Jump to content

SunnyinBangrak

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,409
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SunnyinBangrak

  1. There was a time when inflammatory statements presented as fact without credible supporting evidence was a conspiracy theory. This bit is my favourite - "Note that Durham found nothing untoward in the agency, and even praised Brennan's handling of the matter." ????
  2. ? He did not say "average" price, only you did. If you have to make false claims about what Trump said in order to "debunk" them, well that is not good is it? Contrary to your false accusation, I am not a "devotee" I am just interested in knowing the real facts about issues.
  3. Poor Rudy. Sad to see America's Mayor having such a public battle with alcoholism, and the mocking and abuse he cops from the usual quarter for it. Hope he can get clean and regain his former self, he was an absolute lion. I expect a huge raft of SA cases to swamp every GOP member now that proof and evidence are no longer required, nor even remembering when it happened.
  4. No, it is not hogwash. The part of my post which you cut proves it with credible links. Gas prices DID reach $9 under Biden as he claimed. "Fact check "He wrongly claimed that U.S. gasoline prices reached $9 under Biden. The highest weekly average price under Biden was about $5 in June 2022." Actual reality "MENDOCINO, Calif. -- If you think gas prices are bad here in the Central Valley, be glad you're not filling up in the Northern California community of Mendocino. Schlafer's Auto Repair is selling regular gas for $9.60 for a gallon." https://abc30.com/california-gas-10-dollars-a-gallon-highest-prices-in-country-mendocino/11932601/ So technically he is correct, yes OK it's not a national average but he did not claim the national average was $9. I'd say Trump is clearly more on the factual side than the fact checker. And most of the fact checks are questionable for the same reason."
  5. look on the bright side, at least the military got their boots handed to them in this election. will Dr T come back and take over from where he was interrupted? who knows but it would be fun to see
  6. without specifying how many % of Americans are Muslim (it is approx 1%) see note 1, your linked statement comparing islamist extremism and right wing extremism is misleading. if 1% of Americans are causing 20% of extremist related killings then clearly this group have a much higher propensity to commit extremist violence. 1)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_States#:~:text=Islam is the third largest,of the total U.S. population.
  7. Now this is exactly what I'm talking about. They "fact check" Trump by using their own opinions and more often than not Trump is more correct than the fact checker. For example Fact check "He wrongly claimed that U.S. gasoline prices reached $9 under Biden. The highest weekly average price under Biden was about $5 in June 2022." Actual reality "MENDOCINO, Calif. -- If you think gas prices are bad here in the Central Valley, be glad you're not filling up in the Northern California community of Mendocino. Schlafer's Auto Repair is selling regular gas for $9.60 for a gallon." https://abc30.com/california-gas-10-dollars-a-gallon-highest-prices-in-country-mendocino/11932601/ So technically he is correct, yes OK it's not a national average but he did not claim the national average was $9. I'd say Trump is clearly more on the factual side than the fact checker. And most of the fact checks are questionable for the same reason.
  8. Why do the left have to lie to make their point that Trump is a liar? It does not smack of an honest stance when they must resort to personal attack and lies IMO Watched the whole town hall yesterday, have to admit it was an impressive performance. A nice combo of humour, sharp witted jabs and truth bombs. 9.5/10 nice one Mr Trump!!
  9. I am concerned the democrat's attempts to fool he public into thinking this guy was lynched by a racist because he was impersonating MJ very misleading. Way more than misleading in fact. Ms Pressley should have shown footage of the thug threatening the public, seems they just can't help being inflammatory.
  10. Good luck Bill, I wanted to do the same as you on at least 2 occasions but was talked out of it. Please open new threads if you have experience with the legal system and let us know how you got on.
  11. Is it not dangerous for a claim of SA without the claimant giving an exact date the event was alleged to have occurred on? More-so that it was decades ago. Seems to me that Trump was unable to give an alibi due to the lady not knowing what date the supposed attack took place on. Not exactly what I expect from the judicial system in a mature democracy but then it does seem the rule books were all thrown out when it comes to the persecution of Trump. This case should send shivers up supporters of the current President who's accuser now doesn't need a specific date so the accused can not prove he was not there. I doubt they thought of this.
  12. His rude and childish comment could be an example of disinhibited behaviour. I hope he is privately getting the care he needs.
  13. Once the left can explain the payments they moved heaven and earth to dishonestly ( https://nypost.com/2023/05/09/cia-fast-tracked-letter-that-falsely-suggested-hunter-biden-laptop-was-russia-op?utm_source=nypost&utm_campaign=android_nyp )stop the public knowing about, then and only then can you say "Comer still has nothing". Don't you see the damage this denial of the obvious is doing to the CIA, FBI, Garland etc? Time to 'fess up
  14. Yes, alot of evidence damaging to biden was "debunked" a few years ago starting with the laptop, the meetings, the transfers. Problem was the debunking was lies, and the evidence is real. That's why a proper investigation is underway at long last and multiple "conspiracy theories" have been proven fact. A few years ago you'd be banned from social media for factually correctly stating the laptop was genuine. Time to hear the truth about the bidens and get justice. You can't use 4 year old "facts" from leftist media while discussing the bidens.
  15. Note he didn't need a cheat sheet and pre-prepared questions(a practise which i am assured is fine and normal in modern democracies). I like it Trumps way, it shows a persons mental abilities and seems more authentic, to me anyway.
  16. Ahhh, FINALLY a reasonable explanation for why all this foreign money was paid to the bidens. I knew there would be a reason for the payments - i think deep down we all did.
  17. false and misleading. "Biden is on pace to take the most vacation than ANY other president including Trump as he prepares to head to Rehoboth Beach for the weekend Joe Biden has spent more than one-third of his time as president vacationing " https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10878885/Biden-pace-vacation-president-prepares-head-Rehoboth.html
  18. "On this platform, unlike the one-way street of broadcast, people are able to interact, critique and refute whatever he or anyone may say. And, of course, anything misleading will get @CommunityNotes . I also want to be clear that we have not signed a deal of any kind whatsoever. Tucker is subject to the same rules & rewards of all content creators. " Good to see it's confirmed there will be no special treatment for Carlson. I note the community notes are working perfectly, even propagandist Glen Kessler got fact checked recently - and boy did he not like it! Great to see Twitter acting as an unbiased free speech forum. Shame it took Musk's buyout to make that happen.
  19. Irrelevant and inflammatory. Trying to equate President Trump to Hunter Biden is clearly bizarre. Worth reminding ourselves that a case involving a adult man having consensual sexual relations with a stripper he supposedly gave a few bucks to keep quiet using uncharted legal wizardry is not equivalent to a senior elected politician engaging in corruption with America's adversaries and the mega coverup/disinfo campaign by alphabet agencies and dishonest media/tech staff required to falsely allege the evidence of this corruption was "Russian disinformation".
  20. So this Latino guy is a non-white white supremacist? I'm wondering if there is a more logical (and less politically favourable for the usual team) explanation for this horrific crime? Don't need to search far.... "Many of his posts referenced his mental health. In his final post, he lamented what his family might say and wrote that no psychologist would have been able to fix him." https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/texas-mall-shooter-shared-extremist-beliefs-jews-women-apparent-social-rcna83336 I wonder why certain media would ignore the crucial mental health angle and instead being divisive and trying to score cheap points? hmmm
  21. sorry, can you explain the relevance your misleading comments on election denialism (which both parties are guilty of) to this thread about biden finally getting his turn to face jail? Who are you talking about that "only accept results that they like regardless of the truth" is that the democrat election deniers, the republican election deniers or both? And again, relevance? I can't get beyond the levels of collusion and deep state interference necessary to get their man in the white house at all cost. Collusion and interference we were absolutely told in no uncertain terms never happened, and yet...... "Can I add your name to this list?” Morell asks Brennan in the email. “Trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on [Oct. 22, 2020], a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue,” Morell explains, admitting the letter was to help Biden during his showdown with Trump. Brennan responded: “Ok, Michael, add my name to the list. Good initiative. Thanks for asking me to sign on.” The smoking-gun email exchange shows that Brennan knew Morell’s political motivation before he signed on to the letter. " https://nypost.com/2023/05/05/ex-cia-chief-michael-morell-wrote-hunter-biden-laptop-disinfo-letter-for-biden-to-use-as-during-debate/ IMO All 51 of these intel chiefs need to be in jail along with biden for destroying democracy and destroying trust in government institutions by orchestrating a campaign to discredit evidence of a candidate's corruption.
  22. From the OP "In conversations, Democrats and senior West Wing aides are downplaying the potential impact, arguing Hunter Biden was a factor in the 2020 election and voters elected his father anyway." and "“But the Republicans have failed — both in the 2020 campaign and in their 2023 congressional hearings — to have questions about Hunter Biden impact public opinion and I don’t think they will succeed now, regardless of what DOJ decides.” and "But they also point out that Trump made many of these allegations during the 2020 campaign, even springing one of Hunter’s ex-business partners, a man named Tony Bobulinski, as a surprise guest at the last 2020 general election debate. It had little impact." Could that be because the narrative at the time was "https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276 and factually discussing the evidence of biden's corruption would get you banned from the internet and labelled a "conspiracy theorist"? Politico's dishonest phrasing is a modern marvel, shocking people trust this outlet.
  23. "no attempting to intimidate" you say? "The top Republican probing Hunter Biden's business affairs has claimed that lawyers for the president's son are intimidating possible witnesses and whistleblowers. 'We've got witnesses that are scared to death to come forward. They fear for their lives,' he was quoted as saying. 'The Hunter Biden legal team — they're testing the limits.'" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12025963/Top-Republican-claims-Hunter-Bidens-lawyers-intimidating-possible-whisteblowers.html
  24. because I refuse to accept the biden family got paid all this money for absolutely no reason.
×
×
  • Create New...