Jump to content

Shock as Trump backs Putin on election meddling at summit


webfact

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

He never would have approved it then if he had actually understood what he was doing. 

 

I wonder how often he thinks ahead rather than "shooting from the hip"?

 

The POTUS keeps referring to where are those 33,000 emails?        Has anyone told him they're available to read on Wikileaks.com?    So many of them are queries about arranging a phone call to someone.

 

 

Edited by watcharacters
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Johnniey said:

Who would give their casinos money?

Who really need casinos, when you have land and are free? Casinos is just distraction from what life is and about. It is sugar, cocain or what ever your fix is. 

 

Anyway, we humans is very easy distracted from whats important, and whats true, and Trump represent everything about that! Just to get back on topic. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Just for a chuckle, it would be interesting to hear from any "trump" fans on how they are going to defend the traitor president. Oh, my 401k is up so I don't care! But Hillary! Is there anything the orange con man can do that would shake some sense into his fans? So far, no. 

IMO, Trump was foolish for willingly giving his enemies ammunition to beat him with. He should have known better.

IMO the over reaction is all just <deleted> and wind, but it's just going to make it harder to keep a majority in November. He'd have been better off waiting till after the elections. Perhaps he believed the positive press from NoKo summit would carry over. Whatever, he didn't help himself. Perhaps he should not stand in 2020 and let the opposition deal with Pence as president, 555555555555555.

What he should have done was whisper to Putin to wait till the midterms were over and he'd have more flexibility.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

Perhaps that's because he's now finally shown himself to not really be a U.S. president. But rather, a stooge for Russia who was elected in part because of a massive Russian election tampering effort to discredit his opponent.

 

Any true American and believer in U.S. democracy would be sickened and disgusted by what Trump has done. He's a traitor to his own country and people.

 

Rod Rosenstein disagrees with you. He just went on record as saying the Russians had no effect on the outcome of the election. Rosenstein is no friend of Trump.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, watcharacters said:

 

I wonder how often he thinks ahead rather than "shooting from the hip"?

 

The POTUS keeps referring to where are those 33,000 emails?        Has anyone told him they're available to read on Wikileaks.com?    So many of them are queries about arranging a phone call to someone.

 

 

Different e mails. Trump is referring to the e mails that were illegally deleted.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If You believe Russia in no doubt influenced the election, then most likely they will do the same and Trump will win next election again for sure. Or will Russia be scolded enough they will behave and not interfere ? 

But I'm thinking the voting public will have there day. Who are the likely candidates going up against Trump?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stud858 said:

If You believe Russia in no doubt influenced the election, then most likely they will do the same and Trump will win next election again for sure. Or will Russia be scolded enough they will behave and not interfere ? 

But I'm thinking the voting public will have there day. Who are the likely candidates going up against Trump?

Who are the likely candidates going up against Trump?

Please, please, please let it be Clinton! However, Pelosi, Warner, or the "impeach 45" congresswoman would all be excellent candidates.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Rod Rosenstein disagrees with you. He just went on record as saying the Russians had no effect on the outcome of the election. Rosenstein is no friend of Trump.

You got some evidence to back this claim up?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Different e mails. Trump is referring to the e mails that were illegally deleted.

 

Please disprove this:

 

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

 

cartoon.jpg

Hillary Clinton Email Archive

On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for over 30 thousand emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. More PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016, and a set of additional 995 emails was imported up to February 2, 2018.

Edited by watcharacters
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, xylophone said:

This sums it up for you...…..

Trump.docx

image.png.064f76f48aeaad44da4679b9345a8de7.png

I have watched US-Soviet/#Russia presidential press conferences for more than 30 years, sometimes in the room. Have never seen anything as bad or embarrassing as @realDonaldTrump's just-concluded performance.

 

Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of “high crimes & misdemeanors.” It was nothing short of treasonous. Not only were Trump’s comments imbecilic, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin.

 

Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia William J. Burns doesn't mince his words on the Trump/Putin summit: "I think that press conference was the single most embarrassing performance by an American president on the world stage that I've ever seen.

 

Who are the first two paragraphs of comment in your post coming from?  Burns or someone else?

 

The 2nd pgh at least seems to be yesterday's comments from former CIA Director John Brennan.

 

 

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BobBKK said:

No it's not. Russia, USA and others constantly do this. It is using a minor issue, which had NO effect on the election, as a political tool for 2020.

You hit the hammer on the nail,well said

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

 Right, it's just those butt hurt anti-Trumpers who are condemning him:

Fox Hosts Offer Rare Criticism Of Trump After Russian Summit

Even Brian Kilmeade called the president’s remarks “ridiculous.
Neil Cavuto of Fox Business called the performance “disgusting.”
“Fox & Friends” co-host Abby Huntsman ― daughter of Jon Huntsman, the U.S. ambassador to Russia ― was not so forgiving, suggesting that Trump had thrown America under the bus:
 
Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro called Trump’s performance “self-serving and utterly grotesque,” before declaring Trump “made a fool of himself.” The BBC’s headline simply stated, “Trump sides with Russia against FBI.”

 

 

So there actually is some limit as to just how far their head in the sand partisanship can go???  I actually thought they had no bottom depths limit as to how far they could/would sink on behalf of Trump. So, I guess I should be heartened that they do seem to have some limit.

 

Sad to say, I'm not sure the Trump Republicans in the House of Representatives will share those traits.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

Anyone born in America is a native American.

I thought it meant all the ancestory must have been born there too. I'm native to the planet earth.  I know that much for sure 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Who are the first two paragraphs of comment in your post coming from?  Burns or someone else?

Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia William J. Burns, but from the NZ Herald newspaper...……….sorry about that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...