Jump to content

13 police officers transferred under new graft rules


webfact

Recommended Posts

13 police officers transferred under new graft rules

By The Nation

 

f005473c03e9eb1f5d8e019acaef5ec3.jpeg

Prayut Chan-o-cha

 

PRIME MINISTER General Prayut Chan-o-cha has transferred 13 police officers for alleged involvement in human trafficking under the government’s new anti-graft guidelines, which came into effect yesterday.

 

The Cabinet approved the guidelines at its meeting yesterday right after the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) put it forward.

 

The guidelines, which require agencies to act quickly on corruption complaints, took immediate effect as several government schemes for the poor have lately been embroiled in graft scandals. 

 

Investigations are ongoing into alleged irregularities in the disbursement of state funds for the destitute as well as the alleged embezzlement of Bt118 million from the Education Ministry’s fund for the underprivileged. 

 

“Upon receiving or hearing corruption complaints, the chief of a relevant agency must launch a probe within seven days,” government spokesman Lt-General Sansern Kaewkamnerd said. “The probe must also conclude within 30 days.” 

 

He said that if the preliminary information showed evidence of corruption, an agency chief must transfer accused officials. 

 

“The transfer can be made within the same agency or ministry, if the alleged offences are not serious,” he added. 

 

However, the guidelines required that accused officials be transferred to another agency at least on a temporary basis if charges were serious. 

 

According to the guidelines, the chief of a government agency must also take immediate disciplinary action against accused officials if an investigation finds evidence of wrongdoing. 

 

“There is no need to wait until criminal proceedings conclude first,” Sansern said. 

 

When alleged offences involve criminal wrongdoing, the Centre for National Anti-Corruption should be alerted. 

 

Sansern said based on the guidelines, officials found guilty of grave disciplinary offences could not return to their old posts or be promoted for three years, since they had to be transferred because of the wrongdoing. 

 

“This rule applies to officials whose offences do not warrant dismissals,” he said. 

 

Among the 13 police members transferred yesterday, one was a police colonel and two were lieutenant colonels. This group of suspects also includes a commissioned policewoman. 

 

In a related development, Social Development and Human Security Minister General Anantaporn Kanjanarat said he planned to punish five officials later this week for their role in the alleged embezzlement of state funds for the destitute. 

 

“They are C7 and C8 officials,” he said, referring to bureaucratic rankings, which range from C1 to the highest of C11. 

 

Anantaporn said he would act on the first conclusions of the investigation and would take further action when it was finished. 

 

Asked whether the corruption scandal had already implicated the ministry’s permanent secretary and deputy permanent secretary,

Anantaporn said: “Our probe has found that some officials gave the order.” He did not elaborate.

 

The national police Counter-Corruption Division also stated yesterday that 10 more temples had been found to have engaged in alleged embezzlement of state funds for monasteries. 

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30341886

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-03-28
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I know thais are fiercly protective and loyal to their provinces of birth but,Thailand has 76 .....not hard to see how easy corruption can hide itself for generations, the sheer number of govt staff  it takes to care for each province. the paper work must be insane..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, leeneeds said:

Court marshal for 3 years is a long time to reflect, 

one hopes they turn the right corner, 

Courts martial are reserved for military offenders, but in view of the fact that many of the civilians involved in this scandal wear military style uniforms, it would seem appropriate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, colinneil said:

Pathetic thats what it is, being transferred is not any kind of punishment.

It is a joke, big fuss made by Prayut over nothing.

Dismissal is the only punishment for these people, nothing less.

I would like to think that a "transfer" whether to an inactive post or an empty room is an action taken prior to court proceedings, a trial and, if found guilty, an eventual holiday behind bars.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All fine and dandy.  Transfer on an allegation.  Fine.  If the chief of a government agency must also take immediate disciplinary action against accused officials if an investigation finds evidence of wrongdoing.  Again, all fine and dandy.  But what are the rules about an investigation?  Who investigates?  Who does the investigators work for?  Who do they report to? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, webfact said:

transferred 13 police officers for alleged involvement in human trafficking

transferred? If the case is a slam dunk they should be sackedand imprisoned during the time, and if the case is weak they should still be working until found guilty

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As they never tell you the names, locations of the bent police, people we will just have to take this at face value...

 

What a surprise having C7 & C8's as the scapegoats to appease the public. These guys do not do anything without the consent of somebody higher up the food chain, who turn a blind eye so long as the monthly stipend is to his/her liking...

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, colinneil said:

Pathetic thats what it is, being transferred is not any kind of punishment.

It is a joke, big fuss made by Prayut over nothing.

Dismissal is the only punishment for these people, nothing less.

And jail....

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sansern said based on the guidelines, officials found guilty of grave disciplinary offences could not return to their old posts or be promoted for three years, since they had to be transferred because of the wrongdoing. 

Grave disciplinary offences,then goes on to say,
“This rule applies to officials whose offences do not warrant dismissals,” he said.

Is this not a contradiction, and what offence do they have to commit to get the sack

or even get prison time if found guilty.

regards worgeordie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yawn, yawn yawn, yes yes i am sure those C7 & C8 officials were top of the tree and there was in no way money flowing up to the heads of Government and ministries!

Just window dressing and showing face. The officials know nothing will happen to them as all those above them are equally compromised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting tough on corruption. Let's all give a sstanding ovation to Thailand on its monumental effort in cleaning corruption under the edict that if found guilty if embezzlement you will be transferred to a different department. Wonderful - not even a whack with a length of pipe insulation.

 

Truly pathetic

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all arbitration in place of enforcement individuals and groups decide the fate of the accused and the guilty, the fragility of the house of cards is well known to all and must be reinforced with swift and ongoing action of the corrupt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, colinneil said:

Pathetic thats what it is, being transferred is not any kind of punishment.

It is a joke, big fuss made by Prayut over nothing.

Dismissal is the only punishment for these people, nothing less.

Yes, a transfer just confirms to them that they have'nt really done anything too wrong and everything will be ok in the long run..........status quo maintained!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sawadee1947 said:

I don't know why their are still on duty? Why not expel them?

It seems like a bunch of corrupt criminals.

....but it's part and parcel with the system........uniforms are protected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PatOngo said:

....but it's part and parcel with the system........uniforms are protected.

and it's a shame that whoever rules the country there was/still is no change. And the outlook doesn't show any improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""