Jump to content

RTP: Start fining drunk drivers up to 200,000 baht!


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, ttrd said:

RE - what is the point of me relying on a taxi home because I don't want to drink and drive when the taxi driver I get is out of his tree

 

DONT - and by planning to visit a bar/restaurant in a walking distance from Your home/accommodation seems to be a safer option.…:coffee1:

well that solved that one ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, smedly said:

well that solved that one ?

One solved is one saved as its said - Rome was not built in one day so its all about to manage to function in a safe manner in the time between...:coffee1:

Edited by ttrd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, stanleycoin said:

That will be the Falang price.

What will Somchai pay,  500 baht and a quick Wai :jap:

maybe an increase,  to a double Wai. :jap::jap:

with choc chip I hope!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jail time and car confiscation would be effective deterrents. Draconian measures are needed. Many offenders don't have 100, 000 - 200, 000 baht to pay the proposed fines.

Edited by Gecko123
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raising the fine for drunk driving is the same tactic the government used to attempt to control motorcycle riding on the sidewalk. It's a ploy used to attempt to scare people into compliance but like most laws, they are eventually ignored.

Aside from Songkran, police patrols are rare so few are apprehended to begin with.   In addition, being drunk is culturally acceptable here, which makes it difficult to assess an exorbitant fine.  TIT  

Edited by barefootbangkok
Spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ICECOOL said:

prob depends if it's a legal stop  or not but it seems it's 0.05 as I got tested on one of their blowers and it showed  .038. Walked away.

Just out of curiosity how much did you have to drink, and what do you weigh? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, cornishcarlos said:

 

I think it's 50 mg !!! Actually, you are right in 0.5g/l.. It's 50mg/100ml

Actually, when you put it like that I think I'm wrong. It should be 0.05g/l if it is 50mg/100ml.. As 0.5g/l equates to 500mg/100ml, that cant be right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jossthaifarang said:

Just out of curiosity how much did you have to drink, and what do you weigh? 

I was drinking the 3.5 percent Singh's light which they strangely increased to 4.5 percent 2 weeks later.  Had 8 in 4 hrs with food but I weigh 100 kg.  I now just drink the 5 percent and have water along the way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, smedly said:

That shit makes me very angry, what is the point of me relying on a taxi home because I don't want to drink and drive when the taxi driver I get is out of his tree, not the first time this has happened either

Just download the GRAB app and use a car instead. Riding on the back of a motobike in Thailand when drunk I stopped many years ago . Unless you like to gamble. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ICECOOL said:

I was drinking the 3.5 percent Singh's light which they strangely increased to 4.5 percent 2 weeks later.  Had 8 in 4 hrs with food but I weigh 100 kg.  I now just drink the 5 percent and have water along the way. 

Alcohol concentration in the body is usually determined by measuring:
Blood alcohol concentration (BAC)
Breath alcohol concentration (BrAC)

 

http://www.iddpa.org/alcohol02.htm

Edited by ttrd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ICECOOL said:

I was drinking the 3.5 percent Singh's light which they strangely increased to 4.5 percent 2 weeks later.  Had 8 in 4 hrs with food but I weigh 100 kg.  I now just drink the 5 percent and have water along the way. 

Cheers mate, I only weigh 69kg I'll stick to 6 @ 5 percent in 4 hrs..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nchuckle said:

Which is why confiscation of the vehicle (he won’t have money to buy another and drive again) is the only remedy.

It is the best solution and maybe they will learn from it . Fines will not help that's for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, cornishcarlos said:

 

I think it's 50 mg !!! Actually, you are right in 0.5g/l.. It's 50mg/100ml

Sounds about right, its 35 in the uk which allows you about 3 or 4  bottles, the drop off rate after drinking is about 20ml per hour after first consumption https://www.healthline.com/health/how-long-does-alcohol-stay-in-your-system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Thaiwrath said:

Why not ?

Surely that would be a far better deterrent, especially for the more affluent offenders, some of whom think they are above the law.

 

Because the whole intention of this to allow police to charge higher bribes to let drivers get back in their cars and drive home drunk.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, helloagain said:

I agree stanleycoin. I get so pissed at the 2 tier price. Its the same crime. Thais are obsessed with the word farang. My thai wife has been to many countries now and not once has she heard somebody say that asian over there.

well dont get me started, its called PC, politically correctness....  just look around in your own country, if you are a normal looking white male they will pick on you 80% of the time, its too risky for them to pick on others as they will get accused of racial harassment blah blah blah .... so you could call it reverse rasialism ...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Thaiwrath said:

Why not ?

Surely that would be a far better deterrent, especially for the more affluent offenders, some of whom think they are above the law.

That's an odd thing to say as there are many more offenders who are not affluent (than there are those who are) that think they are above the law.

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A post using ALL CAPS has been removed, please turn off your Caps Lock when posting. 

 

Another troll post using an oversize insulting emoji has been removed, continue to use those emojis and your posts will simply disappear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Thaiwrath said:

Why not ?

Surely that would be a far better deterrent, especially for the more affluent offenders, some of whom think they are above the law.

 

Yes, but that tier of society are indeed above the law, and would never ever see a jail from the inside. Only the non elite, non connected, non hiso.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.






×
×
  • Create New...