BangkokReady

How do you feel that the following comments incite violence: "Let's put her with a rifle standing [in the warzone] with nine barrels [held by enemy combatants] shooting at her. Let's see how she feels about it. You know, when [she's in a war and the] guns [of the enemy] are trained on her face." (I edited the quote to honestly reflect the exact context and show what Trump was actually referring to.)

It's a computer generated image.

Pathetic morons for pointing out a lie? What about the people who told the lie, or shared it here, or are now defending a lie? Aren't they pathetic morons?

For saying that someone would be unable to handle being in a firefight? Why?

I understand that there are people out there who genuinely wish to abuse or harm young people, but I don't believe that any of what is being discussed here actually involves people wanting to do that, as much as some users appear to wish that it did. The question you have replied to is a hypothetical one, posed to expose the logical flaws of another user's statement. This is why he isn't willing to answer it.

You gave an answer, but what you wrote in no way answers my question. 🙄

How about answering the question?

You did say that, yes . Is it OK to be attracted to a 16 year old that looks 18, but not an 18 year old that looks 16...? 🤔

So how did you meet? How did you begin a relationship if she wasn't interested in you? How did you know you could trust her re the age thing? She happened to look exactly 18, or she looked older than 18? You didn't want to check the ID to be sure? Also, iirc, you said you were a teacher. How did you feel about that and dating someone young enough to be one of your students (and your daughter) when you were a middle aged man? Your comments seem to be asking more questions than they answer. Wouldn't you want to find out someone's age anyway, if you want a serious relationship With them? (Presumably you would have an upper limit as well as a lower one.)

Is this a joke? This makes no sense at all. You basically went against everything you've said in this tread. That isn't the topic. 🤦‍♂️

Hardly surprising. Social media leads to a lot being exposed that previously no one would know about. With monks seen strolling around smoking and using their smart phones, then all the news about drinking, fighting and drug dealing, why would people still want to give them free food and money? They aren't keeping up their side of the bargain.

Your "leanings".

Very true. As with the sin sod, you have to "prove" your wealth by giving it away.

In denial, it seems. It fits you perfectly.

If the communist cap fits... 🤷‍♂️

Do you really think people are going to swallow a lie like this? Who's still talking about the assassination attempt on Trump? And would it be the same if it was Biden or Harris? No chance! The problem with you Stalinist propagandist types, is you always try to accuse people of what you re doing yourself. Sometimes you get away with it, but sometimes, like now, you don't.

You want rid of tourists who come to Thailand to get wasted on drugs and alcohol? Do you think Thailand can survive that kind of financial hit?

Thai people amazed by "Thainess" again... 🙄

Biden has clearly shown signs of dementia, while Trump has not. It also wasn't restricted to "the MAGA" crowd. Everyone could see it and was discussing it, apart from dishonest people who were trying to hide it with lies about speech impediments. There is no hypocrisy.

There's this myth that trans women started the Stonewall riots and nursed homosexual men who had AIDS during the 80s, and if it weren't for trans women conditions never would have improved for gay men.

He's just a typical left-wing nutjob. He'll make nonsense arguments when he can, but mostly he just trolls people when he cannot respond to what they have said. There's this weird Marxist online thing where people feel that they're achieving something if they keep responding/trolling and taking up the other person's time. Like they're "doing their bit". This seems to be his MO.

Are you saying that once men retire they can just live off their partner? There's no expectation to provide any longer? Sounds lovely, but I don't dont beleive this to be the case. Its not that unusual. Women often like opder men. I assume that she is, otherwise why is anyone even discussing it? If the girls isn't interested it's all pretty much over. Why? If she's 18, it's fine. If she's not 18, then you walk away. How would that even work? Only date girls that look over 25? Or 30 just to be sure? Sounds kind of stupid. I think you just don't want older guys dating younger over 18 girl's for some reason. Jealous???

It's really strange the way many people seem to really want there to-be guys going after underage Girls, though. Like they need it to be happening or something. It seems on every thread discussing older guys with younger over 18 girls, there are always people trying to make out that that men wanting to be with younger women are suspect in some way.

Translate? What's to translate? It's just a bog standard left-wing garbage story lying about something Trump did. Propaganda, basically. A lot of these garbage attempted hit pieces started being generated once people really started to wise up to Biden's dementia. Lies to try to make Trump sound like he had cognitive issues as well. Pretty see through.

Quite the opposite, in fact.