Jump to content

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    5,121
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by youreavinalaff

  1. Where you tested must be behind the times. I took that part of the test in 2006.
  2. I don't recall making any such comment. My wife is 9 years younger than me. The UK Prime Minister is Rishi Sunak. Any more questions or assumptions?
  3. Not mind reading, as explained multiple times. The press jumped on the Spanish kiss following the comment from the footballer saying it was " no big deal". Therefore negating any issues others many have had. That's even less to report about than someone saying nothing at all.
  4. No mind reading, as I pointed out. For someone without a hidden agenda, it's quite easy to see how the jockey feels. The press also. As your link shows, the female Spanish footballer had no real issues, until the press and the feminists blew it out of proportion. She said she didn't like it at the time but it was no big deal. He apologised for any offense caused. That should have been the end and Spain would have been able to celebrate the occasion of being world champions. The only problem was the bunch of people who decided to make more of it. You seem to be in the know. Answer this, why were the newspapers, TV news stations and the internet not full of stories like " female horse owner/trainer kisses male jockey on the lips"?
  5. Strange reply. It's obvious how he, the media and all others that are aware of the incident feel, when one looks as the lack of hysteria. Unlike that of the " Spanish kiss" that has been blown out of all proportion, considering the female herself said the kiss was " no big deal" on the day after the World Cup Final.
  6. The jockey is sensible. He realizes that a kiss in jubilation, excitement, release of pressure that had been built up over time, celebration of a great achievement, is just that. Nothing sinister, nothing sexual and certainly not abuse. Just a happy kiss. Those looking on, the media, journalists, the lady's husband, etc all feel the same way. Either that or the equality women seek is flawed.
  7. Are you attempting to be a comedian or an idiot? Either way, we'll done.
  8. More twists and turns than the Monaco GP.
  9. Really? Would you care to elaborate on your knowledge of the asylum system? No criteria?
  10. It's been tried at tge old army airport. I'm sure most expats would like an operating airport in their province. It won't happen. Airlines won't want to service 2 or more airports in such close proximity.
  11. Intelligent people can hypothesize. Can link possible scenarios to real scenarios to make comparisons. Can debate "what if". You obviously can't so I'll leave you to comment on JonnyF's post about a female kissing a male in jubilation and the subsequent fall out from it.
  12. Oh dear. Once again, failure to engage in a balanced conversation by the link man. At least I have an imagination and am not indoctrinated by what I agree with and in denial about what I don't agree with. Hence, you ignoring the post by JonnyF.
  13. There are but I don't have the info to hand. Give the bus station a call. 043 812 513
  14. Now. That's even more bad advice. If I stop drinking, I'll become dehydrated and will likely need medical attention. No thanks.
  15. Exactly my point.
  16. Having been involved in teaching university students, I know what I'm talking about.
  17. Not funny at all. Not arguing either. Just stating facts. Which is far apart from your most recent posts.
  18. So am I still qualified. However, not in the eyes of KSP. KSP are the topic of this thread, hence my use of past tense. I'm qualified to teach in UK. Not In Thailand. Amazing when you think about it.
  19. No need for therapy. Maths lessons maybe. You said " most of us". So far 4 of "us" differ to 1 of " us". I believe 4 out of 5 would be deemed " most".
  20. Funny. Vets are required to work in public surgeries for 2 years once qualified. The private vets, that you perceive to be better qualified, graduated from the same establishments. Also, it is far more likely vets in private practices are less qualified than those in public practices, or even not qualified at all.
  21. Make that 4 to 1.
  22. Proud = foolish, in this case.
  23. There have been 3 posts on here that suggest not. I'd say 3 to 1 is " most".
  24. I, too, was qualified. Until they changed the rules. Again and again.
  25. Unlikely there is a 40x difference. Unless it's the difference between those that got ripped off and those that didn't.
×
×
  • Create New...