Jump to content

StevieAus

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    2,781
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by StevieAus

  1. 6 hours ago, Bangkok Barry said:

    I wrote until 6am, not from. But then, I've often had to be at railway stations or airports at 6am in Germany, Austria and Switzerland and there'd always be the odd few standing with a beer at that time. A bit like Pattaya in pre-Covid days, I suppose ????

    To be fair I do recall what was known as “ early openers” pubs in Sydney years ago to cater I think for those finishing night shift.

    Each to their own

  2. 14 minutes ago, Bangkok Barry said:

    And then we read of police raids on private homes where friends have gathered for a drink and a neighbour has called in to say they are a health hazard.

    But a message to the OP - it isn't just this government that is conducting a war against alcohol. It was during Thaksins's reign that the daytime ban of sales except between 11 and 2 was introduced, by a minister who wanted to close bars at 10pm and nightclubs at midnight. Meanwhile, the tourists they are trying to attract from Europe can drink in bars open until 6am if they want, with quality beer cheaper than they would have to pay in Thailand.

    I cannot imagine why anyone would want to drink beer from 6am however cheap or good quality.

    However if I was forced to live in Europe particularly during the winter months I might find it’s the only thing to get you through the day !!!!!

    • Haha 2
  3. Apart from the restrictions on the times you can purchase where is it banned?

    Last week four of us had wine with dinner at a restaurant in the center of Chiang Mai

    Yesterday I paid for Thai whisky for some locals at a local “bar” who did some work for me and I bought a dozen bottles of wine from Makro

    Maybe your looking in the wrong place ?

  4. 13 hours ago, scorecard said:

    "...after several years the Australian government notified him that his residents visa was being cancelled and his pension was being stopped because he is not an Australian citizen and has left Australia."

     

    He may be able to return to live in Australia for 2 years to gain/achieve 'residence qualifications' which would mean he is qualified to receive the full OAP (old age pension). In this situation (if he accepted to gain 'residencecy' he would receive the OAP immediately in Australia. If he can gain 'residence' then after 2 years in Australia he would also be entitled to 'portability' which means he could get his full pension paid into a bank account abroad for the rest of his life and not need to personally ever return to Australia.

    While what has happened to your friend sounds sad one would have to ask the question why he didn’t become an Australian Citizen.

    I have met people over the years mainly from Europe who for reasons best known to themselves would not take it out when all that was required was completing a form.

    If in that situation like your friend if you let your visa lapse you have to start again.

    I ensured that my Thai wife obtained hers on the earliest possible date, now although we live here it’s never lost.

  5. 7 hours ago, Scouse123 said:

    Just like in many other countries that resurrect campaigns to encourage reductions in crime such as knife and gun crime, they repeat amnesties. So, why can't they do it again?

     

    With overstays falling into the most ' least serious crimes ' category and no doubt this lady contributing to the economy over many years, even if its only her weekly shopping, a lady who has just lost her husband, why can't they look at the amnesty situation again as a sign of goodwill to foreigners?

     

    She isn't tapping in to free social care or healthcare or the welfare system like Thais are able to do in the UK after their marriages fail and they have their shiny new UK passports.

     

    You mention :- . If there are people that still are hiding out somewhere and refuses to adhere to the rules of law, then it´s not time to blame Thailand and immigration.

     

    Rule of law?  The same rule of law used by immigration that nearly crucifies foreigners for bringing in SLIGHTLY over their amount of cigarettes or alcohol at Suvarnabhumi airport but the cops themselves are flying in their tax evading booze and ciggies in police airplanes emblazoned with RTP insignia!!!

     

    The government speaks to us in its announcements almost as though it's our ' duty ' to come and spend money in Thailand despite the flip flopping, ASQ hotels and quarantine, rule changes and xenophobia despite the fact that there is <deleted> all open when you get here, when it suits them, and they do it without shame.

    I think you will find that the people who are crucifying foreigners for exceeding their duty free allowance are not Immigration but Customs and I don’t believe that they are part of the RTP.

    Probably just as bad but try exceeding you’re entitlement entering Australia and you will experience problems.

    • Thanks 1
  6. 6 hours ago, ChaiyaTH said:

    Yeah while for a bit of drugs they remain jailed decades. I notice a lot of murderers get out early in TH to only do it again.

    Not only here either there are many cases in Australia and the UK where murderers, rapists  child molesters etc are released and re offend.

    Unfortunately life no longer means life and there are all sorts of reductions for pleading guilty, good behavior etc etc.

    It seems to be only the US where life means life.

  7. 11 hours ago, IvorBiggun2 said:

    When it comes to my nationality then yes I am.

    Sorry to disappoint you but as my father was born in the UK I also hold British citizenship and passport but always use my Australian passport.

    On the subject of the correct definition if you look at HM Passport office website they refer to UK passports.

    Perhaps you should raise the issue and post their response.

  8. 11 hours ago, IvorBiggun2 said:

    I was referring to the fact that the first passport of any nationality is the hardest to obtain. Whereas a renewal is relatively easy to get of any nationality. I have 3 Luk Rung children aged 14 and 12 (twins). All with Thai & British passport.

    By the way when asked what nationality one is one declares British. Not UK

    I am aware you did and I referred to that in my opening paragraph.

    I am also aware that the correct terminology is British but for the purpose of this thread I am sure readers understand.

    Must be feeling pedantic ?

    • Like 1
  9. 8 minutes ago, Artisi said:

    The white Australia policy was shelved many many years ago, and people who want to apply for citizenship are offered extensive language learning if they require it. 

    I am out of touch with the residency requirements but wasn’t English Language proficiency something that gave you “higher points” ?

    Its good to know they are offering extensive language training,I know kids got it at school but when my Thai wife got her residency about 15 years ago it was very limited and low quality.

    I paid for her to attend  college full time.

  10. 1 minute ago, Artisi said:

    The comment started out as foreigners costing the the government money, not about Aust, UK etc. In theory farangs have to pay, meaning no expense to the government, of course many don't pay, but that's a different subject to what the original poster was inferring. 

    Of course those a/ holes not paying is the very reason the government is now ramping up the need for forengiers to have their own health cover. 

    From memory the post I responded to originally had a comment about no cheap medical or hospital costs for foreigners.

    So to decide if it’s cheap you have to compare with elsewhere.

    Anyway my view is that if you travel or move to a country knowing that you are not going to receive free treatment and you are unable to pay or you are uninsured it’s very foolish.

    I am finished now thanks for your input.

  11. 9 minutes ago, Thunglom said:

    Thai airlines used to be run by the Airforce who didn't want the job. A Qantas pilot once told me that it was a miracle that Thai airplanes weren't falling out the sky every day.

    Thy are just about broke now so won't be around muck longer anyway.

    Before I studied Law I was an aircraft engineer with Qantas from 1974-1980 and regularly did the turn around checks on Thai.

    There were never any issues I can recall with Thai and their MELs were always good.

    The airlines we were concerned about included Pan Am and “ We will fix in Bombay” Air India just  to mention a couple.

  12. 5 hours ago, Artisi said:

    You just confirmed my comment, it's not free nor cheap by Thai standards when a local can get treated for B35. 

     

    Your not local or Thai that’s why you cannot get the 35 baht treatment.

    If you live in the UK or Australia and use the Government system it’s free apart from maybe medication.

    You cannot expect what happens in one country to apply in another if you do, with respect your living in a fools paradise !

  13. 33 minutes ago, Artisi said:

    Why does it cost Thailand money, there is no free or cheap treatment for foreigners. 

    I don’t know what your definition of cheap is or whether you have obtained treatment from a government hospital where compared with what you would pay as a private patient in Western countries it is very cheap.

    I can also see a specialist doctor seven days a week at a top Chiang Mai Hospital for 500 baht about $AUS 22.00

    The cost in Sydney these days depending on the speciality is $AUS 300- 400

    That is after visiting a GP for a referral and waiting for an appointment no visits on a weekend.

  14. 2 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

    If that were true why would they give a 3rd booster? thai logic?

    Well the first response is how would you expose people to Covid?

    Its got nothing to do with Thailand or their logic it’s from the UK it’s research into antibodies and the effects of being exposed to Covid after being vaccinated twice there is no suggestion that you shouldn’t receive a booster and I didn’t state that.

    Its presented by Dr John Campbell on YouTube and it’s still there.

    As a non medical layperson I found it quite informative but then I am always ready to listen and learn.

    .

    • Like 1
  15. 4 hours ago, Andrew Dwyer said:

    That may be but latest from the U.K. :

     

    Covid booster vaccine rollout to begin across UK next week https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-58550833

    I wasn’t suggesting that it had been adopted as a policy and in any event I don’t know how you could put it into effect.

    It was really about antibodies and the effect of being exposed to Covid after being vaccinated.

    Its still on YouTube and presented by Dr John Campbell

    For me as a lay person I found it easy to understand and very enlightening.

     

  16. 19 hours ago, edwinchester said:

    I asked a couple of wifeys police friends why the law wasn't enforced......'not easy, too difficult' was the reply. Before anything actually changes the Royal Thai Police Force needs to be staffed by officers who actually care about the job they're supposed to be doing.

    Some time ago I asked a local senior police officer who spoke pretty good English, why after issuing a fine for not having a licence, no insurance, not wearing a hemet etc etc. they allow the offender to drive off and continue committing the same offense or why as in many countries the vehicle isn’t seized.

    His explanation was that they can only book the offender once in each twenty four hour period for the same offense.

    He couldn’t seem to get his head around the difference between fining and preventing an ongoing offense.

    I gave up in the end.

×
×
  • Create New...