DrJack54

In Pattaya Soi 8 hard to beat 80 baht Breakfast. This pic 1 hr ago.

Yes 2009. Discussed in this very old thread. https://aseannow.com/topic/534748-180-day-rule-and-90-days-within-180-days-rule-explained/

The mistake would be in receiving a 60 day stamp. Non O entry provides 90 day stamp. Do nothing. Out of interest do you plan to obtain a 12 month extension? If you can outline the process you went through at Vientiane that would be helpful.

He is playing Russian Roulette. I can't find the report .... however back in 2019 (there were a few denied entries at both BKK and DMK. One stood out....a chap (multiple back to back visa exempt only 30 days back then) ..was denied at DMK and flown back to Saigon. Refused entry at Saigon and finally flown back to passport country UK.

Talk about rolling the dice. Assume this lastest "last time warning" after previous same warning was at Thai airport since you mentioned Vietnam. Getting refused entry would he hellish.

There is no such rule re "times per calendar year " Previously there was a rule re limit of 2 land border entries per calendar year. That recently was removed. There never been similar rule on visa exempt entries via air.

So you asked Visa agent. Not clear what type of non O you inquired about. Non O based on marriage or retirement.

Not that I was asked, however I see that as being a tourist. 2 months x 3 with time between visits should be fine using visa exempt.

Off topic: Thailand perhaps introducing ETA. What about Vietnam that has many countries likewise visa exempt available. Will things change there. I'm unaware as Oz folk need tourist visa to enter Vietnam.

Agree, however the visa exempt is free. SETV has an application fee and to make matters worse both options now grant same 60 day stamp.

Here is MFA site re ETA. http://www.thaievisa.go.th/ You try and find useful information.

Not posting as facts. Of course it's not MFA. Information regarding this ETA sketchy at best. Siam Legal have same requirements posted. Time will tell.

"I Have heard" ? I would like a first hand report

You could be correct. My guess (no rhyme or reason) is that a simple "ETA not required at this time" The items that are listed as requirements for the ETA are currently done with ease by the airlines and immigration. Like the plain sentence from @Upnotover above ... "The immigration system works rather well already" Personally don't see a purpose for new bit of paperwork.

They are, however take just couple of examples. Onward flight: for many folk reporting they often fly visa exempt without onward flight that might change things. Financials: not sure how that is shown (proved) prior to entering Thailand. It's meaningless. The funds (while rarely checked) is about having it on your person upon entry to Thailand. Proof of accommodation: the address of where you stay required previously on TM6 ...was commonly "Nana Hotel Soi 4 Sukhumvit" nonsense address. I wouldn't lose sleep over this nonsense.

What are you referring to "every 3 months" surely not visa exempt+ 30 day extension.

I don't see that as an issue. If "the site crashes" it would simply not be required. What's more concerning (imo) is listed requirements. From link I posted earlier... A valid passport Proof of travel plans, including tickets into and out of Thailand Accommodation details, such as hotel bookings or residential addresses Evidence of sufficient funds to support their stay (e.g., 10,000 THB for single travelers, 20,000 THB per family). If such items actually included flight tickets (especially onward/return), "evidence" of sufficient funds, etc then that would put some folk off

I attended CW on Nov 5 and made a 90 day report. I gave her my passport and TM47. Had lots of other items...lease etc. She didn't want anything. I had made appointment and was seen straight away. Found parking not an issue..

Assume you have a Thai bank account in your name only.

No problem. Some folk obtain the 60 day extension from the 90 day non O stamp to "buy time" for seasoning. Done often

The OP did not ask about land border entries. Nor asked about entry Visa exempt at Thai airports. From the OP..... " would like to know if it's possible to do a 60 days extension for being father of thai child after a 60 days visa exemption" Answer : no issue.

The OP asked a very simple question. imo (assuming) his return ticket is also with Emirates then should have zero issue explaining that he intends to apply for 30 day extension. If still an issue he then asks for supervisor and happy to sige waiver (commonly done by airlines) Last option is to either a) book a "rent a ticket" or b) purchase throw away flight. Both done in couple of minutes. Simple.

Assume you are referring to online notification. If so do it on Monday or Sunday.

Oversized font add from out of date company removed. Post above from @Caldera correct.

That's an ok position than having a valid extension based on marriage. Here is a thread with several links and discussion. https://aseannow.com/topic/1338007-non-o-based-on-having-a-thai-child/ This thread discussing "guardianship" https://aseannow.com/topic/1307713-visa-based-on-having-a-thai-child/ The OP in this thread shares some similar aspects. https://aseannow.com/topic/1329956-help-with-parental-visa/