GammaGlobulin

I use this mug for my tea, every morning....

Your thinking is COMPLETE Garbage: a. For one thing, please do tell... How many years have you lived in China? b. You seem to know very little about living under an authoritarian state. c. Go to China, and live there....and...... PLEASE....do NOT come back. CommieChina is probably the very best place for you to get the education of which you seem to be in dire need. I just love to hear know-nothings spout off about things that show their true ignorance. If you were a TRUE China Ham, which you are not, obviously, then you would not be singing such a very illogical tune. We have already heard too much of your thinking, since the early 1980s...and.....most of us knew back then what was what. How truly ignorant your arguments seem to me. PATHETIC is the word for these.... And, I very rarely use this word, pathetic, but, in this case, pathetic is finally warranted. Enjoy your ignorance, my friend, until the day you finally wise up, and by which time.... It will be far too late for the world. Such ignorance is only seen by those who have not lived in China for many, many years. Become an Old China Ham, if you wish, just in case you are willing to spend the time. But, DO YOU have the PERSPICACITY to EVEN qualify???? I KNOW that you do NOT.... very sorry for being so blunt, but.... Call a spade a spade, is what my mother always taught me....

According to which "reportage"? I am speaking French now. The Chinese, including ZhouEnLai, have always loved the French, and French diplomacy. But, the French know nothing about handling Great Power, these days. Do you have a link to the reportage that you refer to? If you do, then maybe some of us can evaluate whether it seems analytically sound. Our (the entire world's) biggest error was in inviting China to join the WTO without stringent restrictions. Another error was relying on China to be the worlds single supplier, without diversification. It is time to stop China from using its trade with the world to fund its military so that it can dream about such things as invading Taiwan. China is a PARIAH on the world stage. The USA is all about DEMOCRACY and caring for weaker countries, in order to help the weaker countries to quickly boost their economies and... Thereby become RICH.... This is according to the reportage that I have been familiar with during the past six decades. Do you have a link to the reportage that you mention in this Topic?

Outcomes from COVID can be influenced by the exposure, dosage of virus. As far as I know. But, apparently, I do not know EVERYTHING.

Light from stars can be distorted due to the turbulence of the atmosphere. This is why modern telescopes use lasers to assist in correcting for distortion. I love science. And, you should, too. Science does not lie. Science is just a search for truth about reality, based on the best tools available.

Time, once again, obviously, to take up the White Man's Burden. Will our sacrifice and good will be tested once again?

Has McCarthyism returned to the USA? When people start dropping like flies during the next Bird_Flu pandemic, those antivaxers will be first in line, begging for a vaccination.

How do you pronounce an internet router, anyway? Some say rooter or rooster. Just terrible. Also, what really takes the cake is the fact that Social Media users are creating a language used while texting, and not having full sentences, and that this new language is Tainting spoken and written English, up to the High School level, already. In another decade, perhaps this new language will be much more developed, and spoken everywhere, replacing proper English, already.

Nor worries. He does not understand Formal Logic, or two statements in Formal Logic, connected by the AND symbol. If you write the statement logically, and then convert to an English Sentence, then.. One MUST include the word AND. He does not understand this finer point of logic. I am Science teacher. plus I always like to use many atoms in my writing. If you are going to connect these two, then one MUST add an and, either in symbolic logic terms, or just use the word AND in a written sentence. He just does not get it.

Obviously, she is just one more nurse who paid attention and obtained good grades in her anatomy and physiology classes at university.

Why are construction workers, plumbers, and home builders always shouting at each other. Is it due mostly to lack of formal education? Or, is it due to having gone stone deaf after exposure to those grinding machines they are always listening to?

Oh, no worries... Just pronounce it -CH=CH2

Geeze... Is it really against forum rules for me to make a facetious comment, once in a while? Anyway, for sure, joking aside, we need to raise the minimum factory wage around the world before we can actually have free and unfettered trade between countries.

China is already invading Africa, BIG TIME.

Maybe he is against the exploitation of workers, worldwide. We need a minimum wage for workers, around the world, perhaps. Then, there might be less need for tariffs.

People who warp the English language in India always require subtitles in YouTube videos.

I am mostly ONLY against ofTen. Not sure how we got started talking about other ways of pronouncing other words, and strange word-usages.

I think that's NYC and Philly talk, pretty much, already. I like it, already. Reminds me of home, already. I never speak this way, but I love listening to those who do, already.

So, if true, then this is the way it should be: Keep tariffs super high on China until the country loses/exterminates/deports Xi and becomes Democratic. And, keep tariffs until China raises minimum wage to USD15.00 per hour. I am pretty sure this has been Trump's plan from the beginning. a. To reduce tariffs between Free Nations. b. To increase tariffs on the ChiCom Bandit State, with Xi as the Great Helmsman and Criminal of the People. We need to take back the stolen BILLIONS that Xi has stolen. We need to have free elections in China. And, we cannot have China threatening the world and threatening its neighbors. China must acknowledge that Taiwan in a separate country, as has always been the case. OR, We will increase tariffs on China goods to 300 percent....BIG TIME....! (Please note that the reporter for DW in the linked vid seems to be wearing a lady's NUT-BROWN suit, of some sort. I don't like nut-brown in clothing.)

When we start making exceptions for random words, such as the word often, then things can go awry. We should enforce, reinforce, and teach everyone that the T in often should be pronounced just as much as the T in listen. And, no college professors should be allowed to pronounce the T in often, just as this rule was always in effect when I was at university. There needs to be some uniformity at universities.

Importantly, one really cannot NOT have tariffs on countries, such as China, that exploit and employ SLAVE LABOR. One needs to protect one's economy from all countries that use SLAVE LABOR. And, we need to punish US companies that setup factories in countries that allow slave labor. For this purpose, tariffs are a godsend. The problem is that many US companies LOVE SLAVE LABOR. Instead, these days, we should enforce the use of Robotics whenever feasible to do so. Some people in some countries love to argue about the many BENEFITS of slave labor. And I agree that such people should be enslaved for a decade, just to teach them the many benefits of being a slave.

Such a sad image. All factory work needs to be automated, to the highest degree possible.

I never did. I love tariffs on China. But, I think I mentioned I would like to cut tariffs on the EU, UK, to zero. Zero tariffs for all trading partners. But, I am no Navarro-type economist from Harvard.

Yes. Just spell it like it is supposed to be spelled (spelt). And, do not use "spelt", either.

I AGREE that this was not done in the proper sequence. Should have boosted tariffs on China to 204%. First. CommieChina is our enemy, and will be in the hot war of the future. We cannot continue to add to the economy of a country which is spending large on its military which, obviously, they intend to use against our interests. Who knows now, though, how to stop trade with China. But it must be done. Navarro is a nutcase, though, I agree with you. His book was so-so, but not original, and not that good. Maybe he was not the one who actually wrote his book on China.