watthong

You need to go further up the thread to see what that one was saying...

Fat chance: Hunter and his laptop only had political currency with the MAGA crowd ie those already in Trump bag. People with grown-up but dependent children would sympathize with Biden, those with brains but no children would not pay attention to this GOP overhyped nonsense. McCarthy trying to impeach Biden on this account is the kind of farces we see these days in the lower house, which has become thoroughly infested with MAGA trolls.

I tend to agree with Jingthing...Garland might have come - belatedly - to realize that he isn't up for the job as head of DOJ (age/health wise maybe or just lack of cojones). He made amends with the assignment of Smith in my book.

No he can't. There's method in his madness. His begging for "All I need is 11870 votes!" to Raffensberger totally wipes the insanity argument off the table. I have the feeling that Trump is using his (remaining) free time to plan some sort of coup-encore. His minions probably are getting busy to help him....behind bars.

Oops, you forgot (how convenient) Stormy - of "not freakishly small but well below average" fame?

Your thread has been effectively killed by the notorious forum "body-snatching" troll. Be aware next time "it" lurks around.

Hope you look at yourself in the mirror sometime. Do you know what's a party pooper (sorry if that's not in your "King's English" - if not than invest in an American dictionary, especially when nosing into their business.") Crashing in somebody's party and wondering why people are having fun, lunatic if you ask me.

Up to now, I still wonder if the Jan6 committee did not have the hearing, would we have Jack Smith? What would explain Merrick Garland inaction up to that point? Seems like he came into his job with his hands tied. What could have been the restraint?

One final friendly bit og advice from the "other side of the pond:" Try not to speak/act like frogs sitting at the bottom of a well. The sky is larger than what you might see from there (hope you get that, but fat chance, sincerely.)

They are on this forum to keep other folks distracted FROM reading the indictment. The indictment to them is like holy water to vampires. Even just a whiff of it would turn them to ashes.

Ari Melber of MSNBC gave a fantastic recap of Jan 6 coup, and how 3rd indictiment charges correlate with TRUMP FAILED coup bullet points. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOYhisvHoWs

Riding Indian trains are scarrier than rip tides. Yet it's one of their daily routine.

20 pages plus in, let's have a breather and take stock - This thread is probably one of numerous US Dem around the world on-line non-stop parties, popping out champagne one indictment to the next, sleepless and existing on popcorn. We've been grinning ear2ear and don't mind the pesky gatecrashers. Their noisy squirming under humiliation is the icing on our "reconciliation" cake. A whackamole game for us whenever they open their mouth. Poor things, brains gone mush, no longer knowing what's right or wrong, no hope for redemption or absolution for their master, who now has to bear the indignities of being subdued by the hands of the law time and again for the whole world to see. (How do you feel Trump, being at the beck and call of a humble public servant such as Jack Smith, a man of way less words and power than you once did?) They can't stand the sound of justice coming, reality is catching up with them, grabbing them by the neck. Their fate is worse than rats on a sinking ship. At least the little rodents are wise enough to follow one human golden rule, "It's better to be thought of as fools, than open one's mouth and drink Trump kook-aid."

As a Brit you should get out more, travel is easy (especially parts of the world that at one time or another had been grabbed colonially by the "Crown.") Don't restrict your world view to that of your telly screen, that would help the flow of general discussion...

My guess you don't own a TV.

Actually the pool of jury is the weakest link in our judicial system. For all the oomph and angst over choices of judges, locations etc. it only takes one juror to upset the apple cart. In a not too recent famous trial (Kittenhouse) the defense even hired a juror-whisperer to be in the courtroom. And we know how Trump gang navigates the underworld. It's like fish to the water.

Looks like he 's clocked out.

We make do with what we got, if crickety old tool, as long as it does the job. In this case kicking the orange butt out of the WH. American spirit... You no american no?

At this point the trumpers are like zombies, regurgitating old nonsense and gurgling gibberish. They wish they were dead, but they can't, being Trumps army of the undead they are doomed to do one thing and one thing only, defending the master at any cost and juncture. At least vampires got a respite when the sun is up.

What's your shift? 8pm to midnight? to the 2nd post above.

Thanks, finally someone answers my question, "why only six unindicted?"

Carson's victory might have been due to that particular judge on his case. I bet on Jack Smith and judge Chutkan would rally together and give this only idiots would believe me argument a "new and improved" interpretation...

Could you give a brief refresher on that case, thanks.

In short if I refuse the fact shown to my face, saying that I can't read, understand etc., does that allow me to plead innocence (non-knowledgement) of the fact? what kind of law is this?

That was a genuine question of mine, not a criticism. Sorry if it sounded that way.