Jump to content

London murder rate overtakes New York's


webfact

Recommended Posts

London murder rate overtakes New York's

 

A spike in violent crime in London saw more murders committed in the city in February and March than there were in New York, figures show.

 

So far in 2018, 46 people in London have been fatally stabbed, shot or injured compared to 50 in the US city.

 

But, while New York's rate month-on-month has decreased since January, London's is on the rise.

 

Full story: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-43610936

 
bbc_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright BBC 2018-04-02
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, impulse said:

I'd have to drill down in the stats before I'd get concerned for my own safety. 

 

What are the odds that a middle class, conservative behaving white guy with a decent job and a house in the 'burbs, who doesn't drink, doesn't chase women and is usually in bed by 10:00 PM being a victim?  In the USA, pretty close to nil- according to FBI statistics about race and location when it comes to becoming a murder victim.  I suspect it's similar in London.  Don't get involved in illegal activities, or associate with dodgy people, or wander around drunk in the wee hours, or hit on other guys' wives, and you're probably pretty safe.

 

Not that the increase in murder rate is acceptable, regardless of what demographic is suffering for it.  But, like genocide in Sub Saharan Africa, as deplorable as it may be- it doesn't put me at risk, and there isn't a thing I can do about it.

 

I'd add a comment about those crazy Brits needing better gun control, but...well...gun control may not be the panacea that some people seem to think it will.

 

Non hysterical media point out the rise in stabbing deaths in London is mostly related to gang violence, most victims being younger males.

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/london-stabbings-knife-crime-deaths-murders-three-days-teenagers-statistics-a8281756.html

 

No mention of 'extremists', as alleged by the usual members, for the reporting period.

 

HMG stats for crime by ethnic group below, a very big majority of victims are non white...

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/663376/race-cjs-2016-infographic.pdf

 

 

Edited by simple1
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An off topic post and an answer to it have been removed.

Two posts containing grammar police comments have been edited.

 

3. If possible please proofread your post first, poor grammar and spelling can make the post difficult to understand. However be aware that not every member is a native English speaker and excessive posts regarding others spelling and grammar not only hijacks the topic but is poor netiquette.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, samran said:

Immigrants complaining about immigrants right here on TV? Who would have thunk it? I guess it’s still 1 April in some parts of the world....

There are two types of immigration, the right type and the wrong type. Both the UK and Thailand (amongst many other places) both suffer from the later type.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, observer90210 said:

the high rise of murders is obviously due to the social discrepancies

The fact that under the old stop and search regime knife crime was falling was just a statistical glitch then.

 

Interestingly one of the links included this little snippet:

 

"There will be a “significant increase” in targeted stop and searches by police in London as part of efforts to combat rising violent crime, Sadiq Khan has said."

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/sadiq-khan-stop-search-london-crime-plan-violence-police-metropolitan-stabbings-acid-murder-moped-a8152371.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lungstib said:

With London one of the worlds best examples of the gulf between rich and poor this is the inevitable result. Cant get guns, use a knife, acid, anything to give an edge. 

 

Unless there were dramatic changes, London didn't make the cut, whereas New York did:

 

Top 20 major cities with the highest income inequality in 2016

https://blog.euromonitor.com/2017/10/income-inequality-ranking-worlds-major-cities.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, impulse said:

Perhaps the real cause isn't immigration, but the increasing concentration of wealth that deprives the masses of a path to the middle class?  That "garbage" you refer to used to have a path out- real or mirage.  Today, a lot more of them realize they don't.

 This leaves me with a question about immigration.

  Why have immigrants come in to a country when there is a problem already  with wealth distribution ?  If the mass's are poor and do have proper work or wages how can they hope to support immigrants? So we are back to immigration is a big part of the problem huh.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Expatthailover said:

Were the Krays and the Richardsons in the 60's 'immegrants'?

To clearly imply that there is a correlation between being native born and white and serious crime followed by 'not wish to sound racist' is at best preposterous and at worst xenophobic.

Amazing that you left the confines of 'your old country'. All those lovely law abiding white folk....swoon.

To be surrounded by non whites and in the main non English speakers must be a terrible ordeal for you. 

 

This ain't the 60's, though.

And, regardless of the auto-labeling: provided the correlation does exist, would it still be "racist" to comment about it? To be clear, I'm not making a strong claim here - didn't delve into the figures, and anyway sorting out some of the details isn't straightforward. Question more to do with discussion.

Edited by Morch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bert bloggs said:

I was reading this and looking at the pictures of the people involved ,i could not help noticing that very few are what you would call "native British people " wonder if it has something to do with uncontroled immegration to my old country? sorry if i am not PC and do not wish to appear racist ,or any of the other things one gets accused of these days for daring to speak.

 

 

It depends on how you form an opinion.  If ur stating point is 'native British' and immigration has been happening since 1940's, one wonders at what stage do you start to change your opinion?  After 70 years, 90 years?  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bert bloggs said:

I was reading this and looking at the pictures of the people involved ,i could not help noticing that very few are what you would call "native British people " wonder if it has something to do with uncontroled immegration to my old country? sorry if i am not PC and do not wish to appear racist ,or any of the other things one gets accused of these days for daring to speak.

Who cares about PC , it's a disease and it's immigration, if you are racist stand to it, most people are even if they deny it. I personally am not racist but I don't like Indians (men), Pakistan (men) Arabs (men) and Africans, I am the least bigoted man in the world :smile:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Finlaco said:

 

 

It depends on how you form an opinion.  If ur stating point is 'native British' and immigration has been happening since 1940's, one wonders at what stage do you start to change your opinion?  After 70 years, 90 years?  

Ok i agree ,i shall rephrase. looking at the pictures "the native British people in these pictures do not look like the people who originally inhabited the UK,when i was younger"  but it seems that the "immegrants" who came all those years ago did not teach their children well . Is that more to your liking?

also i am not trying to be racist as my wife is Thai ,my son is 50/50 and my very best friend for 40 years is half Jamaican . and his dad was one of the nicest men i ever met,and he was an immegrant .

Edited by bert bloggs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's somewhat interesting to read the Brits agonizing over this, given a lot of the sanctimonious posts everytime there is a shooting in the US.

Guns, knives, and in a rather curious UK phenomenon, acid all have been around for ever.

What makes society more or less violent is an interesting question.

Murder in the US, aside from the headline grabbing mass shootings is at it's lowest levels in decades, whereas it seems the UK rate is on the rise.

The various 'experts' on TVF have postulated everything from immigration to inequality, and probably fluoride in the water given time!

The US has one of the largest immigrant populations in the western world, yet the data (no matter what Trump says, data isn't his strong point) says immigrants have a lower crime rate than native born Americans. So why the reverse would be true in the UK, I can't imagine.

Income inequality. Well here we are in Thailand with a gun owning culture and massive income inequality, yet I don't see the same headline grabbing news.

I have no answers. But what I do know is that there probably isn't a single simple answer, more likely a very complex mix of interwoven societal reasons, with unfortunately no 'bumper sticker' solution

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...