VBF

Lol 🤣🤣 I have a similar background to you, as it happens and there's a difference between being wrong, which I was not, and slightly ambiguous (possibly), which is how you chose to interpret it. Your turn for the handbag? Or shall we just leave it there like gentlemen?

Watching / listening to that fine gentleman creates one feeling for me...... Ahhhhhhhhh and relax!

One is immensely gratified old chap Innit! 😎🤣

That took me about 10 seconds....and being a big Jazz fan, I'm ashamed of myself! ☹

He can't remember! 🤪

Indeed. If one travels business class one can automatically use the Fast Track or VIP Immigration line. Some airlines eg Emirates will inform you of that. It usually has a VERY much shorter queue so one is through in a couple of minutes...... Be SURE to keep your boarding card handy as there are sometimes staff waiting at the entrance to the Fast Track area checking that you're eligible. (You should be keeping the card anyway but that's another topic!)

But have you got.........

@sandyf It's not what I want to believe - it's the way in which websites work and use of the correct terminology is all. And in fact you're effectively saying the same as I said which is illustrated here https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/difference-between-website-and-domain-name/#:~:text=1.,2. "A domain name is the address that helps to identify and locate a website on the internet, while a website is a collection of web pages hosted on a server. " And to break it down further the Country top level domain is actually .th with thaievisa.go being the second level domain. So wherever one is in the world, one hits the domain thaievisa.go.th which represents a website containing webpages to which you are directed depending upon your data input (i.e. answers to certain questions including location and nationality) To illustrate I've used the site from the UK in 2023 and 2024 - the data input required from me (documents uploaded as an example) has changed in that time. See my post: https://aseannow.com/topic/1316462-application-process-for-tourist-evisa-from-london-as-of-january-2024/ Note my final paragraph - that may or may not be the same for applications from other countries - I wouldn't know.

Posting here to reply to all who mentioned my "woke" comment earlier, not just @spidermike007 and @flyingtlger to whom it was initially directed. I get what you're all saying about Thai women and "woke" and yes you're probably correct, especially in comparison with Western women. My comment was more about the Press and other media, who do tend to follow the West in some areas - reporting in a "Woke" style seems to be one of them.

Thanks. I spent quite a long time remastering many of my own LPs - my friend to whom I referred above taught me. As I always looked after my vinyl, I needed to do very little actual signal processing, leaving the few unwanted artefacts in situ. I say remastering rather than digitising because I took the time to insert gaps between tracks, perform cross-fades etc. A "labour of love" I can assure you. A few of my LPs though needed "declicking" or "dehissing" type processing. Then..... I discovered Torrent sites....but that's a different story. 🙄 Btw, if you happen to be into Jazz / Blues, look out for reissues using CEDAR technology - It's been called "Photoshop for music" by a professional engineer - some of the 1920s/30s music don't arf brush up nice. 😎

That's because there's not much else to show. One guy does apartment tours posing like a prospective renter, sometimes gentlemans clubs. Only thing left of interest to most people are bars and go-go's which you can't really take a tripod and camera into and actively film. The girls don't want to be interviewed. That leaves just a bunch of street shots and the same old babble, here is lk metro, here is soi pothole, etc. Same stuff hundreds of guys have filmed before. I agree, and having "dipped in" to both the websites mentioned, subscribe to neither, however for newbies to Pattaya it gives them an idea of the place, as long as they realise that both sites are heavily influenced by the producers' opinions.

I'm being deliberately contentious and somewhat pedantic here but IS a bar a private place? If it's open to the public, it may be private property, but is it not still a public place? For example, in UK there are pubs owned by companies or individuals with Saloon and Public bars. Remember the devil is in the detail, especially in matters of law. UPDATE: My post coincided with @Dr Jon above but we seem to be saying much the same thing

Being in my sixties and having been an audio enthusiast since my teens my take(s): I own excellent though "vintage " audio kit - Quad electronics, Spendor speakers, early Linn table, SME, Stanton, blah blah - all state of the art in 1990! Oh and s couple of Denon and NEAL cassette decks which were always a compromise, no matter how good quality they were. Back then when my ears were better, I did loads of comparisons between LPs and CDs, even buying LPs like "Love Over Gold" and "Dark Side of the Moon" on both media. I always tried to get "DDD" CDs - (young people see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARS_code ) At the time I was in regular contact with a BBC Sound Engineer friend who had almost perfect pitch (the ratbag) and owned similar kit and who for the last 25 years has been re-mastering old and valued recordings to digital formats. I, along with my friend, came to the conclusion then, that, although TECHNICALLY analogue should be better than digital, unless the analogue is perfect, digital usually betters it. Since then there have been myriad advances in digital sound production, few real advances in analogue and the world has moved on. Except......... my ears have obviously degraded, although I have excellent hearing for one of my vintage and of course, the ears are still analogue! Audio reproduction has ALWAYS been about "The closest approach to the original sound" as Quad used to advertise.. I'm currently sitting at my PC listening to FLAC recording of Van Morrison's latest album on a Creative Sound Blaster and speakers - it sounds great but still better on the Spendors in the next room. Thing is, either way vinyl doesn't enter the equation. It's rather like asking if a 1990s LP compares to a 1920s 78 RPM record. Oh and on my next trip, I'm bringing a few hundred "albums" on my laptop / tablet to play over my JBL headphones - try carrying that lot around as LPs! As I said, just my take - no axes to grind here - I'm very content to listen to the music, NOT the equipment

So, I'm a non-smoker of anything, period. I hadn't experienced cannabis since a trip to Cambodia in 2011 where I enjoyed Happy Pizza But, last year, in Pattaya, I bought a small box of "cookies" from one of the shops openly selling them on Soi Bukhaui. I ate one in my hotel room and the effects were VERY noticeable - yup, I was stoned...but very happily! I'm well over the age of consent. (Old enough to know better!) 😃 My minor dilemmas are: Was I legal at the time? - I think the answer is yes Would I be legal to do that now? What if I shared said cookies with another adult? What if, having consumed said cookies, I / we went out in public WITHOUT taking remaining cookies but still being well under the influence? NO plans to drive by the way. These are all questions which, were I to be in UK, would be relevant and could easily cause me problems but I can't fathom out what the answers are in Thailand.

I agree, especially when they use weapons as in this case. I also agree - sadly it's a sign of "woke" hitting Thailand as it has in other countries. The victims are too often disregarded in favour of the transgressors.

No it's not misleading. The OP reported using thaievisa.go.th which is the starting point and most importantly, the "THAI E-VISA OFFICIAL WEBSITE" That's important to confirm to the OP that we're on the same homepage as it were and not using some other unofficial site. Therefore my comments that followed were accurate and relevant. Certainly, when you enter your nationality and location, it directs you to the appropriate web pages but it is still the same, official web site. FYI https://byjus.com/gate/difference-between-website-and-webpage/#:~:text=Website and Webpage-,Difference Between Webpage and Website,-Webpage VS Website

I don't wish to be critical, but your first picture is incorrect. Here's the correct version....you're welcome 🤣

I'm in UK but using the same website to apply for visas. In 2023, I had 2 one-way tickets for my trip instead of a return ticket. I combined them into one PDF and uploaded that. There are several ways to do that as have already been suggested; my method was: I use Windows, so used Snipping Tool to take images of each tickets drop the images into a Word document, 1 page for each ticket and identify each as "Outward ticket" and "Return ticket". Then, save that as a PDF. The file size limits are told to you on the website but if the PDF uploads successfully, then its within limits. Also, later in the process, you're given an opportunity to check your documents.

Or maybe you might be a redneck...... 1 min 38sec into it.

my guess is you aren't a smoker and you have no real time knowledge about what you are saying...please correct me if I am wrong Despite my post above, there is a BIG difference between being under the influence of Alcohol or Cannabis and DRIVING under said influence. In UK the latter is a very serious offence and WILL result in a hefty fine and loss of driving licence, sometimes even prison! IMO, again despite what I said above, that is right and proper

In case, like me, anyone is confused as to the difference between the two terms this is from an Australian perspective: https://adf.org.au/talking-about-drugs/law/decriminalisation/overview-decriminalisation-legalisation/ and I believe the British view is similar. Thailand, however may have it's own interpretation and I've not looked into any other countries. I'm sure in USA it varies by State. It does appear to me, (a non-recreational drug person out of choice) that one could be in trouble for possession of recreational cannabis whether to smoke or cooked in foodstuff Having said that, I like a drink or several and have absolutely no axes to grind if others like their form of relaxant. Enjoy.....but "let's be careful out there"

I agree with what you say and initially disagreed with "The BBC cannot detect a VPN per se." I use iPlayer normally, then switch "My Norton" VPN on: Note the region is set to UK however BBC iPlayer now shows: I switch the VPN off and iPlayer works again (after a refresh) So yeah, doesn't actually SAY it's a VPN so your explanation makes sense - they must just see an all-too familiar IP address and of course, Norton 360 is used by many people worldwide.

May I say that is one of the fairest and most balanced views of religion I've seen for a while. I've lived in a Muslim society and predominantly Christian ones and grew up amongst a lot of Jewish people. I'm no religious bigot, in fact I'm a complete agnostic and have neither belief nor disbelief in any of them - my view is "if it works for you, great, but leave me out of that particular discussion, please don't proselytise and don't abuse it to create problems for others" All 3 religions that you mention theoretically believe in the same things - the Bible, Koran and Talmud are very similar - yes I have read parts of all (in English) BUT.... when politicians and extremists get hold of them, the true nature of them vanishes - which is a facet that, again, all 3 of those religions share.

Just re-reading this thread and I wouldn't be too sure of that. As an experiment, whilst sitting in my home in UK I switched my VPN on and tried to connect to the BBC iPlayer. It immediately blocked me citing the VPN. Switched VPN off, and BBC worked fine. My point is that the BBC have the technology to detect a VPN (which is well-known) then I rather think major banks may have too.

Similar to you in terms of multiple accounts - but one of my UK banks requires authentication for every login, either by a card reader or SMS - my choice each time Another states that a SMS containing a one time code will be sent at random logins and that seems to be the case (although doubtless there's an algorithm controlling the "randomness" somewhere) I've just tried both of those using Norton's free VPN and both work. Oh and yet another account will also send a SMS "randomly" Not doubting your word but I find it odd that you're using UK banks and never getting SMS's although I do not use any banking Apps on my phone - all mine is done on a PC. Obviously the phone is used to receive the SMS's!