I love conspiracy theories where the poster "did his own research". It is especially great when the authors have no basic education in the subject at hand. Always check the qualifications first!
Martin Neil, Professor of computer science and statistics at Queen Mary, University of London. UK.
Jonathan Engler, Healthcare entrepreneur
Norman Fenton, Professor of Risk
Agreed, they are capable of reading a spreadsheet.
Now compare them with a highly qualified scientist: (Name withheld to protect the innocent) Doctor of Medicine, clinical associate in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Laboratory of Clinical Investigation (LCI). Chief of the NIAID's Laboratory of Immunoregulation. He developed therapies for formerly fatal diseases such as polyarteritis nodosa, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and lymphomatoid granulomatosis. In 2003, the Institute for Scientific Information stated that from 1983 to 2002 (he) was the 13th most-cited scientist among the 2.5 to 3.0 million authors in all disciplines throughout the world who published articles in scientific journals.
The Republican-led (no scientists) Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic 520-page report, offered no new direct evidence of a lab leak, but summarized a circumstantial case, including that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) used NIAID money to conduct “gain-of-function” studies that modified distantly related coronaviruses. You cannot blame politicians for not being able to study science.