmament of Hamas is essential yet challenging.
International cooperation is crucial for Gaza’s future stability.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been released under investigation after his arrest for suspected misconduct in public office. Thames Valley Police arrested him in Norfolk and conducted searches at properties in both Berkshire and Norfolk.

Get the latest headlines in your email

King Charles III emphasized the importance of letting "the law take its course" and expressed full support and cooperation with the police. The investigation scrutinizes Andrew's ties to the late Jeffrey Epstein, alongside accusations of sharing confidential information.

This arrest is Andrew's first, and he has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Thames Valley Police confirmed a detailed investigation is now in progress.

Earlier this month, separate allegations surfaced regarding a woman allegedly brought to the UK by Epstein for a meeting with Andrew in 2010. This matter is still being evaluated.

After his arrest at Sandringham, Andrew was seen leaving the police station looking subdued. Thames Valley Police alerted the Home Office in advance of the arrest.

While this arrest is unrelated to sexual offence allegations, it highlights serious concerns about misconduct in public office. The situation remains under careful watch as the investigation unfolds.

Thames Valley Police have concluded their searches in Norfolk but continue to assess all aspects related to the allegations, ensuring a thorough approach to the case. They remain committed to uncovering the truth and upholding justice.

Key Takeaways
Andrew investigated for public office misconduct.
King Charles fully supports the police investigation.
Arrest not linked to any sexual offence allegations.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
President Donald Trump has issued a stark warning, stating the world has "probably 10 days" to see if a deal with Iran can be reached before potential military action. At the inaugural Board of Peace meeting in Washington, Trump emphasized the urgency, warning of consequences if a meaningful agreement isn't secured.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Negotiations between US and Iranian officials have recently shown progress in Switzerland. Special Envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, reportedly had productive discussions. However, Trump acknowledged the difficulties in dealing with Iran's nuclear program, reiterating his hope for a diplomatic resolution.

The White House's increased military presence in the Middle East includes the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier. Despite this buildup, the UK has not permitted the US to use its bases for potential strikes on Iran.

Iran has bolstered its military defenses, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamanei issuing warnings to US forces via social media. US intelligence has observed Iran reinforcing its military sites, heightening tensions.

Congressional opposition to potential military action is growing. Democrat Ro Khanna and Republican Thomas Massie plan to invoke the 1973 War Powers Act to force a vote, aiming to curtail presidential powers in committing to armed conflict. Past attempts to limit such powers have faced resistance, as seen with Senate Republicans blocking a similar resolution regarding Venezuela.

Khanna cautioned against catastrophe, pointing out Iran's complex society and military capabilities. The idea is to prevent unnecessary risks to US troops in the region.

The Board of Peace, originally aimed at resolving the Israel-Hamas conflict, now appears to extend beyond, possibly sidelining the UN. As the deadline approaches, global attention focuses on whether diplomacy will prevail or if the region could face further instability.

Key Takeaways
Trump sets 10-day deadline for deal with Iran.
Military tensions rise, UK withholding base support.
Congress seeks to limit executive military action.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Former President of South Korea, Yoon Suk Yeol, has been sentenced to life imprisonment for attempting to impose military rule. Yoon’s actions to deploy military troops and arrest politicians on December 3, 2024, were deemed an insurrection that severely harmed South Korea's democracy, according to Judge Ji Gwi-yeon.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Prosecutors had initially sought the death penalty, but Yoon received a life sentence. The martial law attempt left the nation deeply divided, with large crowds of Yoon’s supporters and opponents gathering outside the court during the sentencing. Supporters were visibly upset, while anti-Yoon protesters demanded a harsher penalty.

Yoon's lawyers disputed the verdict, claiming it lacked evidence and was predetermined. An appeal from either side could send the case to the Supreme Court, delaying finalization.

Yoon shocked the nation with his unexpected martial law declaration, claiming a need to protect against "anti-state" forces. The motives were believed to stem from domestic issues, including opposition party challenges and corruption allegations involving his wife. The martial law was quickly overturned after legislative intervention, leading to Yoon’s impeachment and subsequent legal troubles.

Former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo received a 23-year sentence, and ex-Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun was jailed for 30 years for advising the martial law. Other top officials were sentenced for their involvement in this "top-down insurrection."

Security was heightened outside the court, with extensive police deployment ensuring order. Inside, Yoon argued his presidential right to declare martial law, citing threats from opposition parties. However, the court found insufficient proof that Yoon premeditated the declaration a year in advance.

The ruling Democratic Party criticized the court for not issuing a death sentence, alleging it undermined judicial justice. Despite their stance, South Korea hasn’t executed anyone since 1997, rendering a death penalty essentially a life sentence. Yoon faces more trials related to these events, and although similar past cases have led to eventual pardoning, it remains uncertain if Yoon will receive clemency.

Key Takeaways
Yoon sentenced to life for martial law attempt.
Political climate remains divided post-verdict.
Yoon argues presidential prerogative amidst ongoing trials.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026
CharlieH
CharlieH
Summary
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office - read the police statement in full
Photos show cars arriving at the Sandringham Estate in Norfolk earlier this morning
It comes after Thames Valley Police said they were assessing a complaint over the alleged sharing of confidential material by the former prince with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein
Andrew, who turns 66 today, has consistently and strenuously denied any wrongdoing
This is a breaking story, we'll bring you more shortly

Police statement
spokesperson for Thames Valley poilice said: 
"As part of the investigation, we have today (19/2) arrested a man in his sixties from Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office and are carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk. 
The man remains in police custody at this time.  
We will not be naming the arrested man, as per national guidance. Please also remember that this case is now active so care should be taken with any publication to avoid being in contempt of court. 
Assistant Chief Constable Oliver Wright said: “Following a thorough assessment, we have now opened an investigation into this allegation of misconduct in public office.  
“It is important that we protect the integrity and objectivity of our investigation as we work with our partners to investigate this alleged offence. 
“We understand the significant public interest in this case, and we will provide updates at the appropriate time.” 


Get the latest headlines in your email

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
In the aftermath of the Gaza War, Hamas is struggling to regain control over the region despite significant losses. The conflict left their military in disarray, leadership depleted, and infrastructure devastated. Despite these setbacks, Hamas is reclaiming control over security, taxation, and government functions, questioning its willingness to disarm as required by a new peace plan.


Get the latest headlines in your email

Activist Mohammed Diab notes that Hamas has regained control in over 90% of its areas, reinstating police presence and reestablishing administrative control. People in Gaza now rely on Hamas for essential services, highlighting its regained dominance.

However, market vendors report aggressive tax enforcement by Hamas, making survival difficult under economic pressures. Traders, essential for importing goods post-ceasefire, face heavy taxation. Some report harsh measures, including threats and kidnappings, for non-compliance with tax demands.

Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem describes the region as in a state of emergency, justifying "exceptional measures" to maintain order. He separates these actions from Hamas's broader goals, attributing them to government necessity rather than organizational policy.

Despite such control, Gaza's leadership is challenged by Israel. The Israeli Defense Forces report ongoing skirmishes, emphasizing the need for Hamas's disarmament to ensure peace. Conversely, Hamas highlights continued Israeli attacks, complicating the ceasefire's stability.

Trump's peace plan, integral to Gaza's restructuring, depends on Hamas disarming. Negotiators face complications in how this disarmament would be executed, given the group's deeply ingrained and well-armed presence.

Internally, Hamas faces political tensions. Reports of internal power struggles and continued influence in government sectors suggest resistance to relinquishing control. Public actions, such as medical case transfers through Rafah Crossing, indicate Hamas's ongoing administrative involvement.

The situation in Gaza remains critical, with the implementation of Trump’s plan hinging on tangible disarmament actions. The international community watches closely as this complex power dynamic continues to evolve.

Key Takeaways
Hamas regains control amidst post-war chaos.
Tax enforcement challenges local traders.
Disarmament crucial for peace plan success.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg found himself on the stand in a landmark trial scrutinizing social media's impact on young users. Challenged over Meta's efforts to block underage access to platforms, Zuckerberg admitted improvements but lamented delays, stating, “I always wish we could have gotten there sooner.”

Get the latest headlines in your email

The plaintiffs' lawyers questioned the effectiveness of Meta's age verification, arguing children often bypass restrictions. Zuckerberg responded, “I don’t see why this is so complicated,” while acknowledging the company could do more to protect users.

During the trial, plaintiffs accused Meta of designing addictive platforms harming young people's mental health. Evidence includes internal documents supporting these claims, while Zuckerberg's legal team attributed issues to external factors like home life.

This trial is pivotal, with KGM's case among many "bellwether" trials gauging jury reactions to social media's design liabilities. Recent testimony by Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri denied claims of clinical addiction, describing excessive use as akin to watching too much TV—an interpretation disputed by many psychologists and lawmakers.

At the heart of these proceedings is ongoing frustration for families like John DeMay's, who lost his son to an online scam. DeMay, skeptical of past assurances from Zuckerberg, continues advocacy for greater online child safety and finds hope in court action over legislative progress.

Zuckerberg’s testimony follows a history of congressional hearings on child safety where his promises left families unconvinced. The trial may lead to significant repercussions for social media firms, potentially altering platform designs and leading to substantial payouts.

Meta, also facing separate legal challenges in New Mexico over consumer protection violations, denies concealing knowledge of social media harms. Instagram has introduced safety features for young users, but a review by advocacy group Fairplay found most features lacking effectiveness.

Concerns about Meta’s handling of child safety have been echoed by former employees, with allegations of data misuse and toxic workplace practices, highlighting internal struggles with these critical issues.

Key Takeaways
Zuckerberg defends Meta’s child safety measures.
Trial emphasizes social media's potential harm to youth.
Ongoing legal battles could reshape platform policies.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Tensions are reaching a boiling point as Russia and Iran plan joint military exercises, with concerns over possible US military involvement. The drills, happening on February 19 in the Sea of Oman and northern Indian Ocean, aim to enhance maritime security and counter-terrorism efforts, according to Iranian navy commander Hassan Maghsoodloo.

Get the latest headlines in your email

These exercises, which began as part of the 2019 Maritime Security Belt involving China, showcase a united stance against Western geopolitical pressures. Meanwhile, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is conducting maneuvers in the strategically important Strait of Hormuz, amid threats of US intervention.

President Donald Trump has previously warned of potential strikes against Iran, largely in response to the regime’s severe crackdown on protestors. As the bond between Russia and Iran appears stronger than ever, sources suggest the US might be on the verge of a major Middle Eastern conflict, possibly involving Israel. This would represent the most significant US intervention in at least a decade.

The US aims to keep its military actions contained within Iran, if intervention occurs, but the question remains whether Tehran’s allies, such as Russia, would retaliate, potentially sparking a wider conflict.

Diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran continue. Recent negotiations in Geneva, involving Trump’s advisers and Iran’s Foreign Minister, showed some progress but failed to resolve fundamental disagreements. Both sides admitted to making headway, but certain issues remain unresolved.

Vice President JD Vance acknowledged these diplomatic challenges, highlighting Trump’s desire for a deal while noting Iran's reluctance to meet US demands. He remarked that diplomacy may have reached its "natural end," adding to the uncertainty of the situation.

As the world watches these developments closely, the potential for conflict remains high, raising fears of a new war in the Middle East.

Key Takeaways
Russia and Iran prepare for joint naval exercises.
US military intervention seems increasingly likely.
Diplomacy struggles with unresolved issues between the US and Iran.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
In a dramatic revelation, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, faces allegations of witnessing the torture of a young girl using electric shocks. The accusation, emerging from the Epstein files, claims the event occurred in the mid-1990s at Frogmore Cottage, Windsor.

Get the latest headlines in your email

The FBI report from July 2020 suggests Andrew was present with Ghislaine Maxwell during the incident. Despite these serious claims, Andrew has consistently denied any wrongdoing. The accusations surface amid his recent eviction from Royal Lodge, intensifying public scrutiny of his past.

Reports indicate an anonymous tip led to these revelations, alleging other men were also present during the torture. The Epstein files, newly released, connect Andrew to this disturbing event but do not independently verify wrongdoing.

Surrey Police are urging the public to provide information about historical human trafficking and sexual assault cases in the area during the same period. However, they emphasize that these appeals are unrelated to the electric shock allegations.

The police have reviewed their records for any prior reports of such incidents, finding none. A spokesperson stressed their commitment to investigating new leads and urged individuals with information to come forward.

These allegations form part of a broader investigation into historic abuses, with Surrey Police coordinating with national agencies to pursue any credible new evidence. The force is committed to examining all information thoroughly and neutrally.

As investigations continue, this development adds to the challenges facing Andrew, who has repeatedly asserted his innocence regarding any allegations linked to Epstein and Maxwell.

The police call for objective assessment and further public aid in providing information is crucial in addressing these serious allegations. The unfolding situation underscores the complexities and sensitivities involved in such historic cases.

Key Takeaways
Andrew faces allegations of witnessing torture.
Surrey Police seek public information on related cases.
Investigations remain open and ongoing.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
In an explosive development, billionaire Elon Musk has branded Nigel Farage's Reform UK party as "nazis." This intensifies an ongoing feud sparked by Laila Cunningham, Reform's mayoral candidate, who accused Rupert Lowe's Restore Britain party of being "neo-nazi." Musk's response on social media platform X, claiming "THEY are the ones who want race extinction," has escalated the situation dramatically.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Rupert Lowe, backed by Musk in the past, is demanding an apology from Cunningham, warning that such allegations endanger their members. Despite leading in opinion polls, Reform UK has not responded to Musk's allegations.

Musk, who once supported US President Trump, has criticized the casual use of terms like "fascist" or "Nazi" before. Lowe dismissed the insults from Reform, arguing the party is outdated and ineffective, and called the attacks repetitive.

The conflict comes soon after Lowe initiated Restore Britain, claiming over 70,000 members, a figure not independently verified. With recent defections from local councillors, the new party appears to be gaining momentum.

Nigel Farage brushed off threats from the new party, criticizing Lowe's extreme policies like mass deportations. He stated Restore Britain has moved beyond reason, asserting that Reform remains the authentic centre-right force in British politics and dismissing other minor parties’ efforts.

Restore Britain is positioning itself further right than Reform UK, challenging Farage's influence. Farage argued that setting up a new party isn't enough for political success, emphasizing Reform's established reputation.

As tensions rise, Musk’s intervention adds a new layer of controversy, highlighting the evolving power struggle within right-wing politics in the UK. The intensity of remarks and strategic moves by these parties reflect a deeply competitive political scene.

Key Takeaways
Musk calls Reform UK "nazis," fueling a political feud.
Rupert Lowe's Restore Britain garners attention and members.
Farage maintains Reform UK as the true centre-right option.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Donald Trump has launched a scathing attack on UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, urging the reversal of the Chagos Islands agreement. The US President used Truth Social to voice his concerns, warning Starmer: "DO NOT GIVE AWAY DIEGO GARCIA!" Trump asserted that Starmer is "losing control" by ceding sovereignty to Mauritius under a 99-year lease deal.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Diego Garcia, a crucial military base in the Indian Ocean, is at the heart of this controversy. Trump highlighted its strategic importance, particularly in relation to potential US actions against Iran, describing the lease as a "big mistake." He argued that the base is vital for protecting the UK and allied countries from threats, while maintaining a robust US-UK alliance.

The agreement has met with fierce opposition from Conservatives, who brand it a "catastrophic surrender." Critics claim it could compromise security by aligning with a Chinese ally and cost British taxpayers billions. Trump's criticism echoes these concerns, warning that transferring control from the UK could damage one of its key alliances.

Prominent Conservative figures, including Leader Kemi Badenoch, support Trump's standpoint. They criticize the deal as "great stupidity," urging Starmer to cancel it. Shadow Foreign Secretary Dame Priti Patel described Trump’s intervention as a “humiliation” for Starmer, accusing the government of dangerous and irresponsible decision-making.

Signed for £3.4 billion in May, the deal permits UK-US joint military operations at Diego Garcia but hands the islands’ control to Mauritius. Trump called the claims of Mauritian sovereignty “fictitious,” intensifying concerns about the legitimacy of their historical claim. Critics argue that the agreement irresponsibly relinquishes British sovereign territory.

Despite the heated debate, Trump reassured that US-UK relations remain strong. However, he insisted the UK must resist "Wokeism" and other challenges to maintain its global stance. The Conservatives have vowed ongoing resistance, determined to fight what they term the "Chagos Surrender."

This unfolding controversy highlights deep divisions over the deal, with Trump’s involvement amplifying the political tumult. The calls for Starmer to reconsider the decision grow louder, underscoring the strategic importance of the Chagos Islands and the pressure from across the Atlantic.

Key Takeaways
Trump condemns Starmer's Chagos Islands deal.
Conservatives oppose potential security risks.
Strategic significance of Chagos Islands central to debate.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
A disturbing BBC investigation uncovers teenage girls as young as 14 being lured into forced sex by London gangs. These vulnerable young women, exploited for everything from drug debts to sexual favors, highlight a grim reality in the capital.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Survivors reveal harrowing tales. Kelly, one such victim, shared how she was groomed by three men, initially forced into drug dealing, later exploited for sex. Despite feeling a sense of belonging, she realized she was manipulated, with gang life offering only exploitation.

Detective Sgt. John Knox from the Met Police stresses that girls in this world are "lowest rung," forced into compliance, including sexual acts. He estimates around 60 children in South London alone are affected, depicting a dire situation where saying no isn't an option, equating to rape in the eyes of the law.

Previous focus on grooming gangs in northern England obscured London’s issue, a complex web involving men from various ethnic backgrounds. Mayor Sadiq Khan emphasizes commitment to combating child sexual exploitation in all its forms.

Despite past denials of gang presence comparable to Rotherham's, the Mayor's office now supports thorough policing efforts. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Kevin Southworth insists the issue is high on the Met’s radar, with grooming for both criminal and sexual purposes rampant in London.

Social workers attribute vulnerability to factors such as broken homes and poverty. Survivor Milly detailed her terrifying experience being passed around by different men, often under the influence, drawing parallels to incidents in Rotherham and Rochdale. Her account underscores the severity of exploitation, often racialized, though experts warn against generalizations based solely on ethnicity.

Ruth, another survivor, adds that her abuse by South Asian men involved manipulation through lavish gifts, a sense of attention, culminating in exploitation. Her story contradicts notions that all cases involve further criminal activity like drug dealing.

Alan Collins, an expert solicitor, urges caution against racial profiling of perpetrators. The spectrum of ethnicities in London gangs reflects the city’s diversity, negating a single racial narrative. Southworth underscores the wide range of ethnic backgrounds in suspects, advising against simplistic associations.

With around 2,000 child exploitation cases reported annually, the Met undertakes a massive re-examination of past cases, fueled by a national review into group-based exploitation. Improvements include training for 23,000 officers and bolstered child exploitation teams.

An independent inquiry led by Baroness Longfield soon kicks off, endowed with full investigatory powers. The Home Office assures that even closed cases face re-evaluation, offering no sanctuary for offenders.

Continued efforts from law enforcement and governmental bodies aim to dismantle grooming operations citywide, ensuring justice and safety for all victims.

Key Takeaways
London gangs exploit vulnerable girls for sex.
Ethnicity of perpetrators spans diverse backgrounds.
Major police review underway, focusing on past cases.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
The serene slopes of Lake Tahoe turned deadly as rescue teams discover eight skiers' bodies after a devastating avalanche struck on Tuesday. With one skier still missing, hopes fade as officials presume them dead, casting a somber shadow over the search efforts.

Get the latest headlines in your email

The avalanche, described as "football-field" sized, tore through Castle Peak at 11:30 PST, leaving chaos in its wake. Originally, 15 skiers were reported missing. Miraculously, six were found alive, yet the tragic discovery of eight dead leaves an emotional toll, especially for the rescue team with one member's spouse among the deceased.

Authorities face grim conditions. Continuous snowfall adds three feet to existing treacherous terrain, stalling body recovery. Rescuers, battling severe weather, report the hazard remains high.

Sheriff Wayne Woo expressed profound condolences, highlighting the heartache families endure. The deceased, comprising seven women and two men, remain unnamed as families are informed. Once retrieved, their bodies will be moved to the Placer County morgue, awaiting identification.

Teams totalling 50 members, equipped for the extreme conditions, conduct operations. Forced to ski two miles to reach survivors, the crew rescued two unable to walk, conveying them to hospital with non-life-threatening injuries.

The tragedy unfolded as a mix of 11 recreational skiers and four guides with Blackbird Mountain concluded a three-day tour. California Governor Gavin Newsom's office commends the coordinated effort of state and local teams amid dangerous weather described as "treacherous."

Warnings urge avoidance of the backcountry as rescuers focus on recovery. As the area still grapples with more snowfall and closed highways, the avalanche—rated D2.5 on a D1 to D5 scale—proves deadly, with debris over six feet deep.

Nearby Boreal Mountain Resort, battered by 30 inches of snow since Tuesday, closed due to severe winds and zero visibility. The nature of the storm has also crippled key highways, including Interstate 80.

Amid the somber recovery, the Tahoe community remains resolute, honoring the lives lost in this tragic natural disaster.
Key Takeaways
Eight skiers confirmed dead in Tahoe avalanche.
Severe conditions delay body recoveries.
Authorities warn against backcountry travel.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Epstein Files Shake UK: Royals and Politicians Face Scrutiny
The dramatic release of over 3 million documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein rocks the very core of British high society. Former Prince Andrew, Sarah Ferguson, and Peter Mandelson are now under a harsh spotlight, their connections to the disgraced financier raising serious questions.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, previously known as Prince Andrew, has long maintained he severed all ties with Epstein in 2010 after the financier's conviction. But BBC interviews and emails urge otherwise. The latest documents reveal compromising photos that add fuel to the fire. Though her identity is obscured, the images raise more questions about Andrew’s past behavior. He faces mounting pressure from legal and public circles to address these allegations head-on.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has publicly urged the former prince to testify in the US Congress, a move that could bring even more revelations into the public eye. Andrew’s email communications with Epstein suggest a relationship closer than previously acknowledged. Notably, emails regarding a meeting with a 26-year-old Russian acquaintance of Epstein have piqued interest. Thames Valley Police are examining these allegations but note that no official reports have been made yet.

Meanwhile, Sarah Ferguson, known affectionately as "Fergie," finds herself caught in Epstein’s web. She's been previously described in communications as viewing Epstein as a “supreme friend.” More recent emails expose a deep admiration and reliance on his support. With the closure of her charity, Sarah’s Trust, following these revelations, Ferguson faces even greater suspicion. Her past communications thank Epstein for his kindness and profess deep gratitude, potentially implicating her more deeply.

Peter Mandelson, once the influential UK ambassador to the US, now confronts a wave of allegations over leaked UK government documents to Epstein. Widely regarded for his strategic savvy, Mandelson now sees his political career marred by controversy. Resigning from the Labour Party amid reports that he leaked sensitive tax plans, Mandelson is under investigation. Financial records imply he and his partner received substantial payments from Epstein, further muddying the waters.

As authorities sift through these allegations, Mandelson faces a criminal inquiry, largely centered on claims he disclosed confidential information to Epstein. Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has handed over relevant details to the police. The investigations continue as Mandelson’s resignation from the House of Lords looms.

Both Ferguson and Mandelson's transgressions paint a picture of a society intertwining with Epstein’s sordid dealings. The scandal threatens to widen, pulling in more figures from Britain's elite and daunting those involved with potential judicial inquiries.

The repercussions stretch beyond personal disgrace, impacting institutional trust. As the royal family and political figures grapple with these disclosures, questions of accountability and transparency loom large. The royal family has yet to comment officially on the latest raft of revelations, leaving the public and media to speculate on next steps.

Prince Edward, Andrew's brother, recently emphasized the importance of remembering Epstein’s victims, underscoring the human toll of these scandals. Yet, the situation remains fluid, with insiders and the public eagerly awaiting further developments.

Accusations against these high-profile figures suggest a timeline of impropriety that could rewrite recent British history. The conversation is no longer just about association but accountability and justice for those lost in Epstein’s disastrous wake.

Key Takeaways
Andrew faces intense scrutiny over Epstein links.
Fergie’s ties to Epstein lead to her charity’s closure.
Mandelson investigated for alleged leaks to Epstein.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 17 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
A surprising poll has dropped, revealing that a whopping 53 percent of Americans believe President Trump is desperately trying to conceal crimes linked to notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The Economist/YouGov poll, unleashed Tuesday, sends shockwaves across the nation, with only 29 percent backing Trump against the allegation of a cover-up.

Get the latest headlines in your email

In another jaw-dropping reveal, the poll shows a staggering 50 percent of Americans think Trump was involved in Epstein’s shady dealings. Meanwhile, a mere 30 percent believe he kept his hands clean. The details behind these figures reveal a stark party divide. Among Democrats, a stunning 91 percent accuse Trump of a cover-up, while just 13 percent of Republicans share the sentiment. A similar split exists regarding alleged involvement: 86 percent of Democrats point the finger at Trump, with 67 percent of Republicans defending him.

Despite the uproar, Trump stands firm. He's consistently denied any role in Epstein's sordid past and insists he distanced himself from the disgraced financier long ago. Yet, criticism of his administration's handling of the Epstein investigation refuses to die down.

A major move came last year when Congress nearly unanimously passed a law demanding the Department of Justice reveal all Epstein-related files. Reluctantly, Trump signed the bill. However, the DOJ faces backlash for releasing heavily redacted documents, leaving some victim identities glaringly exposed. The numbers from the latest poll show widespread disapproval, with only 24 percent satisfied with Trump’s investigative handling, against 57 percent expressing discontent.

Amid the turmoil, former Trump ally Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene slammed the situation as Trump’s “biggest political miscalculation.” On the "Home of the Brave" podcast, Greene voiced disdain for the president’s handling of the Epstein files. She argued he was pressured into transparency, flipping his stance just before a crucial vote in Congress.

This new poll surveyed 1,682 U.S. adults between February 13-16, carrying a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points.

Key Takeaways
53% think Trump is covering up Epstein crimes.
50% believe Trump was involved with Epstein.
DOJ criticized for Epstein file handling.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 17 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Jelena, a British-Latvian dual national, faces possible denial of entry back into the UK after her South American trip due to new passport rules effective February 25. These changes are part of a broader immigration reform aimed at modernizing UK borders, yet dual nationals like Jelena feel unprepared and betrayed by the new requirements.

Get the latest headlines in your email

What Are the New Rules?
Under previous regulations, dual nationals from visa-free countries could enter the UK using their foreign passports. Now, they must present either a British passport or a digital certificate of entitlement. Without these documents, they risk being barred from returning. Acquiring these isn’t automatic and incurs time and financial costs—£100 for a passport and £589 for the certificate.

These changes coincide with the launch of the Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) system, which requires non-visa visitors to secure a £16 entry document. Dual nationals cannot apply for ETA and must comply with the new document requirements, affecting non-Irish EU citizens as well.

Impact on Individuals
Jelena, residing in the UK for 16 years, now has to alter her travel plans to get a British passport from Latvia, fearing potential loss of her job or home access. Similarly, UK-German national Petra Gartzen discovered the rule change while in Spain, now urgently trying to secure her passport before returning to the UK.

Swiss national Shaun West is considering renouncing his UK citizenship, viewing the changes as discriminatory. Meanwhile, Norwegian dual national Linn Kathenes is rushing to coordinate her passport applications for work travel commitments.

Criticism and Communication Issues
Critics argue that communication about these changes has been inadequate, leaving dual nationals in precarious positions. While the government maintains that information has been available since 2024, many affected individuals claim they were not effectively informed.

Campaign group the3million calls for the government to reconsider, suggesting a low-cost travel authorization to alleviate disruption.

Government Stance
The Home Office defends the policy, asserting that consistent communication efforts have been made and emphasizing the policy’s alignment with international standards practiced by countries like the United States and Canada.

As the deadline approaches, dual nationals are facing stress and logistical challenges. There are growing calls for clearer communication and transitional measures to ease the burdens of complying with the new regulations.

Key Takeaways
New rules require dual nationals to have a British passport or certificate of entitlement.
Critics cite inadequate communication, leaving many scrambling to meet requirements.
The government claims international alignment with similar policies.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 17 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Minnesota Officials Slam FBI Over Lack of Cooperation
Officials in Minnesota are frustrated as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) refuses to cooperate with their probe into the death of Alex Pretti. The 37-year-old nurse was shot by US Customs and Border Protection agents during a Minneapolis protest on January 24.

Get the latest headlines in your email

State vs. Federal Tensions
Minnesota's Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) has accused the FBI of withholding crucial information and evidence from their investigation. BCA Superintendent Drew Evans labeled the FBI's stance as "concerning and unprecedented." The FBI has yet to respond to these allegations.
Call for Joint Investigation
The BCA expressed a willingness to conduct a joint investigation with federal authorities, emphasizing their commitment to thorough and transparent probes despite limited access to key evidence. Pretti’s family also advocates for a joint state and federal investigation, emphasizing justice and accountability.
Civil Rights Inquiry
The Department of Justice launched a separate civil rights investigation into Pretti's death in January. Meanwhile, the BCA is also reviewing other incidents, including the fatal shooting of Renee Good by ICE agents and an injury to a Venezuelan national during a car chase.
Operation Metro Surge Aftermath
The FBI's reluctance comes amid tensions from Operation Metro Surge, an immigration crackdown initiated by the Trump administration. This operation sparked national protests against President Trump’s immigration policies and ICE tactics.
Local Impact and Reaction
The crackdown led to over 4,000 arrests of undocumented immigrants, with claims of arresting individuals convicted of serious crimes. Minnesota's Democratic Governor Tim Walz criticized the operation, citing "deep damage, generational trauma, and many unanswered questions" in its wake.
As state and federal entities remain at odds, the call for cooperation grows louder, raising questions about transparency and justice in the wake of contentious immigration policies.

Key Takeaways
Minnesota accuses FBI of withholding information in Alex Pretti case.
Calls for joint investigations stress need for transparency and justice.
Operation Metro Surge leaves a lasting impact and sparks controversy.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 17 Feb 2026


ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Progress made but challenges remain in Geneva discussions
Iran and the US have agreed on main "guiding principles" to address their nuclear program dispute, following indirect talks in Geneva. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced the progress but acknowledged further work is needed. The US echoed this sentiment, stating advancement, albeit with unresolved details.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Negotiations and Military Tensions
Facilitated by Oman, the talks aimed to resolve tensions exacerbated by US military threats over Iran's response to anti-government protests and nuclear activities. President Trump expressed hopes for a deal, emphasizing potential consequences if negotiations fail. The US believes Iran may be pursuing nuclear weaponry, a claim Tehran denies.
Focus and Divergence
Iran's focus was on its nuclear program and potential sanction relief, while Washington highlighted additional concerns, including missile development. A US official noted progress but indicated ongoing gaps requiring Iranian proposals in the coming weeks.
Red Lines and Consequences
US Vice-President JD Vance acknowledged both progress and challenges, citing red lines set by Trump that Iran hesitates to address. Trump, hinting at indirect involvement, stressed negotiation urgency, referencing past military actions as leverage.
Military Build-up
Amid the talks, the US reinforced its military presence in the Middle East, with aircraft carriers and additional naval forces near Iran. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei responded defiantly, challenging US military assertions and accusing them of attempting to dictate negotiation outcomes.
Iran's Show of Force
In response to US military moves, Iran's Revolutionary Guard conducted drills in the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical oil export route. Araghchi emphasized Iran's resolve not to yield to threats while seeking a fair agreement.
Outlook and Challenges
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged the diplomatic opportunity but cautioned against overestimating success. The first indirect talks in Oman were marked as a positive start, but significant hurdles remain.
Key Takeaways
Iran and US progress on nuclear talks, but challenges persist.
Military tensions rise with US presence near Iran, sparking Iranian defiance.
Both sides express willingness for diplomacy, yet underline difficulties.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 17 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Jesse Jackson: MLK's Protégé Who Reshaped America
Jesse Jackson emerged as a significant figure in the US civil rights movement, becoming the first African-American to transition from activism to major-party presidential politics. A protégé of Martin Luther King Jr., Jackson dedicated his life to improving the socio-political landscape for African-Americans, making his mark with two noteworthy presidential campaigns.


Get the latest headlines in your email

Civil Rights Beginnings
Jackson's involvement in the civil rights movement began in the 1960s. Driven by a vision of a unified, diverse America, he focused on advocating for the poor and working-class citizens. His iconic "keep hope alive" speech at the 1988 Democratic National Convention held powerful echoes in Barack Obama’s future "hope and change" campaign slogan.

Building a Legacy
Jackson was instrumental in launching initiatives like Operation Breadbasket and Operation PUSH, which promoted economic opportunities for Black Americans. His call for a "rainbow coalition" of voters from various races and beliefs anticipated a more inclusive political landscape, paving the way for leaders like Barack Obama and Kamala Harris.

Challenges and Achievements
Despite his monumental achievements, Jackson's later years faced turbulence due to personal scandals and health issues. Following a diagnosis of a degenerative disease, he reduced his public engagements. Yet, his support for Obama’s presidential bid and his continued championing of progressive causes showcased his enduring influence.

Navigating Controversy
Jackson's journey wasn’t without personal challenges, including public revelations of an affair and his son’s legal troubles. These incidents brought scrutiny, but they did not overshadow his lifelong contributions to racial and social justice, which left an indelible impact on American politics.

A Lasting Influence
In 2024, Jackson delivered a keynote speech at the Democratic convention where Kamala Harris was officially nominated for president. At this event, figures like Al Sharpton and Pramila Jayapal paid tribute to Jackson, acknowledging his vital role in paving the way for Black political leaders to rise.

From Humble Beginnings
Born in segregated South Carolina, Jackson's upbringing in a community marked by racial divides fueled his determination. Early leadership roles in high school and college hinted at a future dedicated to service and activism. His involvement in sit-ins and marches demonstrated a commitment to civil rights that would define his career.

Transformative Political Efforts
Jackson’s presidential runs in the 1980s were groundbreaking. His campaigns highlighted issues of universal healthcare, economic equality, and social justice, advancing a liberal agenda that influenced the Democratic Party’s platform. Despite not winning the nomination, his efforts showed the potential for a Black candidate to garner nationwide support.

Enduring Advocacy
Jackson remained a staunch advocate for change even as health challenges surfaced. He was vocal during key events like the aftermath of George Floyd’s death, calling for justice and reform. His commitment to causes such as withdrawing US troops from conflict zones and raising the minimum wage showcased his unwavering dedication to justice.

Jesse Jackson’s journey reflects his lifelong commitment to civil rights and equality. Overcoming personal and professional hurdles, he left a legacy of hope and systemic change. His tireless advocacy reshaped American politics, contributing to a more inclusive future.

Key Takeaways
Jesse Jackson’s activism to politics trajectory paved the way for future leaders.
His initiatives and speeches fostered inclusivity and systemic change.
Despite personal challenges, his impact on civil rights remains profound.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 17 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
Tensions are escalating as China ramps up pressure on Japan following comments by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan's defense. Beijing has responded with various tactics, ranging from economic restrictions to revoking cultural ties, including reclaiming pandas from Tokyo's Ueno Zoo.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Diplomatic Strain Over Taiwan
The conflict began when Takaichi suggested Japan might activate its self-defense forces if Taiwan were attacked. China, viewing Taiwan as part of its territory, demanded retractions as Takaichi refused to back down. Despite her firmness, China filed complaints with the UN and postponed trilateral talks with Japan and South Korea.

Economic and Cultural Retaliations
China's actions have targeted Japan's economy. Restrictions on rare earth exports and travel advisories have impacted tourism and stock markets. Additionally, cultural exchanges have suffered; concerts and film releases have been canceled. Even Pokémon faced backlash over a Yasukuni Shrine event, seen as insensitive due to wartime associations.

Military Tensions and Diplomatic Moves
China increased its military presence near Japan, sending warships and jets. Analysts note these moves are less aggressive than past confrontations, as China aims to appear as a stabilizing power compared to the US.

Domestic Support and Political Strategy
Takaichi's election victory, seen as support for her stance on China, strengthens her position. She plans to boost defense spending and economic policies. The evolving power dynamic makes de-escalation difficult, with both sides unlikely to concede easily.

The Role of the US and Future Implications
President Donald Trump's support for Takaichi adds complexity. Upcoming meetings between Trump and Xi Jinping could alter US-China relations, impacting Japan's strategy. As Tokyo faces pressure, it focuses on bolstering US ties to maintain regional stability.

China's pressure campaign is likely to continue, but may not intensify given Takaichi's strong domestic backing. The diplomatic "tango" between China and Japan persists, with each weighing its next move.

Key Takeaways
China targets Japan's economy and culture amid Taiwan tension.
Takaichi’s firm stance gains domestic support after election win.
US-China dynamics may influence future regional strategies.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 16 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News
In a fiery BBC interview from Berlin, Hillary Clinton accused Donald Trump's administration of a "cover-up" over Jeffrey Epstein-related files. She demanded full disclosure, criticizing the administration for delaying the process and urging them to "get the files out."

Get the latest headlines in your email

The White House countered Hillary's claims, insisting they have already released more documents than Democrats. Clinton stressed that everyone, including Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, should testify if called upon by Congress. Andrew, consistently denying any misconduct, is under growing pressure to address his Epstein links.

Recently, the US Department of Justice released millions of files under the new Epstein Files Transparency Act. Despite this move, some lawmakers, like Republican Thomas Massie, claimed the release lacked depth and demanded additional internal memos about Epstein's prosecution decisions.

Epstein, a convicted sex offender, died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. His connections with high-profile figures have led to intense scrutiny, particularly concerning his ties to Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton.

Andrew settled out of court with Virginia Giuffre in 2022, without admitting any wrongdoing. Tragically, Giuffre died in 2025. As of now, the Clintons are set to testify before Congress. By agreeing to testify, they avoided a contempt vote—an action not seen since 1983 when a former president last testified.

While Bill Clinton had known Epstein years ago, he maintains he was unaware of Epstein’s crimes. Both Clintons, never accused of illegal conduct, are advocating for their hearings to be public. Hillary Clinton emphasized their willingness for transparency, stating, "We have nothing to hide. Sunlight is the best disinfectant."

Hillary suggested that the Clintons are being used to deflect attention from Trump, who appears frequently in the files but refutes any criminal connections. The DOJ has previously dismissed some allegations against Trump as unfounded, suggesting they were politically motivated during the 2020 election.

The White House underscored its commitment to the investigation, highlighting its cooperation with subpoenas and Trump’s recent calls for probing Epstein’s Democratic connections.

Key Takeaways
Hillary Clinton accuses Trump of delaying Epstein document release.
The Clintons will testify publicly, stressing the need for transparency.
Trump, denying wrongdoing, labeled some allegations politically timed.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 16 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.